簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 洪鐿珏
Hung, Yi-Chueh
論文名稱: 品牌模仿對消費者品牌混淆、品牌評價與購買意願之影響
The Effect of Brand Imitation on Consumer Brand Confusion, Brand Evaluation, and Purchase Intention
指導教授: 賴孟寬
Lai, Meng-Kuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 企業管理學系
Department of Business Administration
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 81
中文關鍵詞: 品牌模仿價格品牌混淆品牌評價購買意願
外文關鍵詞: Brand Imitation, Price, Brand Confusion, Brand Evaluation, Purchase Intention
相關次數: 點閱:152下載:2
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 品牌模仿係指廠商將其產品包裝外觀設計、製作得與領導品牌相似。由於相似的產品包裝外觀,消費者可能會認為模仿品牌的產品屬性,利益和功效是與領導品牌相似的,此情況即稱為消費者品牌混淆。本研究主要探討品牌模仿和價格之主效果和交互效果對依變數—消費者品牌混淆、品牌評價,以及購買意願的影響。具體而言,本研究之實驗設計為2 (包裝相似性:高vs.低) x 3 (價格:未揭露、微低vs.較低),以操弄洋芋片包裝與價格進行實驗。
    本研究結果顯示,品牌模仿和價格具有主效果與交互效果,影響消費者品牌混淆與品牌評價。意即,消費者對於模仿品牌有較高的品牌混淆與品牌評價,此外,消費者對於價格微低於領導品牌的模仿品牌也產生較高的品牌混淆與品牌評價,因此,假設H1, H2, H3, H4獲得支持。另外,由線性結構模式之路徑分析顯示,品牌混淆與品牌評價之關係顯著,即消費者對模仿品牌的品牌混淆越高,品牌評價越高,假設H5獲得支持。而且,品牌評價與購買意願之關係亦顯著,即消費者對模仿品牌的評價越高,購買意願越高,假設H6獲得支持。然而,品牌混淆與購買意願之關係不顯著,假設H7未獲支持。探究原因,回顧品牌混淆之定義,係指消費者對於模仿品牌產生不精確之評價。據此,品牌混淆透過品牌評估,間接地影響消費者之購買意願,而無顯著之直接效果。

    Brand imitation refers to the market follower makes its product package looks like the leading brand’s product package. Because of the similar package, consumers may think that the attributes, benefits, and performance of the imitating brand are similar to that of the leading brand; this situation is called consumer brand confusion. This study investigates how brand imitation and price influence consumer brand confusion, consumers’ brand evaluation, and consumers’ purchase intention toward the imitating brand. Specifically, package similarity and price are manipulated. The former is designed as high and low similar to the leading brand; the latter is designed as competitive (lower than the leading brand’s price) and differentiated (much lower than the leading brand’s price). The two are manipulated to see their interactive influence on consumer brand confusion, brand evaluation, and purchase intention. Furthermore, the casual relationship between brand confusion and brand evaluation are assumed. In addition, brand confusion and brand evaluation are hypothesized to affect purchase intention of the imitating brand.
    Generally, the results support the hypotheses and demonstrate that brand imitation and price interactively influence consumer brand confusion, brand evaluation, and purchase intention. Specifically, H1, H2, H3, H4, H5, H6 are supported. However, the relationship between consumer brand confusion and purchase intention is not significant, thus H7 is not supported. Retrospect to the definition of brand confusion, which refers to consumers’ inaccurate evaluation of the imitating brand. Accordingly, consumer brand confusion has indirect effect on purchase intention through brand evaluation.

    CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTERⅡ LITERATURE REVIEW 5 Imitation Strategy 5 Imitation 5 Brand Imitation 7 Price 8 Brand Evaluation 10 Brand Evaluation 11 Stimulus Generalization 12 Brand Confusion 14 The Relationships among Brand Imitation, Brand Evaluation, and Brand Confusion 15 The Relationships among Brand Confusion, Brand Evaluation, and Purchase Intention 20 Conceptual Model 22 CHAPTERⅢ METHODOLOGY 23 Research Design 23 Brand and Product Selection 23 Operational Definition of Research Variables 24 Independent Variable 25 Dependent Variable 27 Experimental Material 28 Research product picture 29 Questionnaire design 29 PretestⅠ 31 Sample and Procedures 31 Results 32 Modifications 35 PretestⅡ 36 Experimental Material 36 Research product picture 36 Sample and Procedures 36 Sample 36 Questionnaires and Procedures 37 Results 37 PretestⅢ 42 Experimental Material 42 Research product picture 42 Questionnaire design 42 Sampling and Procedures 43 Sample 43 Questionnaires and Procedures 43 Results 43 Formal Data Collection 45 Sampling and Procedures 45 Sample 45 Questionnaires and Procedures 45 Experimental Material 46 Research product picture 46 Questionnaire design 46 CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 48 Data Handing 48 Data Coding 49 Validity and Reliability 51 Factor Analyses 51 Reliability 51 Validity 53 Effectiveness of Manipulation 56 Hypothesis Testing 56 Other Findings 63 CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 68 Conclusions 68 Empirically Tested Model 70 Research Contributions 71 Academic Contributions 71 The Effect of Brand Imitation 71 The Interaction Effect of Package Similarity and Price 72 The Relationship between Consumer Brand Confusion and Brand Evaluation 72 The Relationship between Brand Evaluation and Purchase Intention 73 The Gender Differences on Purchase Intention of the Imitating Brand 73 Managerial Implications 73 Firms Can Use Brand Imitation as Market Entry Strategy 73 Firms of the Imitating Brand Should Be Cautious of Setting Price 74 Limitations and Suggestions for Future Research 74 REFERENCES 76 Appendix A1~A4: Product Picture—PretestⅠ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Formal Questionnaire Appendix B1~B4: Questionnaire—PretestⅠ、Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Formal Questionnaire

    ACNielsen. (2006). The Power of Private Label 2005, Schaumburg, IL: Author.

    Alain, D. A., & Ezzedine, G. (2001). Consumer evaluations of brand imitations. European Journal of Marketing, 35(1/2), 153-167.

    Allen, C. T., & Janiszewski, C. A. (1989). Assessing the role of contingency awareness in attitudinal conditioning with implications for advertising research. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 30-43.

    Armstrong, G., & Kotler, P. (2009). Marketing (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Auh, S., & Shih, E. (2009). Brand name and consumer inference making in multigenerational product introduction context. Journal of Brand Management, 16(7), 439-454.

    Balabanis, G., & Craven, S. (1997). Consumer confusion from own brand lookalikes: An exploratory investigation. Journal of Marketing Management, 13(4), 299-313.

    Boyle, P. J., & Lathrop, E. S. (2009). Are consumers' perceptions of price–quality relationships well calibrated? International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(1), 58-63.

    Brisoux JE, Laroche M. (1980). A proposed consumer strategy of simplification for categorizing brands. Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 357-361.

    Britt, S. H. (1975). How Weber's Law Can Be Applied to Marketing. Business Horizons, 18(1), 21-29.
    Burshteyn, D., & Buff, C. L. (2008). Private-label brands, manufacturer brands, and the quest for stimulus generalization: An EGG analysis of frontal cortex response. Review of Business Research, 8(6), 92-96.

    Carpenter, G. S., & Nakamoto, K. (1989). Consumer preference formation and pioneering advantage. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 26(3), 285-298.

    Chatura, R., Harvir, B., & Gordon, M. (2008). Web site satisfaction and purchase intentions: Impact of personality characteristics during initial web site visit. Managing Service Quality, 18(4), 329-348.

    Ching-Wen Chu,& Hsi-Peng Lu. (2007). Factors influencing online music purchase intention in Taiwan. Internet Research, 17(2), 139-155.

    Collins-Dodd, C., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999). National brand responses to brand imitation: Retailers versus other manufacturers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 8(2), 96.

    Crosno, J. L., Freling, T. H., & Skinner, S. J. (2009). Does brand social power mean market might? Exploring the influence of brand social power on brand evaluations. Psychology & Marketing, 26(2), 91-121.

    Dawar, N., & Lei, J. (2009). Brand crises: The roles of brand familiarity and crisis relevance in determining the impact on brand evaluations. Journal of Business Research, 62(4), 509-516.

    Dee, K. K., & Eun Young, K. (2007). Japanese consumers' need for uniqueness: Effects on brand perceptions and purchase intention. Journal of Fashion Marketing & Management, 11(2), 270-280.

    Dipl.Kffr.(FH), & BBA Annika Kristin Baiker. (2007). Fighting brand counterfeiting in E-commerce. Nordestedt Germany: GRIN Verlag.

    Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers' product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 28(3), 307-319.

    Drödge, C., & Darmon, R. Y. (1987). Associative positioning strategies through comparative advertising: Attribute versus overall similarity approaches. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 24(4), 377-388.

    E-ICP. (2008). Eastern integrated consumer profile database. Taiwan: Eastern Online Co., Ltd.

    Enrico, V., Alessandro, A. (2007). Strategies of imitation: An insight. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 5(3), 198-205.

    Foxman, E. R., & Muehling, D. D. (1990). An investigation of factors contributing to consumer brand confusion. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 24(1), 170-189.

    Foxman, E. R., Berger, P. W., & Cote, J. A. (1992). Consumer brand confusion: A conceptual framework. Psychology & Marketing, 9(2), 123-141.

    Gardial, S., & Biehal, G. (1987). Measuring consumers’ inferential processing in choice. Advances in Consumer Research, 14(1), 101-105.

    Ghoshal, T., Boatwright, P., & Cagan, J. (2009). Unwrapping the good news: Packaging pays, and "How"! The role of packaging in influencing product valuation. Advances in Consumer Research - Asia-Pacific Conference Proceedings, 8, 254-256.

    Golder, P.N., & Tellis, G.J. (1993). Pioneer advantage: Marketing logic or marketing legend. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, 158-170.

    Gopinath, M., Tam, L., & Glassman, M. (2008). Effect of country-of-targeting on product evaluations. Advances in Consumer Research - North American Conference Proceedings, 35, 1000-1001.

    Graeff, T. R., & Olson, J. C. (1994). Consumer inference as part of product comprehension. Advances in Consumer Research, 21(1), 201-207.

    Grossman, R. P., & Till, B. D. (1998). The persistence of classically conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 23-31.

    Hansen, T. (2005). Perspectives on consumer decision making: An integrated approach. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(6), 420-437.

    Hoch, S. J., & Banerji, S. (1993). When do private labels succeed? Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 57-67.

    Howard, D. J., Kerin, R. A., & Gengler, C. (2000). The effects of brand name similarity on brand source confusion: Implications for trademarks infringement. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 19(2), 250-264.

    Janiszewski, C., & Warlop, L. (1993). The influence of classical conditioning procedures on subsequent attention to the conditioned brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(2), 171-189.

    Kapferer, J.-N. (1995). Brand Confusion: Empirical study of a legal concept. Psychology & Marketing, 12(6), 551-568.

    Kearney, Í., & Mitchell, V.-W. (2001). Measuring consumer brand confusion to comply with legal guidelines. International Journal of Market Research, 43(1), 85-91.

    Keller, K. L. (1987). Memory Factors in Advertising: The effect of advertising retrieval cues on brand evaluations. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 316-333.

    Kerin, R. A., Varadarajan, P. R., & Peterson, R. A. (1992). First-mover advantage: A synthesis, conceptual framework, and research propositions. Journal of Marketing, 56(4), 33.

    Luk, Sherriff T. K., & Yip, Leslie S. C. (2008). The moderator effect of monetary sales promotion on the relationship between brand trust and purchase behaviour. Journal of Brand Management, 15(6), 452-464.

    Kuvykaite, R., Dovaliene, A., & Navickiene, L. (2009). Impact of package elements on consumer’s purchase decision. Economics & Management, 441-447.

    Lambert, Z. V. (1978). Differential thresholds in consumer perception of retail prices. Journal of Psychology, 100, 139-150.

    Lichtenstein, D. R., & Burton, S. (1989). The relationship between perceived and objective price-quality. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 26(4), 429-443.

    Loken, B., Ross, I., & Hinkle, R. L. (1986). Consumer 'confusion' of origin brand similarity perceptions. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 5(1), 195-211.

    McDaniel, C., & Baker, R. C. (1977). Convenience food packaging and the perception of product quality. Journal of Marketing, 41(4), 57-58.

    McKechnie, D. S., Grant, J., & Katsioloudes, M. (2008). Positions and positioning: Strategy simply stated. Business Strategy Series, 9(5), 224-230.

    Meyers-Levy, J., & Sternthal, B. (1991). Gender differences in the use of message cues and judgments. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(1), 84-96.

    Miaoulis, G., & D'Amato, N. (1978). Consumer confusion and trademark infringement. Journal of Marketing, 42(2), 48-55.

    Ming-Hsu, C., & Wen-Bin, C. (2007). Psychophysical methods in study of consumers’ perceived price change for food products. Psychological Reports, 100(2), 643-652.

    Mitchell, V.-W., & Kearney, Í. (2002). A critique of legal measures of brand confusion. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 11(6/7), 357.

    Mitchell, V.-W., Walsh, G., & Mo, Y. (2005). Towards a conceptual model of consumer confusion. Advances in Consumer Research, 32(1), 143-150.

    Mitra, A. (1995). Price cue utilization in product evaluations The moderating role of motivation and attribute information. Journal of Business Research, 33(3), 187-195.

    Monroe, K. B. (1971). Measuring Price Thresholds by Psychophysics and Latitudes of Acceptance. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 8(4), 460-464.

    Monroe, K. B., & Petroshius, S. M. (1981). Buyers’ perception of price: An update of the evidence, Perspectives in Consumer Behavior (3rd ed.). IL: Scott Foresman and Company.

    Pavlov, I. P. (1928). Lectures on the conditioned reflex. New York: International Publishers.

    Pilzer, P.Z. (1990). Unlimited wealth: The theory and practice of economic alchemy. New York: Crown Publishers.

    Pollster. (2009). An on-line survey of potato chip brand on fourth quarter of 2009. Taiwan: Pollster Technology Marketing Ltd. Retrieved October 16, 2009. http://www.pollster.com.tw/report/583/index.htm

    Roberts, J. H., & Lattin, J. M. (1991). Development and testing of a model of consideration set composition. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 28(4), 429-440.

    Robinson, W. T., & Fornell, C. (1985). Sources of market pioneer advantages in consumer goods industries. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 22(3), 305-317.

    Rosenberg, L. J. & Hovland, C. I. (1960). “Cognitive, Affective, and Behavior Components of Attitude,” in Attitude organization and Change: An Analysis of Consistency among Attitude Components. Eds. M. J. Rosenberg et al. New Haven, Ct: Yale University Press.

    Rundh, B. (2005). The multi-faceted dimension of packaging: Marketing logistic or marketing tool? British Food Journal, 107(9), 670-684.

    Schiffman, L.G., & Kanuk, L.L. (2007). Consumer Behavior (9th ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Sehrawet, M., & Kundu, S. C. (2007). Buying behaviour of rural and urban consumers in India: The impact of packaging. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 31(6), 630-638.

    Shankar, V., Carpenter, G. S., & Krishnamurthi, L. (1998). Late mover advantage: How innovative late entrants outsell pioneers. Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), 35(1), 54-70.

    Sherif, C. W. (1963). Social categorization as a function of latitude of acceptance and series range. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 148-156.

    Shimp, T. A., Stuart, E. W., & Engle, R. W. (1991). A program of classical conditioning experiments testing variations in the conditioned stimulus and context. Journal of Consumer Research, 18(1), 1-12.

    Silayoi, P., & Speece, M. (2004). Packaging and purchase decisions: A focus group study on the impact of involvement level and time pressure. British Food Journal, 106(8), 607-628.

    Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66.

    Teng, L. (2009). A comparison of two types of price discounts in shifting consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 14-21.

    Till, B. D., & Priluck, R. L. (2000). Stimulus generalization in classical conditioning: An initial investigation and extension. Psychology & Marketing, 17(1), 55-72.
    Tsiotsou, R., & Alexandris, K. (2009). Delineating the outcomes of sponsorship: Sponsor image, word of mouth, and purchase intentions. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 37(4), 358-369.

    Underwood, R. L., & Klein, N. M. (2002). Packaging as brand communication: Effects of product pictures on consumer responses to the package and the brand. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 10(4), 58.

    Veale, R., & Quester, P. (2009). Do consumer expectations match experience? Predicting the influence of price and country of origin on perceptions of product quality. International Business Review, 18(2), 134-144.

    Völckner, F., & Hofmann, J. (2007). The price-perceived quality relationship: A meta-analytic review and assessment of its determinants. Marketing Letters, 18(3), 181-196.

    Walsh, G., Hennig-Thurau, T., & Mitchell, V.-W. (2007). Consumer confusion proneness: Scale development, validation, and application. Journal of Marketing Management, 23(7/8), 697-721.

    Ward, J., Loken, B., Ross, I., & Hasapopoulos, T. (1986). The influence of physical similarity on generalization of affect and attribute perceptions from national brands to private label brands. American Marketing Educators' Conference. Chicago: American Marketing Association.

    Warlop, L., & Alba, J. W. (2004). Sincere flattery: Trade-dress imitation and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 14(1/2), 21-27.

    Wells, L. E., Farley, H., & Armstrong, G. A. (2007). The importance of packaging design for own-label food brands. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 35(9), 677-690.

    Wilke, R., & Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1999). Brand imitation and its effects on innovation, competition, and brand equity. Business Horizons, 42(6), 9.

    Zaichkowsky, J. L., & Simpson, R. N. (1996). The effect of experience with a brand imitator on the original brand. Marketing Letters, 7(1), 31-39.

    Zaichkowsky, J.L. (1995). Defending your brand against imitation: Consumer behavior, marketing strategies, and legal issues. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.

    Zheng Zhou, K. (2006). Innovation, imitation, and new product performance: The case of China. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 394-402.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2020-12-31公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE