隨著科技進步和全球自然災害頻發，頻譜需求日益增加，尤其在災害期間，頻譜擁擠問題更為嚴重。如何有效調配有限的頻譜資源，成為提升災防應變能力的關鍵挑戰。目前我國在頻譜應急管理、跨部門協作及災防法規方面仍顯不足，需加強相關機制建設。本文回顧美國與日本的應變機制，並依照通訊、組織、法規三個面向提出適合我國的改進建議，建立我國災防應變藍圖，以優化災害應對能力。
在通訊方面，建議於災前完成資源盤點，包含：建立應急頻譜資料庫、設備相容資料庫及備援設備清單，並根據災防需求規劃備援頻段與切換機制。此外，應對接國際通訊標準，並定期進行跨機構協作演練，確保災後能迅速調用資源。應變期間，本研究建議參考美國的救災機制，透過全國呼叫頻道、臨時核配機制、頻譜優先使用權及動態調度提升救災效率。
在組織管理方面，應借鑒美國ICS制度，強化災防體系內部分工，並建立標準化部門編組模式，確保應變運作的專業化與制度化。此外，亦建議增設災害分級啟動規則，強化中央與地方的協作。且應將數位發展部納入災防體系，與NCC協作提升通訊資源整合與調度。
在法規方面，建議增訂災時臨時頻譜授權法源，簡化頻譜調度程序，避免行政程序造成的延誤。亦建議修訂《災害防救法》，明確災防主管機關職責，並增設應急通訊豁免條款，保障災後快速啟用通訊資源。
綜合上述，本研究針對我國災防應變體系中的頻譜管理、組織協作與法規制度提出改進建議，旨在提升災害應對中的通訊穩定性與應變效率。借鑑國際經驗，建立了符合我國需求的災防應變藍圖，並從通訊、組織與法規三方面進行優化，期望提升災後恢復能力與資源配置效率。

With advancements in technology and the increasing frequency of disasters, the demand for spectrum is rising, especially during disaster periods, where spectrum congestion becomes even more severe. Analysis shows that our country has shortcomings in spectrum management, inter-agency collaboration, and disaster prevention regulations, which urgently need improvement. This research draws from the response mechanisms of the United States and Japan and proposes specific recommendations to optimize disaster response capabilities.
In terms of communications, it is recommended to conduct a resource inventory before a disaster, establish spectrum and equipment databases, and plan for backup frequency bands and switching mechanisms. The country should align with international standards and regularly conduct drills. During the response period, it is suggested to refer to the U.S. system to improve spectrum scheduling efficiency.
Regarding organizational management, it is advised to adopt the U.S. Incident Command System (ICS) to standardize the division of responsibilities, strengthen collaboration between central and local governments, and enhance cooperation between the Ministry of Digital Development and the National Communications Commission (NCC).
In terms of regulations, it is recommended to introduce temporary spectrum authorization provisions, simplify scheduling processes, and amend the Disaster Prevention and Relief Act to include emergency communication exemption clauses.
The recommendations put forward in this study cover communications, organization, and regulations, aiming to enhance disaster prevention response capabilities and ensure public safety.

ARRL. (2023). Idalia Prompts Amateur Radio Activations. American Radio Relay League. https://www.arrl.org/news/idalia-prompts-amateur-radio-activations
Bereday, G. Z. F. (1964). Comparative Method in Education. Rinehart and Winston.
Canfield, J. M. (2010). Say Again? Lessons From Hurricane Katrina in Spectrum Management and Communications Interoperability: Defense Technical Information Center. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA525271
Connolly, M. (2012). Aligning Institutions of Higher Education emergency preparedness plans with the National Response Framework. Journal of Emergency Management, 10(4), 241–151.
Davis, L. E., Rough, J., Cecchine, G., Schaefer, A. G., & Zeman, L. L. (2007). Hurricane Katrina: Lessons for Army Planning and Operations (1st ed.). RAND Corporation. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7249/mg603a
FCC. (2023). Affordable Connectivity Program; Lifeline and Link Up Reform and Modernization; Schools and Libraries Universal Service Support Mechanism; Emergency Connectivity Fund; Rural Health Care Universal Service Support Mechanism; Connect America Fund; Universal Service Contribution Methodology, DA 23-805. https://www.fcc.gov/document/order-waiving-certain-rules-areas-impacted-hurricane-idalia
FEMA. (2008). Emergency Support Function #2 – Communications Annex. https://www.fema.gov/pdf/emergency/nrf/nrf-esf-02.pdf
FEMA. (2019). National Response Framework. https://www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-04/NRF_FINALApproved_2011028.pdf
FEMA. (2023). FEMA, Federal and Non-Governmental Partners Respond to Hurricane Idalia. https://www.fema.gov/press-release/20230830/fema-federal-and-non-governmental-partners-respond-hurricane-idalia
Hosokawa, M. (2011). The disaster caused by the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and fire fighting operation by Japanese fire service. IEICE Communications Society Global News Letter, 35(4), 7–8.
ITU. (2015). Radiocommunication objectives and requirements for Public Protection and Disaster Relief (PPDR). https://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-r/opb/rep/R-REP-M.2377-2015-PDF-E.pdf
ITU. (2016). Final Acts of the World Conference on International Telecommunications (WCIT-12). https://www.itu.int/oth/R0A0600001A/en
ITU-R. (2017). Spectrum needs for Public Protection and Disaster Relief (PPDR).
Kinoshita, K., Ito, Y., Kimura, H., & Maeda, Y. (2012). Technologies and Emergency Management for Disaster Recovery—With Focus on the Great East Japan Earthquake. IEICE Transactions on Communications, E95.B(6), 1911–1914. https://doi.org/10.1587/transcom.E95.B.1911
Martin, K. J. (2006). Independent Panel Reviewing the Impact of Hurricane Katrina on Communications Networks: Report and Recommendations to the Federal Communications Commission.
McGuire, M., & Schneck, D. (2010). What if Hurricane Katrina Hit in 2020? The Need for Strategic Management of Disasters. Public Administration Review, 70, S201–S207.
Moran, K. (2005). Hurricane Katrina and Communications Interoperability: Hearing before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation (pp. 3–4). https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-261418A1.pdf
NOAA. (2023). A Coordinated and Collaborative Response to Hurricane Idalia | response.restoration.noaa.gov. https://response.restoration.noaa.gov/coordinated-and-collaborative-response-hurricane-idalia
NTIA. (2023). Manual of Regulations and Procedures for Federal Radio Frequency Management. https://www.ntia.gov/sites/default/files/2023-11/12_2021_edition_rev_2023.pdf
Schneider, S. (2008). Who’s to Blame? (Mis) perceptions of the Intergovernmental Response to Disasters. Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 38(4), 715–738. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjn019
Shaw, R., Peary B., Ideta A., & Takeuchi, Y. (2012). Emergency Communication: Lessons from the Great East Japan Earthquake. Knowledge Note 3-2, Cluster 3: Emergency Response.
Sledge D, Thomas HF. (2019). From Disaster Response to Community Recovery: Nongovernmental Entities, Government, and Public Health. Am J Public Health, 109(3), 437–444. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304895
Uanalyze. (2023). 網通｜美國無線數據使用量創新高，出現史上最大增幅. UAnalyze 優分析. https://uanalyze.com.tw/articles/787646534
U.S. Executive Office of the President. (2006). THE FEDERAL RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA: LESSONS LEARNED. LESSONS LEARNED. https://biotech.law.lsu.edu/katrina/govdocs/katrina-lessons-learned.pdf
Van de Belt, M., Teguig, S., Beylot, A.-L., & Pujolle, G. (2013). LTE: the technology driver for future public safety communications. IEEE Communications Magazine, 51(10), 154–161.
中央災害防救委員會. (2023). 災害防救基本計畫 (113年至117年). 中央災防會議.
中央通訊社. (2023). 數位部規劃台版PPDR 拚救災通訊優先穩定 | 產經. 中央社 CNA. https://www.cna.com.tw/news/afe/202310290035.aspx
日本中央防災会議. (2024). 防災基本計画.
內閣府. (2024). 防災基本計画. https://www.bousai.go.jp/taisaku/keikaku/pdf/kihon_basicplan.pdf
周佳宥. (2011). 台灣災害防救法之過去、現在與未來. 法令月刊, 62(10), 103-114. https://doi.org/10.6509/TLM.201110_62(10).0006
周元浙 & 鍾秉正. (2009). 從法治國原則論我國軍隊動用-以災害防救法為中心 [中央警察大學]. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22098NDMC1194008%22.&searchmode=basic
國家通訊傳播委員會. (2009). 莫拉克颱風造成中南部通信中斷，採取緊急應變措施 (莫拉克颱風造成中南部通信中斷，採取緊急應變措施) . 國家通訊傳播委員會. https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/Chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=8&cate=0&keyword=&is_history=1&pages=74&sn_f=11639
國家通訊傳播委員會. (2016). 高雄市美濃區地震造成基地臺故障136台，已修復28台，電信業者已積極搶修，並派遣行動基地臺支援. 國家通訊傳播委員會. https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/chinese/news_detail.aspx?site_content_sn=8&is_history=1&pages=3&sn_f=35027
國家通訊傳播委員會. (2022). 「電信事業申請衛星固定通信用 無線電頻率審查作業要點」草案 公開說明會. https://www.ncc.gov.tw/chinese/files/22051/52_47466_220513_1.pdf
張家昕 & 李建鵬. (2021). 以美國災害管理作法探討我國災防機制之研究. 後備半年刊, 103(108–132).
戴正新. (2003). 我國公共政策制定過程之研究：以災害防救法為例 [國立成功大學]. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22091NCKU5635011%22.&searchmode=basic
數位發展部. (2023a). 中華民國無線電頻率分配表. https://law.moda.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL000084
數位發展部. (2023b). 運用 MOCN 技術建置雲端核網 提升行動通信網路韌性計畫 選擇方案及替代方案 成本效益分析報告. https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/download/agenda1/02/agendaAnnex/11/01/07/1101072541.pdf
朱柔若. (2000). 社會研究方法：質化與量化取向. 揚智出版社.
災害防救辦公室. (2023). 中央災防會報. https://cdprc.ey.gov.tw/Page/A80816CB7B6965EB
葉至誠 & 葉立誠. (2011). 研究方法與論文寫作. 商鼎.
蔡旻芯. (2017). 軍隊執行災害防救法制之研究 [國防大學]. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22105NDU00194012%22.&searchmode=basic
謝志強. (2014). 我國災害防救法之研究-以災害防救體系及災害應變措施為中心 [中央警察大學]. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22102CPU05560017%22.&searchmode=basic
財訊. (2023). 國內首例！花蓮強震 天祥通訊中斷 中華電信出動低軌衛星投入救災. https://www.wealth.com.tw/articles/b5afae16-4a8a-4746-ab47-15f8a6ab9598
陳俊成. (2012). 國軍於災害防救法中角色定位之法律政策學分析. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22101NUK05772013%22.&searchmode=basic