線上問卷調查是現今各領域中均會使用的工具，常用於量化人們的主觀體驗、態度或觀點等。然而，過去研究指出問卷調查存在著一些潛在問題，例如當人們缺乏內在動機填寫問卷時，會產生如隨機回答、回應不夠努力等現象。
為了改善這個現象，許多研究試圖透過遊戲化設計的方式結合問卷設計，例如將自我報告的問題轉化成遊戲形式等。然而，文獻回顧發現過去的研究較少涉及遊戲化設計加入後是否會影響填答結果的相關研究。
因此，我們在不改變問卷題目和量表的情況下，將遊戲化元素融入線上問卷設計中，並以以五大人格問卷 IPIP 50 為媒介，創造出遊戲化版本的五大人格問卷。來進行同一參與者之填答結果一致性以及內在動機之比較。
結果發現，遊戲化加入後，增加了人們填答問卷時的內在動機，增加了興趣與享受程度，且減少了壓力及緊張程度，不過也發現到遊戲化加入後有可能會使填答結果產生變化。因此，本研究認為，遊戲化能夠提升參與者的內在動機，不過當問卷需要提供準確數值時，可能不適合放入遊戲化內容。並且未來在設計遊戲化類型的問卷時，需要且謹慎考慮遊戲化元素數量的使用，在遊戲化帶來的刺激與問卷的有效性進行平衡。

Online questionnaire surveys are widely used tools across various fields today. They are commonly employed to quantify individuals' subjective experiences, attitudes, or perspectives. However, previous studies have indicated the existence of some potential issues with questionnaire surveys. For example, when individuals lack intrinsic motivation to complete the questionnaires, it can result in phenomena such as random responses or insufficient effort in their responses.
To address this issue, many studies have attempted to integrate gamification design into questionnaire surveys as a way to improve the situation. However, literature reviews have found that there is a scarcity of research examining whether the adding of gamification design in questionnaires affects the responses provided by individuals.Therefore, without changing the questionnaire items and scales, we incorporated gamification elements into the design of online questionnaires. Using the IPIP-50, Big Five personality questionnaire, as a medium, we created a gamified version of the Big Five personality questionnaire. The results revealed that the adding of gamification increased the intrinsic motivation of individuals when filling out the questionnaire. It enhanced their interest and enjoyment while reducing stress and anxiety levels. However, it was also observed that the adding of gamification could potentially lead to variations in the responses provided.
Therefore, this study suggests that gamification can enhance participants' intrinsic motivation. However, when the questionnaire requires individuals to provide accurate data, it may not be suitable to incorporate gamified elements. Furthermore, in future designs of gamified questionnaires, careful consideration should be given to the quantity of gamification elements used. It is important to strike a balance between the stimulation brought by gamification and the effectiveness of the questionnaire.

Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality (pp. xiv, 593). Holt, Reinhart & Winston.
Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571. https:/ doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004
Bowling, N. A., Huang, J. L., Bragg, C. B., Khazon, S., Liu, M., & Blackmore, C. E. (2016). Who cares and who is careless? Insufficient effort responding as a reflection of respondent personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 218–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000085
Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality (pp. xv, 602). World Book Company.
Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Winsborough, D., Sherman, R. A., & Hogan, R. (2016). New Talent Signals: Shiny New Objects or a Brave New World? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 9(3), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2016.6
Cheng, V. W. S., Davenport, T., Johnson, D., Vella, K., & Hickie, I. B. (2019). Gamification in Apps and Technologies for Improving Mental Health and Well- Being: Systematic Review. JMIR Mental Health, 6(6), e13717. https://doi.org/10.2196/13717
Chou, Y. (2016). Actionable Gamification: Beyond Points, Badges, and Leaderboards. Packt Publishing Ltd.
Cobb-Clark, D. A., & Schurer, S. (2012). The stability of big-five personality traits. Economics Letters, 115(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2011.11.015
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From Game Design Elements to Gamefulness: Defining Gamification. 11, 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Eysenck, H. J. (1991). Dimensions of personality: The biosocial approach to personality. In Explorations in temperament: International perspectives on theory and measurement (pp. 87–103). Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899- 0643-4_7
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007
Guin, T. D.-L., Baker, R., Mechling, J., & Ruyle, E. (2012). Myths and Realities of Respondent Engagement in Online Surveys. International Journal of Market Research, 54(5), 613–633. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJMR-54-5-613-633
Harman, J. L., & Brown, K. D. (2022). Illustrating a narrative: A test of game elements in game-like personality assessment. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12374
Harms, J., Biegler, S., Wimmer, C., Kappel, K., & Grechenig, T. (2015). Gamification of Online Surveys: Design Process, Case Study, and Evaluation. 9296, 219–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22701-6_16
Herzog, A. R., & Bachman, J. G. (1981). Effects of Questionnaire Length on Response Quality. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 45(4), 549–559.
Höchsmann, C., Infanger, D., Klenk, C., Königstein, K., Walz, S. P., & Schmidt-Trucksäss, A. (2019). Effectiveness of a Behavior Change Technique-Based Smartphone Game to Improve Intrinsic Motivation and Physical Activity Adherence in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Serious Games, 7(1), e11444. https://doi.org/10.2196/11444
Hommel, B. E., Ruppel, R., & Zacher, H. (2022). Assessment of cognitive flexibility in personnel selection: Validity and acceptance of a gamified version of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(1), 126– 144. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12362
Huang, J. L., Curran, P. G., Keeney, J., Poposki, E. M., & DeShon, R. P. (2012). Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveys. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(1), 99–114.
Keusch, F., & Zhang, C. (2017). A Review of Issues in Gamified Surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 35(2), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439315608451
Klock, A. C. T., Ogawa, A. N., Gasparini, I., & Pimenta, M. S. (2018). Does gamification matter?: A systematic mapping about the evaluation of gamification in educational environments. https://doi.org/10.1145/3167132.3167347
Koivisto, J., & Hamari, J. (2019). The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.10.013
Krosnick, J. A. (1991). Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), 213–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050305
Landers, R. N., & Collmus, A. B. (2022). Gamifying a personality measure by converting it into a story: Convergence, incremental prediction, faking, and reactions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12373
Landers, R. N., & Sanchez, D. R. (2022). Game-based, gamified, and gamefully designed assessments for employee selection: Definitions, distinctions, design, and validation. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 30(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12376
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2020). A comparison of flipped learning with gamification, traditional learning, and online independent study: The effects on students’ mathematics achievement and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 464–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1541910
López-Martínez, A., Meroño, L., Cánovas-López, M., García-de-Alcaraz, A., & Martínez- Aranda, L. M. (2022). Using Gamified Strategies in Higher Education: Relationship between Intrinsic Motivation and Contextual Variables. Sustainability, 14(17), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141711014
Maniaci, M. R., & Rogge, R. D. (2014). Caring about carelessness: Participant inattention and its effects on research. Journal of Research in Personality, 48, 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.09.008
Mazarakis, A., & Bräuer, P. (2022). Gamification is Working, but Which One Exactly? Results from an Experiment with Four Game Design Elements. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 0(0), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041909
McCord, J.-L., Harman, J. L., & Purl, J. (2019). Game-like personality testing: An emerging mode of personality assessment. Personality and Individual Differences, 143, 95–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.02.017
Meade, A., & Craig, B. (2012). Identifying Careless Responses in Survey Data. Psychological Methods, 17, 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
Prott, D., & Ebner, M. (2020). The Use of Gamification in Gastronomic Questionnaires. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 14(02), Article 02. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i02.11695
Ryan, R. M. (1982). Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 450–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.43.3.450
Sartori, R., Costantini, A., Ceschi, A., & Scalco, A. (2017). Not only correlations: A different approach for investigating the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and job performance based on workers and employees’ perception. Quality & Quantity, 51(6), 2507–2519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-016-0406-2
Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63, 506–516. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa6303_8
Saxena, M., & Mishra, D. K. (2021). Gamification and Gen Z in Higher Education: A Systematic Review of Literature. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education (IJICTE), 17(4), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJICTE.20211001.oa10
Toda, A. M., Klock, A. C. T., Oliveira, W., Palomino, P. T., Rodrigues, L., Shi, L., Bittencourt, I., Gasparini, I., Isotani, S., & Cristea, A. I. (2019). Analysing gamification elements in educational environments using an existing Gamification taxonomy. Smart Learning Environments, 6(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561- 019-0106-1
Wanick, V., & Bui, H. (2019). Gamification in Management: A systematic review and research directions. International Journal of Serious Games, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.17083/ijsg.v6i2.282
Zheng, L., Goldberg, L. R., Zheng, Y., Zhao, Y., Tang, Y., & Liu, L. (2008). Reliability and Concurrent Validation of the IPIP Big-Five Factor Markers in China: Consistencies in Factor Structure between Internet-Obtained Heterosexual and Homosexual Samples. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(7), 649–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.07.009