本研究旨在探討混合實境技術（Mixed Reality）在企業教育訓練中的應用，以提高培訓效果。研究背景指出，在競爭激烈的商業環境中，企業教育訓練對提高員工的技能和知識、達到工作效能和業務目標至關重要。混合實境技術（Mixed Reality）被視為一種創新的執行方案，提供豐富的學習體驗、個性化的環境，並在虛擬場景中融入實際工作情境。這不僅可以提高學習者的動機和參與度，還能夠即時提供反饋，改進學習效果，同時降低實際訓練成本和資源需求，研究的目標是透過深入瞭解混合實境技術在企業教育訓練領域的應用和價值，為未來企業的教育訓練策略提供有力的依據，並改善企業教育訓練的效率和成果，研究結果將為企業提供實踐建議與方法，以推動混合實境在企業教育訓練中的應用，從而最大程度地提升學習和發展的效果。論文將關注以下兩個主要目的：
一、 探索混合實境技術在企業教育訓練中的引入、過程、挑戰，以及成果
二、 評估混合實境技術應用在企業教育訓練中的成效評估
本研究以A.D.D.I.E.模型為基礎，探討其在教育訓練教材開發中的應用，並就執行製作、風險管理和推廣提出結論。以此模型製作訓練教材，提供了有組織和系統性的方法，有助於提升教材質量和學習成果，但同時需注意時間、資源和靈活性的限制。在實際應用中，組織應權衡這些因素，以確定是否適合使用此模型，或者是否需要結合其他方法以滿足不同的教育訓練需求。
利用柯氏四級培訓評估模式評估其在不同層次的效果，包括反應、學習、行為和結果層次，經訪談科技產業之員工與其直屬主管後，歸納如下：在評估混合實境技術在企業教育訓練中的應用效果，解決傳統面對面訓練的無趣和參與度不足的問題，提供豐富的學習體驗，並在虛擬場景中融入實際工作情境，以提高學習者的動機和參與度，同時即時提供反饋，降低實際訓練成本，提高學習滿意度、促進跨部門合作、提高效率和生產力方面取得積極效果。研究也指出樣本大小、研究設計、技術限制等限制，需要謹慎考慮。最終，本研究提供管理層使用A.D.D.I.E.模型來製作培訓教材的建議，同時強調風險管理和全面執行計劃的重要性，以確保混合實境訓練的成功應用。

This study aims to explore the application of Mixed Reality technology in corporate education and training to enhance training effectiveness. Background emphasizes the critical role of corporate education and training in enhancing employees' skills and knowledge and achieving operational efficiency and business goals in a highly competitive business environment. The study results offer practical recommendations and methods for organizations to promote the application of Mixed Reality in corporate education and training, maximizing the effectiveness of learning and development. The paper addresses two objectives:
Explore the introduction, process, challenges, and outcomes of Mixed Reality technology in corporate education and training.
Utilizing Kirkpatrick's Four-Level Training Evaluation Model to assess its effects at different levels. The evaluation of the application of Mixed Reality technology in corporate education and training addresses issues such as the lack of interest and engagement in traditional training, providing rich learning experiences, integrating real work scenarios into virtual settings to enhance learner motivation and engagement, providing real-time feedback, reducing actual training costs, and achieving positive effects on learner satisfaction, promoting cross-departmental collaboration, and improving efficiency and productivity. The study also points out limitations such as sample size, research design, and technological constraints that need to be carefully considered. In conclusion, the research provides recommendations for management to use the A.D.D.I.E. model for training material production, emphasizing the importance of risk management and a comprehensive execution plan to ensure the successful application of Mixed Reality training.

鄭毓婷. (2012). 教育訓練態度對教育訓練滿意度及工作績效之影響-以影響性認知與學習導向為調節變數. (碩士), 中原大學, 桃園縣. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/fd2y5r
林郁晨. (2022). 以師徒關係探討企業中員工組織承諾之影響-以I公司為例. (碩士), 國立成功大學, 台南市. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/tc73pr
Akçayır, M., & Akçayır, G. (2017). Advantages and challenges associated with augmented reality for education: A systematic review of the literature. Educational Research Review, 20, 1-11.
Alhalabi, W., & Alshehri, M. (2020). Mixed Reality in Higher Education: An Overview of the Current State of Research and Practice. Journal of Information Technology Education, 19, 255-278.
Al-Rahmi, W. M., Alias, N., Othman, M. S., & Saged, A. A. (2018). The Influence of Using Virtual Reality for Learning on Learning Satisfaction and Outcomes. Journal of Information Systems Research and Innovation, 2(2), 27-34.
Azuma, R. T. (2019). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.
Bassi, L., & Van Buren III, M. E. (2018). 21st Century Workforce Development: New Learning Strategies for New Challenges. Human Resource Planning, 41(4), 51-5
Bauer, F., Fischer, M. R., & Kopp, V. (2011). Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Association, 306(9), 978-988.
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative case study methodology: Study design and implementation for novice researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544-559.
Brown, C., & Miller, D. (2018). Fostering a Culture of Learning and Innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 36(4), 145-162.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Sage Publications.
Chen, C. M., Chen, Y. H., & Chiang, T. H. (2018). Applying Augmented Reality to Enhance Learning Motivation and Achievement in Elementary School Students. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(8), 1084-1096.
Chen, C. M., Wang, C. Y., & Kinshuk. (2018). Effects of interface interaction on learning performance using augmented reality: A meta-analysis study. Educational Technology & Society, 21(4), 274-288.
Chiang, T. H., Yang, S. J. H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). Augmented Reality for Learning: A Systematic Review of Research Trends from 2009 to 2018. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 299-314.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Devedzic, V. (2017). Personalised Learning in Augmented Reality. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 27(4), 734-750.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications.
Farrington, C. A., et al. (2019). Creating a Learning Culture: A Step-By-Step Approach for the Empowered Workplace. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32(1), 103-118.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219-245
Graham, C. R. (2018). Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. R. Graham, P. L. M. Zemke, & D. D. Bichsel (Eds.), Blended Learning Systems: Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions (pp. 1-24). Springer.
Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., & McKee, A. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
Hawkins, M. A., & Kim, J. (2017). Customized Training Programs: The Impact on Training Effectiveness and Employee Engagement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(3), 345-359.
Holden, D. P., Hitchens, M., & Sulieman, L. A. (2016). Augmented reality and virtual reality in surgical education: A review. Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia, 10(4), 417-422.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107.
Huang, T. Y., Chiang, T. H. C., Hwang, G. J., & Wu, W. W. (2019). Effects of augmented reality-based inquiry learning on student engagement, performance, and flow experience. Educational Technology & Society, 22(1), 327-340.
Iqbal, T. (2017). Challenges and Opportunities in Augmented Reality Training. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video (pp. 277-281). ACM.
Johnson, L., & Smith, R. (2020). The Impact of Digital Transformation on Workforce Skills and Education. Journal of Business Trends, 25(3), 45-59.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2018). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1959). Techniques for Evaluating Training Programs. Journal of the American Society of Training Directors, 13(11), 3-9.
Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Klein, H. J., Noe, R. A., & Wang, C. (2019). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 72(3), 715-754.
Lee, C. Y., Chang, C. H., & Wu, W. H. (2017). A comparison of virtual reality versus traditional teaching on the learning outcomes of grasp and pinch force and dexterity of the hand. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(1), 94-104.
Lee, M. J. W., & Dalgarno, B. (2020). Beyond the moral panic: Ethical complexities of immersive technologies in schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(5), 1613-1628
Lombardi, M. M., Higgins, M. C., & Pearce, C. L. (2010). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 97-126.
Marsick, V. J., & Watkins, K. E. (2001). Informal and incidental learning in the workplace. Routledge..
Mayer, R. E. (2016). The Efficiency of Multimedia Learning. Learning and Instruction, 46(3), 1-9.
Raelin, J. A. (2008). Work-Based Learning: Bridging Knowledge and Action in the Workplace. Jossey-Bass.
Smith, A., & Jones, B. (2019). The Role of Training and Development in Employee Retention. Human Resources Quarterly, 12(2), 78-92
Smith, A. N., Lee, J., McCulloh, I. A., & Kim, C. H. (2019). The promise and peril of augmented reality in education: A constructivist analysis. Educational Media International, 56(3), 197-213.
Tsai, C. C., Shen, P. D., & Chen, C. C. (2020). Learning in mixed reality environments: Effects of visual realism on learning outcomes and interest. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(2), 671-689.
Tong, X., Chen, C. M., & Chen, Y. (2018). The impact of augmented reality on sustainable supply chain management. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 95(9-12), 3999-4010.
Vovk, A., & Ronen, S. (2018). Learning in virtual reality: Effects of customization and control. Computers & Education, 124, 1-11.
Wang, C. H., & Huang, H. C. (2017). Knowledge Sharing and Innovative Work Behavior in Healthcare: A Cross-Level Analysis of Professional Commitment as the Mediator. International Journal of Information Management, 37(6), 634-645.
Warren Bennis (1993)《An Invented Life: Reflections on Leadership and Change》
Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y., & Liang, J. C. (2020). Current status, opportunities, and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 150, 103840.
Yin, R. K. (1989). Case study research Design and methods.
Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.