本研究透過個案訪談與觀察，發現善用有效的方法、快速的讓與自閉症個案接觸之關係人互相分享對孩童在不同環境與狀況下的理解與經驗能加強彼此間的互動性，且更能協助這些相關人士了解自閉症孩童的不同面向。因此本研究旨在以設計觀點設計出「觀測自閉症兒的15張輔助圖卡」，並透過操作運用所得之觀察線索與自閉症個案相關人士包含：家長、職能治療師或心理師、設計師與特教老師之綜合討論，強化父母、教師與治療師間的溝通，透過各領域專業間的整合，以便自閉症孩童的狀況被全方面的透析了解。透過文獻回顧並轉化IDEO創新圖卡的設計概念，運用設計方法設計出本研究之圖卡，可發現透過以觀測自閉症兒的15張輔助圖卡操作的過程中歸納出幾個結論：
一：提供一個多方互動且系統化的方式，幫助與個案接觸關係人找出個案在各方面的觀察線索。
二：此模式可適用於不同之自閉症個案，能有效率的協助與個案相關人士，包含：家長、特教老師、治療師或心理師，彼此間關係更緊密以了解自閉症孩童在不同環境空間之情況。

This research discovers an effective way through case interview and observation to make multidiscipline team members including parents, special education teachers, occupational therapists and psychologists share their understanding and experience of children with autism under different circumstances. To strengthen their interactivity, this study aims to design the "15 observing cards for autistic children," and the observing cards are created by using design method. Researchers transform the concept of the IDEO method cards to create observing cards in reference review. The 15 observing cards for autistic children provide better methods for those people related to autism cases. The concluded findings are：
1. Systematic and interactive ways for relevant people to observe and discover the clues of children with autism are provided.
2. The method can be applied to different autism cases. It efficiently helps to better understand autistic children in different environments by enhancing the communication and relationship between those related to autism cases such as parents, special education teachers, occupational therapists and psychologists.

英文文獻：
(1) Bauman, M. L., & Kemper, T. L. (2005). The neurobiology of autism.
Maryland: JHU Press.
(2) Bogdashina, O. (2003). Sensory perceptual issues in autism and asperger
syndrome: Different sensory experiences-different perceptual worlds.
London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
(3) Donnellan, A. M. (1985). Classic Readings in Autism New York:
Teachers College Press
(4) Gallagher, J. J., Coleman, M. R., & Anastasiow, N. J. (2010). Educating
exceptional children: Cengage Learning.
(5) Horner, R. H. (1994). Functional assessment: Contributions and future
directions. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27(2), p.401.
(6) IDEO. (2003). Method Cards: 51 Ways to Inspire Design. Palo Alto, from
http://www.ideo.com/work/method-cards/
(7) Iwata, B. A., Pace, G. M., Dorsey, M. F., Zarcone, J. R., Vollmer, T. R.,
Smith, R. G., . . . Mazaleski, J. L. (1994). The functions of self-injurious
behavior: An experimental-epidemiological analysis. Journal of Applied
Behavior Analysis, 27(2), pp.215-240.
(8) Kraijer, D. (2000). Review of adaptive behavior studies in mentally
retarded persons with autism/pervasive developmental disorder. Journal
of autism and developmental disorders, 30(1), pp.39-47.
(9) Lord, C., & Bishop, S. L. (2010). Autism spectrum disorders. Social
Policy Report, 24(2), pp.12-14.
(10) Lord, C., Rutter, M., Goode, S., Heemsbergen, J., Jordan, H., Mawhood,
L., & Schopler, E. (1989). Austism diagnostic observation schedule: A
standardized observation of communicative and social behavior. Journal
of autism and developmental disorders, 19(2), pp.185-212.
83
(11) Mundy, P. (2005). Autism and Its Impact on Child Development:
Comments on Charman, Stone and Turner, and Sigman and Spence.
Synthesis on autism.
(12) Pierce, K., & Schreibman, L. (1995). Increasing complex social behaviors
in children with autism: effects of peer-implemented pivotal response
training. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 28(3), p.285.
(13) Rogers, S. J. (1999). Intervention for young children with autism: From
research to practice. Infants & Young Children, 12(2), pp.1-16.
(14) Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Renner, B. R. (1986). The Childhood
Autism Rating Scale (CARS): For diagnostic screening and classification
of autism: Irvington (New York)
(15) Suri, J. F. (2005). Thoughtless acts？: Observations on intuitive design.
San Francisco: Chronicle books.
(16) Taylor, R. L. (2006). Assessment of exceptional students: Educational
and psychological procedures. Boston: Pearson Education,Inc.
(17) Wechsler, D. D. (1991). Manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for
Children (3 ed.). San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
84
中文文獻：
(1) 宋維村, 徐澄清, & 謝清芬. (1983). 克氏行為量表. 台北: 教育部特
殊小組.
(2) 林巾凱, 林仲慧, 林明慧, 莊孟宜, 簡錦蓉, 張珮玥, 林佑萱. (2004).
兒童感覺統合功能評量表. 台北: 心理出版社股份有限公司.
(3) 林宏熾,楊雅茵, & 陳錦慧. (2010). 學前階段自閉症兒童一般轉銜技
能之分析研究. 研究與實務的對話, 10, pp.13-16.
(4) 林金定, 嚴嘉楓, & 陳美花. (2005). 質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步
驟分析. 身心障礙研究, 3(2), pp.122-136.
(5) 林寶貴, 黃玉枝, 黃桂君, & 宣崇慧. (2009). 修訂學齡前兒童語言障
礙評量表. 台北: 教育部.
(6) 林寶貴, & 錡寶香. (2002). 兒童口語理解測驗. 台北: 國立台灣師範
大學特殊教育中心.
(7) 俞筱鈞. (1995). 瑞文氏彩色圖形推理測驗(CPM). 台北: 中國行為科
學社股份有限公司.
(8) 洪清一. (1999). 知覺動作訓練. 台北市: 五南出版社.
(9) 徐享良. (2007). 中華適應行為量表. 臺北市: 教育部：特殊教育工作
小組.
(10) 張世慧, & 藍瑋琛. (2012). 特殊教育學生評量. 台北: 心理出版社股
份有限公司.
(11) 張正芬. (1997). 自閉症兒童的行為輔導-功能性評量的應用. 特殊教
育季刊, 65, pp.1-7.
(12) 張正芬、王華沛. (2005). 「自閉症兒童行為檢核表」之編製及相關研
究. 殊教育研究學刊, 28, pp.145-166.
(13) 陳心怡, & 陳榮華. (2013). 魏氏幼兒智力量表第四版（WPPSI–IV）.
台北: 中國行為科學社股份有限公司.
(14) 陳榮華, & 陳心怡. (2007). 魏氏兒童智力量表第四版(WISC-IV). 台北:
中國行為科學社股份有限公司
(15) 陳麗如. (2004). 特殊教育論題與趨勢. 台北: 心理出版社股份有限公
司.
(16) 楊坤堂, 張世慧, & 李水源. (2005). 學前幼兒與國小低年級兒童口語
語法能力診斷測驗. 台北: 台北市立師範學院身心障礙研究所.