簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳冠妤
Chen, Guan-Yu
論文名稱: 探討視覺輔助對公共參與之影響:ZMET於臺南西市場與西門商場個案之應用性
Effects of Visual Aids in Public Participation Applicability of ZMET in the case of the West Market and Ximen Market in Tainan
指導教授: 林蕙玟
Lin, Hui-Wen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 創意產業設計研究所
Institute of Creative Industries Design
論文出版年: 2018
畢業學年度: 106
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 160
中文關鍵詞: 公共參與視覺輔助方法西市場西門商場
外文關鍵詞: Public Participation, Visual Aids, West Market, XImen Market
相關次數: 點閱:322下載:80
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 現在在台灣使用的參與方式主要集中在參與的口頭交流,這可能導致專業人士和非專業人士,政府和公民之間的脫節,原因是前者傾向於以更視覺為主的方式思考。隨著公民意識的提高,類似的溝通衝突也可以在公共政策制定與相關計畫的領域看到。
    為了研究視覺輔助如何增強公眾參與及其效果,本研究使用行動研究作為實驗研究設計,透過分析經常用於營銷和廣告研究的視覺輔助方法,將其使用於公共參與領域之全新應用。
    本研究採用不同的研究方法,包括訪談、案例研究、調整視覺輔助方法與實際應用測試。實際應用測試旨在觀察使用視覺輔助工具如何連結專業和非專業人員,以便使不同的利害關係人在公眾參與的過程中能夠更好地進行溝通,而實際應用的基地選在台南西市場與西門商場,因西市場為市定古蹟,且在執行修復計畫的過程中有溝通的爭議產生,因此可以作為檢視方法應用性的場域。

    The participation methods being used in Taiwan now are mainly focusing on verbal communication for participation, which may cause the disconnection between professionals and non-professionals, or governments and citizens, due to the reason that the former ones tend to think in a more visual way. As the raising of consciousness of citizenship, the conflicts can also be seen in the public policy making field.
    To study on how the visual aid can enhance the public participation and the effects of it, this research use an action plan process as an experimental research design to study the brand new application of the new method of visual aids that often used in marketing and advertisement fields but never in public participation study.
    This research uses different research methods, including interviews, case study, method modification and on-site implementation. The on-site implementation is used to discover the enhancement of using visual aids to bridge professionals and non-professional for better communication in public participation. The on-site implementation is used in the West Market, which is the one of the municipal heritages in Tainan.

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 10 1.1 Background and Motivation 10 1.2 Research Objective 13 1.3 Research Questions 13 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 2.1 Public Participation in Planning Process 14 2.1.1 The Definition of Public Participation 15 2.1.2 The Purpose of Public Participation 16 2.1.3 Types of Public Participation 17 2.2 Forms of Public Participation in Taiwan 19 2.2.1 Traditional Participation Methods 21 2.2.2 Participatory Design 22 2.2.3 Participatory Budget 23 2.2.4 i-Voting 25 2.2.5 Workshop 26 2.2.6 Public Participation GIS (PPGIS) 26 2.3 Methods for Enhancing Participation 27 2.3.1 Photo-elicitaion 28 2.3.2 Photovoice 29 2.3.3 Zaltman Metaphor Elicitation Technique 31 2.4 Summary 34 CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 38 3.1 Research Process 38 3.2 Research Design 39 3.3 Research Method 41 3.3.1 Interview 41 3.3.2 Modification of the ZMET for the Site 42 3.3.3 Case Study and Analyze 44 3.3.4 On-Site Implementation 45 CHAPTER 4 DATA COLLECTION 47 4.1 Investigation for the West Market and the Ximen Market 47 4.1.1 Site Background 47 4.1.2 Interview 50 4.1.3 Site Analysis 58 4.2 Case Study 63 4.2.1 Taichung Shin Sei Green Waterway Plan 63 4.2.2 Taipei Mitsui Warehouse Dispute 70 4.2.3 Hsinchu Science Park in Yilan 79 4.2.4 Comparison and Findings of Four Cases 86 4.3 Summary 91 CHAPTER 5 IMPLEMENTATION 93 5.1 Modification of the ZMET for the Site 93 5.1.1 ZMET Procedures Analysis 93 5.1.2 Modification Principles 94 5.1.3 Modified Procedures Version 1 95 5.1.4 Modified Procedures Version 2 98 5.2 On-Site Implementation 101 5.2.1 Research Target 101 5.2.2 Implementation Practice and Analysis 102 5.2.3 Revision for Modification after Implementation 121 5.3 Summary 125 CHAPTER 6 SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION 127 6.1 Conclusion 127 6.2 Suggestions for future study 130 REFERENCE 132 Appendix 1—Modified Procedures Version 1 143 Appendix 2—Modified Procedures Version 2 144 Appendix 3—Revised Modified ZMET Procedures 147 Appendix 4—Interview with Officer in Market Council 148 Appendix 5—Interview with Mrs. Y 149 Appendix 6—Interview with Mr.C (Village Chief) 158 Appendix 7—Interview with Mr.C (Market Administration 164

    Aberley, D. and R. Sieber (2002). Public Participation GIS Developed First International PPGIS Conference, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
    Affairs, M. o. E. (2014). 經濟部辦理流域綜合治理計畫建立民眾參與機制注意事項. 10320212630.
    Amado, M. P., et al. (2010). "Public Participation in Sustainable Urban Planning." International Journal of Human and Social Sciences 5:2.
    Ansell, C. and A. Gash (2008). "Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18(4): 543-571.
    Archon, F. (2015). "Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and Its Future." Public Administration Review 75(4): 513-522.
    Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking / Rudolf Arnheim, Berkeley : University of California Press, 1969.
    Arnstein, S. R. (1969). "A Ladder Of Citizen Participation." Journal of the American Institute of Planners 35(4): 216-224.
    Baiocchi, G. (2001). "Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment and Deliberative Democratic Theory." Politics & Society 29(1): 43-72.
    Byrne, E., et al. (2016). "Participatory Photography in Qualitative Research: A Methodological Review." 2016 4(2).
    California Historical Society, C. (2015, January 21 - July 3, 2016). "Experiments In Environment: The Halprin Workshops 1966-1971." 2018.
    Chang, L. (2016). "公眾參与平台:傳統參与平台与新興參与平台間關系研究." Journal of ANHUI Administration Institute 7.
    Chen, I.-H. (2016). 參與式工作坊使用地理資訊對於地震防災意識提升之研究. 都市計劃學系, 成功大學: 1-105.
    ChengShan-Liu (2010). "當前審議式民主的困境及可能的出路." 中國行政評論 17:2: 109-132.
    Chieh-Tsai (2007). "非言語溝通在日常生活中的作用." 市場周刊倫理研究 2(人力資源).
    Chien, K.-X. (2010). PPGIS作為公共領域媒介的矛盾與限制—以台灣鄉村地區一個案為例. 地理及區域研究, 臺灣大學: 1-63.
    ChinSen-Chang (1993). 台灣的都市計畫1895-1988. Taipei, 業強出版社.
    Chou, J.-X. (2001). 府城今昔. Taiwan.
    Clark-IbáÑez, M. (2004). "Framing the Social World With Photo-Elicitation Interviews." American Behavioral Scientist 47(12): 1507-1527.
    Collier, J. (1957). "Photography in Anthropology: A Report on Two Experiments." American Anthropologist 59(5): 843-859.
    Collier, J. and M. Collier (1986). Visual Anthropology: Photography as a Research Method, University of New Mexico Press.
    Corbett, J. M. and C. P. Keller (2006). "An Analytical Framework to Examine Empowerment Associated with Participatory Geographic Information Systems (PGIS)." The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization 40(4).
    Council for Cultural Affairs, E. Y. (2003). 文建會網路學院case智庫─社區總體營造.
    Dan-Chang (1981). 社區計畫之民眾參與: 柳鄉社區更新計畫個案硏究.
    Du Wen-Ling, C., Zhih-Chung (2007). "民眾參與公共決策的反思—以竹科宜蘭基地設置為例." 臺灣民主季刊 4: 33-62.
    Epstein, I., et al. (2006). "Photo Elicitation Interview (PEI): Using Photos to Elicit Children's Perspectives." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5(3): 1-11.
    Ganapati, S. (2010). Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Survey. Comparative E-Government. C. G. Reddick. New York, NY, Springer New York: 449-466.
    Gernald Zaltman, L. H. Z. (2008). Marketing Metaphoria: What Deep Metaphors Reveal About the Minds of Consumers, Harvard Business Review Press.
    Given, L. M., et al. (2011). "Photovoice: A participatory method for information science." Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 48(1): 1-3.
    Glass, J. J. (1979). "Citizen Participation in Planning: The Relationship Between Objectives and Techniques." Journal of the American Planning Association 45(2): 180-189.
    Goldfrank, B. (2007). "The politics of deepening local democracy: decentralization, party institutionalization, and participation." Comparative Politics: 147-168.
    GuangYeh-Ruei (2016). 「現實」與「理想」之間:臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究發展基金會宜蘭工作室的參與式規劃設計實踐. Graduate Insitute of Building and Planning College of engineering, National Taiwan University. Master.
    GuoHsien-Hsu (2000). 商議式民主與民主想像.
    HanJu-Chan (2016). i-Voting制度對民主治理的反思:以台北市為例. 政治學系碩士班, TungHai University. Master.
    Hanzl, M. (2007). "Information technology as a tool for public participation in urban planning: a review of experiments and potentials." Design Studies 28(3): 289-307.
    Harper, D. (2002). "Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation." Visual Studies 17(1): 13-26.
    Hester, R. T. (1999). 造坊有理: 社區設計的夢想與實驗, 遠流.
    Hong, S. (2015). "Citizen Participation in Budgeting: A Trade-Off between Knowledge and Inclusiveness?" Public Administration Review 75(4): 572-582.
    HsinRung-Liu (1997). 參與式設計與都市政治中的專業者-以淡水與芝山經驗為例. 建築與城鄉研究所. 台北市, 國立臺灣大學. 碩士
    HsinYin-Wang (2010). GoogleEarth應用在空間規劃中民眾參與之探討. 都市發展與建築研究所. 高雄市, 國立高雄大學. 碩士: 96.
    Hurworth, R., et al. (2005). "The use of photo-interviewing: three examples from health evaluation and research." Evaluation Journal of Australasia 4(1/2): 52.
    JingFang-Gao (2013). "行政决策中的公众参与机制:一个批判性诠释." 廊坊师范学院学报 29.
    JinLai-Xia (2015). "行政決策中的公眾參与類型研究." Journal of Guanzhou University ( Social Science Edition) 14(8).
    KaiHong-Feng and HongHsin-Chen (2014). "治理與公民參與-淡水河流域治理之Q方法論分析." 臺灣民主季刊 11(1): 41-101.
    Klijn, E. H. and C. Skelcher (2007). "Democracy and governance networks: compatible or not?" Public administration 85(3): 587-608.
    Langendorf, R. (1992). "The 1990s: Information Systems and Computer Visualization for Urban Design, Planning, and Management." Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 19(6): 723-738.
    Liang-Quan Chen, H.-E. J. (1999). 社區動力遊戲:工作坊使用活起來, Yuan-Liou Publishing Co., Ltd.
    Liao, T.-H. (2016). 台中市綠川規劃過程民眾參與之研究. 景觀學系, 中原大學. 碩士.
    Lin, J.-D., et al. (2005). "質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析." 身心障礙研究季刊 3(2): 122-136.
    Lin, S.-K. (2013). PPGIS促進溝通之成效-美濃國家自然公園案例分析. 地理及區域研究, 臺灣大學: 1-115.
    Lin, W.-Y. (2016). 參與式規劃設計對地方連結影響之研究-以彰化縣芬園鄉舊社社區及線西鄉塭仔社區為例. 建築系建築及都市設計碩士班, 朝陽科技大學. Master
    Linz, S. (2011). "Photo elicitation: Enhancing learning in the affective domain." The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 42(9): 393-394.
    LiWei-Liu (2008). "社區營造的反思:城鄉差異的考量、都市發展的觀點、以及由下而上的理念探討." 都市與計劃 35(4): 313-338.
    Mannay, D. (2013). "‘Who put that on there … why why why?’ Power games and participatory techniques of visual data production." Visual Studies 28(2): 136-146.
    MeiRong-Lai (2013). 從專業者觀點探討民眾參與都市計畫機制. 都市與空間資訊學系碩士班, 逢甲大學. Master.
    Minichiello, V., et al. (2008). In-Depth Interviewing: Principles, Techniques, Analysis.
    Moore, S. K., et al. (2008). "Local and large‐scale climate forcing of Puget Sound oceanographic properties on seasonal to interdecadal timescales." Limnology and Oceanography 53(5): 1746-1758.
    Moynihan, D. P. and S. K. Pandey (2007). "The Role of Organizations in Fostering Public Service Motivation." Public Administration Review 67(1): 40-53.
    Nabatchi, T. (2010). "Addressing the citizenship and democratic deficits: The potential of deliberative democracy for public administration." The American Review of Public Administration.
    NanTian-Juang (1992). 給期盼成長的開發者. 社區參與及發展:開發者指南. Taipei, 創興出版社.
    Office, Y.-H. C. A. (2009). 臺南市市定古蹟「西市場」及「原臺南州青果同業組合香蕉倉庫」修復調查研究計畫.
    Patsias, C., et al. (2013). "Participatory Democracy, Decentralization and Local Governance: the Montreal Participatory Budget in the light of ‘Empowered Participatory Governance’." International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37(6): 2214-2230.
    PeiJu-Yang (1993). 參與式設計之研究─專業者介入:社區空間的認同、動員與生產. 建築與城鄉研究所. 台北市, 國立臺灣大學. 碩士
    Pink, S. (2001). Doing ethnography: Images, media and representation in research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research.
    Robin A. Coulter, G. Z., Keith S. Coulter (2001). "Interpreting consumer perceptions of advertising: An application of Zaltman metaphor elcitation technique." JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH 30(4).
    RueiMing-Tseng (2014). 參與對等與全球正義, 聯經.
    RueiYung-Luo (2002). 參與式社區設計研究:台灣經驗(1990-2000)的反省. 建築與城鄉研究所. 台北市, 國立臺灣大學. 碩士: 100.
    RungYen-Sun (2002). 社區規劃之參與式設計支援系統建立. 建築及都市設計研究所. 台中市, 朝陽科技大學. 碩士: 116.
    Sarah, E. (2006). "Critical Issues in Participatory GIS: Deconstructions, Reconstructions, and New Research Directions." Transactions in GIS 10(5): 693-708.
    ShuRung-Tang (2007). 海岸環境議題中民眾參與機制之研析-以台十一線東部濱海公路改善計畫為例. 環境政策研究所. 花蓮縣, 國立東華大學. 碩士: 216.
    Skovdal, M. and F. Cornish (2015). Qualitative Research for Development.
    Smith, A., et al. (1998). Visual Communication in Urban Planning and Urban Design, Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis (UCL): London, UK.
    TsungYu-Lai (1998) 民眾參與都市建設事務之意義與限制. 21-31
    Wampler, B. (2007). "Participatory budgeting in Brazil."
    Wampler, B. (2010). Participatory budgeting in Brazil: Contestation, cooperation, and accountability, Penn State Press.
    Wang, C. and M. A. Burris (1997). "Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment." Health Education & Behavior 24(3): 369-387.
    Wang, C. C., et al. (1998). "Photovoice as a Participatory Health Promotion Strategy." Health Promotion International 13(1): 75-86.
    Webler, T., et al. (2001). "What is a good public participation process? Five perspectives from the public." Environ Manage 27(3): 435-450.
    WenYen-Wu and H. Hsieh (2002). 都市政治研究的典範轉移現象之探討.
    YaLi-Chao (2003). "符號版圖的迷思:影像化趨勢下語言的未來發展." 國科會專題研究計畫新聞學研究 77: 187-215.
    Zaltman, G. (1996). "Metaphorically Speaking: New technique uses multidisciplinary ideas to improve qualitative research." JouRNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH 8(2).
    Zaltman, G. (1997). "Rethinking Market Research: Putting People Back In." JouRNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH 34.
    Zaltman, G. and R. H. Coulter (1995). "Seeing the Voice of the Customer: Metaphor-Based Advertising Research." JOURNAL OF ADVERTISING RESEARCH 35(4).
    Zheng, C.-H. (2006). 正面思考的威力. Business Weekly Business Weekly a division of Cite Publishing Ltd 974: 56.
    內政部 (2018). 都市計畫草案辦理公開展覽前應行注意事項. 內政部營建署都市計畫組. 1070800103.
    林明哲 (2008). 探討民眾參與行為在城鄉風貌發展過程中的主要影響因素. 都市發展與建築研究所. 高雄市, 國立高雄大學. 碩士: 154.
    施鴻志 and 周士雄 (1996). "區域多功能成長中心發展模式之研究-南部區域產業成長中心發展策略." 都市與計劃 23: 75-94.
    曾瓊瑤 (2003). 民眾參與新竹市東門城護城河河岸空間規劃之研究. 建築學系, 成功大學: 1-170.
    黃文陽 (1995). 民眾參與公共政策制定─高雄地區衛武營都會公園推動工程為例. 公共事務管理研究所. 高雄市, 國立中山大學. 碩士: 161.

    下載圖示 校內:2020-12-31公開
    校外:2020-12-31公開
    QR CODE