| 研究生: |
彭詰雅 Peng, Chieh-Ya |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
金融科技是否創造額外借貸市場?以美國房貸市場為例 Whether Fintech Creates Additional Lending Market? Evidence from the Mortgage Market |
| 指導教授: |
林軒竹
Lin, Hsuan-Chu |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 財務金融研究所 Graduate Institute of Finance |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 25 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 金融科技 、房貸市場 、傳統銀行 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Fintech, Mortgage Lending Market, Traditional Bank |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:205 下載:64 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本文 探討在借貸需求增加時,金融科技是否能為借貸市場提供更好的流動性 以及讓消費者更容易取得貸款,因而創造額外借貸市場。以 2 019 年 美國房貸市場為例, 本文分別以借款金額、債務收入比、借貸金額收入比及借款人信用分數作為放款準則進行檢驗, 研究結果顯示金融科技貸款機構相較於傳統銀行有比較寬鬆的放貸準則,在借貸需求增加時,能增加放款機率, 且傳統銀行 容易 拒絕 較 高債務收入比的借款申請 金融科技貸款機構則無此現象, 因此 本 研究結果支持假說 :金融科技創造額外借貸市場。
This paper examines whether Fintech can create an additional lending market by providing better liquidity and making loans more accessible to consumers in the wake of credit demand. Applying the U.S. mortgage market sample in 2019, we investigate the lending standards of borrowing amount, debt-to-income ratio, loan-to-income ratio, and borrower credit score. The results suggest that Fintech lenders ease lending standards compared to traditional banks and can increase lending accessibility when lending demand surges, and we also find that traditional banks are more likely to reject applications with high debt-to-income ratios. In contrast, we cannot find the evidence in the Fintech lenders sample. Therefore, the results of this study support the hypothesis that Fintech lenders create an additional lending market.
Allen, L., Shan, Y., & Shen, Y. (2020). Do FinTech Lenders Fill the Credit Gap? Evidence from Local Mortgage Demand Shocks. City University of New York,
Balyuk, T. (2019). Financial innovation and borrowers: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending. Working Paper. Emory University.
Bartlett, R., Morse, A., Stanton, R., & Wallace, N. (2019). Consumer-Lending Discrimination in the Era of FinTech. Working Paper. UC Berkeley.
Bates, R. (2017). Banking on the future: an exploration of fintech and the consumer interest Consumers International.
Berg, G. & Schrader, J. (2012). Access to credit, natural disasters, and relationship lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 21(4), 549-568.
Boot, A. W. & Thakor, A. V. (2000). Can relationship banking survive competition? Journal of Finance, 55(2), 679-713.
Buchak, G., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A. (2018). Fintech, regulatory arbitrage, and the rise of shadow banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 130(3), 453-483.
Chavaz, M. (2016). Dis-integrating credit markets: diversification, securitization, and lending in a recovery. Staff Working Paper. Bank of England.
Cortés, K. R. (2014). Rebuilding after disaster strikes: how local lenders aid in the recovery. Working Paper. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland.
Cortés, K. R. & Strahan, P. E. (2017). Tracing out capital flows: How financially integrated banks respond to natural disasters. Journal of Financial Economics, 125(1), 182-199.
De Roure, C., Pelizzon, L., & Thakor, A. V. (2019). P2P lenders versus banks: Cream
skimming or bottom fishing? Working Paper. Reserve Bank of Australia.
Degryse, H. & Ongena, S. (2007). The impact of competition on bank orientation. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 16(3), 399-424.
Dietrich, A. & Wernli, R. (2016). What drives the interest rates in the P2P consumer lending market? Empirical evidence from Switzerland. Working Paper. Lucerne University of Applied Sciences.
Dlugosz, J., Gam, Y. K., Gopalan, R., & Skrastins, J. (2019). Decision-making delegation in banks. Working Paper. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Fuster, A., Plosser, M., Schnabl, P., & Vickery, J. (2019). The role of technology in mortgage lending. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1854-1899.
Gan, J. (2007). Collateral, debt capacity, and corporate investment: Evidence from a natural experiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 85(3), 709-734.
Garmaise, M. J. & Moskowitz, T. J. (2009). Catastrophic risk and credit markets. Journal of Finance, 64(2).
Gaudêncio, J., Mazany, A., & Schwarz, C. (2019). The Impact of Lending Standards on Default Rates of Residential Real-Estate Loans. ECB Occasional Paper(220).
Gibilaro, L. & Mattarocci, G. (2018). Peer-to-peer lending and real estate mortgages: evidence from United Kingdom. Journal of European Real Estate Research, 11(3), 319-334.
Haupert, T. (2020). The Racial Landscape of Fintech Mortgage Lending. Housing Policy Debate, 1-32.
Jagtiani, J., Lambie-Hanson, L., & Lambie-Hanson, T. (2020). Fintech lending and mortgage credit access. The Journal of FinTech, 1-50.
Jagtiani, J. & Lemieux, C. (2019). The roles of alternative data and machine learning in fintech lending: evidence from the LendingClub consumer platform. Financial Management, 48(4), 1009-1029.
Koetter, M., Noth, F., & Rehbein, O. (2020). Borrowers under water! Rare disasters, regional banks, and recovery lending. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 43.
Parlour, C. A. & Rajan, U. (2001). Competition in loan contracts. American Economic Review, 91(5), 1311-1328.
Sawada, Y. & Shimizutani, S. (2008). How Do People Cope with Natural Disasters? Evidence from the Great Hanshin-Awaji (Kobe) Earthquake in 1995. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 40, 2-3.
Stiglitz, J. E. & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American economic review, 71(3), 393-410.
Tang, H. (2019). Peer-to-peer lenders versus banks: substitutes or complements? The Review of Financial Studies, 32(5), 1900-1938.