簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 胡子洋
Hu, Tzu-Yang
論文名稱: 利用現地量測與數位孿生模擬評估建築室內熱環境
Evaluation of Building Indoor Thermal Environments Using On-Site Measurements and Digital Twin-Based Simulations
指導教授: 林大惠
Lin, Ta-Hui
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 機械工程學系
Department of Mechanical Engineering
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 134
中文關鍵詞: 數位孿生 、太陽輻射模型 、建築能耗模擬 、節能策略 、SPINLab
外文關鍵詞: Digital Twin, Solar Radiation Model, Building Energy Simulation, Energy-Saving Strategy, SPINLab
相關次數: 點閱:78  下載:0 
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 可信賴的建築數位孿生需要的不只是即時連線:其預測準確度取決於輸入資料的品質,其實用性則取決於校準後的模型在操作條件改變時,是否仍能重現實測行為。多數建築場址僅量測全水平面日射量,模擬所需的直射與漫射分量因此缺測;同時,鮮少研究會將校準後的模型,拿去對照它從未被調校過的條件加以測試。本論文以 SPINLab 的可旋轉雙房測試平台與由此建立的 IESVE 模型,同時處理這兩個問題。
    在輸入保真度方面,四種太陽輻射重建方法在四個朝向下,對照實測室內溫度反應進行評估(CV(RMSE) 4.34%–9.18%)。這些方法在不同太陽輻射暴露條件下的表現差異,顯示目前的局地太陽輻射輸入建模,仍需在更廣泛的條件範圍內提升其代表性。
    在模型驗證方面,參數先針對一種操作模式(全時段運轉房間)進行校準,接著凍結參數,並在未經任何調整的情況下,對照執行獨立間歇循環協議、未參與校準的第二個房間進行評估。兩房配對比較後,合併室內溫度 CV(RMSE) 為 3.08%;其中循環房間(Room B)的資料則提供了獨立證據,顯示校準後的模型在操作條件改變後仍維持適用性。
    驗證後的模型接著延伸至決策支援應用。在所測試的西向朝向條件下,duty-cycle 分析辨識出一個可用的 10:00–14:00 控制時間窗;此後,隨著日照負荷增加,可供循環運轉利用的熱容裕度大幅縮小。另一項獨立於模擬模型之外的捲簾遮陽實驗顯示,同樣的上游遮陽邏輯效益明顯因朝向而異,並診斷出目前阻礙將遮陽整合進模型的具體技術缺口:實驗中桌面照度觸發點與模擬中分區層級輸出之間,尚缺乏經驗證的對應關係。
    整體而言,這些結果使虛擬模型從靜態基準,推進到具備已刻劃輸入保真度、且經跨操作模式驗證行為的模型,同時明確指出在它能根據持續傳入的量測資料自動更新自身之前,還缺少哪些具體環節。

    A trustworthy Building Digital Twin needs more than real-time connectivity: its predictions are only as good as their inputs, and its usefulness depends on whether a calibrated model still reproduces measured behaviour once operating conditions change. Most building sites measure only global horizontal irradiance, leaving the direct and diffuse components a simulation needs unmeasured, and few studies test a calibrated model against conditions it was never tuned to match. This dissertation addresses both problems using SPINLab’s rotatable twin-room testbed and an IESVE model built from it.
    For input fidelity, four solar-radiation reconstruction approaches were evaluated against measured indoor-temperature responses across four orientations (CV(RMSE) 4.34–9.18%). Their varying performance across solar-exposure conditions highlights the need for more representative local solar-input modelling across a broader range of conditions.
    For model validation, parameters were calibrated against one operating regime, an always-ON room, then frozen and evaluated without retuning against a second room running an independent intermittent-cycling protocol that took no part in calibration. The paired-room comparison yielded a combined indoor-temperature CV(RMSE) of 3.08%, while the cycling-room data provided independent evidence that the calibrated model remained useful under the changed operating condition.
    The validated model was then extended toward decision support. Under the examined west-facing condition, the duty-cycle analysis identified a usable 10:00–14:00 control window, after which increasing solar load substantially reduced the thermal margin available for cycling. A separate, model-independent roller-blind experiment showed the same upstream-shading logic delivers markedly orientation-dependent value, and identified the specific technical gap, an unresolved correspondence between the experiment’s desk-level illuminance trigger and the simulation’s zone-level output, that currently blocks integrating shading into the model.
    Together, these results move the virtual model from a static baseline to one with characterised input fidelity and cross-regime validated behaviour, while identifying exactly what remains before it can update itself automatically against incoming measurements.

    摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vi List of Figures vii Nomenclature ix Chapter 1. Introduction 1 1.1. Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2. Research Objectives 6 1.3. Research Contributions 6 Chapter 2. Literature Review 10 2.1. Input Uncertainty in Building Thermal Simulation 10 2.2. Digital Twin Maturity and Model Fidelity 18 2.3. Passive Shading Strategies 23 2.4. Active HVAC Control Strategies 24 2.5. Positioning This Dissertation 25 Chapter 3. Methodology 28 3.1. The SPINLab Facility 28 3.2. The IESVE Simulation Model 31 3.3. Solar Radiation Decomposition Methods 36 3.4. Air-Conditioning Experimental Design 42 3.5. Shading and Lighting Experimental Design 46 Chapter 4. Solar Radiation Model Evaluation and Thermal Response Assessment 48 4.1. Clear-Glazing Validation Across Orientations 48 4.2. Low-E Glazing Comparison and Model Transfer Test 61 Chapter 5. Air-Conditioning Control: Experimental and Simulation Analyses 67 5.1. Measured Cycling Behaviour 67 5.2. Cross-Day Model Diagnostic 77 5.3. Sensitivity-Based Model Calibration 81 5.4. Cycling Model Validation 85 5.5. Comfort–Energy Trade-offs 88 Chapter 6. Roller Blind Shading Strategy 94 Chapter 7. Conclusion 110 References 113

    [1] G. Javier Aguado-Rodríguez, Abel Quevedo-Nolasco, Martiniano Castro-Popoca, Ramón Arteaga-Ramírez, M. Alberto Vázquez-Peña, and B. Patricia Zamora-Morales. Meteorological variables prediction through ARIMA models. Agrociencia, 50(1):1–13, 2016.

    [2] Muhammad Waseem Ahmad, Monjur Mourshed, David Mundow, Mario Sisinni, and Yacine Rezgui. Building energy metering and environmental monitoring – A state-of-the-art review and directions for future research. Energy and Buildings, 120:85–102, 2016.

    [3] Amine Allouhi, Youness El Fouih, Tarik Kousksou, Abdelmajid Jamil, Youssef Zeraouli, and Youssef Mourad. Energy consumption and efficiency in buildings: current status and future trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109:118–130, 2015.

    [4] Salwa M. Al-Masrani and Karam M. Al-Obaidi. Dynamic shading systems: a review of design parameters, platforms and evaluation strategies. Automation in Construction, 102:195–216, 2019.

    [5] Shireen Alqadi, Amira Elnokaly, and Behzad Sodagar. Calibrating building thermal simulation model using indoor environmental measurements. In Proceedings of the ZEMCH International Conference, pp. 516–528, 2021.

    [6] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ASHRAE Guideline 14-2014: Measurement of Energy, Demand, and Water Savings. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 2014.

    [7] American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers. ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2020: Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy. American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Atlanta, GA, 2020.

    [8] Hamed Amini, David Bjelland, Tikka Maria, Kari Alanne, Mohamed Hamdy, and Risto Kosonen. Scalable and adaptive multi-stage hourly calibration of simulation models with high usage fluctuations: case studies for multi-purpose buildings. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, advance online publication, pp. 1–22, 2025.

    [9] Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior. Manual of Building Energy-Efficiency Rating System. Architecture and Building Research Institute, Ministry of the Interior, New Taipei City, Taiwan, 268 pp., 2024.

    [10] Buddhika Arsecularatne, Navodana Rodrigo, and Ruidong Chang. Digital twins for reducing energy consumption in buildings: A review. Sustainability, 16(21):9275, 2024.

    [11] ASHRAE, The American Institute of Architects, Illuminating Engineering Society, U.S. Green Building Council, and U.S. Department of Energy. Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small to Medium Office Buildings: Achieving Zero Energy. ASHRAE, Atlanta, GA, 240 pp., 2019.

    [12] Fabiani Denise Bender and Paulo Cesar Sentelhas. Solar radiation models and gridded databases to fill gaps in weather series and to project climate change in Brazil. Advances in Meteorology, 2018:6204382, 15 pp., 2018.

    [13] Eleonora Brembilla, Taoning Wang, Panagiota Theodoropoulou, and Wouter Beck. Evaluation of blinds control techniques for daylight and visual comfort in complex real-world conditions. In Proceedings of Building Simulation 2023: 18th Conference of IBPSA, pp. 3164–3171, 2023.

    [14] Building and Construction Authority, Singapore. BCA SkyLab: The world’s first high-rise rotatable laboratory for the tropics. Building and Construction Authority, Singapore, 2017.

    [15] Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection, Taiwan. CNS 12112:2012: Lighting of Indoor Work Places. Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection, Ministry of Economic Affairs, Taipei, Taiwan, 2012.

    [16] Xiaodong Cao, Xilei Dai, and Junjie Liu. Building energy-consumption status worldwide and the state-of-the-art technologies for zero-energy buildings during the past decade. Energy and Buildings, 128:198–213, 2016.

    [17] Central Weather Administration, Ministry of Transportation and Communications, Taiwan. Observation station data. Available from: https://www.cwa.gov.tw/V8/C/W/OBS_Station.html, 2024.

    [18] C. B. Chiou, C. H. Chiou, C. M. Chu, and S. L. Lin. The application of fuzzy control on energy saving for multi-unit room air-conditioners. Applied Thermal Engineering, 29(2–3):310–316, 2009.

    [19] Pieter de Wilde. The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation. Automation in Construction, 41:40–49, 2014.

    [20] Efficiency Valuation Organization. International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol (IPMVP): Core Concepts. Efficiency Valuation Organization, 2022.

    [21] Dagimawi D. Eneyew, Miriam A. M. Capretz, and Girma T. Bitsuamlak. Toward smart-building digital twins: BIM and IoT data integration. IEEE Access, 10:130487–130506, 2022.

    [22] N. A. Engerer. Minute resolution estimates of the diffuse fraction of global irradiance for southeastern Australia. Solar Energy, 116:215–237, 2015.

    [23] D. G. Erbs, S. A. Klein, and J. A. Duffie. Estimation of the diffuse radiation fraction for hourly, daily and monthly-average global radiation. Solar Energy, 28(4):293–302, 1982.

    [24] Laurentiu Fara, Alexandru Diaconu, Dan Craciunescu, and Silvian Fara. Forecasting of energy production for photovoltaic systems based on ARIMA and ANN advanced models. International Journal of Photoenergy, 2021:6777488, 19 pp., 2021.

    [25] Aidan Fuller, Zhong Fan, Charles Day, and Chris Barlow. Digital twin: Enabling technologies, challenges and open research. IEEE Access, 8:108952–108971, 2020.

    [26] Aaron Garrett and Joshua R. New. Suitability of ASHRAE Guideline 14 metrics for calibration. ASHRAE Transactions, 122:469–477, 2016.

    [27] Michael Grieves and John Vickers. Digital twin: Mitigating unpredictable, undesirable emergent behavior in complex systems. In Franz-Josef Kahlen, Shannon Flumerfelt, and Anabela Alves, editors, Transdisciplinary Perspectives on Complex Systems, pp. 85–113. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017.

    [28] Karla Guerrero Ramírez, Cristina Nuevo-Gallardo, Jesús Miguel Santamaría Ulecia, Beatriz Montalbán Pozas, and Carlos Fernández Bandera. Digital twin implementation based on a white-box building energy model: A case study on blind control for passive heating. Energy and Buildings, 349:116454, 2025.

    [29] Christian A. Gueymard. Direct and indirect uncertainties in the prediction of tilted irradiance for solar engineering applications. Solar Energy, 83(3):432–444, 2009.

    [30] Vicente Gutiérrez González, Germán Ramos Ruiz, and Carlos Fernández Bandera. Empirical and comparative validation for a building energy model calibration methodology. Sensors, 20(17):5003, 2020.

    [31] W. J. Hee, M. A. Alghoul, B. Bakhtyar, OmKalthum Elayeb, M. A. Shameri, M. S. Alrubaih, and K. Sopian. The role of window glazing on daylighting and energy saving in buildings. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42:323–343, 2015.

    [32] Hsing-Yun Huang. Evaluations of Glass Performance on Indoor Environment and Air-Conditioning Electricity Consumption of Buildings. Master’s thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, 2023.

    [33] Ruey Lung Hwang and Ming-Jen Cheng. Field survey on human thermal comfort reports in air-conditioned offices in Taiwan. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal, 1:8–13, 2007.

    [34] Rob J. Hyndman and Anne B. Koehler. Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4):679–688, 2006.

    [35] Pierre Ineichen. Comparison and validation of three global-to-beam irradiance models against ground measurements. Solar Energy, 82(6):501–512, 2008.

    [36] Integrated Environmental Solutions (IES). BPM Student Handbook: A Lifelong Resource for Students, Educators, and Professionals. Version 1.0, IES Ltd., 2023.

    [37] Integrated Environmental Solutions (IES). ApacheHVAC. Available from: https://www.iesve.com/software/virtual-environment/applications/apachehvac, 2024.

    [38] Integrated Environmental Solutions (IES). ApacheSim. Available from: https://www.iesve.com/software/virtual-environment/applications/apachesim, 2024.

    [39] Integrated Environmental Solutions (IES). MicroFlo. Available from: https://www.iesve.com/software/virtual-environment/applications/microflo, 2024.

    [40] International Energy Agency. Net Zero by 2050: A Roadmap for the Global Energy Sector. IEA, Paris, 224 pp., 2021.

    [41] David Jones, Chris Snider, Aydin Nassehi, Jason Yon, and Ben Hicks. Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology, 29:36–52, 2020.

    [42] Werner Kritzinger, Matthias Karner, Georg Traar, Jan Henjes, and Wilfried Sihn. Digital twin in manufacturing: A categorical literature review and classification. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(11):1016–1022, 2018.

    [43] Niraj Kunwar, Kristen S. Cetin, and Ulrike Passe. Dynamic shading in buildings: a review of testing methods and recent research findings. Current Sustainable/Renewable Energy Reports, 5(1):93–100, 2018.

    [44] Niraj Kunwar, Kristen S. Cetin, Ulrike Passe, Xiaohui Zhou, and Yunhua Li. Full-scale experimental testing of integrated dynamically-operated roller shades and lighting in perimeter office spaces. Solar Energy, 186:17–28, 2019.

    [45] Joseph C. Lam, Danny H. W. Li, and S. O. Cheung. An analysis of electricity end-use in air-conditioned office buildings in Hong Kong. Building and Environment, 38(3):493–498, 2003.

    [46] Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. FLEXLAB: The Facility for Low Energy Experiments in Buildings. Available from: https://flexlab.lbl.gov, 2024.

    [47] Linda K. Lawrie and Drury B. Crawley. Development of Global Typical Meteorological Years (TMYx). Climate.OneBuilding, Pagosa Springs, CO, USA, 2022. Available from: https://climate.onebuilding.org.

    [48] Giovanni Lugaresi, Sofia Gangemi, Giulia Gazzoni, and Andrea Matta. Online validation of digital twins for manufacturing systems. Computers in Industry, 150:103942, 2023.

    [49] Azad M. Madni, Carla C. Madni, and Scott D. Lucero. Leveraging digital twin technology in model-based systems engineering. Systems, 7(1):7, 2019.

    [50] Everett L. Maxwell. A Quasi-Physical Model for Converting Hourly Global Horizontal to Direct Normal Insolation. Technical Report SERI/TR-215-3087, Solar Energy Research Institute, Golden, CO, 1987.

    [51] Ana C. Menezes, Andrew Cripps, Dino Bouchlaghem, and Richard Buswell. Predicted vs. actual energy performance of non-domestic buildings: Using post-occupancy evaluation data to reduce the performance gap. Applied Energy, 97:355–364, 2012.

    [52] Maryam MeshkinKiya and Riccardo Paolini. Preparing Weather Data for Real-Time Building Energy Simulation. In Proceedings of eSim 2020: 11th Conference of IBPSA-Canada, Vancouver, Canada, 2020.

    [53] Nur Haziqah Mohamad Zaidi, Chin Haw Lim, and Halim Razali. Mitigating the energy consumption and carbon emissions of a residential area in a tropical city using digital twin technology: A case study of Bertam, Penang. Buildings, 14(3):638, 2024.

    [54] K. W. Mui, L. T. Wong, and N. K. Fong. Optimization of indoor air temperature set-point for centralized air-conditioned spaces in subtropical climates. Automation in Construction, 19(6):709–713, 2010.

    [55] Tariq Muneer. Solar Radiation and Daylight Models. 2nd ed., Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, 345 pp., 2004.

    [56] National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Foundational Research Gaps and Future Directions for Digital Twins. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 202 pp., 2024.

    [57] National Climate Change Secretariat and National Research Foundation. Aircon System Efficiency Technology Primer: A Summary. National Climate Change Secretariat and National Research Foundation, Singapore, 16 pp., 2011.

    [58] J. F. Orgill and K. G. T. Hollands. Correlation equation for hourly diffuse radiation on a horizontal surface. Solar Energy, 19(4):357–359, 1977.

    [59] Richard Perez, Pierre Ineichen, Robert Seals, Joseph Michalsky, and Ronald Stewart. Modeling daylight availability and irradiance components from direct and global irradiance. Solar Energy, 44(5):271–289, 1990.

    [60] Richard Perez, Pierre Ineichen, Everett L. Maxwell, Roland D. Seals, and Alois Zelenka. Dynamic global-to-direct irradiance conversion models. ASHRAE Transactions, 98(1):354–369, 1992.

    [61] Luis Pérez-Lombard, José Ortiz, and Christine Pout. A review on buildings energy consumption information. Energy and Buildings, 40(3):394–398, 2008.

    [62] Giorgos Petrou, Anna Mavrogianni, Phil Symonds, Anastasia Mylona, Dane Virk, Rokia Raslan, and Mike Davies. Can the choice of building performance simulation tool significantly alter the level of predicted indoor overheating risk in London flats? Building Services Engineering Research and Technology, 40(1):30–46, 2019.

    [63] Jesús Polo and Richard Perez. Solar radiation modeling from satellite imagery. In Jesús Polo, Luis Martín-Pomares, and Antonio Sanfilippo, editors, Solar Resources Mapping, Green Energy and Technology, pp. 183–197. Springer, Cham, 2019.

    [64] Enrico Prataviera, Jacopo Vivian, Giulio Lombardo, and Angelo Zarrella. Evaluation of the impact of input uncertainty on urban building energy simulations using uncertainty and sensitivity analysis. Applied Energy, 311:118691, 2022.

    [65] Paul Raftery, Marcus Keane, and James O’Donnell. Calibrating whole building energy models: An evidence-based methodology. Energy and Buildings, 43(9):2356–2364, 2011.

    [66] T. Agami Reddy, Itzhak Maor, and Chanin Panjapornpon. Calibrating detailed building energy simulation programs with measured data — Part II: Application to three case study office buildings (RP-1051). HVAC&R Research, 13(2):243–265, 2007.

    [67] Mohammad Royapoor and Tony Roskilly. Building model calibration using energy and environmental data. Energy and Buildings, 94:109–120, 2015.

    [68] José A. Ruiz-Arias and Christian A. Gueymard. Solar irradiance component separation benchmarking: the critical role of dynamically-constrained sky conditions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 202:114678, 2024.

    [69] Manajit Sengupta, Aron Habte, Christian Gueymard, Stefan Wilbert, Dave Renné, and Thomas Stoffel, editors. Best Practices Handbook for the Collection and Use of Solar Resource Data for Solar Energy Applications: Second Edition. Technical Report NREL/TP-5D00-68886, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, 238 pp., 2017.

    [70] Manajit Sengupta, Yu Xie, Anthony Lopez, Aron Habte, Galen Maclaurin, and James Shelby. The National Solar Radiation Data Base (NSRDB). Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 89:51–60, 2018.

    [71] Amina Sghiri, Maryam Gallab, Safae Merzouk, and Saliha Assoul. Leveraging digital twins for enhancing building energy efficiency: A literature review of applications, technologies, and challenges. Buildings, 15(3):498, 2025.

    [72] Guodong Shao, Joe Hightower, and William Schindel. Credibility consideration for digital twins in manufacturing. Manufacturing Letters, 35:24–28, 2023.

    [73] Siemens. Central glare protection (CenGlrPrt11): Application program description. Siemens Desigo Room Automation documentation. Available from: https://sid.siemens.com/r/A6V11176345/7005907211_7032966283_6.0_en-US_6997186187, 2024.

    [74] Joshua S. Stein, William F. Holmgren, Jessica Forbess, and Clifford W. Hansen. PVLIB: Open source photovoltaic performance modeling functions for Matlab and Python. In 2016 IEEE 43rd Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (PVSC), pp. 3425–3430, Portland, OR, USA, 2016.

    [75] Sustainable open Innovation Initiative (SII). ZEB Design Guideline (Medium-Sized Office Building Edition), ver. 1. Available from: https://sii.or.jp/zeb/zeb_guideline.html, 2018.

    [76] Taipower Company. The methods of reduce electricity consumption: Demand response. Taipower Company, Taipei, Taiwan, 2014.

    [77] Taipower Company. Automated demand response on air condition field project. Taipower Company, Taipei, Taiwan, 2017.

    [78] Taipower Company. Demand response load management program. Available from: https://www.taipower.com.tw/en/page.aspx?mid=4523&cid=2803, 2021.

    [79] Taipower Company. Interruptible air conditioner program. Available from: https://www.taipower.com.tw/en/page.aspx?mid=4523&cid=2802, 2021.

    [80] Taiwan Green Productivity Foundation. Electricity management and demand control Q&A, energy-saving technical manual. Available from: https://www.ecct.org.tw/Knowledge/knowledge_more?id=6added8771424f0ab456abfa4aacce19, 2021.

    [81] Federico Tartarini, Stefano Schiavon, Toby Cheung, and Tyler Hoyt. CBE Thermal Comfort Tool: Online tool for thermal comfort calculations and visualizations. SoftwareX, 12:100563, 2020.

    [82] Gökçe Tomrukçu, Hazal Kızıldağ, Gizem Avgan, Ayşe Özlem Dal, Neşe Ganiç Sağlam, Ece Kalaycıoğlu Özdemir, and Touraj Ashrafian. A systematic approach to manual calibration and validation of building energy simulation. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(1):203–230, 2026.

    [83] Pape Moussa Toure, Younouss Dieye, Prince Momar Gueye, Vincent Sambou, Seckou Bodian, and Sumailla Tiguampo. Experimental determination of time lag and decrement factor. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 11:e00298, 2019.

    [84] Athanasios Tzempelikos and Hui Shen. Comparative control strategies for roller shades with respect to daylighting and energy performance. Building and Environment, 67:179–192, 2013.

    [85] U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Management Program. M&V Guidelines: Measurement and Verification for Federal Energy Projects, Version 3.0. U.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Management Program, Washington, DC, 2008.

    [86] Chris van Dronkelaar, Mark Dowson, Esfand Burman, Catalina Spataru, and Dejan Mumovic. A Review of the Energy Performance Gap and Its Underlying Causes in Non-Domestic Buildings. Frontiers in Mechanical Engineering, 1:17, 2016.

    [87] Liping Wang, Paul Mathew, and Xiufeng Pang. Uncertainties in energy consumption introduced by building operations and weather for a medium-size office building. Energy and Buildings, 53:152–158, 2012.

    [88] Nan Wang, Jiangfeng Zhang, and Xiaohua Xia. Energy consumption of air conditioners at different temperature set points. Energy and Buildings, 65:412–418, 2013.

    [89] Pimonmart Wankanapon and Richard G. Mistrick. Roller Shades and Automatic Lighting Control with Solar Radiation Control Strategies. International Journal of Building, Urban, Interior and Landscape Technology, 1:37–46, 2011.

    [90] Fernando Simon Westphal and Roberto Lamberts. Building simulation calibration using sensitivity analysis. In Proceedings of the Ninth International IBPSA Conference, pp. 1331–1338, Montréal, Canada, 2005.

    [91] Pei-Yu Yu and Tsung-Che Su. Intelligent Energy Saving System Technologies Demonstration and Application for Residential and Service Sectors (1/3). Research Center for Energy Technology and Strategy, National Cheng Kung University, 2022.

    [92] Yufeng Zhang, Huimei Chen, and Qinglin Meng. Thermal comfort in buildings with split air-conditioners in hot-humid area of China. Building and Environment, 64:213–224, 2013.

    [93] Zhihang Zheng, Jin Zhou, Zhu Jiaqin, Ying Yang, Feng Xu, and Hongcheng Liu. Review of the building energy performance gap from simulation and building lifecycle perspectives: Magnitude, causes and solutions. Developments in the Built Environment, 17:100345, 2024.

    下載圖示
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE