| 研究生: |
盧宥翔 Lu, Yu-Hsiang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
異文化之產品造形與感性關聯–以綜合加工機為例 The Relationships between Product Forms and Kansei in Different Cultures – A Case Study of Machining Center |
| 指導教授: |
陳國祥
Chen, Kuohsiang |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系 Department of Industrial Design |
| 論文出版年: | 2009 |
| 畢業學年度: | 97 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 104 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 感性工學 、綜合加工機 、跨文化 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Machining center, Kansei Engineering, Cross-culture |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:132 下載:2 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
2007 年台灣身為世界工具機生產第六大國家,綜合加工機為台灣工具機產業出口的最大宗,也是台灣外銷的主力產品之一。台灣身為世界工具機生產大國,在面對外在環境的多重競爭考量之下,如何提昇產品品質與整體觀感,將成為產品能否成功至極關鍵。
本研究試圖探討台灣與日本不同文化背景、族群對於兩來源國所生產的綜合加工機產品造形意象評價上的差異,並建構出造形與感性語彙之關聯性,以提供設計師作為參考。以感性工學技術,採用語意差異法,以台灣國立成功大學工業設計系學生20 位、日本千葉大學工業設計系學生20 位、兩國工具機相關產業廠商各20 位作為調查對象。
綜合本研究實驗結果發現,兩國廠商與學生的對於感性評價之差異可以歸納如下:(1)日本製綜合加工機比台灣製的更具正面意象,在「鬆散的—緊密的」兩國具有顯著的意象差異(t=1.709,P=0.047<0.05)。(2)以ANOVA 分析結果,兩國廠商在60 個評價中(6 語彙x 10 樣本)僅有兩個評價相異,整體相似性達97%。從問卷內部一致性分析看廠商評價較學生族群一致。(3)「粗劣的的–高品質的」、「醜陋的–美觀的」兩項語彙差異性最大,在10 個樣本中有4 個樣本達顯著性(40%)。(4)獨立式(懸吊式)的控制面板均給予兩國廠商負面的產品形象。(5)「灰色系」的主體顏色給予兩國廠商具有「緊密的」意象感受。
Taiwan was the sixth largest machine tools manufacturing country in the world 2007. Sharing the largest export of the machining tools industry, Machining Centers isalso Taiwan’s principal products to sell in the world. Being the main machining tools manufacturing country, Taiwan is now facing drastic competition from the whole industry environment. How to enhance product quality and country of origin image will become the key point for a successful product.
This study tried to investigate the difference of image evaluation on the country of origin image by dissimilar cultural background and user groups between Taiwan and Japan, and to establish the relationships between the product form and Kansei image to provide designers some design references. Employing Kansei Engineering technology, adopting Semantic Differential Method, this research surveyed 20 Taiwan industrial design students from National Cheng Kung University, 20 Japan industrial design students form Chiba University and 20 machining tools related companies from each country.
This study found that: 1) The machining centers made in Japan enjoy better image than Taiwan, especially for “Loose-Compact” Kansei words which reached significant difference (t=1.709,P=0.047<0.05). 2) As the results from ANOVA, onlytwo different evaluations existed among 60 evaluations (6 pair words x 10 Samples)between the two nations’ companies with the similarity of 97%. The consistent analysis for the questionnaire content showed that the evaluations between companies were better than students. 3) “Low-quality-High-quality” and “Ugly-Beautiful” had the most diverse Kansei evaluations, four out of ten samples reached significant level(40%). 4) The control penal with independent or suspensory style delivered a negative product image to both of the two nations’ companies. 5) “Grey” body color series reinforced the “Compact” image to both of the two nation’s companies.
【中文文獻】
王海山主編;王續琨等撰編(2003),科學方法百科辭典,台北市:恩楷出版社。
王宗興(2001),自行車車架造形特徵對意象認知影響之研究,國立成功大學工業計研究所碩士論文。
王建彬(2005),臺灣機械工業的回顧與展望 -上-,機械月刊 ,第31 卷,第7 期,民94 年7 月。
王建彬(2005),臺灣機械工業的回顧與展望 -下-,機械月刊,第31 卷,第8 期,民94 年8 月。
周君瑞(2000),複合感性意象之塑造-以造形特徵為基礎,國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
邱淑娟(2006),跨文化消費者感性研究—以手機為例,國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
馬永川(1997),產品意象語彙與造形呈現對應關係之研究,國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文。
高清漢(1996),當前台灣產品形象定位之探討,國立交通大學應用藝術研究所碩士論文。
張宗祐(1997),產品造形風格辨識閾之探討—以包浩斯風格為例,國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
莊盈祺(2001),複合式感性意象下產品造形的建構,國立成功大學工業設計研究所系碩士論文。設計研究所碩士論文。
陳國祥(1997),造形風格之系統觀,97 海峽兩岸暨國際工業設計研討會論文集,國立台北科技大學,臺北市:視傳文化。
陳國祥、管倖生、鄧怡莘、張育銘(2001),感性工學–將感性予以理性化的手法,工業設計,第29 卷,第1 期。
陳崇賢(2005),工業設計在我國工具機產業應用之研究,國立雲林科技大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
游萬來、林俊明(1997),產品風格的量化描述研究以轎車形態為例,設計學報,第2 卷,第2 期。
黃淑貞(1993),以使用情境基礎之產品造形發展因素研究,國立交通大學工業工程研究所碩士論文。
楊振雄(1995),車床工具機造形意象語彙之研究,國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
榮泰生(2006),SPSS 與研究方法,臺北巿:五南出版社。
劉佳達(2004),巨型動力遊艇外形特徵與感性認知之關聯分析,國立成功大學系統及船舶機電工程所碩士論文。
蔡子瑋(1995),產品意象語言研究 :以本土性意象為例,國立成功大學工業設計研究所碩士論文。
鄭文嘉(2005),複合工具機與關鍵零組件發展利基及模式探討,工業技術研究院產業經濟與趨勢研究中心出版:新竹縣,經濟部技術處發行:臺北市電腦商業同業公會經銷:臺北市。
鍾清枝(1987)[民76] ,工具機,臺北巿:全華。
Albers-Miller, Nancy D. (1996 ), Designing cross-cultural advertising research:a closer look at paired comparisons, International Marketing Review, 13 (5), 59-75.
Barber, W. & Badre, A. (1998). Culturability: The Merging of Culture andUsability, Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Human Factors and the Web,
Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Boor, S. & Russo, P. (1993). How fluent is your interface? Designing forinternational users. Human Factors and Computer Systems. Conference (4th. 1993).
Proceedings of the conference on Human factors in computing systems. Boston:Addison- Wesley Longman Publishing. p.342-347.
Chan, C.-S. (1994). Operational Definitions of Style, Environment andPlanning B: Planning and Design, 21: 223–246.
Chen, K. & Owen, C. L. (1997). Form language and style description. DesignStudies.1997. 18 (3): pp. 223-320.
Creusen, M. E. H. (1998). Product Appearance and Consumer Choice, Ph. D.Thesis, Technische Universieit Delft, The Netherlands.
Han, C. Min (1989), Country Image: Halo or Summary Construct? Journal ofMarketing Research, 26(May), pp.222-229.
Han,C. M. and V. Terpstra(1988),Country-of-Origin Effects for Uni-Nationaland Bi-National Products, Journal of International Business Studies,Vol.19, No. 2,
pp.235-255.
Henson, B., et al. (2006), Affective consumer requirements: A case study of moisturizer packaging. Concurrent Engineering-Research and Applications, 2006.
14(3): p. 187-196.
Hofstede, G. (1997). Culture and Organizations: Software of the mind,London:McGraw-Hill.
Mondragn, S., P. Company, and M. Vergara (2005), Semantic differential applied to the evaluation of machine tool design. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2005. 35(11): pp. 1021-1029.
Nakada, K., (1997), Kansei engineering research on the design of construction Machinery. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 1997. 19(2) : pp.129-146.
Nagamachi M. (1995), Kansei Engineering- A new Ergonomic Consumer-oriented Technology for Product Development, International Journal of
Industrial Ergonomics 15(1): pp. 3-11 JAN 1995.
Nagamachi M. (2002). Kansei engineering as a powerful consumer-oriented technology for product development, Applied Ergonomics 33 (3): 289-294 MAY 2002.
Nagashima, A. (1970), A comparison of Japanese and U.S. Attitudes toward Foreign Products, Journal of Marketing, 34(1), pp.68-74.
Roth, Martin S. and Jean B. Romeo (1992), Matching Product Category and Country Image Perceptions: A Framework for Managing Country-of-Origin Effects,
Journal of International Business Studies, 23(3), pp.477-497.
Saint, J.,1993, Interpretation Skills for Managers, 南區工業設計人才培訓暨研究發展中心。
Samiee, Saeed(1994), Consumer Evaluation of Products in a Global Market,Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 25, No.3, pp.579-604.
Schtte, S. and J. Eklund ( 2005), Design of rocker switches for work-vehicles- an application of Kansei Engineering. Applied Ergonomics, 2005. 36(5): pp.557-567.
Sun, H. (2007). Building a Culturally-competent Corporation Website: anexploratory study of Culture Markers in Multilingual Web Design, Proceeding of the
Annual ACM Conference on Systems Documentation, New Mexico.
Wenqi S. (2000), A Cross-Cultural Study of Vehicle Front Mask Design UsingKansei Engineering Approach, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings, General Sessions , 2007, pp. 372-375(4).