成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	馬映蕎 Ma, Ying-Kiu
論文名稱：	工業設計教育中不同產品設計流程對知識創造歷程的影響 The Impact Of Different Product Design Processes On Knowledge Creation In Industrial Design Education
指導教授：	洪郁修 Hung, Yu-Hsiu
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年：	2025
畢業學年度：	113
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	254
中文關鍵詞：	知識創造、產品設計流程、SECI模型、工業設計教育、精實開發
外文關鍵詞：	knowledge creation, product design process, SECI model, industrial design, lean development
相關次數：	點閱：32 下載：5
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究探討不同產品設計流程對工業設計教育中知識創造的影響。研究特別比較了產品開發流程與精實產品開發流程，聚焦於各自對設計學生之間知識流動與轉化的影響。研究目標包括辨識知識創造活動的差異、檢視隱性與顯性知識的轉化，以及確定影響知識流動與創新的關鍵因素。
研究採用混合方法，結合量化調查與質性訪談。量化部分使用經過驗證的問卷，根據SECI模型（社會化、外化、結合、內化）結構化設計，用以評估學生的知識創造能力與知識創造在流程實踐。質性部分則透過對參與產品開發專案的學生進行半結構訪談，以深入了解團隊互動與知識管理實踐。
研究結果顯示，雖然兩組學生在知識創造能力上表現出相似的水平，但精實產品開發流程顯著提升了學生在知識外化與結合方面的能力，特別是在使用結構化工具與數據驅動方法的情境下。然而，在社會化與內化層面未發現顯著差異，這表明團隊文化與長期學習在這些方面扮演更重要的角色。研究結果突顯了兩種流程的互補優勢：精實產品開發流程在知識表達與整合的效率與清晰度上具有優勢，而產品開發流程則支持系統性知識保存與跨團隊合作。
總結來說，本研究建議整合兩種設計流程的優勢，以創造一個平衡創新速度與可持續知識管理的學習環境。這些洞察為高等教育中的課程設計提供了寶貴的指導。

This research explores the impact of different product design processes on knowledge creation within industrial design education. The study specifically compares the conventional product development process and the lean product development process, focusing on how each influences the flow and transformation of knowledge among design students. The research objectives are to identify differences in knowledge creation activities, examine the conversion of tacit and explicit knowledge, and determine key factors affecting knowledge flow and innovation.
A mixed-methods approach was adopted, combining quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews. The quantitative component utilized validated questionnaires to assess knowledge creation ability of students and knowledge creation practice in the design process, structured according to the SECI model (Socialization, Externalization, Combination, Internalization). The qualitative component involved semi-structured interviews with students who participated in product development projects, allowing for a deeper understanding of team interactions and knowledge management practices.
Results indicate that while both groups of students demonstrated similar levels of knowledge creation ability, the lean product development process significantly enhanced students’ capabilities in externalizing and combining knowledge, particularly through the use of structured tools and data-driven approaches. However, no significant differences were found in socialization and internalization dimensions, suggesting that team culture and long-term learning play a more critical role in these aspects. The findings highlight the complementary strengths of both processes: lean methods foster efficiency and clarity in knowledge expression and integration, whereas conventional processes support systematic knowledge preservation and cross-team collaboration.
In conclusion, the study recommends integrating the strengths of both design processes to create a learning environment that balances innovation speed with sustainable knowledge management. These insights offer valuable guidance for curriculum design in higher education.

SUMMARY	iii
摘要	v
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS	vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS	vii
LIST OF TABLES	xi
LIST OF FIGURES	xii
LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS	xiii
CHAPTER 1 Introduction	1
1 Research Background	1
2 Research Motivation	3
3 Current State Of Research And Challenges	4
4 Research Gaps	5
5 Research Objectives And Questions	6
6 Research Contributions	7
CHAPTER 2 Literature Review	8
1 Product Development In university	8
1.1 Product Development Process and lean product development process on knowledge creation	14
2 Application Of Research Method	16
3 Literature Review Summary	18
CHAPTER 3 Research hypothesis	20
1 Research Hypothesis Background	20
2 Definition Of Research Grouping	21
3 Research Hypothesis Construction	23
3.1 Research Hypothesis Verification	25
4 Summary Of Research Hypotheses	26
CHAPTER 4 Research Methods	27
1 Research Design	27
1.1 Research Framework And Process Definition	27
1.2 Definition Of Each Groups Process	28
1.3 Key Differences Of Product Development Process	28
1.4 Comparison Of SECI Model Processes	30
2 Research Samples	31
2.1 Sample Recruitment And Screening Criteria	31
2.2 Research Period And Methods	32
2.3 Group Definition And Sample Distribution	32
2.4 Research Design And Sample Limitations	32
3 Research Tools And Data Collection	33
3.1 Quantitative Tools And Data Collection Process	33
3.2 Qualitative Tools And Data Collection Process	34
4 Data Analysis	35
4.1 Quantitative Data Analysis Methods	35
4.2 Qualitative Data Analysis Methods	36
4.3 Limitations Of The Research Analysis	37
5 Research Ethics Explanation	37
6 Research Process And Steps	37
CHAPTER 5 Research Results	40
1 Quantitative Research Results	40
1.1 Descriptive Statistics Results Of Quantitative Research	40
1.2 Statistical Results Of Knowledge Creation Ability	41
1.3 Statistical Results Of Knowledge Creation Practices	44
1.4 Summary Of Quantitative Research Results	46
2 Qualitative Research Results	46
2.1 Interviewee Information	46
2.2 Experiences Of Each Interviewee	48
2.3 Similarities And Differences Among The Interviewees	50
2.4 Analysis Of Explicit And Tacit Knowledge	51
2.5 Analysis Of Each Interviewee Knowledge Creation Process	54
2.6 Summary Of Qualitative Research Findings	67
3 Mixed Research Results	68
3.1 Integration Of Quantitative And Qualitative Results	68
4 Research Findings Summary	71
CHAPTER 6 Research Discussion	73
1 Research Discussion	73
2 Verification And Discussion Of Research Hypotheses	74
2.1 Verification And Discussion Of Hypotheses 1	74
2.2 Verification And Discussion Of Hypotheses 2	75
2.3 Verification And Discussion Of Hypotheses 3	76
2.4 Verification And Discussion Of Hypotheses 4	76
2.5 Hypothesis Verification Summary	77
3 Analysis Of Qualitative Results	79
3.1 Qualitative Discussion On Problem Definition And Requirements Elicitation Process	79
3.2 Qualitative Discussion On The Results Of Information Collection And Investigation Processes	80
3.3 Discussion Of Qualitative Results On Concept Ideation And Development Process	81
3.4 Qualitative Discussion On The Process Of Concept Selection And Refinement	81
3.5 Discussion Of Qualitative Results From The Prototyping And Testing Process	82
3.6 Discussion Of Qualitative Results On Design Modification And Process Optimization	82
3.7 Qualitative Results Discussion Of The Presentation Process	83
3.8 Comprehensive Discussion of Qualitative Results In The Product Development Process Steps	83
4 Theoretical And Practical Implications	87
4.1 Theoretical Validation Of The SECI Model In University Product Development Processes	87
4.2 The Contribution Of Processes To Knowledge Preservation, Transmission, And The Field Of Education	88
4.3 Summary Of Research Discussion	89
CHAPTER 7 Research Conclusion	91
1 Summary Of Main Findings	91
2 Discussion of Results and Theoretical Connections	92
2.1 Comparison With Previous Literature And Unexpected Findings	94
2.2 Summary Of Results Discussion And Theoretical Connections	95
3 Practical Implications And Educational Recommendations	95
3.1 Practical Implications	95
3.2 Educational Recommendations	96
4 Research Limitations And Future Prospects	97
4.1 Research Limitations	97
4.2 Suggestions For Future Research	99
REFERENCES	101
Appendix A Suvrey data	112
A.1 Content Validity Of Knowledge Creation Questionnaire	112
A.2  Content Validity Of Knowledge Creation Capability Questionnaire	114
A.3  Knowledge Creation Processes Corresponding to Questions in the Knowledge Creation Questionnaire	116
Appendix B Semi-Structured Interview Questions for Knowledge Creation	120
B.1  Semi-Structured Interview Questions	120
Appendix C Thesis (Chinese version)	122
                                    

Ahmed, R., Khan, M. R., & Tufail, M. M. B. (2023). Accelerating firm’s operational performance through GSCM practices and lean management: A case of the textile sector of Karachi. International Journal of Management Research and Emerging Sciences, 13(4), 33-53.
Aikhuele, D., & Turan, F. (2018). A conceptual model for the implementation of lean product development. International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), 9(1), 1-9.
Alanoğlu, M., Karabatak, S., & Karabatak, M. (2021). Investigation of self-directed learning skills of distance education students. Paper presented at the 2021 9th International Symposium on Digital Forensics and Security (ISDFS).
Albers, A., Gronau, N., Rapp, S., Grum, M., Zaiser, A., Bursac, N., & Weber, E. (2018). Influencing factors and methods for knowledge transfer situations in Product Generation Engineering based on the SECI model. DS 91: Proceedings of NordDesign 2018, Linköping, Sweden, 14th-17th August 2018.
Albuquerque, F., Torres, A. S., & Berssaneti, F. T. (2020). Lean product development and agile project management in the construction industry. Revista de Gestão, 27(2), 135-151.
Anand, G., & Kodali, R. (2008). A conceptual framework for lean supply chain and its implementation. International Journal of Value Chain Management, 2(3), 313-357.
Andreeva, T., & Ikhilchik, I. (2011). Applicability of the SECI model of knowledge creation in Russian cultural context: theoretical analysis. Knowledge and Process Management, 18, 56-66. doi:10.1002/KPM.351
Arenas, J. J., & González, D. (2018). Technology transfer models and elements in the university-industry collaboration. Administrative sciences, 8(2), 19.
Asiri, A., & Finlay, J. (2025). Digital competencies of public library professionals in England. Journal of Electronic Resources Librarianship, 37(1), 35-57.
Baldé, M., Ferreira, A., & Maynard, T. (2018). SECI driven creativity: the role of team trust and intrinsic motivation. J. Knowl. Manag., 22, 1688-1711. doi:10.1108/JKM-06-2017-0241
Bandera, C., Bartolacci, M. R., & Passerini, K. (2016). Knowledge management and entrepreneurship: A contradictory recipe. International Journal of Knowledge Management (IJKM), 12(3), 1-14.
Bartezzaghi, E., Corso, M., & Verganti, R. (1997). Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development. International journal of technology Management, 14(1), 116-138.
Baskerville, R., & Dulipovici, A. (2006). The theoretical foundations of knowledge management. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 4(2), 83-105.
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
Beech, N., MacIntosh, R., MacLean, D., Shepherd, J., & Stokes, J. (2002). Exploring constraints on developing knowledge: On the need for conflict. Management Learning, 33(4), 459-475.
Boomsma, R., van den Brink, C., & Van Kann, F. (2021). Co-creation and the role of the expert knowledge herein. A case study of the.
Bothorel, H., Pernoud, A., & Christofilopoulos, P. (2024). Translation and cross-cultural adaptation into french of the harris hip score and the modified harris hip score. Patient Related Outcome Measures, 81-91.
Budiyanto, K. K., Harapan, E., Purwanto, M. B., & Smaratungga, S. (2024). 21st century English learning: A revolution in skills, critical thinking, creativity, and visual communication. Asian J. Appl. Educ, 3(1), 43-54.
Canonico, P., De Nito, E., Esposito, V., Iacono, M. P., & Consiglio, S. (2020). Knowledge creation in the automotive industry: Analysing obeya-oriented practices using the SECI model. Journal of Business Research, 112, 450-457.
Carmen Camelo‐Ordaz, M., Fernández‐Alles, M., Martín‐Alcázar, F., Romero‐Fernández, P. M., & Valle‐Cabrera, R. (2004). Internal diversification strategies and the processes of knowledge creation. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(1), 77-93.
Chatti, M. A., Klamma, R., Jarke, M., & Naeve, A. (2007). The Web 2.0 driven SECI model based learning process. Paper presented at the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).
Cheng, E. (2020). Knowledge management for improving school strategic planning. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49, 824-840. doi:10.1177/1741143220918255
Cleveland, W. J. (2023). How is Design Thinking Applied in Practice? : Drexel University.
Comm, C. L., & Mathaisel, D. F. (2005). An exploratory study of best lean sustainability practices in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 13(3), 227-240.
Corno, F., Reinmoeller, P., & Nonaka, I. (1999). Knowledge Creation within Industrial Systems. Journal of Management and Governance, 3, 379-394. doi:10.1023/A:1009936712733
Costa, A., Presenza, A., & Abbate, T. (2023). Digital transformation in family-owned winery SMEs: an exploratory analysis in the South-Italian context. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 527-551.
Dahmani, N., Benhida, K., Belhadi, A., Kamble, S., Elfezazi, S., & Jauhar, S. K. (2021). Smart circular product design strategies towards eco-effective production systems: A lean eco-design industry 4.0 framework. Journal of cleaner production, 320, 128847.
Dai, W., Liu, Q., Gao, Y., Liu, W., & Ouyang, S. (2025). Optimizing Curriculum Design for Professorship Education Using CAD and Neural Network Technologies. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 20(1), 1-24.
Dal Forno, A. J., Forcellini, F. A., Kipper, L. M., & Pereira, F. A. (2016). Method for evaluation via benchmarking of the lean product development process: Multiple case studies at Brazilian companies. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 23(4), 792-816.
De Castro Peixoto, L., Barbosa, R., & De Faria, A. F. (2021). Management of Regional Knowledge: Knowledge Flows Among University, Industry, and Government. Journal of the knowledge economy, 13, 92-110. doi:10.1007/s13132-020-00702-9
Enkhtur, A., Zhang, X., Li, M., & Chen, L. (2024). Exploring an effective international higher education partnership model through virtual student mobility programs: A case study. ECNU Review of Education, 20965311241232691.
Eriksson, P. E., Leiringer, R., & Szentes, H. (2017). The role of co-creation in enhancing explorative and exploitative learning in project-based settings. Project management journal, 48(4), 22-38.
Farnese, M., Barbieri, B., Chirumbolo, A., & Patriotta, G. (2019). Managing Knowledge in Organizations: A Nonaka’s SECI Model Operationalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02730
Freitas, R. d. C., Freitas, M. d. C. D., Gomes de Menezes, G., & Odorczyk, R. S. (2018). Lean Office contributions for organizational learning. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(5), 1027-1039.
Fritz, C. O., Morris, P. E., & Richler, J. J. (2012). Effect size estimates: current use, calculations, and interpretation. Journal of experimental psychology: General, 141(1), 2.
Gaur, A. S., Ma, H., & Ge, B. (2019). MNC strategy, knowledge transfer context, and knowledge flow in MNEs. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(9), 1885-1900.
Glisby, M., & Holden, N. (2003). Contextual constraints in knowledge management theory: the cultural embeddedness of Nonaka's knowledge‐creating company. Knowledge and Process Management, 10(1), 29-36.
Gómez-Molina, D.-L., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2022). Lean management in universities: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 13(1), 156-177.
González-Pérez, L. I., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2022). Components of Education 4.0 in 21st century skills frameworks: systematic review. Sustainability, 14(3), 1493.
Hines, P., Francis, M., & Found, P. (2006). Towards lean product lifecycle management: A framework for new product development. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 17(7), 866-887.
Hu, J., Lee, J., & Yi, X. (2023). Blended knowledge sharing model in design professional. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 16326. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-43505-z
Hubers, M., Poortman, C., Schildkamp, K., Pieters, J., & Handelzalts, A. (2016). Opening the black box: knowledge creation in data teams. 1, 41-68. doi:10.1108/JPCC-07-2015-0003
Jakubik, M. (2008). Experiencing collaborative knowledge creation processes. The Learning Organization, 15(1), 5-25.
Jakubik, M. (2011). Becoming to know: Essays on extended epistemology of knowledge creation: Svenska handelshögskolan.
Kakouris, A., & Liargovas, P. (2021). Introducing art in entrepreneurial teaching: A theoretical framework. Paper presented at the European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship.
Karlsson, C., & Åhlström, P. (1996). The difficult path to lean product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 283-295. doi:10.1016/S0737-6782(96)00033-1
Kayyali, M. (2025). Internationalization of Higher Education: Frameworks, Challenges, and Future Trends. In Contemporary Approaches to Internationalization in Higher Education (pp. 1-36): IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
King, W. R. (2009). Knowledge management and organizational learning. In Knowledge management and organizational learning (pp. 3-13): Springer.
Lai, I. K., & Lu, T.-W. (2016). How to improve the university–industry collaboration in Taiwan's animation industry? Academic vs. industrial perspectives. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(6), 717-732.
León, H. C. M., & Farris, J. A. (2011). Lean product development research: Current state and future directions. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 29-51.
Leonard-Barton, D., Swap, W. C., & Barton, G. (2015). Critical knowledge transfer: Tools for managing your company's deep smarts: Harvard Business Press.
Li, M., Liu, H., & Zhou, J. (2018). G-SECI model-based knowledge creation for CoPS innovation: the role of grey knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(4), 887-911.
Liker, J. K., & Morgan, J. (2011). Lean product development as a system: a case study of body and stamping development at Ford. Engineering Management Journal, 23(1), 16-28.
Liu, C. (2024). The application of AI and product innovation efficiency: the role of knowledge innovation under SECI model. Aslib Journal of Information Management. doi:10.1108/ajim-04-2024-0348
Lubinga, S. N., Maramura, T. C., & Masiya, T. (2023). Adoption of Fourth Industrial Revolution: challenges in South African higher education institutions.
Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing research, 35(6), 382-386.
Ma, F., Zhao, H., & Wu, C. (2023). The impact of task-oriented leadership to subordinates' knowledge creation behavior–based on organismic integration theory. International Journal of Manpower, 44(2), 283-298.
Macleod, H., Sinclair, C., Haywood, J., & Woodgate, A. (2016). Massive Open Online Courses: designing for the unknown learner. Teaching in Higher Education, 21(1), 13-24.
Malhotra, A., & Majchrzak, A. (2004). Enabling knowledge creation in far‐flung teams: best practices for IT support and knowledge sharing. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8(4), 75-88.
Mariano, S., & Awazu, Y. (2017). The role of collaborative knowledge building in the co-creation of artifacts: Influencing factors and propositions. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(4), 779-795.
Metaxiotis, K., & Psarras, J. (2003). Applying knowledge management in higher education: the creation of a learning organisation. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 2(04), 353-359.
Muscio, A., & Vallanti, G. (2014). Perceived obstacles to university–industry collaboration: Results from a qualitative survey of Italian academic departments. Industry and innovation, 21(5), 410-429.
Nachar, N. (2008). The Mann-Whitney U: A test for assessing whether two independent samples come from the same distribution. Tutorials in quantitative Methods for Psychology, 4(1), 13-20.
Nonaka, I., & Konno, N. (1998). The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. California Management Review, 40, 40-54. doi:10.2307/41165942
Nonaka, L., Takeuchi, H., & Umemoto, K. (1996). A theory of organizational knowledge creation. International journal of technology Management, 11(7-8), 833-845.
Okoye, K. (2022). Using Strategic Intelligence and Technology as building block for Educational Innovation: a conceptual framework towards the impact for outcome-based education. Paper presented at the 2022 4th International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical, Electronic and Communications Engineering (ELECOM).
Oppenheim, B. (2004). Lean product development flow. Systems Engineering, 7. doi:10.1002/sys.20014
Otoom, A. A., Atoum, I., Al-Harahsheh, H., Aljawarneh, M., Al Refai, M. N., & Baklizi, M. (2024). A collaborative cybersecurity framework for higher education. Information & Computer Security(ahead-of-print).
Panjaitan, M. I., & Rajagukguk, D. M. (2023). Development Of Computer-Based Photoshop Learning Media Using Computer Based Interaction Method. Literacy: Journal of Education and Social Science, 1(01), 1-6.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension, Chicago and London. In: The University of Chicago Press.
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in nursing & health, 29(5), 489-497.
Rasmussen, K., Bero, L., Redberg, R., Gøtzsche, P. C., & Lundh, A. (2018). Collaboration between academics and industry in clinical trials: cross sectional study of publications and survey of lead academic authors. bmj, 363.
Ray, J. (2014). Advancing knowledge creation modelling through improved organizational communications. Available at SSRN 2632603.
Revano, T. F., & Garcia, M. B. (2020). Manufacturing design thinkers in higher education institutions: The use of design thinking curriculum in the education landscape. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE 12th international conference on humanoid, nanotechnology, information technology, communication and control, environment, and management (HNICEM).
Riivari, E., Kivijärvi, M., & Lämsä, A.-M. (2021). Learning teamwork through a computer game: for the sake of performance or collaborative learning? Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1753-1771.
Rousseau, V., Aubé, C., & Tremblay, S. (2013). Team coaching and innovation in work teams: An examination of the motivational and behavioral intervening mechanisms. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(4), 344-364.
Rubens, A., Spigarelli, F., Cavicchi, A., & Rinaldi, C. (2017). Universities’ third mission and the entrepreneurial university and the challenges they bring to higher education institutions. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 11(03), 354-372.
Saaksvuori, A., & Immonen, A. (2004). The role of product management in collaborative business development. In Product Lifecycle Management (pp. 165-180): Springer.
Salgado, E. G., & Dekkers, R. (2018). Lean product development: nothing new under the sun? International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(4), 903-933.
Santos, E., Carvalho, M., & Martins, S. (2024). Sustainable enablers of knowledge management strategies in a higher education institution. Sustainability, 16(12), 5078.
Sarwat, N., & Abbas, M. (2021). Individual knowledge creation ability: dispositional antecedents and relationship to innovative performance. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1763-1781.
Schuh, G., Eversheim, W., Jung, M., Lenders, M., & Schöning, S. (2008). Lean Innovation–ein Widerspruch in sich? In Business Excellence in technologieorientierten Unternehmen (pp. 13-20): Springer.
Schulze, A., & Hoegl, M. (2006). Knowledge Creation in New Product Development Projects. Journal of Management, 32, 210-236. doi:10.1177/0149206305280102
Schützer, K., Rodrigues, L. F., Bertazzi, J. A., Durão, L. F. C., & Zancul, E. (2017). Learning environment to support the product development process. Procedia Manufacturing, 9, 347-353.
Seghroucheni, O. Z., Lazaar, M., & Al Achhab, M. (2025). Bridging Tacit Knowledge and Explicit Knowledge: An Ontological Model for Effective Knowledge Conversion. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 15(2).
Sian Lee, C., & Kelkar, R. S. (2013). ICT and knowledge management: perspectives from the SECI model. The Electronic Library, 31(2), 226-243.
Smeds, R. (1994). Managing change towards lean enterprises. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14(3), 66-82.
Soam, S. K., Subbanna, Y. B., Rathore, S., Sumanth Kumar, V. V., Kumar, S., Vinayagam, S. S., . . . Kumar, A. (2023). Academia-industry linkages for sustainable innovation in agriculture higher education in India. Sustainability, 15(23), 16450.
Teerajetgul, W., & Charoenngam, C. (2006). Factors inducing knowledge creation: empirical evidence from Thai construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 13(6), 584-599.
Terán-Bustamante, A., Martínez-Velasco, A., & Dávila-Aragón, G. (2021). Knowledge management for open innovation: Bayesian networks through machine learning. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 40.
Tereshchenko, E., Salmela, E., Melkko, E., Phang, S. K., & Happonen, A. (2024). Emerging best strategies and capabilities for university–industry cooperation: opportunities for MSMEs and universities to improve collaboration. A literature review 2000–2023. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 13(1), 28.
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Shehata, B., Liu, D., Zhao, J., Metwally, A. H. S., . . . Lee, L.-H. (2022). Is Metaverse in education a blessing or a curse: a combined content and bibliometric analysis. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1), 1-31.
Tortorella, G. L., Marodin, G. A., Miorando, R., & Seidel, A. (2015). The impact of contextual variables on learning organization in firms that are implementing lean: a study in Southern Brazil. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 78(9), 1879-1892.
Tuli, P., & Shankar, R. (2015). Collaborative and lean new product development approach: a case study in the automotive product design. International Journal of Production Research, 53, 2457-2471. doi:10.1080/00207543.2014.974849
Tyagi, S., Cai, X., Yang, K., & Chambers, T. (2015). Lean tools and methods to support efficient knowledge creation. International Journal of Information Management, 35(2), 204-214.
Veer Ramjeawon, P., & Rowley, J. (2017). Knowledge management in higher education institutions: enablers and barriers in Mauritius. The Learning Organization, 24(5), 366-377.
von Thienen, J., Royalty, A., & Meinel, C. (2017). Design thinking in higher education: How students become dedicated creative problem solvers. In Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 306-328): IGI Global Scientific Publishing.
Walde, P., & Völlm, B. A. (2023). The TRAPD approach as a method for questionnaire translation. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1199989.
Wang, X., Liu, Z., & Lei, X. (2024). Untangling the knowledge creation in the cross-project organisations. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 36(12), 4672-4685.
Yin, X., Li, F., Chen, J., & Zhai, Y. (2023). Innovating from university–industry collaboration: the mediating role of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital. doi:10.1108/jic-10-2022-0207
Zeivots, S., Hopwood, N., Wardak, D., & Cram, A. (2025). Co-design practice in higher education: practice theory insights into collaborative curriculum development. Higher Education Research & Development, 44(3), 769-783.
Zhang, X.-Y., & Wang, X. (2020). Team learning in interdisciplinary research teams: antecedents and consequences. J. Knowl. Manag., 25, 1429-1455. doi:10.1108/jkm-07-2019-0372
Zhu, L., Sun, D., Luo, M., Liu, W., & Xue, S. (2024). Investigating pre-service science teachers’ design performance in laboratory class: The inquiry-based design thinking approach. Journal of science education and technology, 33(1), 30-44.

校內：立即公開
校外：立即公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文