| 研究生: |
楊佳山 Yang, Chia-Shan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
市場區隔策略、產品品質差異化及產品退貨之研究 Research on market segmentation strategies, product quality differentiation and product return |
| 指導教授: |
謝中奇
Hsieh, Chung-Chi |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系 Department of Industrial and Information Management |
| 論文出版年: | 2018 |
| 畢業學年度: | 106 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 69 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 機率銷售 、品質差異市場 、品質選擇 、消費者退貨 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Probabilistic selling, Quality-differentiated market, Quality choice, Customer return |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:139 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
如何面對市場多樣的差異性一直是許多零售業者需要面對的難題,提供多種不同等級產品或服務的組合是許多零售業者常採用的手法;而在品質差異市場的銷售策略中,服務升級之類似於機率銷售的手法相當常見。但消費者的差異性不只存在於購買產品前,也存在於購買產品後。因此,在納入消費者退貨可能性後,服務升級或機率銷售是否依然能夠實行及如何訂定最佳銷售策略對零售商而言仍是重要的課題。
本研究欲探討在消費者存在退貨可能性的情況下,零售商採用針對高階消費者策略、強市場區隔策略、弱市場區隔策略及機率銷售策略搭配不同的退款金額區間對零售商決策產生的影響,並分別建構兩個模型。模型一為零售商販售的產品品質水準為外生變數的情況下,探討不同的銷售策略與退款金額區間對零售商定價及利潤產生的影響。模型二則使零售商能自行訂定產品品質水準,並更進一步比較不同品質產品的品質水準差異。
本研究發現,當產品品質為外生變數時,機率銷售於大部分情境為最佳銷售策略,唯有在高品質產品產能過剩情況嚴重或消費者為高機率退貨且不適合之產品對於消費者剩餘價值低時,最佳策略為弱市場區隔策略。當產品品質水準為內生變數時,機率銷售策略於任何情境皆為最佳策略。最後,當高品質產品產能能夠幾乎完全消耗時,零售商應擴大兩種產品之品質水準差距以獲得最大利潤;反之,在高品質產品產能過剩情況嚴重時,零售商則應縮小兩種產品之品質水準差距。
This thesis studied the effect of customer return on the retailer’s selling strategy choice in a quality-differentiated market. In this study, we considered a monopoly retailer selling two quality-differentiated products to the market consisting of high type and low type customers. High type customers value quality more than low type customers, and both types of customers may incur product return. The retailer should determine the selling strategy, price and the amount of customer refunds before he sells the products to the customers. This study developed models to analyze the profit of the retailer when adopting different selling strategies and different amounts of customer refunds. Furthermore, we also discussed the scenario when the quality level is endogenous for the retailer. The results showed that probabilistic selling dominates the other selling strategies in most situations no matter the quality level is exogenous or endogenous. And, we found that when the quality level is endogenous, the retailer should pay attention to the increment of the market size of high type customers if they want to increase profit when adopting probabilistic selling. Finally, when the capacity of high quality products is almost consumed, the retailer shall increase the quality difference to gain more profit; otherwise, he shall decrease the quality difference.
Akçay, Y., Boyacı, T., & Zhang, D. (2013). Selling with Money‐Back Guarantees:
The Impact on Prices, Quantities, and Retail Profitability. Production and Operations Management, 22(4), 777-791.
Alexandrov, A., & Deb, J. (2012). Price discrimination and investment incentives.
International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(6), 615-623.
Anderson, E. T., & Dana Jr, J. D. (2009). When is price discrimination profitable?.
Management Science, 55(6), 980-989.
Anderson, C. K., & Xie, X. (2014). Pricing and market segmentation using opaque
selling mechanisms. European Journal of Operational Research, 233(1), 263-272.
Biyalogorsky, E., Gerstner, E., Weiss, D., & Xie, J. (2005). The economics of service
upgrades. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 234-244.
Chen, R. R., Gal-Or, E., & Roma, P. (2014). Opaque distribution channels for
competing service providers: Posted price vs. name-your-own-price mechanisms. Operations research, 62(4), 733-750.
Chen, J., & Chen, B. (2016). Competing with customer returns policies. International
Journal of Production Research, 54(7), 2093-2107.
Davis, S., Gerstner, E., & Hagerty, M. (1995). Money back guarantees in retailing:
Matching products to consumer tastes. Journal of Retailing, 71(1), 7-22.
Deneckere, R. J., & Preston McAfee, R. (1996). Damaged goods. Journal of
Economics & Management Strategy, 5(2), 149-174.
Desai, P. S. (2001). Quality segmentation in spatial markets: When does
cannibalization affect product line design?. Marketing Science, 20(3), 265-283.
Fay, S. (2008). Selling an opaque product through an intermediary: The case of
disguising one's product. Journal of Retailing, 84(1), 59-75.
Fay, S., & Xie, J. (2008). Probabilistic goods: A creative way of selling products and services. Marketing Science, 27(4), 674-690.
Fay, S., & Xie, J. (2014). Timing of product allocation: Using probabilistic selling to
enhance inventory management. Management Science, 61(2), 474-484.
Fay, S., Xie, J., & Feng, C. (2015). The effect of probabilistic selling on the optimal
product mix. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 451-467.
Geng, X. (2018). Opaque pricing over vertically differentiated servers. IISE
Transactions, 50(7), 627-642.
Hess, J. D., Chu, W., & Gerstner, E. (1996). Controlling product returns in direct
marketing. Marketing Letters, 7(4), 307-317.
Hsiao, L., & Chen, Y. J. (2012). Returns Policy and Quality Risk in E‐Business.
Production and Operations Management, 21(3), 489-503.
Hsiao, L., & Chen, Y. J. (2014). Return policy: Hassle‐free or your money‐back
guarantee?. Naval Research Logistics, 61(5), 403-417.
Huang, T., & Yu, Y. (2014). Sell probabilistic goods? A behavioral explanation for
opaque selling. Marketing Science, 33(5), 743-759.
Ivanov, S. H. (2015). Optimal overbooking limits for a hotel with three room types
and with upgrade and downgrade constraints. Tourism Economics, 21(1), 223-240.
Jerath, K., Netessine, S., & Veeraraghavan, S. K. (2010). Revenue management with
strategic customers: Last-minute selling and opaque selling. Management Science, 56(3), 430-448.
Jiang, Y. (2007). Price discrimination with opaque products. Journal of Revenue and
Pricing Management, 6(2), 118-134.
Li, Y., Xu, L., & Li, D. (2013). Examining relationships between the return policy,
product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 451-460.
Moorthy, K. S. (1984). Market segmentation, self-selection, and product line design
Marketing Science, 3(4), 288-307.
Moorthy, K. S., & Png, I. P. (1992). Market segmentation, cannibalization, and the
timing of product introductions. Management Science, 38(3), 345-359.
Parlaktürk, A. K. (2012). The value of product variety when selling to strategic
consumers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 14(3), 371-385.
Rice, D. H., Fay, S. A., & Xie, J. (2014). Probabilistic selling vs. markdown selling:
Price discrimination and management of demand uncertainty in retailing.
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 31(2), 147-155.
Shang, G., Ghosh, B. P., & Galbreth, M. R. (2017). Optimal retail return policies with
wardrobing. Production and Operations Management, 26(7), 1315-1332.
Shulman, J. D., Coughlan, A. T., & Savaskan, R. C. (2011). Managing consumer
returns in a competitive environment. Management Science, 57(2), 347-362.
Su, X. (2009). Consumer returns policies and supply chain performance.
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 11(4), 595-612.
Xiao, Y., & Chen, J. (2014). Evaluating the potential effects from probabilistic selling
of similar products. Naval Research Logistics, 61(8), 604-620.
Xie, J., & Gerstner, E. (2007). Service escape: Profiting from customer cancellations.
Marketing Science, 26(1), 18-30.
Yılmaz, Ö., Pekgün, P., & Ferguson, M. (2017). Would you like to upgrade to a
premium room? Evaluating the benefit of offering standby upgrades. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 19(1), 1-18.
Zhang, Z., Joseph, K., & Subramaniam, R. (2014). Probabilistic selling in quality-
differentiated markets. Management Science, 61(8), 1959-1977.
Zhang, Y., Hua, G., Wang, S., Zhang, J., & Fernandez, V. (2018). Managing demand
uncertainty: Probabilistic selling versus inventory substitution. International Journal of Production Economics, 196, 56-67.
校內:2023-06-26公開