簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 秦冠豪
Chin, Kuan-Hao
論文名稱: 從社會資本觀點討論虛擬社群中的成員互動
The Interactions of Virtual Communities from Social Capital Perspective
指導教授: 賴孟寬
Lai, Meng-Kuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 76
中文關鍵詞: 虛擬社群社會資本社會網絡互動價值創造
外文關鍵詞: Virtual communities, Social capital, Social network, Interactions, Value creations
相關次數: 點閱:71下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究藉由「社會資本」的研究架構來探討虛擬社群中的互動以及價值創造。社會資本指的是經由人際網絡的關係中,所產生的實際或是潛在資源。本研究以「批踢踢股票板」當做研究對象社群,從文獻回顧中發展出的八個研究假設來探討「社會資本」理論架構中的不同構面,即結構資本構面、認知資本構面與關係資本構面的關係,此外也針對「社會身分認同」的差異對於知識分享以及參加群體行動所造成的干擾效果進行研究。本研究以便利抽樣的方式將網路問卷的連結放置在「批踢踢股票板」收集資料。研究顯示,在虛擬社群中,透過成員的互動,「結構資本」和「關係資本」產生正相關,「認知資本」有和「關係資本」產生正相關,此外「結構資本」與「認知資本」之間會產生正向影響,因此,假設H1 至假設H7 皆獲得資料的支持。此外在虛擬社群中,成員的「社會身分認同」會加強成員參與群體活動的意願;但對於成員的知識分享的意願和態度則沒有影響,假設H8b並未獲得支持。探究原因,個人在板上分享投資訊息或知識等行為代表著將潛在利潤以及獲利機會分享給板上其他成員,和投資利益最大化的目標相違背。
    本研究的貢獻除了在於以實證資料釐清「社會資本」理論中各構面間的關係之外,也將成員的個人動機因素納入研究架構中,本研究結果可以讓行銷人員了解到消費者是否選擇參與虛擬社群以及決定其參與程度的影響因素,作為經營一個成功的虛擬社群的準則依據。

    This study investigates the interactions and value creation in virtual communities from the social capital perspective. Social capital means the actual and potential resources embedded within,available through, and derived from the network of relationships processed by an individual and
    social unit.This study clarified the interrelationships among structural, cognitive and relational dimensions of social capital in virtual community. In addition, the moderating effect of individual’s motivation for social identity is examined as well. Based on literature review, eight hypotheses are developed to address the inter-relationships among dimensions of social capital.
    An online questionnaire was designed to collect data. All hypotheses are tested with structure equation model. Generally, the results show that, in virtual communities, structural capital and cognitive capital both positively relate to relational capital. Besides, structural capital positively relates to cognitive capital and cognitive capital also positively relates to structural capital. H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 and H7 are supported. This study further investigates the influence of actual investment experience. The results show that investment experience influenced the path from tie strength to trust due to perceived risk, which negatively relates to trust. In addition, the moderating effect of social identity on the path from trust to collective action is significant, but there is no difference on the path from trust to knowledge sharing. H8 is partially supported. This research contributes to the social capital field by providing an empirically research
    explores the inter-relationships of social capital dimensions in virtual communities. Furthermore,this study tests the role of social identity in virtual communities. In summary, the results serve as a guide for marketers to understand factors that will influence individuals to participate in a virtual community from the social capital perspective.

    TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTERⅡ LITERATURE REVIEW 7 Research Development and Trend of Virtual Community 8 Information System Success Model 8 Theoretical Background 8 Social Capital Theory 8 Structural Capital 9 Cognitive Capital 10 Relational Capital 10 Self-determination Theory 12 Development of Hypothesis 13 The Concept of Trust 13 The Structural Capital and Relational Capital – Tie Strength and Trust 14 The Cognitive Capital and Relational Capital – Shared Vision and Trust 15 The Cognitive Capital and Relational Capital – Reciprocity and Trust 16 Trust and Knowledge Sharing 17 Trust and Collective Action 18 How Structural Capital Influences Cognitive Capital – Tie Strength and Shared Vision 19 The Cognitive Capital Influences Structural Capital 20 Extrinsic Motivation – Social Identity 20 Conceptual Model 20 CHAPTERⅢ METHODOLOGY 23 Construct Definition and Measurement 23 Independent Variables 24 Mediating Variable 28 Moderating Variable 29 Dependent Variables 30 The Results of Pre-Test (PTT NBA Jersey Board) 36 Reliability and Validity 36 Item Analysis 36 The Results of Pre-Test (PTT Stock Board) 38 Formal Data Collection 47 Sampling Respondents 47 Procedures 47 CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 48 Data Handing 48 Data Coding 48 Factor Analyses 50 Reliability 55 Content Validity 55 Construct Validity 56 Hypothesis Testing 56 CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 64 Conclusions 64 Empirically Tested Model 66 AcademicContributions 66 The Inter-relationships among Dimensions of Social Capital in Virtual Community 67 Managerial Implication 67 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 68 REFERENCES 70 TABLE LIST Table 1-1 Recent Virtual Community Studies from Social Capital Perspective 5 Table 3-1 Source of Questionnaire Items 33 Table 3-2 The Means, SDs, Cronbach α and Factor Analysis of PTT NBA Jersey Board (n=30) 39 Table 3-3 The Results of Item Analysis of PTT Stock Board 43 Table 4-1 Data Coding and Sample Distribution (n=405) 49 Table 4-2 The Means, SDs, Cronbach α and Factor Analysis (n=405) 52 Table 4-3 Results of LISREL 56 Table 4-4 The LISREL Results of Full Model 58 Table 4-5 Results of Moderating Effect of Social Identity 62 Table 4-6 The LISREL Results of Full Model 63 Table 5-1 Summary of Research Findings 65 FIGURE LIST Figure 2-1. Conceptual Social Capital Model. 12 Figure 2-2. The Conceptual Model of this Study 22 Figure 4-1. The Parameter Estimates of Research Construct 57 Figure 5-1. Empirically Tested Model 66

    Abrams, L, C., Cross, R., Lesser, E., & Levin, D. Z. (2003). Nurturing interpersonal trust in knowledge-sharing networks. Academy of Management Executive, 17(4), 64-80.

    Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges and Benefits. Communication of the Association for Information Systems, 1, 1-28.

    Allen, N. J., and Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63, 1-18

    ANDERSON, M. H. (2008). Social networks and the cognitive motivation to realize network opportunities: a study of managers’ information gathering behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 51–78.

    Babin, B. J., & Boles, J. S. (1998). Employee behavior in a service environment: a model and test of potential differences between men and women. Journal of Marketing, 62, 71-91.

    Beatson, A., Coote, A. V., & Rudd J. M. (2006). Determining consumer satisfaction and commitment through self-service technology and personal service usage. Journal of Marketing Management, 22, 853-882.

    Bellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. A. (2002). The Internet in every day life. New Media and Society, 11(4), 487-507.

    Bellman, S., Johnson, E., Lohse, G. & Mandel, N. (2006). Designing marketplaces of the artificial with consumers in mind: four approaches to understanding consumer behavior in electronic environments. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(1). 21-33.

    Bhatnagar., & Sanjoy. (2004). Segmenting consumers based on the benefits and risks of internet shopping. Journal of Business Research, 5, 38-55.

    Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. NY: John Wiley & Sons
    .
    Bock, G.W., Zmud, R.W., Kim, Y., Lee, J. (2005). Behavioral intention formation knowledge sharing: Examining roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.

    Boland, R. J., & Tenkasi, R. V. (1995). Perspective making and perspective taking in communities of knowing. Organization Science, 6(4), 350-372.

    Bolino, M. C., Turnley, W. H., & Bloodgood, J. M. (2002). Citizenship behavior and the creation of social capital in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 27(4), 505-522.

    Brewer, Marilynn B., & Michael D. (2000). Group Distinctiveness, Social Identification, and Collective Mobilization. Self, Identity and Social Movements. University of Minnesota Press.

    Brown, J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987). Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362.

    Butler,J. K., Cantrell, R.S. (1994). Communication factors and trust: an exploratory study. Psychological Reports 74(1), 33-34.

    Chang, H. H. (2007). Critical factors and benefits in the implementation of customer relationship management. Total Quality Management, 18(5), 483–508.

    Chang, H. J. (2009). Online supportive interactions: using a network approach to examine communication patterns within a psychosis social support group in Taiwan. The American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1504–1518.

    Chiu C. M., Hsu M. H., & Wang T.G. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems, 42, 1872-1888.

    Chow, S., & Chan, L. S. Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45, 458-465.

    Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation ofhuman capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
    Comley P. (2008). Online research communities. International Journal of Market Research, 50(5), 301-317.

    Cox, J. C. (2004). How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior, 46, 260-281.

    Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 310-331.

    Deaux, K. (1996). Social Identification. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. MA:Guilford Press.

    Debra, S., & Malewicki. (2005). Member involvement in entrepreneur network organizations: the role of commitment and trust. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 10(2), 141–166.

    Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2000). The what and why of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227-268.

    DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 1(19), 9–30.

    Dholakia, U.M., Bagozzi, R.P. & Pearo, L.K. (2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 21, 241-263.

    Durgree, J. F., O’Connor, G. C., & Veryzer, R. W. (1996). Observations: Translating values into product wants. Journal of advertising research, 36(6), 53-68.

    Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987). Developing buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 51(2), 11-27.

    Gächter, S., Fehr, E. (1999). Collective action as a social exchange Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 39, 341-369.

    Galia (2008). Intrinsic-extrinsic motivations and knowledge sharing in French firms. The Icfai Journal of knowledge management, 5(1), 93-107.
    Ganesan, S. (1994). Determinants of long-term orientation in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 58, 1-19.

    Gantley, D., & Lampe, C. (2009). The ties that bind: Social network principles in online communities. Decision Support System, 47, 266-274.

    Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. S. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63, 70-87.

    Giffin, K. (1967). The contribution of studies of source credibility to a theory of interpersonal trust in the communication process, Psychological Bulletin, 68(2), 104-120.

    Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.

    Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

    Gundlach., Gregory, T., Achroi, R. S., & Mentzer J. T. (1995). The Structure of Commitment in Exchange. Journal of Marketing, 59, 78-92.

    Hagel, J. & Armstrong, A.G. (1997). Net Gain: Expanding Markets through Virtual Communities. MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Hansson, F., Husted, K., & Vestergaard. J. (2005). Second generation science park: from structural holes jockeys to social capital catalysts of the knowledge society. Technovation, 25, 1039-1049.

    Harrison, R., & Kessels, J. (2003). Human resource development: key organizational process in a knowledge company. Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on HRD Research and Practice Across Europe. Toulouse.

    Haythornthwaite, C. (2002). Strong, weak, and latent ties and the impact of new media. The Information Society, 18, 385-401.

    He, W., Qiao, Q., & Wei, K. (2009). Social relationship and its role in knowledge management systems usage. Information & Management, 46, 175-180.

    Hsu, C., & Lin, J. (2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management, 45, 65-74.

    Hsu, M. H., Ju, L., Yen, C. H., & Chang, C. M. (2007). Knowledge sharing behavior in virtual communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 65(2), 153-169.

    Huysman, M., & Wulf, V. (2006). IT to support knowledge sharing in communities, towards a social capital analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 21, 40-51.

    Hwang, H. (2008).A preliminary examination of the factors for knowledge sharing in technology mediated learning. Journal of Information Systems Education, 19(4), 419-429.

    Ibarra, H., Kilduff, M., & Tsai W. P. (2005). Zooming In and Out: Connecting Individuals and Collectivities at the Frontiers of Organizational Network Research. Organization Science, 16(4), 359-371.

    Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. NY: Random House.

    Jiang, C. (2005). The impact of entrepreneur’s social capital on knowledge transfer in Chinese high-tech firms: the moderating effects of absorptive capacity and guanxi development. Management International Review, 46(3), 277-292.

    Johnson, A. (1975). Time allocation in a Machigurnga community. University of Pittsburgh: Of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education.

    Jones, J. I. (2002). On the concept of trust. Decision Support System, 33, 225-232.

    Kang, K. W., & Shin, S. K. (2009) Modeling antecedents of knowledge exchange intentions in virtual communities: anonymity and perceived network-structure approach. Proceedings for the Northeast Region Decision Sciences Institute, 197-202.

    Kim, H. S., Park, J. Y., & Jin, B. (2008). Dimensions of online community attributes : Examination of online communities hosted by companies in Korea. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(10), 812-830.

    Konaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14-37.
    Krackhardt, D. (1992). Networks and organizations: Structure, form, and action. MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Lawrence, T. B. (1995). Power and resources in an organizational community. Academy of Management Best Papers Proceedings, 251–255.

    Lee, F. S. L., Vogel D., & Limayem M., (2003) Virtual community informatics: A review and research agenda. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 1(5), 47 -61.

    Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985). Trust as a social reality. Social Forces, 63(4), 967-985.

    Li, H. (2004). Virtual Community Studies: A Literature Review, Synthesis and Research Agenda. NY: Proceedings of the Americas Conference on Information Systems.

    Li, X., Montazemi, A. R. & Yuan. (2006). Agent-based buddy-finding methodology for knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 43, 283-296.

    Lin, F. H. (2008). Antecedents of virtual community satisfaction and loyalty: an empirical test of competing theories. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 138-144.

    Loury, G. (1977). A dynamic theory of racial income differences. Women, minorities, and employment discrimination. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Mainelli, M. (2003). Risk/reward in a virtual financial community. Information Service and Use, 22(1), 17-27.

    McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.

    McCabe, K., Rigdon, M., & Smith, V. (2003). Positive reciprocity and intentions in trust games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 52, 267-275.
    McKnight, D., & Chervany, L. (2002). What trust means in E-commerce customer relationships: An interdisciplinary conceptual typology. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(2). 35-39.

    Milne, R., & Boza, E. (1999). Trust and concern in consumers’ perceptions of marketing information management practices. Journal of interactive marketing 13(1), 5-24.

    Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. NY: Oxford University Press.

    Moorman, C., Rohit D., & Zaitman, G. (1993), Factors Affecting Trust in Market Relationships. Journal of Marketing, 57, 81-101.

    Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu. (2005). The information content of stock markets: why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 215-260.

    Morgan, R. M. & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 58(3). 20-38.

    Muniz, A.M., & O’Guinn, T.C. (2001), Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27, 412-32.

    Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1997). Social capital, intellectual capital and the creation of value in firms. Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings, 35-39.

    Nie, N. H., Hillygus D. S., & Erbring L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations and sociability: findings from a detailed time diary study. MA: Blackwell Publishers.

    Organ, D. W., & Konovsky, M. (1989). Cognitive versus affective determinants of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 157-164.

    Parzefall R. (2008). Psychological contracts and reciprocity: a study in a Finnish context. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(9), 1703-1719.

    Pervan, S. J., Bove, L., Johnson, L. W. (2009). Reciprocity as a key stabilizing norm of interpersonal marketing relationships: Scale development and validation. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 60-70.
    Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner. J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1320-1350.

    Preece, J., & Krichmar, M. D. (2003). Online communities: focusing on sociability and usability. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, NJ: Erlbaum Associates Inc. Publishers.

    Ridings, C.M., Gefen, D., Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and effects of trust in virtual communities. Strategic Information Systems, 11 (3-4), 271-295.

    Ridings. C., Gefen. D., & Arinze. B., (2006). Psychological barriers: lurker and poster motivation and behavior in online communities. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 18, 329-354.

    Rindfleisch, A., & Moorman, C. (2001). The acquisition and utilization of information in new product alliances: A strength of ties perspective. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 1-18.

    Rothaermela. F. T., & Sugiyamab. S. (2001). Virtual internet communities and commercial success:individual and community-level theory grounded in the atypical case of TimeZone.com. Journal of Management 27, 297–312.

    Sabatini, F. (2009). Social capital as social networks: A new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 429-442.

    Scott, S. C., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to Organizational Identity. Academy of Management Review, 25, 43–62.

    Sicilia M., & Palazón M., (2008). Brand communitieson the internet: A case study of Coca-Cola’s Spanish virtual community. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(3), 255-270.

    Sparrowe, R. T., & Liden, R. C. (1997). Process and structure in leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Review, 22, 522-52.

    Stevenson, W. B., & Greenberg, D. (2000). Agency and social networks: Strategies of action in a social structure of position, opposition, and opportunity. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 651–678.

    Tajfel, H. (1982). Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.

    Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intra-firm Networks, Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-478.

    Wang, J. C. & Chiang, M. J., (2009). Social interaction and continuance intention in online auctions: A social capital perspective. Decision Support System, 11, 185-199.

    Wang, Y., & Fesenmaier, D. R. (2003) Understanding the motivation of contribution in online communities an empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets, 13(1), 33-46.

    Wasko, M., Teigland, R., & Faraj, S. (2009). The provision of online public goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice. Decision Support Systems 47, 254–265.

    Wu, B., Hom, W., Tetrick, L., Shore, M., Jia, L., Li, C., & Song, J. (2006). The norm of reciprocity: scale development and validation in the Chinese context. Management and Organization Review, 377-402.

    Yang, S. C., & Farn, C. K. (2009). Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A muti-informant design. International journal of Inforamtion management, 29, 210-218.

    Yu, C. P., & Chu, T. H. (2007). Exploring knowledge sharing from OCB perspective. Information & Management, 44, 321-331.

    Zaltman & Morreman (1988). The importance of trust in the use of research. Journal of advertising research, 16-24

    無法下載圖示 校內:2020-12-30公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE