日本與韓國兩國因TFT-LCD產業在成本競爭力考量下，設備在地化的比例遠高於台灣，因此台灣設備產業的發展，需要以研發新穎的設備為主，並能增加生產量、縮短交機的時間及達到高良率的目標，來節省TFT-LCD廠投資成本與經營成本，提高投資效率並改善投資報酬率(Return On Investment﹐ROI)。本論文以台灣、日本與韓國三個國家在TFT-LCD 設備產業中競爭力做分析比較，利用Porter(1990 ) 於「國家競爭優勢」（The Competitive Advantage of Nations）一書中所提出的鑽石模型(Diamond Structure)。針對設備產業內部因素中「市場需求面」、「企業策略、結構與競爭」、「生產因素」與「相關支援的產業」及外部環境中「政府」與「機會」等六個構面上做全盤的分析與瞭解。經由本論文研究，探討對於TFT-LCD設備產業發展相當成熟的日本及積極持續投資次世代，並在政府政策上強力扶值的韓國設備產業，台灣設備產業如何利用自己本身的資源與競爭優勢，在激烈競爭的TFT-LCD設備產業中，爭得一席之地，甚至獨霸一方。因此在經過廣泛的收集研究報告、產業新聞、專業期刊等初級資料後，再透過產業界重要級人物問卷訪談，深入地瞭解韓國、日本TFT-LCD設備產業競爭力探討，最後提出研究的結論與建議，做為台灣設備產業發展策略上參考及政府未來政策的建議。

Japan and Korean’s TFT-LCD industries consider the competitiveness of the cost. So their proportion of local equipment setting is more popular than Taiwan.Instead, Taiwan’s equipment industries development priority need to increase the number of productions by new equipment and shorten the lead time and achieve the high quality of productions. However, TFT-LCD factories can save the cost of investment and raise the investment efficiency of operating cost to improve the ROI (Return On Investment).
This thesis compares and analyzes the competitiveness of the industry in TFT-LCD equipment among Taiwan, Japan and Korea. In the Porter’s (1990) book “The Competitive Advantage of Nations” that mentioned about the “Diamond Structure”. So, we have to analyze and realize totally at the industry of the equipment’s inside factor with six aspects “ Demand Conditions”, “Firm Strategy, Structure and Rivalry”, “Factor Conditions” and “Related and Supporting Industries” and the other outside factors “Government” and “Opportunity”. The research of this paper shows that how the equipment industries of Taiwan use their own resources and competition advantages to compete with Japan country which quite maturity in TFT-LCD equipments. And Korea country with strong support by their government, for this reason, they can earn their own stage and further surpasses the others among the intense of competition industries. Therefore, widely collecting research paper, industry's news, specialized periodical and interviewing the important grades of personages of related industrial by the questionnaire, with that results. Then we can understand Korea and Japan’s TFT-LCD equipment industry's competitiveness deeply. At the end, we can put forward the conclusion and suggestions by these studies and we can take it for our references on industry's development strategy of the equipment and afford the suggestion of consulting to our government's policy for Taiwan.

一、中文部分
1. 陳連春譯（民81），「彩色液晶顯示器技術原理（初板）」，台北：建興圖書。
2. 李明軒、邱如美合譯（民87），Michael E﹒Porter著（1990），「國家競爭優勢」，台北：天下文化。
3. 周旭華譯（民87），Michael E﹒Porter著（1980），「競爭策略」，台北：天下文化。
4. 吳萬益（民88），「企業研究方法」，初版，台北：東華出版。
5. 高登第、李明軒合譯（民90），Michael E﹒Porter著（1998），「競爭論」，台北：天下文化。
6. 田志豪、趙中興（民90），「顯示器原理與技術（二版）」，台北：全華科技。
7. 紀國鐘、蘇炎坤（民91），「光電半導體技術手冊（初板）」，台北：經濟部
技術處。
8. 蔡坤達（民91），「台灣光電產業之發展與競爭優勢」，國立台灣大學國家
發展研究所碩士論文。
9. 石岱勳譯（民94），「日經FPD2006戦略篇–平面顯示器技術及未來趨勢，
初版」，台北：龍璟文化。
10.財團法人經濟研究院（民94），「科學技術統計要覽(2005年版)」，台北：
行政院國家科學委員會。
11.徐作聖、陳仁帥（民94），「產業分析」，初版，台北：全華科技圖書。
12.徐作聖、賴賢哲（民94），「科技政策理論與實務」，初版，台北：全華科技圖書。
13.林欣蔚譯（民95），「日經FPD2006戦略篇–FPD企業之經營與技術戦略
總覽」，初版，台北：龍璟文化。
14.林欣蔚譯（民95），「日經FPD2006實務篇–以實際數據深入剖析FPD之
市場趨勢」，初版，台北：龍璟文化。
15.陳俊宏（民92），「影響我國生物科技產業國際競爭力相關因素之研究」，
國立成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
16.李輝鈞（民92），「台灣中小尺寸TFT-LCD專業製造廠競爭優勢分析」，國
立清華大學工業工程與工程管理研究所碩士論文。
17.蔣漢旗（民92），「台韓TFT-LCD製造發展策略比較分析之研究」，國立交
通大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
18.蘇兆鳴（民92），「我國平面顯示器設備產業發展策研究」，國立清華大學
高階主管經營管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
19.邱垂洲（民92），「台灣TFT LCD產業發展及競爭力分析」，國立中央大學
管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文。
20.官坤林（民92），「台灣晶圓代工產業分析與競爭策略之研究」，國立交通
大學管理科學系碩士論文。
21.呂正華（民93），「台灣與南韓產業科技政策發展與競爭力之比較」，國立
台北大學企研所碩士論文。
22.黃仁德、胡貝蒂（民95），「台灣租稅獎勵與產業發展」，台北：聯經出版。

二、網站資料
全球高科技產業研究資料庫 http：//www.lib.cycu.edu.tw
工研院ITIS產業技術網　http：//www.itis.org.tw
經濟部全球資訊網http：//iek.itri.org.tw
工研院經資中心　http：//www.moea.gov.tw
半導體設備及材料協會　http//www.semi.org
液晶平面顯示器 http//www.fpd.com.tw
市調單位　http：//www.displaysearch.com
市調單位　http：//www.idc.com
市調單位　http：//www. stanford resources.com
市調單位　http：//www3.gartner.com
拓墣產業研究所　http：//www.topology.com.tw
資策會市場情報中心　http//mic.iii.org.tw
電子時報　http：//www.digitimes.com.tw
財團法人光電科技工業協進會 http：/www. Pida.org.tw
中華民國台灣薄膜電晶體液晶顯示器產業協會 http://www.ttla.org.tw
台灣平面顯示器材料與元件產業協會 http://www.tdmda.org.tw

三、英文部分
1. Ansoff, H. I. (1980) “Strategic Issue Management; SUMMARY ,” Strategic
Management Journal , Chichester: Apr-Jun 1980. Vol. 1, Iss. 2; pp. 131-148.
2. Ansoff, H. I. (1988) “ Strategic Management,” The Practising Manager. Mt. Eliza: Apr 1988. Vol. 8 , Iss. 2; pp. 4-14.
3. Ajami, R. and Arch, G. (1990) “Cooperating to Compete: Using Technology to Link the Multinational Corporation and the Country,” International Journal of Technology Management, Geneva: 1990. Vol. 5, Iss. 2; pp. 165-177.
4. Andersen, O. and Kheam, E. (1998) “ Resource-based theory and international growth strategies: an exploratory study,” International Business Review, Vol. 7, pp.163-184.
5. Buckley, P. J. and Chapman, M. (1996) “ Theory and Method in International Business Research,” International Business Review, Vol. 5, Iss. 3; pp.233-245.
6. Cockburn I.M., Henderson R.M.and Stern S. (2000), “Untangling the origins of competitive advantage Strategic, Management Journal,” Chichester: Oct/Nov 2000. Vol. 21, Iss. 10/11; pp. 1123
7. Chen﹐Y.I. and Hsieh, P.F. (2005) “ Service-based View of Porter’s Diamond Model for Cluster Analysis,” Proceedings of 2005 Annual Conference on Technology Management.
8. Cheng﹐C.J., Lin, B.W. and Hsiao, Y.C. (2005) “ Beyond Porter’s Diamond Model：The Chinese Eight Diagrams for analysis framework of service industry,” Proceedings of 2005 Annual Conference on Technology Management.
9. Dunning, J. H. (1993) “ Multinational Enterprises and the Global Economy,” Wokingham Berks, England: Addison-Wesley.
10. Dunning, J.H. (1991) “ Dunning on Porter: Reshaping the Diamond of Competitive Advantage,” Business and Economic Studies on European Integration, Copenhagen, WP. pp. 6-91.
11. Dunning, J.H. (1992) “ The Competitive Advantages of Countries and the Activities of Transnational Corporations,” Transnational Corporations, Vol.1, pp.135-168.
12. Dunning, J.H. (1993), “Internationalizing Porter’s Diamond,” Management International Review, Vol.33, pp.7-15.
13. Enderwick, P. (1992), “ The Scale and Scope of Service Sector Multinationals,”
Multinational Enterprises in the World Economy (Buckley P.J. and Casson., M., ed.) Chapter 8.
14. Girod, S. J., and Rugman, A. M. (2005), “Regional Business Networks and the Multinational Retail Sector,” Long range planning, Vol.38, pp 335-357.
15. Hung , S. C.﹐and Whittington, R. (2000), “Playing by the Rules：Institutional
Foundations of Success and Failure in the Taiwanese IT Industry,” Journal of Business Research, 47, pp. 47-53.
16. Moon, H. C., Rugman, A. M. and Verbeke, A. (1998), “A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore,” International Business Review, 7, pp 135-150.
17. Moon, H. C. and Lee, D. (2004), “The Competitiveness of Multinational Firms: A Case Study of Samsung Electronics and Sony,” Journal of International and Area Studies, Jun, pp 1-11.
18. Nesheim, J.L. (1997), “ High Tech Start Up-The Complete Handbook for Creating Successful﹐” New High Teach Companies﹒
19. OH, C. H. and Rugman, A. M. (2006), “Regional Sales of Multinationals in the World Cosmetics Industry,” European Management Journal, Vol 24, No.2-3, pp 163-173.
20. Porter, M.E.(1998), “On competition,” New York: Free Press.
21. Porter, M.E.(1980), “Competitive Strategy ,” New York: Free Press.
22. Porter, M.E.(1985), “Competitive Advantage ,” New York: Free Press.
23. Porter, M.E.(1990), “The Competitive Advantage of Nations ,” New York: Free Press. pp.127
24. Porter, M.E.(1998), “Clusters and the new economics of competition ,” Harvard
Business Review, Free pp﹒77-90
25. Rugman, A. M. (1991), “Diamond in the Rough,” Business Quarterly, Vol.55, pp.61-64.
26. Rugman, A. M. and D’Cruz,Joseph R.（1993）”The Double Diamond Model of
International Competitiveness: The Canadian Experience,” Management International Review, 33（2）,17-39.
27. Rugman, A. M. and Verbeke A.（1993）”Foreign Subsidiaries and Multinational Strategic Management：An Extension and Correction of Porter’s Single Diamond Framework, ”Management International Review, 33（2）,71-84.
28. Rugman, A. M. and D'Cruz, J. R. (1993), “Developing International Competitiveness: The Five Partners Model”, Business Quarterly, Vol. 58, Iss. 2, pp.60-72.
29. Rugman, A. M. and Kirton, J.（1998） “Multinational Enterprise Strategy and the NAFTA Trade and Environment Regime,” Journal of World Business, Vol. 33, Iss. 4, pp 438-454.
30. Rugman, A. M. and Verbeke A.（2000）“ Six cases of corporate strategic responses to environmental regulation, ” European Management Journal, Vol 18, No.4, pp377-386