一、研究動機與目的：
一般室內裝修所進行實木地板舖設或塗佈保護漆等作業，均須使用大量乾式及濕式建材，室內裝修不只限於單一建材逸散行為，而必須同時考量多種污染源之逸散行為，由於單一建材測試不易反映實際建材裝修狀態，因此本研究以「全尺寸複合木地板」作為主要研究議題。
此外，目前我國機械通風量對於引入外氣並無明確定義，而國際上(美國ASHRAE、日本建築基準法等)已針對各空間類別制定其外氣引入量，有鑒於此，本研究藉由不同外氣引入量作為操縱變因，以探討外氣引入量對VOCs移除效率之影響。
二、研究方法：
主要依據ASTM D6670-01(全尺寸環控箱測試法)及ISO16000-6(VOCs採樣分析方法)進行全尺寸建材測試。
三、研究課題：
探討課題共分為三部分：
(一)探討複合木地板構造與高、低逸散VOCs塗料逸散特性之差異。
(二)透過小型環控箱測試之材料測試以Mass-balance理論進行大/小尺寸建材推估比對。
(三)運用不同換氣率(0.25、0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0)h-1下討論建材VOCs移除效率與影響性，依據各國最低外氣量及相關效率研究，同時考量全尺寸環控箱空間體積，將換氣率轉換為(13.75、27.5、55、82.5、110)CMH以探討有效VOCs移除效率之外氣量區間。
四、研究成果：
(一)全尺寸複合木地板構造模組逸散特性比較
1.就清漆塗佈全尺寸木地板之逸散特性而言：以Toluene逸散變化最為顯著，各化合物歷時平均濃度值所佔比例分別為Toluene(67.81%)、m,p-Xylene(12.4%)、o-Xylene(10.02%)、Ethylbenzene(9.77%)。
2.就木質塗料塗佈全尺寸木地板之逸散特性而言：BTEX平均濃度值僅佔全部指標污染物濃度的5.3%，此外分析結果發現Hexanal第72小時濃度值71.03μg/m3高於臭氣恕限值57.5μg/m3，具有臭氣干擾之可能性。
3.以健康綠建材評估基準加以比較，研究發現清漆第72小時逸散因子776.27μg/m2．hr高於標準值(190μg/m2．hr)達4倍之多；而木質塗料所逸散之BTEX濃度並無健康危害之虞，亦突顯出『健康綠建材標章』推行成效與必要性。

(二)全尺寸與小尺寸建材在推估比對上具有明顯差異
1.研究結果顯示小尺寸建材進行推估可能造成實質應用上的濃度偏差或低估，原因為全尺寸建材考量實際空間現狀，包括複合構造組成、施工方式、塗料用量及塗佈過程等，反觀小尺寸建材僅能描述單片建材逸散特性，而導致逸散濃度推估上有所差異。
2.就整體推估濃度而言，除了Toluene和Hexanal呈現推估值高估(約20.2%)，整體濃度為推估值低估(約5.8%)，尤其以低濃度Xylene最為明顯(相差約1~1.5倍)。
(三)提出有效移除污染物之外氣引入量
1.換氣量對建材VOCs移除效率之影響：調變換氣量對清漆具有約40~75%之移除效率；對木質塗料則約有30~87%之移除效率。
2.有效污染物移除效率區間：比照各國機械通風量基準可發現台灣規範値高於國外標準甚多，尤其對通風量引入來源並無明確定義。本研究討論之有效移除效率區間介於13.75~110CMH (0.25~2.0h-1)，若進一步考量工作效率因子，建議未來研究可針對0.5~1.0h-1通風量範圍作深入探討。
3.以不同換氣量與用電量關係作迴歸分析：經迴歸分析計算後可得知每提升1單位換氣量(CMH)則耗電量會增加3.6KWH。
(四)建立不同換氣量之移除模式
1.逸散因子衰減模式之迴歸分析：清漆逸散化合物經二階衰減模式判定結果，發現「二階衰減模式」具有較佳的描述能力，尤其以Xylene最為顯著，判定係數高達0.998。對木質塗料而言，Toluene及Undecane因判定係數過低導致可信度不佳。
2.建立不同換氣量之移除模式：未來可廣泛應用於建材資料庫推估，亦可提供未來使用者設定移除建材VOCs之最佳外氣通風量。

1、Scope：
In general，laying Solid Wood floor or applying paint in Interior design，that have to use a large number dry and wet building materials，but internal decoration isn’t only limited to single building material emission，because small building material test is insufficient to perform real building material emission。Therefore，this study aims for「Full-Scale composite wood floor」as main subject。
Furthermore，this study discusses with the removal efficiency of VOCs from building material under different outdoor air rate。
2、Method：
This study was following ASTM D6670-01(Full-Scale chamber test)and ISO16000-6 (VOCs sample / analysis method) with experiments。
3、Discussion：
The main discussion of this study are as folloes：
(一)VOCs emitted characteristics from Full-Scale composite wood floor with high/low emitted paint。
(二)Applying Mass-balance model to compare with the emission concentration between Full-scale and Small-scale building material。
(三)Discussion with the removal efficiency of VOCs from building material under different outdoor air rate (0.25、0.5、1.0、1.5、2.0)h-1，according to the volume of Full-Scale chamber，Air Change rate transformed(13.75、27.5、55、82.5、110)CMH to discuss outdoor air rate range about VOCs removal efficiency。
4、Result：
(一)VOCs emitted characteristics from Full-Scale composite wood floor module
1.Emission characteristic of Full-Scale wood floor(varnish)：Toluene emitted the most eminency，the proportion of mean concentration of VOCs is Toluene(67.81%)、m,p-Xylene(12.4%)、o-Xylene(10.02%)、Ethylbenzene(9.77%)。
2.Emission characteristic of Full-Scale wood floor(woody paint)：mean concentration of BTEX only account for 5.3% of total target contaminants。
3.To compare healthy green building material index，this study result (varnish) 72th hr emission factor 776.27μg/m2．hr above 4 times standard value (190μg/m2．hr)。

(二)Comparisons of the emission concentration between Full-scale and Small-scale building material
1.Estimation of Toluene and Hexanal performed over-value (about 20.2%)，as a whole concentration is underestimated(about 5.8%)，in particular low concentration(Xylene) is the most eminency (about 1~1.5 times)。
(三)Indicating outdoor air rate to effectively remove contaminants
1. Different outdoor air rate affects varnish to have about from 40 to 75% of removal efficiency；that affects woody paint to have about from 30 to 87% of removal efficiency。
2.The effect of Removal efficiency range is 13.75~110CMH(approximately from 0.25 to 2.0h-1)。
(四)Establishing the removal model under different outdoor air rate
1.With the test results，「the double exponential model」was approved being suitable for predicting the emission factor，R2 is 0.998。
2.the model could be applied extensively for building material data in the future，also be predicting the concentration of VOCs in the indoor environment。

外文部份
1.A. Strini, E. Mapelli and L. Bignami，A volatile organic compounds emission test chamber based on a standard chemical reaction vessel , Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate – Indoor Air ’99,Vol5,pp137-142,(1999)
2.Awad,S.B., “Fundamental Mass Transfer Modeling of Emissions of volatile organic compounds from Building Material.” Ph.D.Thesis.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,Carleton University,Ottawa,Canada,(1999)
3.Brown SK. Indoor air quality. Australia:state of the Environmental Technical Paper Series (atmosphere). Department of the Environment,Sport and Territories,Canberra,(1994)
4.Colombo, A., De Bortoli, M., Schauenburg, H., and Vissers, H., Chamber Testing of Organic Emission from Building and Furnishing Material, The Science of the Total Environment Vol.91. P.237-249, (1990).
5.Colombo, A., De Bortoli, M., Knöppel, H., Schauenburg, H., and Vossero, H., Small Chamber Tests and Headspace Analysis of Volatile Organic Compounds Emitted from Household Products, Indoor Air, Vol.1, p.13-21, (1991).
6.Dagmar Schmidt Etkin，IEQ Strategies-Volatile Organic Compounds in Indoor Environment,Cutter Information CORP,(1996)
7.D.P.Wyon,”The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity”,Indoor Air；14：p92-101，(2000)
8.Dols,W.S. and G.N. Walton，CONTAMW 2.0 User Manual .National Institute of Standards and Technology,NISTIR 6921
9.European Commission Joint Research Centre，Indoor Air Quality & it’s Impact on Man，Report NO18：Evaluation of VOC Emissions from Building Products－Solid Flooring Material，1997
10.Guo,Z.,L.E.Sparks,B.A.Tichenor,and J.C.S.Chang, “Predicting the emissions of individual VOCs from petroleum-based indoor coatings”,Atmospheric Environment,Vol.32,NO.2,pp.231-237,(1998)
11.G.C.Morrison，R.L.Corsi，H.Destaillats，W.W.Nazaroff，J.R.Wells，Indoor Chemistry：Materials，Ventilation Systems，and Occupant Activities，Proceedings of Healthy Buildings，(2006)
12.Hayter,A.J and Dowling M.M, Experimental Design and Emission Modeling for Chamber Experiment, Atmospheric Environment,Vol.27A,p.2225-2234,(1993)
13.H.Levin and A.T.Hodgson，”Voc Concentrations of Interest in North American Offices and Homes”，Proceedings of Healthy Buildings 2006，(2006)
14.J.C.S.Chang and Z.Guo,Characterization of Organic Emissions From a Wood Finishing Product-Wood Stain,Indoor Air,Vol.2,pp.146-153,(1992)
15.JOHN C. S. CHANG, BRUCE A. TICHENOR, ZHISHI Guo AND KENNETH A. KREBS，Substrate Effects on VOC Emissions from a Latex Paint，indoor Air; 7: 241-247，(1997)
16.J.S.Zhang,G..Nong,C.Y.Shaw,J.M.Wang，Measurements of volatile organic compound(VOC) emissions from wood stains by using an electronic balance,ASHARE Trans.105.Part1,(1999)
17.Levin H,et al. Building materials and indoor air quality. OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE. (4)：67-93，(1989)
18.Little,J.C.,A.T.Hodgson,andA.J.Gadgil. “Modeling emissions of volatile organic compounds from new carpet”,Atmospheric Environment,Vol.28,pp.227-234,(1994)
19.L. Antonelli,E. Mapelli,A. Strini,T. Cerulli,R. Leoni and S. Stella，Laboratory and real scale comparative study of benzyl alcohol emissions from a two-component epoxy paint，Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Indoor Air Quality and Climate – Indoor Air 2002,(2002)
20.Molhave L., “Indoor Air Pollution Due To Organic Gases and Vapors of Solvents in Building Materials”, Environment International, Vol.8, p.117-127. , (1982)
21.Matthews, T.G., Wilson D.L., Thompson, A.J., Mason, M.A., Bailey, S.N., and Nelms, L.H., terlaboratory Comparison of Formaldehyde Emission from Particle Board Underlayment in Small Scale Environment Chambers, Journal of the Air Pollution Control Association, Vol. 37, p1320, (1987).
22.M.Devos,F. Patte,J.Rouault,P. Laffort and L.J.van Gemert(Eds.)，” Standardized Human Olfactory Thresholds”，IRL Press ,Oxford,England，(1990)
23.M. Maroni et al., “Indoor Air Quality”, pp. 443-444, (1995).
24.O.A.Seppanen and W.J.Fisk，”Summary of responses to ventilation”，Indoor Air vol.14 p102-118，(2004)
25.O.A.Seppanen ,W.J.Fisk and O.H.Lei，Ventilation and performance in office work，Indoor Air；16：p28-36，(2004)
26.Pawel Wargocki, Perceived Air Quality, Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) Symptoms and Productivity in anOfficewith TwoDifferent Pollution Loads ,Indoor Air,(1999)
27.Pawel Wargocki, The Effects of Outdoor Air Supply Rate in an Office on Perceived Air Quality, Sick Building Syndrome (SBS) Symptoms and Productivity ,(10),222-236, Indoor Air,(2000)
28.P. Wargocki, J. Sundell, W. Bischof, G. Brundrett, P.O. Fanger, F.Gyntelberg, S.O. Hanssen, P. Harrison, A. Pickering, O. Seppa¨nen, P.Wouters, The role of ventilation in non-industrial indoor environments.Proceedings of Indoor Air 2002, the 9th Indoor Air Quality and Climate, Monterey, USA, (2002).
29.P.-C. Wu, Y.-Y. Li, C.-C. Lee,C.-M. Chiang,Li, H.-J. Su ,risk assessment of formaldehyde in typical office building in Taiwan, Indoor air 2003; 13:1-15,(2003)
30.P.-C. Wu, Y.-Y. Li, C.-M. Chiang, C.-Y. Huang, C.-C. Lee, F.-C. Li, H.-J. Su ，Changing microbial concentrations are associated with ventilation performance in Taiwan's air-conditioned office buildings ，Indoor Air， - Volume 15 Issue 1 Page 19-26，January( 2005)
31.Richard A. Wadden & Peter A. Scheff, “Indoor Air Pollution”, pp. 105-107, (1982).
32.Shair and Heitner，Reprinted by permission of the American Chemical Society from Environment Science and Technology，(1974)
33.Spark,L.E.,Tichenor,B.A.,and change,J.,Guo,Z.，Gas-Phase Mass Transfer Model for Predicing Volatile Organic Compound(VOC) Emission Rates from Indoor Pollutant Source,Indoor Air,Vol.6,p.31-40，(1996)
34.Seppa¨ nen, OA, Fisk, WJ, Mendell, MJ. Association of ventilation rates and CO2-concentrations with health and other responses in commercial and institutional buildings, Indoor Air, 9, 252–274,(1999)
35.Sundell J. On the history of indoor air quality and health. Indoor Air; 14(Suppl. 7):51–8,(2004)
36.Seifert,B.“Organic Indoor Pollutant：Source,Species and Concentrations”,Chemical and Environment Science Volume 4：Chemical,Microbiological,Health and Comfort Asoects of Indoor Air Quality－state of the Art in SBS,Ed.Knoppel H. and Wolkoff,p25-36
37.Tichenor,B.A.,Measurement of Organic Compound Emissions Using Small Test Chambers,Environment International,Vol.15,p.389-396,(1989)
38.www.blauer-engel.de/englisch/navigation/body_blauer_engel.htm，RAL-UZ-076
39.X.Yang,Q.Chen,J.Zeng, J.S.Zhang,C.YShaw，A mass transfer model for simulating volatile organic compound emissions from“wet”coating materials applied to absorptive substrates,International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer 44 p1803-1815，(2001)
40.Yang,X, “Study of Building Material Emissions and Indoor Air Quality” Ph.D.Thesis.Department of Architecture,MIT,Cambridge,MA 02139-4307
41.Zhang LZ, Liu JL. Modeling VOCs emissions in the room with a single-zone multi-component multi-layer technique. Building and Environment;39:523–31,(2004)
42.野崎淳夫、池田耕一、吉澤 晉、山崎唯史，建材(複合材)狀物質發生機構-建材VOC,甲醛污染物相關研究(4)，日本建築學會大會學術演講概集，(1999)

中文部份(依中文姓氏第一個字筆劃排序)
1.行政院環境保護署，〝空氣檢驗分析方法建立與驗證－空氣中揮發有機化合物檢驗方法驗證〞，EPA-85-3305-09-02，(1996)
2.行政院環境保護署，〝空氣中揮發性有機化合物檢測方法－不銹鋼採樣筒/氣相層析質譜儀法〞，NIEA A715.11B，( 2000).
3.江哲銘、王文安、周伯丞，建築室內環境保健控制綜合指標之研究，內政部建築研究所，(1999)
4.江哲銘、李俊璋，〝塗料類建材有機逸散物資料庫之建立〞，內政部建築研究所，(2002)
5.江哲銘、李俊璋，〝建材有機逸散物資料庫之建立—地板類建材〞，內政部建築研究所，(2003)
6.江哲銘，全尺寸建材逸散模擬實驗室標準檢測作業程序之研究，內政部建研所，(2005)
7.江哲銘、李彥頤、邵文政、蘇慧貞，相關裝修變因對辦公空間揮發性有機污染物濃度影響分析，建築學報第51期，p1~21，(2005)
8.任憶安、吳萬益、陳麗琴、塗三賢，台灣木質地板市場調查分析，台灣林業科學1997，12(4)：451-458，(1997)
9.李昭興，辦公空間相關變數對揮發性有機化物質濃度影響之研究-以台灣辦公空間為例，成大碩論，(2002)
10.邵文政，「建材揮發性有機化合物管制策略之研究」，成大建研所博士論文，(2006)
11.綠建材解說與評估手冊，內政部建築研究所，(2007)
12.陳丁于，台灣地區室內環境因子對建材揮發性有機物質逸散行為影響之研究，成大建研所碩士論文，(2002)
13.陳振誠，「台灣本土氣候下換氣率影響建材有機物質逸散特性之研究-以合板及清漆為例」，成大建研所碩士論文，(2004)
14.陳家鋒，「複層建材揮發性有機物質逸散特性之研究-以溶劑型接著劑為例」，成大建研所碩士論文，(2005)
15.張志成、周淑梅，建築室內逸散物質檢測分析研究(一)，(1999)
16.賴耿陽，多孔材料學(Pore Structure properties of materials)，復漢，(1990)
17.鍾基強、吳友烈、陳建郎、陳志豪，通風系統最佳耗能與生命週期及健康風險平衡之研究，行政院國家科學委員會研究計畫，(2005)
18.蘇慧貞、江哲銘、李俊璋，高雄市辦公大樓之室內空氣品質調查與健康危害之評估，高雄市政府環境保護局，(1999)
19.蘇慧貞、江哲銘，室內空氣品質檢測方法之研究，中華民國建築學會「建築學報」第51期，春季號，(2003)