| 研究生: |
伍贊宇 Wu, Tsan-Yu |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
具備足踝機構之改造柔性行人下肢衝擊器開發與其於行人-機車碰撞之應用 Development of an Ankle Foot Mechanism to Retrofit the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor on Pedestrian-Motorcycle Crashes |
| 指導教授: |
黃才烱
Huang, Tsai-Jeon |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系 Department of Mechanical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 190 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 行人交通事故 、柔性行人下肢衝擊器 、踝關節傷害 、行人下肢傷害 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Pedestrian Collision, Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor, Ankle Injury, Pedestrian Lower Limb Injury |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:41 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在台灣複雜又擁擠的道路設計下,步行用路人正面臨著巨大的安全隱患,又因道路規劃與國人駕駛習慣不良等因素,導致行人步行路徑與機車行車路線高度重疊,使機車成為台灣行人在道路安全中最大的威脅。相關事故統計指出,行人遭遇交通事故,撞擊點集中於下肢,使其成為最常受損的部位,機車之撞擊點又較汽車更低,且車體缺乏吸能結構,更容易造成脛骨骨折與踝關節韌帶撕裂等傷害,儘管這些傷害的致死率低,但其造成的長期甚至永久殘疾與高昂復健成本等問題,仍會對傷者日常生活造成非常大的不便,其嚴重性不可忽視。
次系統測試目前已廣泛應用於汽車安全領域,其中已開發出多款行人下肢腿模,但其對於踝關節機構之設計均不夠充足,難以重現真實行人足踝關節的碰撞響應,因此,本研究目的為設計出一款改造足踝關節機構,並將其整合至柔性行人下肢衝擊器上,以期為此下肢腿模提供更加完整且符合生物擬真性之碰撞響應。
本研究首先建構柔性行人下肢衝擊器有限元模型,並按照官方規定之流程,通過準靜態測試與動態鐘擺測試。接著利用實體踝關節準靜態實驗與數值模擬取得各旋轉自由度之扭矩負載與卸載曲線,隨後將曲線輸入踝關節有限元模型,並通過了官方規定之三種動態測試。接著將踝關節機構整合至腿模,開發出改造柔性行人下肢衝擊器有限元模型;與原版腿模比較結果顯示,改造腿模可以大程度保留原腿模在第一碰撞下的動態響應,並增加踝關節之撞擊響應。最後,本研究將改造腿模應用於行人-機車正側面撞擊案例分析,結果顯示初始衝擊力為導致行人受傷的主因;在高速撞擊下,行人脛骨中下段、膝關節外側副韌帶與踝關節內側之受傷風險顯著提升;中低速撞擊則僅有踝關節內側之受傷風險顯著提升。
In Taiwan's complex traffic environment, pedestrian pathways heavily overlap with motorcycle routes, making motorcycle collisions the leading cause of lower limb injuries among pedestrians. However, existing Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactors (FLEX-PLI) lack a comprehensive ankle mechanism, limiting its ability to accurately replicate the collision response of the human ankle joint. Therefore, this thesis aims to design a modified ankle joint mechanism and integrate it into the FLEX-PLI GTR to enhance its overall impact biofidelity.
In this study, finite element models of the FLEX-PLI GTR and the ankle foot mechanism were constructed and validated via quasi-static and dynamic testing in compliance with official regulatory standards. After integrating the ankle mechanism into the legform, the retrofitted legform not only preserved the original dynamic response during initial impact but also significantly enhanced the ankle's impact response. Applying this retrofitted legform to pedestrian-motorcycle side-collision analyses revealed that the initial impact force was the primary cause of injury; high-speed impacts (60 km/h) significantly increased the injury risks to the middle-lower tibia, knee lateral collateral ligament, and medial ankle, whereas low-to-medium speed impacts (30, 40km/h) primarily elevated the injury risk to the medial ankle.
Alloys, W. A. (2015). International alloy designations and chemical composition limits for wrought aluminum and.
Been, B., Burleigh, M., Konosu, A., Issiki, T., Takahashi, Y., & Suzuki, H. (2009). Development of a Biofidelic Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor Type GTR prototype, Part 2: Technical Details. 21th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,
Begeman, P., Balakrishnan, P., Levine, R., & King, A. (1993). Dynamic human ankle response to inversion and eversion (0148-7191).
Begeman, P. C., & Prasad, P. (1990). Human ankle impact response in dorsiflexion. Stapp Car Crash Conference,
Bhalla, K. S., Bose, D., Madeley, N., Kerrigan, J., Crandall, J. R., Longhitano, D. C., & Takahashi, Y. (2003). Evaluation of the response of mechanical pedestrian knee joint impactors in bending and shear loading. Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,
C.Schmied, T.Erhart, T.Borvall, N.Karajan, & M.Schenke. (2020). Implicit Analysis using LS-DYNA Tips & Tricks for sucessful implicit analyses.
Center_of_Applied_Biomechanics. (2025). THOR 50th Male Finite Element Model. University of Virginia.
Chalandon, S., Serre, T., Masson, C., Minne, F., Arnoux, P.-J., Perrin, C., Borde, P., Cotte, C., Brunet, C., & Cesari, D. (2007). A comparative study between subsystem and global approaches for the pedestrian impact. Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV), Lyon, France.
Chang, W. (2022). Taiwan’s ‘living hell’ traffic is a tourism problem, say critics. CNN travel. https://edition.cnn.com/travel/article/taiwan-traffic-war-tourism-intl-hnk
Choi, H. Y., Shin, J. Y., Lee, I., Ahn, C. N., & Bae, H. I. (2005). Finite element modeling of THOR-LX and its application. SAE Paper(05-0125).
Craig, M., Parent, D., Lee, E., Rudd, R., & Takhounts, E. (2020). Injury Criteria for the THOR 50th Male ATD. NHTSA Injury Research Division.
Crandall, J. R., Portier, L., Petit, P., Hall, G. W., Bass, C. R., Klopp, G. S., Hurwitz, S., Pilkey, W. D., Trosseille, X., & Tarrière, C. (1996). Biomechanical response and physical properties of the leg, foot, and ankle (0148-7191).
Dempster, W. T. (1955). Space requirements of the seated operator, geometrical, kinematic, and mechanical aspects of the body with special reference to the limbs.
Funk, J. R., Srinivasan, S. C., Crandall, J. R., Khaewpong, N., Eppinger, R. H., Jaffredo, A. S., Potier, P., & Petit, P. Y. (2002). The effects of axial preload and dorsiflexion on the tolerance of the ankle/subtalar joint to dynamic inversion and eversion. 46th Stapp Car Crash Conference (2002),
GESAC. (2005a). BIOMECHANICAL RESPONSE REQUIREMENTS OF THE THOR NHTSA ADVANCED FRONTAL DUMMY. Report No . GESAC-05-03.
GESAC. (2005b). THOR CERTIFICATION MANUAL. Report No . GESAC-05-04.
Han, Y.-H., Lee, I.-H., & Lee, W.-R. (2019). Development of a Flex-PLI System Model and Investigations of Injury 2nd Japanese Modelica Conference, Tokyo, Japan.
Hayashi, S., Awano, M., & Nishimura, I. (2009). Development of a Flex-PLI LS-DYNA Model.
Huang, W.-H., & Jou, R.-C. (2025). Does developing public transportation reduce motorcycle Usage? Evidence from Taiwan. Transport Policy, 171, 389–407.
Humanetics. (2012). Flex-PLI-GTR Technical Product Sheet.
Humanetics. (2015). Reviewed FlexPLI version GTR drawing package, Rev. 4
Humanetics. (2018a). FLEX PLI GTR USER MANUAL Rev K.
Humanetics. (2018b). THOR-50th Percentile Male Dummy User Manual 472-9900 [Rev. F].
Hussain, Q., Feng, H., Grzebieta, R., Brijs, T., & Olivier, J. (2019). The relationship between impact speed and the probability of pedestrian fatality during a vehicle-pedestrian crash: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 129, 241–249.
Isshiki, T., Konosu, A., & Takahashi, Y. (2016). Development and evaluation of the advanced pedestrian legform impactor prototype which can be applicable to all types of vehicles regardless of bumper height-Part 1: finite element model. Proceedings of the International Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conference,
Ivarsson, J., Lesley, D., Kerrigan, J., Bhalla, K. S., Bose, D., Crandall, J. R., & Kent, R. W. (2004). Dynamic response corridors and injury thresholds of the pedestrian lower extremities. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conference,
Kajzer, J., Matsui, Y., Ishikawa, H., Schroeder, G., & Bosch, U. (1999). Shearing and bending effects at the knee joint at low speed lateral loading. International Congress & Exposition,
Kajzer, J., Schroeder, G., Ishikawa, H., Matsui, Y., & Bosch, U. (1997). Shearing and bending effects at the knee joint at high speed lateral loading. SAE transactions, 3682–3696.
Kerrigan, J. R., Drinkwater, D., Kam, C., Murphy, D., Ivarsson, B., Crandall, J., & Patrie, J. (2004). Tolerance of the human leg and thigh in dynamic latero-medial bending. International Journal of Crashworthiness, 9(6), 607–623.
King, A. I. (2018). The biomechanics of impact injury. Springer.
Konosu, A., Ishikawa, H., & Tanahashi, M. (2001). Reconsideration of injury criteria for pedestrian subsystem legform test~ Problems of rigid legform impactor.
Konosu, A., Issiki, T., Takahashi, Y., Suzuki, H., Been, B., & Burleigh, M. (2009). Development of a Biofidelic Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor Type GTR Prototype, Part 1: Development and Technical Evaluations. Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,
Kuppa, S., Wang, J., Haffner, M., & Eppinger, R. (2001). Lower extremity injuries and associated injury criteria.
Li, G., Otte, D., Yang, J., & Simms, C. (2016). Pedestrian injury trends evaluated by comparison of the PCDS and GIDAS databases. Proc. Int. Research Council on Biomechanics of Injury (IRCOBI) Conf., Seoul, Korea,
Longhitano, D. C., & Turley, J. E. (2001). Lower extremity response of the Thor-LX compared to the Hybrid-III lower leg in frontal barrier crash tests. International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,
Mallory, A., & Stammen, J. (2006). Lower extremity pedestrian injury in the US: a summary of PCDS data. NHTSA Vehicle Research and Test Center, UNECE Document number WP29-44-03e.
Miyazaki, H., Kitagawa, Y., Yasuki, T., Kuwahara, M., & Matsuoka, F. (2009). Development of flexible pedestrian legform impactor FE model and comparative study with leg behavior of human FE model THUMS. Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,
Mizuno, Y., & Ishikawa, H. (2001). Summary of IHRA pedestrian safety WG activities-proposed test methods to evaluate pedestrian protection afforded by passenger cars. Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles,
NHTSA. (2004). CERTIFICATION PROCEDURE FOR THE THOR-LX/HYBRID III RETROFIT VERSION 3.2
NHTSA. (2018a). Parts List and Drawings THOR-50M Advanced Frontal Crash Test Dummy THOR-50M Male.
NHTSA. (2018b). THOR 50th Percentile Male (THOR-50M) Qualification Procedures Manual.
Nyquist, G. W., Cheng, R., El-Bohy, A. A., & King, A. I. (1985). Tibia bending: strength and response (0148-7191).
Pai, C.-W., Chen, P.-L., Ma, S.-T., Wu, S.-H., Linkov, V., & Ma, H.-P. (2019). Walking against or with traffic? Evaluating pedestrian fatalities and head injuries in Taiwan. BMC public health, 19(1), 1280.
Peña Fernández, M., Hoxha, D., Chan, O., Mordecai, S., Blunn, G. W., Tozzi, G., & Goldberg, A. (2020). Centre of rotation of the human subtalar joint using weight-bearing clinical computed tomography. Scientific reports, 10(1), 1035.
Pew_Research_Center. (2015). Car, bike or motorcycle? Depends on where you live. https://www.pewresearch.org/?p=13501
Portier, L., Petit, P., Dômont, A., Trosseille, X., Le Coz, J.-Y., Tarrière, C., & Lassau, J.-P. (1997). Dynamic biomechanical dorsiflexion responses and tolerances of the ankle joint complex (0148-7191).
Reid, J. D., Lechtenberg, K. A., & Stolle, C. S. (2010). Development of advanced finite element material models for cable barrier wire rope.
Reith, G., Lefering, R., Wafaisade, A., Hensel, K. O., Paffrath, T., Bouillon, B., Probst, C., & Dgu, T. (2015). Injury pattern, outcome and characteristics of severely injured pedestrian. Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine, 23(1), 56.
Ridella, S., & Parent, D. (2011). Modifications to improve the durability, usability and biofidelity of the THOR-NT dummy. 22nd ESV conference, Paper,
Rudd, R., Crandall, J., Millington, S., Hurwitz, S., & Höglund, N. (2004). Injury tolerance and response of the ankle joint in dynamic dorsiflexion. 48th Stapp Car Crash Conference,
Shah, C. S., Zhu, F., Van De Velde, R., & Kant, R. (2010). A New Development in Pedestrian Safety: The FLEX-PLI GTR LS-DYNA® Model LS-DYNA Forum, Bamberg 2010.
Stolle, C. S., & Reid, J. D. (2010). Modeling wire rope used in cable barrier systems. Proceedings of the 11th International LS-DYNA Users Conference,
Teresiński, G., & Mądro, R. (2001). Ankle joint injuries as a reconstruction parameter in car-to-pedestrian accidents. Forensic science international, 118(1), 65–73.
theplasticshop.co.uk. Technical Data Sheet for Nylon 66 Rod , Sheet and Tube. https://www.theplasticshop.co.uk/plastic_technical_data_sheets/nylon_66_technical_data_sheet.pdf
Thunert, C. (2025). CORAplus Release 4.2.0 User's Manual.
UN/ECE/WP29/GSRP/INF-GR-PS/FLEX-PLI-Subgroup. (2006). Information on the Flexible Pedestrian Legform Impactor GT Alpha (Flex-GTa). TEG-021e.
UN/ECE/WP29/GSRP/INF-GR-PS/FLEX-PLI-Subgroup. (2007). Development of an FE Biofidelic Flexible Pedestrain Legform Impactor Model (FLEX-GT-prototype Model). TEG-031.
UN/ECE/WP29/GSRP/INF-GR-PS/FLEX-PLI-Subgroup. (2008). FLEX-PLI-GTR Development Mechanical Design.
UN/ECE/WP29/GSRP/INF-GR-PS/FLEX-PLI-Subgroup. (2009). Technical Background Information Document for the UN-ECE GRSP explaining the Derivation of Threshold Values and Impactor Certification methods for the FlexPLI version GTR agreed by the FlexPLI-TEG at their 9th Meeting. TEG-127.
UNECE. (2009). Global technical regulation No. 9 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
Varellis, J., Campbell, J. Q., & Tannous, R. E. (2004). Development and validation of a finite element model of the THOR lower extremity. NHTSA Report, February.
WHO. (2023). Global status repot on road safety 2023.
Zander, O., Wisch, M., Ott, J., Burleigh, M., Peldschus, S., & Hynd, D. (2019). Development and evaluation of an upper body mass (UBM) for the flexible pedestrian legform impactor (FlexPLI) and for incorporation within improved test and assessment procedures–results from SENIORS. Proc Int’l Res Council on Biomech Injury, 397–415.
交通部公路局. (2026). 機動車輛登記數.
交通部公路局規劃組. (2026). 省道速限圖資.
交通部統計處. (2024). 111年民眾日常使用運具狀況調查(公共版). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6141/TW-SRDA-AG100010-1
交通部路政及道安司. (2025). 道安總動員. https://doi.org/https://roadsafety.tw/
全國法規資料庫. (2026). 道路交通安全規則-第93條.
吳建勳. (2015). 應用於速克達機車之行人機械下肢衝擊器建模 國立成功大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市.
杜好仁. (2021). 中部某消防局分隊行人交通事故救護資訊分析 朝陽科技大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台中市.
林煌智. (2024). 行人事故特性分析及防範策略之研究 —以新北市中和區為例 中央警察大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 桃園縣.
俞泰華. (2012). 行人與機車騎士下肢碰撞模擬及傷害評估 國立成功大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市.
張開國, 葉祖宏, 賴靜慧, 喻世祥, & 周文靜. (2019). 弱勢用路人交通安全行動方案之研訂 臺北市.
鄭維仁. (2014). 真實行人下肢有限元素模型之設計驗證與碰撞傷害評估 國立成功大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 台南市.
鄭麗菁, 鍾敦輝, 陳建行, & 賴昆城. (2008). GRAY’S 醫用解剖學. 臺北市: 合記.(Richard L. Drake, Wayne Vogl & Adam WM Mitchell, 2005).