| 研究生: |
鄭惠方 Chen, Hui-Fang |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
LNG燃料船用於台灣近海航運之環境效益分析 The environmental analysis of LNG-fueled ships for offshore shipping in Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
張瀞之
Chang, Ching-Chih |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 交通管理科學系碩士在職專班 Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science(on-the-job training program) |
| 論文出版年: | 2016 |
| 畢業學年度: | 104 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 71 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 重油 、硫氧化物 、LNG 、客貨滾裝船 、兩岸航線 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Heavy Fuel Oils (HFOs), sulfur oxides (SOX), Liquefied natural gas (LNG), offshore ships, the cross-strait routes |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:202 下載:6 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
現今海運已成為國際間運輸的主流,全球貿易有90%都透過海上運輸,然而大部分的商用船舶多使用重油為燃料,造成大量環境汙染。船舶運輸產生的SOX、NOX及CO2e排放量分別佔全球的12%、13%、2.8%,對於環境的影響衝擊甚大。液化天然氣(LNG)因具有環保、安全性高且符合國際排放量標準,在國際上已成為船舶替代燃料的最佳選擇。
因此,本研究探討台灣區域兩岸及近海五艘營運中的客貨滾裝船(下稱客滾船),以EPA及洛杉磯港模型導出船舶以LNG替代傳統燃料對環境影響之差異,並以SOX及NOX每延噸海浬排放量進行載運率與排放量之情境分析。實證分析結果為,不論以EPA模型推估或是以洛杉磯港模型推估,以LNG替代傳統燃料,SOX排放量將降低90%以上、NOX排放量將降低70%以上、CO2排放量將降低13%以上,顯示出LNG對於降低環境汙染確有明顯效益。在情境分析中,研究結果得出,以航線類型區分,應以兩岸航線優先推動LNG較具效益;若以船舶類型區分,應以傳統船優先推動LNG較具效益。
關鍵詞: 重油、硫氧化物、LNG、客貨滾裝船、兩岸航線
In Today world, maritime transportation is increasing becoming an international mainstream business. Currently over 90% of global trade depends on maritime transport, but most of the merchant vessels use Heavy Fuel Oils (HFOs) for shipping propulsion, Subsequently causing a lot of environmental pollution. The contribution of ships to global emissions can be identify as follows in the following components: sulfur oxides(SOX), 12%;nitrogen oxides(NOX), 13%;carbon dioxide equivalent(CO2e), 2.8%. Liquefied natural gas (LNG), due to its environmental friendliness, safety and its fulfillment of the international emissions standards, has become the best choice for ships alternative fuel. The aim of this research is to analyze the five offshore ships that are currently operating in Taiwan and also to explore the environmental influences of using LNG alternative to traditional fuels by EPA and PLOA models, and further conduct a scenario analysis of SOX and NOX emissions of per ton-miles. The results show that LNG leads to a reduction of 90% of SOX emissions and 70% of NOX emissions and 10% of CO2 emissions in at least both modes. In the scenario analysis, the results show that in order to distinguish the type of route, then cross-strait routes should be a priority to promote LNG fuel and in order to distinguish the type of ship, then traditional vessels should be a priority to promote the LNG fuel.
Key words: Heavy Fuel Oils (HFOs), sulfur oxides (SOX), Liquefied natural gas (LNG), offshore ships, the cross-strait routes
中文文獻
台灣綜合研究院(2015)。台灣因應氣候變化綱要公約資訊網。2015年6月10日,取自http://www.tri.org.tw/unfccc/。
交通部(2015)。航政業務採用國際公約資訊。2015年6月25日,取自http://www.motc.gov.tw。
行政院環境保護署(2015)。空氣汙染排放量查詢系統。台灣空氣污染排放量[TEDS8]面源─排放量推估手冊。
行政院環境保護署(2015)。臭氧層保護在台灣。2015年6月30日,取自http://www.saveoursky.org.tw/ozone/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=314&Itemid=95。
行政院環境保護署(2015)。溫室氣體排放統計。2015年7月5日,取自http://www.epa.gov.tw/ct.asp?xItem=10052&ctNode=31352&mp=epa。
陳桂清、柯正龍、葉雨松、許真瑜、徐澄清……涂致曄(2012)。臺灣港埠節能減碳效益提升之研究(1/4)。臺北市:交通部運輸研究所。
華健、吳怡萱(2006)。以LNG 作為船舶燃料的趨勢。船舶科技,40,93-109。
經濟部能源局(2011)。能源報導-能源油蹤。綠色航運新「氣」象——船用燃料LNG新趨勢。2015年6月25日,取自http://energymonthly.tier.org.tw/outdatecontent.asp?ReportIssue=201102&Page=31。
經濟部能源局(2013)。我國燃料燃燒二氧化碳排放統計。2015年7月1日,取自http://verity.erl.itri.org.tw。
葉雨松、陳桂清、許真瑜(2013)。臺灣港埠遠洋船舶硫氧化物排放量推估。港灣報導季刊。94,1-5。
蔡鎮遠(2011)。高雄港港區商船排放二氧化硫之推估與管理策略(碩士論文)。2015年6月1日,取自http://etds.lib.ncku.edu.tw/etdservice/view_metadata?etdun=U0026-2907201111402400。
環科工程顧問股份有限公司(2015)。臺灣港務公司102~105年推動綠色港口及港區環境管理之整體規劃報告。交通部臺灣港務股份有限公司委託研究報告。
鄒逸錚(2014)。亞洲地區船用燃料LNG之發展與契機。台灣經濟研究月刊,37(4),80-87。
台灣中國石油股份有限公司(2012)。燃料類產品規範。2015年7月1日,取自http://new.cpc.com.tw/division/mb/product.aspx。
英文文獻
EPA (2000). Analysis of Commercial Marine Vessels Emissions and Fuel Consumption Data. Retrieved date June 24, 2015, from http://www3.epa.gov/otaq/models/nonrdmdl/c-marine/r00002.pdf
Browning, L., & Bailey, k. (2006). Current Methodologies and Best Practices for Preparing Port Emission Inventories. Retrieved date June 24, 2015, from http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/conference/ei15/session1/browning.pdf
Baumgart, M., & Olsen, J. H. B. (2010). LNG-fueled vessels in the Norwegian short-sea market: a cost-effective response to environmental regulation. Retrieved date July 2, 2015, from http://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/handle/11250/168425
Sadek, I. S., El Gohary, M. M., & Banawan, A. A. (2010). Environmental and economical benefits of changing from marine diesel oil to natural-gas fuel for short-voyage high-power passenger ships. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 224(2), 103-113.
Starcrest Consulting Group(2011). 2010 Expanded Greenhouse Gas Inventory. Retrieved date June 30, 2015, from http://starcrestllc.com/projectnews.html
El-Gohary, M. M. (2012). The future of natural gas as a fuel in marine gas turbine for LNG carriers. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 226(4), 371-377.
Bengtsson, S. K., Fridell, E., & Andersson, K. E. (2013). Fuels for short sea shipping: A comparative assessment with focus on environmental impact. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part M: Journal of Engineering for the Maritime Environment, 228(1), 44-54.
Herdzik, J. (2013). Consequences of using LNG as a marine fuel. Journal of KONES, 20(2), 159-166.
Burel, F., Taccani, R., & Zuliani, N. (2013). Improving sustainability of maritime transport through utilization of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) for propulsion. Energy, 57, 412-420.
DNV.GL (2013). LNG as ship fuel A focus on the current and future use of LNG as fuel in shipping. Retrieved date June 30, 2015, from https://www.dnvgl.com/maritime/lng/ships.html
Lloyd's Register(2013).Global Marine Fuel Trends 2030. Retrieved date June 30, 2015,from http://www.lr.org/en/_images/213-34172_Global_Marine_Fuel_Trends_2030.pdf
Puget Sound Maritime Air Emissions Inventory(2013).2011 Puget Sound Maritime Air Emissions Inventory. Retrieved date June 30, 2015,from http://www.pugetsoundmaritimeairforum.org/uploads/PV_FINAL_POT_2011_PSEI_Report_Update__23_May_13__scg.pdf
Franc, P., & Sutto, L. (2013). Impact analysis on shipping lines and European ports of a cap- and-trade system on CO2emissions in maritime transport. Maritime Policy & Management, 41(1), 61-78.
Tzannatos, E., & Nikitakos, N. (2013). Natural gas as a fuel alternative for sustainable domestic passenger shipping in Greece. International Journal of Sustainable Energy, 32(6), 724-734.
Yang, B. S., Sun, P. T., Huang, L. Z., & Song, D. (2013). The Prospective Analysis of Marine Dual Fuel Engine Application Based on Emission and Energy Efficiency. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 291-294, 1975-1980.
International Energy Agency (2014). Key World Energy Statistics 2014. Retrieved date June 15, 2015, from https://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/key-world-energy-statistics-2014.html
International Maritime Organization (2014).Third IMO GHG Study 2014 Final Report. Retrieved date July5,2015, from http://www.imo.org