簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 庫柏新
Jacobs, Marco
論文名稱: The Effects of Psychological Arousal on the Effectiveness of PSA: A Quasi-Experiment Approach on Betel Nut Chewing
The Effects of Psychological Arousal on the Effectiveness of PSA: A Quasi-Experiment Approach on Betel Nut Chewing
指導教授: 吳萬益
Wu, Wann-Yih
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 國際經營管理研究所碩士班
Institute of International Management (IIMBA--Master)
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 82
外文關鍵詞: Public Service Announcement, Sensation Seeking, Fear Arousal in PSA, Betel Nut Taiwan, Betel Nut Cancer
相關次數: 點閱:57下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • Betel nut chewing has raised increasing concerns as a health factor, being a cause of oral cancer. Usually the use and often the abuse of substances that poses a health risk calls for awareness creation amongst society. Creating awareness has been made possible through the use of Public Service Announcement (PSA) to reach large audiences at once and spread messages of concern on matters like drug abuse, alcohol abuse, anti drink and drive campaigns, AIDS awareness campaigns, Global warming ect. Yet through many research this study found a gap, in that little or no research has been done to examine the response of betel nut chewers towards a PSA creating health risk awareness. This study‘s purpose is to investigate the response of betel nut chewers in Taiwan, when being exposed to a PSA expressing health risks from chewing betel nut.
    The Quasi-experiment will examine the difference in affectivity from PSA messages, using high and low levels of fear in the message, to an audience consisting of high and low sensation seekers and amongst them being pre and post users of betel nut (Independent variables being Pre and Post users, Fear level of PSA and Sensation Seekers). Proving the PSA to be likeable or believable the study suggest a positive change in attitude and as a result examine the change in behavioral intension (Dependent variables being Likeability and Believability, Attitude towards PSA and Behavioral intension).

    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .......................... I ABSTRACT ..................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................... III LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ VII LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................. VIII CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivations. .......................................................... 1 1.2 Research Contributions and Objectives. .......................................................... 5 1.3 Research Project and Scope of the Study. ........................................... 6 1.4 Research Procedure. ........................................................................... 7 1.5 The Structure of this Study. ................................................................. 8 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................... 10 2.1 Public Service Announcement. ................................................................ 10 2.1.1 PSAs. .................................................................................. 10 2.1.2 Health Risk. ........................................................................... 12 2.2 Definition of Research Constructs. ................................................ 13 2.2.1 Group-Pre and Post Users. ........................................................... 13 2.2.2 Fear Level: PMSV (Perceived Message Sensation Value). .............. 14 2.2.3 Sensation Seeking. .......................................................... 18 2.2.4 PSA Believability and Likeability of the PSA. ................................ 20 2.2.5 Attitude towards PSA. ............................................................ 22 2.2.6 Behavioral Intention towards the Use. ......................... 23 2.3 Hypotheses Development. ........................................................ 24 2.3.1 Effects of Pre and Post Betel Nut Users towards the Likeability and Believability of PSA. ......................................................... 24 2.3.2 The Effect of Fear Levels, High or Low towards the Likeability and Believability of the PSA. ........................................................ 25 2.3.3 The Effects of Sensation Seekers, High and Low towards the Likeability and Believability of the PSA. ................................. 26 2.3.4 The Effects of PSA Believability and Likeability on the Attitude towards the PSA. .................................................................... 27 CHAPTER THREE RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODOLOGY ...................... 30 3.1 Conceptual Framework of the Study. ....................................... 30 3.2 Research Design. ................................................. 30 3.3 Stimulus Development. ............................... 31 3.4 Measures of Independent Variables. .............................................. 32 3.4.1 Sensation Seeking. ............................................... 32 3.4.2 Ad Likability................................. 33 3.4.3 Ad Believability. ................................................................................... 33 3.5 Manipulation Checks - The Degrees of Fear. ................................................ 34 3.6 Sampling Plan. ............................................................................................... 34 3.7 Main Study. .................................................................................................... 35 3.8 Measures of Dependent Variables and Information of Respondents. ............ 36 3.8.1 Attitude toward the Advertisement................................................ 36 3.8.2 Behavioral Intention toward Betel Nut. ............................................... 36 3.8.3 The Information of Respondents. ........................................... 37 3.9 Data Analysis Procedure. ............................................................................... 37 3.9.1 Descriptive Statistic Analysis. ................................................. 38 3.9.2 Factor Analysis. ............................................................................. 38 3.9.3 Reliability Analysis. .................................................................... 38 3.9.4 Independent Sample T-test. ........................................................ 39 3.9.5 Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA). ................................... 39 3.9.6 One-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). ............................................ 39 3.9.7 Multiple Regression Analysis. .............................................. 40 CHAPTER FOUR DESCRIPTIVE AND RELIABILITY ANALYSIS ..................... 41 4.1 Descriptive Analysis. ........................................................................ 41 4.1.1 Data Collection. ................................................................... 41 4.1.2Measurement Results for Relevant Research Variables. ...................... 42 4.2 Factor Analysis and Reliability Test. ................................................... 45 4.2.1 Fear. ................................................................................. 46 4.2.2 Believability. ......................................................................... 47 4.2.3 Likeability. ............................................................................... 48 4.2.4 Attitude. ............................................................................. 49 4.2.5 Behavioral Intention. .......................................................... 50 CHAPTER FIVE RESEARCH RESULTS .................................................... 52 5.1 Differences between Factors and Research Constructs. ................................ 52 5.1.1 Differences of Dependent Variables under Different Types of Fear PSA.......................................................................................... 52 5.1.2 Differences of Dependent Variables under Different Types of User. ... 53 5.1.3 Differences of Dependent Variables among Different Types of Sensation Seeker. ......................................................... 54 5.2 Comparison among Respondents with Different types of Fear PSA, Sensation Seeker and User. ............................................................................ 55 5.3 Regression between Attitude, Believability, Likeability and Behavioral Intention. ............................................................................... 56 5.3.1 Regression between Believability, Likeability and Attitude towards PSA’s. ................................................................................. 56 5.3.2 Regression between Attitude towards PSA and Behavioral Intention. 57 CHAPTER SIX CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTIONS ............................... 59 6.1 Research Conclusions. ...................................................................... 59 6.2 Managerial Implications. ................................................................. 62 6.3 Limitations and Future Research Directions. ....................................... 63 REFERENCES ..................................................................................... 65 APPENDICES ............................................................................................. 72 Appendix 1: Questionnaire for Experiment .......................................... 72 Appendix 2: PSA Samples ..................................................................... 81

    Aaker, D., & Stayman, D. (1990). Measuring audience perceptions of commercials and relating them to ad impact. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(4), 7-17.
    Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior: Prentice-Hall.
    Anderson, E., & Sullivan, M. (1990). Customer satisfaction and retention across firms.
    Andsager, J., Austin, E., & Pinkleton, B. (2001). Questioning the value of realism: Young adults' processing of messages in alcohol-related public service announcements and advertising. Journal of Communication, 51(1), 121-142.
    Beltramini, R. (1982). Advertising perceived believability scale. Proceedings of the southwestern marketing association, 1-3.
    Beltramini, R. (1988). Perceived believability of warning label information presented in cigarette advertising. Journal of Advertising, 17(2), 26-32.
    Biel, A. (1990). Love the ad. Buy the product? Why liking the advertisement and preferring the brand aren't strange bedfellows after all. Admap, 26, 21-25.
    Boer, H., & Seydel, E. (1996). Protection motivation theory. Predicting health behaviour: research and practice with social cognition models, Open University Press, Buckingham, England.
    Bohner, G., & Wänke, M. (2002). Attitudes and attitude change: Psychology Pr.
    Brown, S., Homer, P., & Inman, J. (1998). A meta-analysis of relationships between ad-evoked feelings and advertising responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 35(1), 114-126.
    Clow, K., James, K., Kranenburg, K., & Berry, C. (2006). The relationship of the visual element of an advertisement to service quality expectations and source credibility. Journal of Services Marketing, 20(6), 404-411.
    Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: L: Erlbaum Associates.
    Crandall, R., Robinson, J., & Shaver, P. (1973). Measures of social psychological attitudes: Institute for Social Research Ann Arbor, MI.
    Cronbach, L. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
    Cronin Jr, J., & Taylor, S. (1992). Measuring service quality: a reexamination and extension. The Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 55-68.
    D'Silva, M., & Palmgreen, P. (2007). Individual differences and context: Factors mediating recall of anti-drug public service announcements. Health Communication, 21(1), 65-71.
    David, C., Cappella, J., & Fishbein, M. (2006). The social diffusion of influence among adolescents: Group interaction in a chat room environment about antidrug advertisements. Communication Theory, 16(1), 118.
    Derbaix, C. (1995). The impact of affective reactions on attitudes toward the advertisement and the brand: A step toward ecological validity. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(4), 470-479.
    Dillard, J., & Anderson, J. (2004). The role of fear in persuasion. Psychology and Marketing, 21(11), 909-926.
    Dillard, J., & Nabi, R. (2006). The persuasive influence of emotion in cancer prevention and detection messages. Journal of Communication, 56, 123.
    Donohew, L., Helm, D., & Haas, J. (1989). Drugs and (Len) Bias on the sports page. Media, Sports, & Society, 225-239.
    Donohew, L., Lorch, E., & Palmgreen, P. (1998). Applications of a theoretic model of information exposure to health interventions. Human Communication Research, 24(3), 454-468.
    Donohew, L., Palmgreen, P., & Duncan, J. (1980). An activation model of information exposure. Communication Monographs, 47(4), 295-303.
    Dunn, S., Seaker, R., & Waller, M. (1994). Latent variables in business logistics research: scale development and validation. Journal of Business Logistics, 15, 145-145.
    Edell, J., & Burke, M. (1987). The power of feelings in understanding advertising effects. The Journal of Consumer Research, 14(3), 421-433.
    Elkind, D. (1967). Egocentrism in adolescence. Child development, 1025-1034.
    Examining privilege, building community Public Service Announcement (PSA) contest. (2009). The Claiming Williams Steering Committee.
    Farnworth, E. (1976). Betel nut - Its composition, chemistry and uses. Science in New Guinea, 4, 85-90.
    Fishbein, M., Hall-Jamieson, K., Zimmer, E., von Haeften, I., & Nabi, R. (2002). Avoiding the boomerang: Testing the relative effectiveness of antidrug public service announcements before a national campaign. American Journal of Public Health, 92(2), 238.
    Floyd, D., & Prentice-Dunn, S. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal ofApplied Social Psychology, 30(2), 407-429.
    Fowler, C., Von Knorring, L., & Oreland, L. (1980). Platelet monoamine oxidase activity in sensation seekers. Psychiatry research, 3(3), 273.
    Freimuth, V., Linnan, H., & Potter, P. (2000). Communicating the threat of emerging infections to the public. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 6(4), 337.
    Goldsmith, R., Lafferty, B., & Newell, S. (2000). The impact of corporate credibility and celebrity credibility on consumer reaction to advertisements and brands. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 43-54.
    Gomà-i-Freixanet, M. (2004). Sensation seeking and participation in physical risk sports. On the Psychobiology of Personality: Essays in Honor of Marvin Zuckerman, 185.
    Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis: Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
    Hawkins, D., Best, R., & Coney, K. (1998). Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy. Seventh International Edition: McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts.
    Helweg-Larsen, M., & Howell, C. (2000). Effects of erotophobia on the persuasiveness of condom advertisements containing strong or weak arguments. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 22(2), 111-117.
    Ho, P., Ko, Y., Yang, Y., Shieh, T., & Tsai, C. (2002). The incidence of oropharyngeal cancer in Taiwan: an endemic betel quid chewing area. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 31(4), 213-219.
    Ho, R. (1998). The intention to give up smoking: Disease versus social dimensions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 138(3), 368-380.
    Ho, R. (2000). Predicting intention for protective health behaviour: A test of the protection versus the ordered protection motivation model. Australian Journal of Psychology, 52(2), 110-118.
    Janis, I., & Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of fear-arousing communications. Journal of abnormal and social psychology, 48(1), 78-92.
    Jennings, R. (2007). Betel nut cancer link takes buzz out of Taiwan tradition. Thomson Reuters.
    Jonah, B. (1997). Sensation seeking and risky driving: a review and synthesis of the literature. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(5), 651-666.
    Keller, P., & Block, L. (1996). Increasing the persuasiveness of fear appeals: The effect of arousal and elaboration. Journal of consumer research, 448-459.
    Ko, Y., Huatig, Y., Lee, C., Chen, M., Litt, L., & Tsai, C. (1995). Betel quid chewing, cigarette smoking and aicohoi consumption reiated to oral cancer in Taiwan. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 24, 450-453.
    Lafferty, B., & Goldsmith, R. (1999). Corporate credibility's role in consumers' attitudes and purchase intentions when a high versus a low credibility endorser is used in the ad. Journal of Business Research, 44(2), 109-116.
    Lang, A. (2006). Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication, 56, 57.
    Lang, A., Dhillon, K., & Dong, Q. (1995). The effects of emotional arousal and valence on television viewers' cognitive capacity and memory. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 39, 313.
    Lang, A., & Yegiyan, N. (2008). Understanding the interactive effects of emotional appeal and claim strength in health messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 52(3), 432-447.
    Looft, W., & Charles, D. (1971). Egocentrism and social interaction in young and old adults. Aging and Human Development, 2, 21-28.
    Lorch, E., Palmgreen, P., Donohew, L., Helm, D., Baer, S., & Dsilva, M. (1994). Program context, sensation seeking, and attention to televised anti-drug public service announcements. Human Communication Research, 20, 390-390.
    MacKenzie, S., & Lutz, R. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65.
    MacKenzie, S., Lutz, R., & Belch, G. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 130-143.
    Marshall, M. (1987). An overview of drugs in Oceania. Drugs in western pacific societies: Relations of substance. ASAO Monograph, 11, 13-49.
    Murphy, D., Belmaker, R., Buchsbaum, M., Martin, N., Ciaranello, R., & Wyatt, R. (1977). Biogenic amine-related enzymes and personality variations in normals. Psychological Medicine, 7(1), 149-157.
    Nunnally, J., & Bernstein, I. (1978). Psychometric theory.
    Ohman, A. (2000). Fear and anxiety: Evolutionary, cognitive, and clinical perspectives. Handbook of emotions, 2, 573-593.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., & Berry, L. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.
    Parpis, E. (1997). Up in Smoke: Kicking Butt. AdWeek (Eastern Edition), 38(41), 33-38.
    Pechmann, C., Zhao, G., Goldberg, M., & Reibling, E. (2003). What to convey in antismoking advertisements for adolescents: The use of protection motivation theory to identify effective message themes. The Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 1-18.
    Peters, E., Lipkus, I., & Diefenbach, M. (2006). The functions of affect in health communications and in the construction of health preferences. Journal of Communication, 56, 140.
    Pierce, J., Anderson, D., Romano, R., Meissner, H., & Odenkirchen, J. (1992). Promoting smoking cessation in the United States: effect of public service announcements on the Cancer Information Service telephone line. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 84(9), 677.
    Powell, F., & Miller, G. (1967). Social approval and disapproval cues in anxiety-arousing communications. Communication Monographs, 34(2), 152-159.
    Rogers, R. (1975). A protection motivation theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Psychology, 91(1), 93-114.
    Rogers, R. (1983). Cognitive and physiological processes in fear appeals and attitude change: A revised theory of protection motivation. Social psychophysiology, 153-176.
    Rogus, M., Palmgreen, P., & Everett, M. (1990). Sensation seeking as a targeting variable for television advertisers.
    Rosenbloom, T. (2003). Risk evaluation and risky behavior of high and low sensation seekers. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 31(4), 375-386.
    Ryu, G., Park, J., & Feick, L. (2006). The role of product type and country-of-origin in decisions about choice of endorser ethnicity in advertising. Psychology and Marketing, 23(6), 487.
    Schoenbachler, D., Ridnour, R., & Humes, K. (1996). Sensation seeking and the effectiveness of physical and social threat drug prevention PSA Messages. Journal of Nonprofit & Public Sector Marketing, 4(1), 51-73.
    Schoenbachler, D., & Whittler, T. (1996). Adolescent processing of social and physical threat communications. Journal of Advertising, 25(4), 37-54.
    Schooler, C., Zahn, T., Murphy, D., & Buchsbaum, M. (1978). Psychological correlates of monoamine oxidase activity in normals. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 166(3), 177.
    Siegel, M. (1998). Mass media antismoking campaigns: A powerful tool for health promotion. Annals of Internal Medicine, 129(2), 128.
    Singhaudomchai, O. (2007). The role of product type, endorser type, and endorser ethnicity on the consumer's response toward the advertisement: A study of Taiwanese and Thai.
    Solomon, M. (2003). Consumer Behavior, Buying, Having, and Being, Pearson Education. Inc.: Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
    Stephenson, M. (2003). Examining adolescents' responses to antimarijuana PSAs. Human Communication Research, 29(3), 343-369.
    Tanner, J., Jr., Hunt, J., & Eppright, D. (1991). The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. The Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 36-45.
    Tanner Jr, J., Hunt, J., & Eppright, D. (1991). The protection motivation model: A normative model of fear appeals. The Journal of Marketing, 55(3), 36-45.
    Umeh, K. (2004). Cognitive appraisals, maladaptive coping, and past behaviour in protection motivation. Psychology and Health, 19(6), 719-735.
    Vallone, D., Allen, J., Clayton, R., & Xiao, H. (2007). How reliable and valid is the Brief Sensation Seeking Scale (BSSS-4) for youth of various racial/ethnic groups? Addiction, 102(s2), 71-78.
    von Knorring, L., Oreland, L., & Winblad, B. (1984). Personality traits related to monoamine oxidase activity in platelets. Psychiatry Research, 12(1), 11-26.
    Walker, D., & Dubitsky, T. (1994). Why liking matters. Journal of Advertising Research, 34(3).
    Warnakulasuriya, S., Trivedy, C., & Peters, T. (2002). Areca nut use: an independent risk factor for oral cancer. British Medical Journal, 324(7341), 799.
    Weinstein, N. (2000). Perceived probability, perceived severity, and health-protective behavior. Health Psychology, 19(1), 65-74.
    Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329-349.
    Witte, K., & Allen, M. (2000). A meta-analysis of fear appeals: Implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Education & Behavior, 27(5), 591.
    Yang, Y., Lee, H., Tung, S., & Shieh, T. (2001). Epidemiological survey of oral submucous fibrosis and leukoplakia in aborigines of Taiwan. Journal of Oral Pathology and Medicine, 30(4), 213-219.
    Yoo, C., & MacInnis, D. (2005). The brand attitude formation process of emotional and informational ads. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1397-1406.
    Zuckerman, M. (1969). Theoretical formulations. Sensory deprivation: Fifteen years of research, 407-432.
    Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal: Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ.
    Zuckerman, M. (1983). Biological bases of sensation seeking, impulsivity, and anxiety: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc Inc.
    Zuckerman, M. (1988). Behavior and biology: Research on sensation seeking and reactions to the media. Communication, social cognition, and affect, 173-194.
    Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions and biosocial bases of sensation seeking: Cambridge Univ Press.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE