過去幾十年以來，路面輕軌系統已成為全球許多城市提升大眾運輸服務和城市永續發展的重要工具，而高雄市政府於2000年展開「臨港線發展為輕軌捷運」規劃工作，計畫將臨港線軌道打造成輕軌路廊串聯高雄市區，以提昇市民使用大眾運輸的習慣，並以台灣第一條路面輕軌的名號，串聯捷運路網，打造獨特的移動景點，創造運輸與觀光效益。
高雄輕軌全線於2024年初開通，成為台灣第一條環狀輕軌系統，在這25年間，高雄輕軌政策經歷了多次變遷，其中主要涉及高雄市政府、沿線居民與民間團體等多方利害關係人，各方對輕軌系統抱持著不同的觀點和期待。
在過往的路面輕軌研究中，較少關注其政策論述上的變化，因此，本研究以高雄輕軌作為研究標的，透過主題分析與批判論述分析探討不同時期的新聞媒體、官方政策、公聽會文件以分析高雄輕軌不同時期論述上的演變，揭露其背後的意識形態，研究結果可供未來推動路面輕軌建設計劃的溝通執行與營運參考。

Over the past few decades, street-level light rail systems have become a crucial tool for enhancing public transportation services and promoting urban sustainability in many cities worldwide. In 2000, the Kaohsiung City Government initiated the "Harbor Line Development into Light Rail Transit" project, aiming to transform the Harbor Line tracks into a light rail corridor connecting Kaohsiung’s urban area. The project sought to increase citizens’ use of public transportation and create a unique transportation landmark under the name of Taiwan’s first street-level light rail, integrating it with the metro network to generate both transportation and tourism benefits. The full operation of the Kaohsiung Light Rail was completed in early 2024, marking it as Taiwan’s first circular light rail system. Over the past 25 years, the Kaohsiung Light Rail policy has undergone several changes, involving multiple stakeholders, including the Kaohsiung City Government, local residents, and interest groups, each holding different views and expectations. Previous studies on street-level light rail have paid limited attention to changes in policy discourse. Therefore, this research takes the Kaohsiung Light Rail as its case study, using thematic analysis and critical discourse analysis to explore the evolution of discourses found in news media, official policies, and public hearing documents across different periods. By uncovering the underlying ideologies, the study aims to provide insights for future communication strategies and operational practices in the promotion and implementation of street-level light rail projects.

陳幼華, 林建華, 王慶麟, & 于新源. (2013). 國內輕軌之啟航─高雄環狀輕軌捷運. 中華技術, 100, 174–189.
范揚材. (2020). 高雄市政府捷運工程局業務報告. https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/Upload/Attachment/BusinessReport/1260/c3d01e95-f8fe-4aab-bba9-fd54650fb65b.pdf
高雄市議會. (2019). 高雄市議會舉辦『高雄輕軌市民意見』公聽會會議紀錄. https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/Upload/Attachment/PublicHearing/528/ba8a6911-c519-4d43-a92d-e1a81bbac218.pdf
高雄市議會. (2020). 「高雄輕軌二階興建」公聽會紀錄. https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/System/PublicHearing/DealData.aspx?s=23C72F73B227D2E3
高雄市政府. (2010). 擬定及變更高雄市鹽埕等四處細部計畫(配合台鐵高雄港站及臨港沿線都市更新再開發)案計畫書. 高雄市政府. https://urbangis.kcg.gov.tw/UBA//web_upload/PlanFile/05730/05730_%E9%9B%BB%E5%AD%90%E5%BB%BA%E6%AA%94_%E9%83%BD%E5%B8%82%E8%A8%88%E7%95%AB%E6%9B%B8.pdf
高雄市政府. (2019). 高雄輕軌捷運二階續建 （含車廂購置）專案報告. https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/Upload/Attachment/ProjectReport/91/f08f09ab-612d-4574-9a92-9327272c975c.pdf
高雄市政府. (2020). 高雄環狀輕軌捷運建設(第二階段)美術館路及大順路段優化策略總結報告書. https://mtbu.kcg.gov.tw/FileContent/GetDownloadFile?fileName=20201207113402909.pdf&fileDictionary=Activities&fileCaption=03-%E7%B8%BD%E7%B5%90%E5%A0%B1%E5%91%8A%E6%9B%B8&fileFormat=.pdf
高雄市政府捷運工程局. (2014). 高雄環狀輕軌建設創造之公共效益分析. https://mtbu.kcg.gov.tw/FileUploadLists/C002300?SubCategoryID=740f6091-7384-47ed-b1b2-ed74f79e7265&PageType=0&Keyword=&PageNumber=2
高雄市政府捷運工程局 & 高雄市政府交通局. (2012). 環狀輕軌捷運規劃路線效益與運量分析及考量機車減量等配套政策專案報告. https://cissearch.kcc.gov.tw/Upload/Attachment/ProjectReport/27/d53a4b1a-2d88-42ec-a72c-b9cbc7e20ddf.pdf
交通部. (2019). 2020年版運輸政策白皮書導論. https://www.iot.gov.tw/zh_tw/archive/pub/reports/-43053420
交通部統計處. (2023). 111 年民眾日常使用運具狀況調查摘要分析. https://www.motc.gov.tw/ch/app/data/view?module=survey&id=56&serno=202304280009
李春長, 梁志民, 簡啟珉, & 俞錚. (2020). 高雄市環狀輕軌對鄰近地區住宅價格之影響：以差異中之差異法結合分量迴歸模型之分析. 臺灣土地研究, 23(2), 195–221. https://doi.org/10.6677/JTLR.202011_23(2).0003
李長晏. (2012). 區域發展與五都治理：實證調查之分析. 中國地方自治, 65(11), 25–46. https://doi.org/10.6581/lsgc.2012.65(11).03
聯合報. (2000a, 九月 16). 臨港東線改輕軌 居民接受否 沿線噪音、塞車問題恐將持續 兩議員強烈反對.
聯合報. (2000b, 十二月 28). 臨港線擬規劃輕軌運輸 市府表示卅億就能開闢 也無鐵路的噪音、及平交道阻塞等問題.
聯合報. (2001, 十月 10). 輕軌平面化 議員反對興建　洪茂俊要求先辦公聽會 主張改為地下或高架.
聯合報. (2002a, 一月 31). 市府推動輕軌運輸 下月公聽會.
聯合報. (2002b, 二月 4). 便利的輕軌.
聯合報. (2002c, 二月 22). 臨港東線發展輕軌運輸 交部樂觀　工程顧問公司提出法令財源等四項問題 官員答應全力解決.
聯合報. (2002d, 三月 1). 輕軌公聽會 贊成反對聲浪參半　專家學者力主趕快興建 民眾顧忌噪音及影響平交道路口交通.
聯合報. (2004, 五月 20). 北高雄 可望搭上輕軌環線 公聽會學者專家建議 向北擴至內惟埤等地 向東延伸至鳳山 捷運局表示樂觀其成.
聯合報. (2006a, 一月 18). 16團體反輕軌捷運 議員聲援 柴山會等代表陳情 指造價高、不符國際需求 部分議員也認為有再審慎評估必要.
聯合報. (2006b, 二月 8). 輕軌建設 市長促加強與議員溝通 市府決定採「大環線」興建 讓北高雄同享電車便利性.
聯合報. (2006c, 三月 11). 反對聲音 專用鐵軌占車道 恐更塞.
聯合報. (2007, 一月 31). 評估效益 不宜輕率.
聯合報. (2012, 十一月 7). 百億興建輕軌 高雄議員唱反調 「運量不足、財政負擔、交通安全」 蕭永達三大理由反對 市長：灣區建設結合輕軌 可帶動多元經濟發展.
聯合報. (2014a, 四月 18). 亞洲新灣區 全球注目 一條水岸輕軌捷運 串連四個國際建築公共建設 注入觀光及經濟發展動能.
聯合報. (2014b, 十一月 10). 輕軌列車亮相 好攝客搶拍.
聯合報. (2016a, 六月 3). 大順路闢輕軌雨豆樹多數保留.
聯合報. (2016b, 十月 3). 輕軌融入市民生活義交將退場若取消管制安檢專家憂行駛安全捷運局：義交站崗逐步減少持續宣導讓民眾慢慢適應.
聯合報. (2018a, 三月 12). 高雄輕軌二階衝擊交通？捷運局：依序、間隔施工美術館路、大順路段避免相鄰橫交道路同時施工配合交管紓解車流增闢汽機車停車格.
聯合報. (2018b, 五月 8). 居民反彈輕軌路權將適度修正綠議員質疑鐵路地下化卻又鋪輕軌在路中央Ｂ型路權專用車道影響其他交通工具通行建議改為Ｃ型路權.
聯合報. (2018c, 六月 3). 輕軌真適合台灣？.
聯合報. (2020a, 五月 14). 高雄 輕軌2階 捷運局將訪沿線22里.
聯合報. (2020b, 八月 29). 高市 輕軌二階爭議 下月提新方案.
聯合報. (2021, 四月 9). 輕軌撞況多 高雄擴建50個偵測裝置.
聯合報. (2022, 十二月 10). 高雄輕軌又出撞況 機車騎士不治.
梁明義 & 王文音. (2002). 台灣半世紀以來快速經濟發展的回顧與省思. 金融投資與經濟發展: 紀念梁國樹教授第六屆學術研討會論文集》. 台北: 台灣大學經濟學系.
林誌銘, 陳烱宗, & 黃美英. (2018). 高雄捷運營運 10 週年. 中國工程師學會會刊, 91(4), 125–132.
吳嘉昌 & 黃育仁. (2016). 有機輕軌 聰明新選擇. 城市發展, 20, 10–25.
吳義隆, 林建華, 陳世任, 張尚瑜, 劉宏裕, & 鍾敦沛. (2021). 輕遊港都風華─高雄環狀輕軌建設. 中華技術, 131, 202–217.
吳義隆, 林永盛, 蔡榮禎, 倪睿謙, 管啟旭, 朱傳熙, & 張尚瑜. (2023). 高雄捷運四線齊發，綠色運輸時代啟動. 工程, 96(1), 13–42.
熊俊莉. (2012). 浅析台湾南北经济, 社会发展差异. 台湾研究, 2, 43–48.
許添本. (2003). 人本交通與綠色交通的發展理念. 都市交通, 18(3), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.29774/UT.200309.0004
余清祥, & 葉昱廷. (2020). 以文字探勘技術分析臺灣四大報文字風格. 數位典藏與數位人文, 69–96. https://doi.org/10.6853/DADH.202010_(6).0003
鄭國雄 & 李政安. (2010, 十月). 特別報導_臺北捷運的建設成果及展望. https://www.ntuce-newsletter.tw/vol.40/T4_1.html
中國時報. (1999, 七月 21). 臨港線轉型輕軌捷運 意見兩極: 座談會上一方建議補路網不足 一方則認為風險高惟均促捷運速動工.
中國時報. (2015, 五月 6). 輕軌擁行駛優先權 警加強執法.
中國時報. (2018a, 十一月 29). 每個交會路口都是「平交道」鐵路地下化又來輕軌居民很無言.
中國時報. (2018b, 十一月 29). 台中山手線喊卡高雄輕軌恐重新檢討太燒錢藍拒埋單.
自由時報. (2013, 四月 18). 議員反輕軌 副市長︰兼具多功能.
自由時報. (2014a, 九月 17). 綠白港都風情 輕軌車廂秀內裝.
自由時報. (2014b, 十一月 10). 爭睹輕軌列車風采 民試坐誇讚.
自由時報. (2017a, 三月 29). 高雄》高架輕軌擋大樓 觀海變看鐵軌.
自由時報. (2017b, 六月 29). 林義守籲輕軌大順路段改工法 市府：原案施工.
自由時報. (2018, 四月 20). 蓋輕軌縮路？居民不滿 捷局︰誤解.
自由時報. (2019a, 三月 19). 《高雄輕軌二階》美術館、大順路爭議 將提修正建議.
自由時報. (2019b, 三月 30). 高雄輕軌成圓 在地社團力挺續建.
自由時報. (2020a, 八月 28). 高雄輕軌二階爭議路段 盼9月底定案.
自由時報. (2020b, 十月 21). 9項配套 高雄輕軌二階3週後復工.
Alefari, D., Dar Saleh, A., & Haggag, M. (2024). The Impact of Light Rail Transit on Urban Development in Dubai, UAE. Sustainability, 16(17), Article 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16177705
Banik, B. J. (1993). Applying triangulation in nursing research. Applied Nursing Research, 6(1), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0897-1897(05)80042-4
Bhatia, V. K., Flowerdew, J., & Jones, R. H. (2008). Advances in discourse studies. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203892299&type=googlepdf
Bonham, J., Johnson, M., & Haworth, N. (2020). On constituting cyclists as ‘hazards’. Journal of transport geography, 84, 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102675
Bottoms, G. D. (1997). Light-Rail transit developments in Western Europe. Proceedings of Seventh National Conference on Light Rail Transit, Transportation Research Board Conference Proceedings, 8, 3–14. https://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/conf/1995/cp8/cp8v2-001.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brown, B. B., & Werner, C. M. (2011). The Residents’ Benefits and Concerns Before and After a New Rail Stop: Do Residents Get What They Expect? Environment and Behavior, 43(6), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510392030
Burr, V. (2006). An introduction to social constructionism. Routledge. https://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=25SKAgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PT4&dq=An+Introduction+to+Social+Constructionism+2006&ots=_CrOh5EwLg&sig=PKSPxRZA4YmCz0rWo7guN85JFMs
Cervero, R. (1984). Journal Report: Light Rail Transit and Urban Development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 50(2), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368408977170
Chava, J., & Renne, J. L. (2022). Transit-Induced Gentrification or Vice Versa?: A Study of Neighborhoods Around Light Rail Stations From 1970–2010. Journal of the American Planning Association, 88(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2021.1920453
Cheek, J. (2004). At the Margins? Discourse Analysis and Qualitative Research. Qualitative Health Research, 14(8), 1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304266820
Cohen-Blankshtain, G., & Feitelson, E. (2011). Light rail routing: Do goals matter? Transportation, 38, 343–361.
Crampton, G. (2003). Economic Development Impacts of Urban Rail Transport. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/116085
Cumyn, A., Ouellet, K., Côté, A.-M., Francoeur, C., & St-Onge, C. (2019). Role of Researchers in the Ethical Conduct of Research: A Discourse Analysis From Different Stakeholder Perspectives. Ethics & Behavior, 29(8), 621–636. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2018.1539671
Daniels, R. (2011). The impact of discontinuity in governance: How transport planning went off the rails in Sydney. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/212695549.pdf
De Bruijn, H., & Veeneman, W. (2009). Decision-making for light rail. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(4), 349–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.11.003
De Cleen, B., Goyvaerts, J., Carpentier, N., Glynos, J., & Stavrakakis, Y. (2021). Moving discourse theory forward: A five-track proposal for future research. Journal of Language and Politics, 20(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.20076.dec
Egan, R., & Caulfield, B. (2024). There’s no such thing as cycle traffic: A critical discourse analysis of public opposition to pro-cycle planning. Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research, 2, 100014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmr.2024.100014
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Wiley.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical Discourse Analysis and the Marketization of Public Discourse: The Universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 133–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926593004002002
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. E. Arnold.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. Routledge. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9781315834368&type=googlepdf
Fairclough, N. (2017). CDA as dialectical reasoning. In The Routledge handbook of critical discourse studies (pp. 13–25). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315739342-2/cda-dialectical-reasoning-norman-fairclough
Fairclough, N., & Scholz, R. (2020). “Critical discourse analysis as ‘dialectical reasoning’: From normative critique towards action, by way of explanation” Interview with Norman Fairclough conducted by Ronny Scholz. Mots. Les langages du politique, 113–123.
Fan, Y., Guthrie, A., & Levinson, D. (2012). Impact of light-rail implementation on labor market accessibility: A transportation equity perspective. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 5(3), 28–39.
Ferbrache, F., & Knowles, R. D. (2017). City boosterism and place-making with light rail transit: A critical review of light rail impacts on city image and quality. Geoforum, 80, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.01.013
Fevyer, D., & Aldred, R. (2022). Rogue drivers, typical cyclists, and tragic pedestrians: A Critical Discourse Analysis of media reporting of fatal road traffic collisions. Mobilities, 17(6), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1981117
Garrett, T. A. (2004). Light-Rail Transit in America. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
Gleave, S. D., & House, W. (2005). What Light rail can do for Cities. A Review of the Evidence Final Report. https://urbantransportgroup.org/system/files/general-docs/WhatLightRailCanDoforCitiesMainText_0218.pdf
Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9780203934753/logics-critical-explanation-social-political-theory-jason-glynos-david-howarth
Gölbaşı, A. P. D. Ş. (2017). Critical Approach in Social Research: Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis. The Online Journal of Communication and Media, 3(4), 5.
Gulcimen, S., Aydogan, E. K., & Uzal, N. (2021). Life cycle sustainability assessment of a light rail transit system: Integration of environmental, economic, and social impacts. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 17(5), 1070–1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.4428
Han, S. (2020). Structuralism and post-structuralism 1. In Routledge handbook of social and cultural theory (pp. 40–56). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315149714-4/structuralism-post-structuralism-1-sam-han
Hensher, D. A. (2016). Why is Light Rail Starting to Dominate Bus Rapid Transit Yet Again? Transport Reviews, 36(3), 289–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1155851
Higgins, C. D., Ferguson, M. R., & Kanaroglou, P. S. (2014). Light rail and land use change: Rail transit’s role in reshaping and revitalizing cities. Journal of Public Transportation, 17(2), 93–112.
Hossain, S. R., & Fuller, S. (2021). Understanding conflict in transport mega-projects: Social impacts and power dynamics in the WestConnex project, Sydney. Australian Geographer, 52(3), 293–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049182.2021.1964162
Huang, R., Moudon, A. V., Zhou, C., Stewart, O. T., & Saelens, B. E. (2017). Light rail leads to more walking around station areas. Journal of Transport & Health, 6, 201–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2017.02.002
Jackson, S. L., & Buckman, J. (2020). Light rail development with or without gentrification?: Neighborhood perspectives on changing sense of place in Denver, Colorado. Journal of Transport Geography, 84, 102678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102678
Jacobs, K. (2006). Discourse Analysis and its Utility for Urban Policy Research. Urban Policy and Research, 24(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111140600590817
Jacobs, K. (2021). Discourse Analysis. In S. Baum (Ed.), Methods in Urban Analysis (pp. 151–172). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-1677-8_9
Jaworski, A., & Coupland, N. (1999). The discourse reader (Vol. 2). Routledge London. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203597071&type=googlepdf
Jensen, C., Hazelton, J. K., & Wellman, G. (2020). Finding “Improvement” in the Language Transportation Planners Use: A Critical Discourse Analysis to Illustrate an Automobile-Centric Bias in Transportation Policymaking. Public Works Management & Policy, 25(2), 167–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/1087724X19885937
Jørgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2002). Discourse Analysis as Theory and Method. SAGE.
Katz, B., & Puentes, R. (2006). Taking the High Road: A Metropolitan Agenda for Transportation Reform. Rowman & Littlefield.
Khan, T. H. (2018). Young men’s experiences and views of sex education in Bangladesh: A Foucauldian discourse analysis. http://dr.library.brocku.ca/handle/10464/13595
Khan, T. H., & MacEachen, E. (2021). Foucauldian Discourse Analysis: Moving Beyond a Social Constructionist Analytic. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 160940692110180. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211018009
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2014). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics (Vol. 8). Verso Books. https://www.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=yblvDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR21&dq=hegemony-and-socialist-strategy-towards&ots=cD94jGIUE2&sig=mCVeIod5nujgAZK54vAATSjHwKA
Laconte, P. (2004). Light Rail: Making Urban Transport More Attractive.
Lan, L. W., Wang, M.-T., & Kuo, A. Y. (2006). Development and deployment of public transport policy and planning in Taiwan. Transportation, 33, 153–170.
Lee, A. H. Y., & Silva, E. A. (2017). Newspaper representation and power relations in infrastructure projects: A case study of Hong Kong’s Express Rail Link. International Planning Studies, 22(3), 256–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2016.1254600
Lees, L. (2004). Urban geography: Discourse analysis and urban research. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 101–107. https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph473pr
McCarthy, M. (1992). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 8(1), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/026565909200800108
Meijers, E., Hoekstra, J., Leijten, M., Louw, E., & Spaans, M. (2012). Connecting the periphery: Distributive effects of new infrastructure. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 187–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.005
Mejia-Dorantes, L., Paez, A., & Vassallo, J. M. (2012). Transportation infrastructure impacts on firm location: The effect of a new metro line in the suburbs of Madrid. Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 236–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.09.006
Nolte, A., & Yacobi, H. (2015). Politics, infrastructure and representation: The case of Jerusalem’s Light Rail. Cities, 43, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2014.10.011
Olesen, K. (2020). Infrastructure imaginaries: The politics of light rail projects in the age of neoliberalism. Urban Studies, 57(9), 1811–1826. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019853502
Olesen, M., & Lassen, C. (2016). Rationalities and materialities of light rail scapes. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.04.005
Page, S. B. (2013). Theories of Governance: Comparative Perspectives on Seattle’s Light Rail Project. Policy Studies Journal, 41(4), 583–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12033
Poole, B. (2010). Commitment and criticality: Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis evaluated. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2009.00234.x
Potter, J., Stringer, P., & Wetherell, M. (2023). Social texts and context: Literature and social psychology. Taylor & Francis. https://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=3PLOEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=IA1&dq=Social+Texts+and+Context+Literature+and+Social+Psychology&ots=YDsMbC65bB&sig=mNDRdSDsqtN0nN6pDwQAE0fea0o
Rear, D. (2013). Laclau and Mouffe’s discourse theory and Fairclough’s critical discourse analysis: An introduction and comparison. Unpublished paper, 1–26.
Rode, P. (2013). Trends and Challenges: Global Urbanisation and Urban Mobility. In Institute for Mobility Research (Ed.), Megacity Mobility Culture (pp. 3–21). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34735-1_1
Rubin, T. A., Moore II, J. E., & Lee, S. (1999). Ten myths about US urban rail systems. Transport Policy, 6(1), 57–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00032-8
Ruffilli, D. C. (2010). Federal Support for Bus Rapid Transit and Light Rail Transit Systems in Canada. Library of Parliament. http://epe.lac-bac.gc.ca/100/200/301/library_parliament/background_paper-ef/2010/2010-64/2010-64-eng.pdf
Scheffels, E., Bond, J., & Monteagut, L. E. (2019). Framing the Bicyclist: A Qualitative Study of Media Discourse about Fatal Bicycle Crashes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(6), 628–637. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119839348
Simpson, J. S. (2007). FTA Implementation of the New Starts and Small Starts Programs. U.S. Department of Transportation. https://www.transportation.gov/testimony/fta-implementation-new-starts-and-small-starts-programs-0
Smith, R. (2010). Poststructuralism, postmodernism and education. The SAGE handbook of philosophy of education, 139–150.
Sugawara, M. (1995). Urban Transportation in Asian Countries.“. Japan Railway and Transport Review, 4, 23–29.
Taylor, S. (2013). What is discourse analysis? Bloomsbury Academic. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/58753
Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.2001.00253.x
Topp, H. H. (1999). Innovations in tram and light rail systems. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 213(3), 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1243/0954409991531092
UN. (2022). World Cities Report 2022. https://unhabitat.org/sites/default/files/2022/06/wcr_2022.pdf
Wertz, F. J. (2011). Five Ways of Doing Qualitative Analysis: Phenomenological Psychology, Grounded Theory, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Research, and Intuitive Inquiry. Guildford Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=5h7TDwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Five+Ways+of+Doing+Qualitative+Analysis:+Phenomenological+Psychology,+Grounded+Theory,+Discourse+Analysis,+Narrative+Research,+and+Intuitive+Inquiry&ots=hJB5q6LUrW&sig=hzRzAVn5wg6XYF0FbMkmBUtJIEA
Wetherell, M. (2015). Discursive psychology: Key tenets, some splits, and two examples. Handbook of critical psychology, 315–324.
Weyrich, P. M., & Lind, W. S. (2001). Twelve anti-transit myths: A conservative critique. https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/Resources/resources/reportsandpublications/Documents/weyrich-myths.pdf
Wiggins, S., & Potter, J. (2008). Discursive psychology. The Sage handbook of qualitative research in psychology, 73–90.