簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 葉士鳴
Yeh, Shih-Ming
論文名稱: 大氣中懸浮微粒含碳成分之分佈與來源
The distribution and sources of carbonaceous of ambient particle
指導教授: 吳義林
Wu, Yee-Lin
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 環境工程學系
Department of Environmental Engineering
論文出版年: 2002
畢業學年度: 90
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 83
外文關鍵詞: OC, EC, CMB, PM2.5, PM10
相關次數: 點閱:87下載:22
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 大氣懸浮微粒中含碳成分的來源極為複雜,以細粒徑微粒來說,大部分是由燃燒過程所產生的,如柴油車、汽機車等交通工具、燃料油、燃料煤的燃燒過程所排放,除此之外,大氣中經由光化學反應產生的二次衍生性氣膠,亦為懸浮微粒中含碳成分的主要來源。
    本研究針對大氣中懸浮微粒,逸散性污染源以及移動性污染源含碳成分的排放特性,進行其中不同粒徑懸浮微粒含碳成分之特性分析,期能利用大氣懸浮微粒其OC與EC最小的比值,推算出二次衍生性氣膠的生成比例。另外,再配合CMB受體模式污染源貢獻量結果,和排放源資料庫對於懸浮微粒之貢獻量,分別推算出代表原生性污染源的OC/EC比值,在與大氣環境中的最小比例值做比較。
    懸浮微粒量測結果顯示,PM2.5的濃度為11.8~105μg/m3之間,PM10的濃度為30.7~110μg/m3之間。懸浮微粒的濃度,南部地區因受工業區的影響比中部地區要高;而夏季的濃度比冬季低,則是台灣地區懸浮微粒季節變化的趨勢。含碳成分部分,有機碳(OC)與元素碳(EC)比例的日、夜變化趨勢為日間大於夜間,其中高峰值則出現在中午12點左右。
    移動性污染源的特性,機車隧道的採樣結果較接近於二行程機車高轉數試驗的結果,其OC/EC的比值PM2.5為5.4、PM10為6.2,而汽車隧道的採樣結果則與直接收集柴油車尾氣的試驗結果不同,分別是隧道的0.41、0.57,尾氣排放的0.72、1.05。逸散性污染源中PM2.5、PM10的OC/EC比例分別,農田平均為1.71、3.16;揚塵平均為4.60、3.40;營建工地平均為0.65、1.64。
    利用大氣懸浮微粒OC/EC的最小比值所推算出衍生性有機碳,在PM2.5微粒中的濃度介於8.87~23.7μg/m3之間,佔總有機碳的比例介於32%~90%之間,PM10微粒當中的濃度介於5.54~22.1μg/m3之間,佔總有機碳的比例介於24%~61%之間。而此比值比利用污染源貢獻量所計算出的比例小,此結果會造成衍生性氣膠高估的現象。

    Carbonaecous species in ambient particle are emitted from varies sources , for fine particle , most of them are produced from combustion processes , like diesel trucks . gasoline cars . motorcycle . and the combustion processes of fuel and coal . In addition , the secondary organic aerosol produced by photochemical reaction is also the major part of carbonaceous species.
    This research discuss the carbonaceous species of ambient particle , fugitive sources and mobile sources. Then , estimate the contribution of of secondary organic carbon by the minimum OC/EC ratio of ambient particle. In addition , we use the result of CMB recept model and emission inventory to estimate the OC/EC ratio of primary sources.
    The PM2.5 concentration in this research ranged from about 11.8 to 105 μg/m3 and the PM10 ranged about 30.7 to 110 μg/m3 .The particle concentration in southern Taiwan is higher than in the middle of Taiwan and summer lower than winter.
    For mobile sources , the result of motorcycle channel sampling is close to the result of two stroke motorcycle in high r.p.m. condition , and the OC/EC ratio of PM2.5 and PM10 are 5.4 and 6.2 . The result of car channel sampling is different to the result of diesel truck tail pip. The OC/EC ratio of car channel sampling is 0.41 , 0.57 and 0.72 , 1.05 of tail pip .The OC/EC ratio of fugitive sources of PM2.5 and PM10 are : farm soil (1.71 , 3.16) , resuspended dust (4.6 , 3.4) and construction work place (0.65 , 1.64).
    The concentration of secondary organic carbon calculated by the minimum OC/EC ratio , for PM2.5 , the concentration ranged 8.87 to 23.7μg/m3 and contribute the total organic carbon from 32% to 90% : ranged 5.54 to 22.1μg/m3 and contribute from 24% to 61% for PM10. But the minimum OC/EC ratio of ambient particle is smaller than the calculated ratio , though the concentration would be over estimated.

    第一章 前言 1 1-1研究緣起 1 1-2 研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 大氣中懸浮微粒之特性 6 2.2大氣環境中懸浮微粒含碳成分特性 8 2.3 懸浮微粒中含碳成分之粒徑分佈特性 8 2.3.1 OC的特性與排放來源 9 2.3.2 EC的特性與排放源 10 2.3.3 有機碳、元素碳分析方法之探討 10 2.4 二次有機污染物之探討 12 2.5 CMB模式結果推估懸浮微粒來源 15 2.6 柴油車、機車懸浮微粒之排放特性 18 2.7 原生性污染源之指紋資料 20 第三章 研究方法 31 3.1 周界採樣 31 3.1.1周界採樣之採樣地點 31 3.1.2 周界採樣之採樣時間 31 3.2 汽、機車隧道採樣 31 3.2.1 東門路機踏車採樣 32 3.2.2 南二高中寮隧道採樣 32 3.3 稀釋混和腔試驗 33 3.4 再捲揚腔試驗 33 3.5 採樣設備與分析方法 34 3.5.1 採樣儀器 34 3.5.2 濾紙前處理與秤重 35 3.6 有機碳、元素碳分析方法 35 3.6.1 分析儀器 35 3.6.2 碳元素之決定 36 第四章 結果與討論 41 4.1 汽、機車隧道結果 41 4.1.1 東門路機車隧道 41 4.1.2 南二高中寮隧道 42 4.2 移動性污染源之含碳成份分佈特性 43 4.2.1 二行程機車 43 4.2.2 四行程機車 45 4.2.3 柴油車 47 4.2.4 汽油車 48 4.3 逸散性污染源含碳成分特性 49 4.3.1 道路揚塵 49 4.3.2 農田土壤 50 4.3.3 營建工地揚塵 51 4.4 大氣環境懸浮微粒採樣結果分析 52 4.4.1 懸浮微粒質量濃度 52 4.4.2 懸浮微粒中含碳成分 55 4.5 二次衍生性氣膠之探討 64 4.5.1 以最小比值推估衍生性氣膠 64 4.5.2 利用受體模式結果推估原生性污染源OC/EC比值 71 4.5.3 利用排放源資料庫推估原生性污染源OC/EC比值 74 第五章 結論與建議 76 5-1 結論 76 5-2 建議 77 參考文獻 78

    Anderson , K.R.,Avol , E.L.,Edwards , S.A., Peng , R.C., Linn, W.S., Hackney ,J.D.(1992). ”Controlled exporsures of volunteers to respirable carbon and sulphuric acid aerosol” Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association , Vol. 42 , pp:771
    Cadle , S.H. and Mulawa , P.A. (1990). “Atmospheric Carbonaceous Species Measurement Methods Comparison Study : General Motors Result. “ Aerosol Science and Technology , Vol. 12, pp.128-141
    Chan Y.C., R.W. Simpson,G.H. Mctainsh , P.D. Vowles,D.D. Cohen and G.M. Bailey (1999) “Source apportionment of visibility degradation problems in Brisbane (Australia) using the multiple linear regression techniques.” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 33, pp. 3237-3250
    Chow J.C., D. Fairley , J.G. Watson, R. DeMandel, E.M. Fujita, D.H. Lowenthal, Lu Zhiqiang, C.A. Frazier, G. Long and J. Cordova (1995) “Source apportionment of wintertime PM10 at San Jose, Calif.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, vol. 121, pp. 378-387
    Gray , H.A. , G.R. Cass , and J.J. Huntzicker, (1986) “ Characteristics of Atmospheric Organic and Elemental Carbon Particle Concentration in Los Angles” Environment Science and Technology Vol. 20 , pp. 580-589
    Hildemann , L.M. , G.R. Markoeski and G.R. Cass (1991) “ Chemical composition of emission from urban source of fine organic aerosol “ Environment Science and Technology Vol.25 , pp.744-759
    Hildemann , L.M. , Markowski , G.R. Jones, M.C. and Cass , G.R. (1991b) “Submicrometer aerosol mass distributions of emissions from boilers , fireplace , automobiles , diesel ttucks , and meat cooking operations “ Aerosol Science and Technology , Vol.14 , pp. 138-152
    Kadowski ,s. (1990) “Characterization of carbonaceous aerosols in the Nagoya urban area 1. Element and Organic carbon concentrations and the region of organic aerosols ” Environment Science and Technology Vol.24 , pp.741-744
    Kim , Y.P. , Moon , K.C. , Lee , J.H. and Baik N.J. (1999) “ Concentrations of Carbonaceous Species in Particles at Seoul and Cheju in Korea “ Atmospheric Environment Vol.33 , pp.2751-2758
    Lin , J.J. and Hua-Shan Tai (2001) “Concentrations and distribution of carboneceous in ambient particles in Kaohsiung City , Taiwan “ Atmospheric Environment Vol 35 , pp:2627-2636
    Magliano Karen L, Hughes Vernon M, Chinkin Lyle R, Coe Dana L, Haste Tami L, Kumar Naresh and Lurmann Frederick W (1999) “Spatial and temporal variations in PM10 and PM2.5 source contributions and comparison to emissions during the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study.” Atmospheric Environment, vol. 33 , pp. 4757-4773
    McMurry , P.H. and Zhang , X.Q. (1989). “Size Distribution of Ambient Organic and Elemental Carbon” Aerosol Science and Technology , Vol. 10, pp.430-437.
    Nunes , T.V and Pio , C.A. (1993). “Carbonaceous Aerosol in Industrial and Coastal Atmospheres” Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 27A, No.8 pp.1339-1346
    Pierson , W.R. and W.W. Brachaczek . (1983) “Particulate matter associated with vehicles on the road Ⅱ” Aerosol Science and Technology , Vol 2 , pp.1-40
    Rogge , W.F. , Hildemann , L.M. , Mazurek , M.A. , Cass , G.R. and Simoneit , B.R.T. (1991) “Source of fine organic aerosol 1. Charbroiler and meat cooking operations.”Environment Science nd Technology , Vol. 25, pp. 1112-1125.
    Rogge , W.F. , Hildemann , L.M. ,Mazurek , M.A. , Cass , G.R. and Simoneit , B.R.T. (1996) “Mathematical modeling of atmospheric fine particle associated primary organic compound concentrations” Journal of Geophysical Research , Vol.101 , pp. 19379-19394
    Seinfeld , J.H. and Panis , S.N. (1998) “Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics of Air Pollution “ John Wiley and Sons, Inc. New York
    Turpin , B.J. , Huntzicker , J.J. , Larson , S.M. and Cass , G.R. “Los Angeles summer midday particulate carbon : Primary and secondary aerosol.” Environment Science and Technology Vol. 25 , pp.1788-1793
    Turpin , B.J. , Huntzicker , J.J. , and Adam , K.M. (1990) “ Intercomparison of Photoacoustic and Thermal-Optical Methods for the Measurement of Atmospheric Elemental Carbon” Atmospheric Environment Vol.25 , pp. 1381-1835
    Venkataraman ,C.;Lyons , J.M. and Friedlander , S.K. “Size distrubution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and element carbon . 1. Sampling Measurement Methods , and Source Characterization . (1994a).” Environment Science and Technology , Vol. 28, No.4, pp.563-572.
    Watson , J.G (1979). “Chemical element balance receptor model metjology for assessing the source of fine and total suspended partical matter in Portland , Oregon , Ph.D. thesis, Oregon Graduate Center.”
    Whitby K.T. and G.M. Sverdrup (1980) “California Aerosols: Their Physical and Chemical Characteristics.” Adv. Environ. Sci. Technol.,10,477
    Wolff , G.T. ;Groblicki , P.S. ;Cadle , S.H. and Countess , R. (1982) ”Particlulate Carbon at Various Location in the United States. In Pariculate Carbon Atmospheric Life Cycle (Edited : Plenum Press by Wolff , G.T. ;Klimisch , R.L.)” New York, NY:Plenum, pp. 297-315
    United States Environment Protection Agency (1996) Air Quality Criteria for Particuate Matter, EPA/600/p-95/001
    許文昌,”台北都會區氣懸微粒之化學特性”,碩士論文,國立中央大學環境工程研究所,1992
    李崇德 ,“台灣北部都會區氣懸微粒粒徑分佈之污染物特性分析” , 行政院環保署,1995
    王弼正、李崇德、陳鏡廉,”大台北地區PM2.5細粒氣膠污染來源推估”,第十四屆空氣污染控制技術研討會,pp402-407,1997。
    蔡瀛逸,鄭曼婷,”高污染狀態下大氣二次氣膠組成之探討”,第十五屆空氣污染控制技術研討會,pp711-718,1998。
    蔡德明、吳義林,”高屏地區大寮測站PM10與PM2.5之組成份特徵研究”,1998年氣膠研討會論文集,pp339-346,1998。
    蔡德明、吳義林、陳冠志,”南高屏地區懸浮微粒分佈特徵與來源之研究”,1998年氣膠研討會論文集,pp311-317,1998。
    林銳敏、黃建達,” 不同空氣品質測站粗細微粒碳成分分佈分析 ” 1999年國際氣膠研討會,台北,pp92-97,1999
    陳康興、林鉅富,”高雄地區大氣中懸浮微粒PM2.5特性及來源之探討” 1999氣膠科技國際研討會,pp76-84,1999。
    林銳敏、戴華山,『高雄市大氣懸浮微粒PM2.5及PM2.5-10之化學成份與來源推估』,高雄市政府環境保護局期末報告,1999
    陳穩至,”大氣中懸浮微粒之特性與來源”,碩士論文,國立成功大學環境工程學系研究所,2000
    周珈汶,”大氣環境OC/EC微粒的粒徑分佈及來源之探討”,碩士論文,國立台灣大學公共衛生學院環境衛生研究所,2001
    陳冠志,”南高屏地區PM10懸浮微粒污染來源之探討” ,碩士論文,國立成功大學環境工程學系研究所,1998

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2002-08-05公開
    QR CODE