簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 黃乙芹
Huang, Yi-Chin
論文名稱: 即時視覺回饋介面於正念體驗與壓力調節之實驗探討
An Experimental Study of Real-Time Visual Feedback Interfaces in Mindfulness Experience and Stress Regulation
指導教授: 何俊亨
Ho, Chun-Heng
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 工業設計學系
Department of Industrial Design
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 113
中文關鍵詞: 即時呼吸回饋正念減壓內感受互動介面設計
外文關鍵詞: Real-time respiratory feedback, Mindfulness-based stress reduction, Interoception, Interactive interface design
相關次數: 點閱:4下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 長期壓力對身心健康的危害已成為全球公共衛生議題,以「正念」為基礎的非藥物介入因此受到廣泛關注。雖然數位正念產品成功彌補了傳統實體課程在時間與空間上的結構性障礙,但其留存率仍面臨挑戰,可能反映出初學者在練習過程中面臨思緒游移、缺乏後設意識等認知層面的挑戰,導致無法持續維持注意力於當下的覺察。為回應此一體驗性障礙,本研究設計一款即時呼吸視覺回饋裝置,透過將使用者的呼吸狀態即時外部化為動態視覺訊號,作為正念練習的輔助介面,並探討其在急性壓力情境中對使用者正念狀態與生理放鬆的潛在效益。
    本研究採取四組雙因子混合設計,包含聆聽有聲書音檔的對照組(C)、正念音檔組(E1)、即時呼吸回饋裝置組(E2)、正念音檔結合即時呼吸回饋裝置組(E3)。共招募 42 位受測者完成 84 人次實驗,實驗依序進行基線測量、Stroop Test 壓力誘發與介入恢復三個階段,並透過主觀壓力量表(SVAS)、狀態正念量表(SMS)與心率變異度(HRV)三項指標進行量測。
    統計分析結果顯示,主觀指標 SVAS 與 SMS 的時間 × 組別交互作用均未達顯著;客觀指標 HRV 雖呈現顯著的時間 × 組別交互作用(p = .038, η² = .101),然而 Bonferroni 校正後的單純主效應分析未達顯著。儘管統計層面未獲支持,描述性趨勢仍呈現重要的探索性意義:配戴裝置之組別(E2、E3)於介入後皆呈 HRV 上升趨勢,未配戴裝置之組別(C、E1)則均呈下降;E2、E3組更是四組中在主觀壓力、主觀正念狀態與客觀生理指標三者恢復方向上均保持一致的組別。
    本研究在討論層面從三個面向回應上述結果:方法論上,揭示了 Stroop Test 壓力誘發強度的限制、非母語英文音檔可能帶來的認知負荷干擾,以及短時單次正念介入效果在文獻中本身存在的爭議;理論層面,以內感受(interoception)作為理論框架,將本裝置的作用機制定位於內感受敏感度向度中的「察覺(Noticing)」功能面向;設計層面,透過三個面向的反思歸納具體設計指南,作為後續即時呼吸回饋裝置設計與相關研究的參考依據。
    本研究的核心貢獻在於:第一,揭示數位正念產品在跨語言應用時的效果可複製性限制;第二,提供一個連結正念、內感受理論與視覺化介面設計的初探性框架;第三,提出立基於實驗觀察與理論基礎的設計指南,為未來相關研究與設計實踐奠定基礎。

    The hazards of chronic stress to physical and mental health have become a global public health issue, drawing widespread attention to mindfulness-based non-pharmacological interventions. Although digital mindfulness products have successfully bridged the structural barriers of traditional physical classes in terms of time and space, their retention rates still face challenges, potentially reflecting cognitive hurdles faced by beginners during practice, such as mind-wandering and a lack of meta-awareness, which hinder their ability to sustain attention on present-moment awareness. To address this experiential barrier, this study designed a real-time respiratory visual feedback device. By externalizing users' respiratory states into dynamic visual signals in real time to serve as an auxiliary interface for mindfulness practice, this study explores its potential benefits on users' state mindfulness and physiological relaxation in acute stress scenarios.
    This study adopted a four-group, two-way mixed design, comprising a control group listening to an audiobook (C), a mindfulness audio group (E1), a real-time respiratory feedback device group (E2), and a mindfulness audio combined with a real-time respiratory feedback device group (E3). A total of 42 participants completed 84 experimental sessions. The experiment sequentially proceeded through three phases: baseline measurement, Stroop Test stress induction, and intervention recovery, utilizing three metrics for measurement: the Subjective Visual Analog Scale (SVAS), the State Mindfulness Scale (SMS), and Heart Rate Variability (HRV).
    Statistical analysis results showed that the time-by-group interaction effects for the subjective metrics SVAS and SMS were both non-significant. Although the objective metric HRV exhibited a significant time-by-group interaction effect (p = .038, eta squared = .101), simple main effects analyses following Bonferroni correction failed to reach significance. Despite lacking support at the statistical level, descriptive trends still present important exploratory significance: the device-wearing groups (E2, E3) both exhibited upward HRV trends following the intervention, whereas the non-wearing groups (C, E1) both showed downward trends. Furthermore, the E2 and E3 groups were the only ones among the four to maintain consistent recovery directions across subjective stress, state mindfulness, and the objective physiological metric.
    In the discussion section, this study responds to the aforementioned results from three perspectives: Methodologically, it reveals limitations in the stress-induction intensity of the Stroop Test, potential cognitive load interference introduced by non-native English audio tracks, and the inherent controversy in literature regarding the effectiveness of short-term, single-session mindfulness interventions. Theoretically, adopting interoception as a framework, it positions the device's mechanism of action within the 'Noticing' functional dimension of interoceptive sensibility. At the design level, it summarizes concrete design guidelines through reflections across three dimensions, serving as a reference basis for subsequent real-time respiratory feedback device designs and related research.
    The core contributions of this study lie in: First, revealing the replicability limitations of digital mindfulness products in cross-language applications; second, providing an exploratory framework connecting mindfulness, interoception theory, and visualized interface design; and third, proposing design guidelines grounded in experimental observations and theoretical foundations, laying the groundwork for future related research and design practices.

    摘要 i SUMMARY iii 致謝 v TABLE OF CONTENTS vi LIST OF TABLES ix LIST OF FIGURES x CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Research Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Objectives and Questions 6 1.3 Research Framework 6 CHAPTER 2 Literature Review 8 2.1 Definition and Practice of Mindfulness 8 2.1.1 Origins of Mindfulness 8 2.1.2 Modern Definitions of Mindfulness 9 2.1.3 Mindfulness Practice Methods 10 2.1.4 Measurement of Mindfulness 11 2.2 Digital Development of Mindfulness Applications for Stress Regulation 12 2.2.1 Implementation and Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) 13 2.2.2 The Evolution of Digital Mindfulness Interventions: Advantages and Limitations 14 2.2.3 Summary: The Digital Evolution of Mindfulness for Stress Regulation 16 2.2.4 Summary: Digital Development of Mindfulness for Stress Regulation 16 2.3 Real-Time Sensory Feedback Design in Digital Mindfulness Products: Form and Content 17 2.3.1 Comparison of Feedback Forms: Selection of Sensory Modalities 18 2.3.2 Comparison of Feedback Content: Selection of Physiological Data Types 22 2.3.3 Physiological Mechanisms of Thoracic and Abdominal Breathing 26 2.3.4 Summary: Real-Time Sensory Feedback Design in Digital Mindfulness Interventions 27 2.4 Definition and Measurement of Stress 29 2.4.1 Basic Definition of Stress 29 2.4.2 Measurement of Stress 30 2.5 Two-Way Mixed-Design Analysis of Variance 32 2.6 Literature Review Summary 33 CHAPTER 3 Research Methods 35 3.1 Experimental Groups 35 3.2 Participant Recruitment 36 3.3 Experimental Procedure 38 3.4 Experimental Equipment and Materials 41 3.4.1 Stress Induction and Intervention Audio Materials 42 3.4.2 Real-Time Breathing Sensing Device 43 3.5 Data Collection 48 3.6 Analysis Methods 52 CHAPTER 4 Results 53 4.1 Manipulation Check: Baseline Verification of the Stress Induction Phase (T1 vs. T2) 53 4.2 Core Analysis: Stress-Reduction and Mindfulness Enhancement Effects of Different Interventions (T2 vs. T3) 57 4.3 Qualitative Interview Results 63 4.4 Summary of Research Results 64 CHAPTER 5 Discussion 67 5.1 Comprehensive Discussion of Experimental Results and the Three Research Questions 67 5.2 Theoretical Mechanism Links of the Real-Time Respiratory Feedback Device 71 5.3 Design Reflections on the Real-Time Respiratory Feedback Device 72 5.4 Chapter Summary 76 CHAPTER 6 Conclusion 78 REFERENCES 81 Appendix A the Device Code 89 A.1 Arduino Data Reception Code 89 A.2 VS Code Data Conversion and Interface Design Code 91

    Ali, A. E., Stepanova, E. R., Palande, S., Mader, A., Cesar, P., & Jansen, K. (2023). BreatheWithMe: Exploring Visual and Vibrotactile Displays for Social Breath Awareness during Colocated, Collaborative Tasks Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Hamburg, Germany. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585589
    Aras, D., Samil Onlu, A., Durmus, T., Cengiz, C., Guler, D., Guler, Y., Ugurlu, A., Aldhahi, M. I., & Gülü, M. (2023). A brief body scan mindfulness practice has no positive effect on the recovery of heart rate variability and cognitive tasks in female professional basketball players. Front Psychol, 14, 1196066. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1196066
    Baer, R., Gu, J., & Strauss, C. (2025). Five facet mindfulness questionnaire (FFMQ). In Handbook of assessment in mindfulness research (pp. 307-329). Springer.
    Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125.
    Baumel, A., Muench, F., Edan, S., & Kane, J. M. (2019). Objective User Engagement With Mental Health Apps: Systematic Search and Panel-Based Usage Analysis. J Med Internet Res, 21(9), e14567. https://doi.org/10.2196/14567
    Bishop, S. R., Lau, M., Shapiro, S., Carlson, L., Anderson, N. D., Carmody, J., Segal, Z. V., Abbey, S., Speca, M., Velting, D., & Devins, G. (2004). Mindfulness: A Proposed Operational Definition. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 11(3), 230-241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bph077
    Borghini, G., & Hazan, V. (2018). Listening effort during sentence processing is increased for non-native listeners: A pupillometry study. Frontiers in neuroscience, 12, 152.
    Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of personality and social psychology, 84(4), 822.
    Choi, K. Y., & Ishii, H. (2020). ambienBeat: Wrist-worn Mobile Tactile Biofeedback for Heart Rate Rhythmic Regulation Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Sydney NSW, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1145/3374920.3374938
    Crosswell, A. D., & Lockwood, K. G. (2020). Best practices for stress measurement: How to measure psychological stress in health research. Health psychology open, 7(2), 205510292093307. https://doi.org/10.1177/2055102920933072
    Dobrushina, O., Tamim, Y., Wald, I. Y., Maimon, A., & Amedi, A. (2024). Interoceptive training with real-time haptic versus visual heartbeat feedback. Psychophysiology, 61(11), e14648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14648
    Doll, A., Hölzel, B. K., Bratec, S. M., Boucard, C. C., Xie, X., Wohlschläger, A. M., & Sorg, C. (2016). Mindful attention to breath regulates emotions via increased amygdala–prefrontal cortex connectivity. Neuroimage, 134, 305-313.
    Electrophysiology, T. F. o. t. E. S. o. C. t. N. A. S. o. P. (1996). Heart Rate Variability. Circulation, 93(5), 1043-1065. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.93.5.1043
    Finck, C., Avila, A., Jiménez-Leal, W., Botero, J. P., Shambo, D., Hernandez, S., Reinoso-Carvalho, F., & Andonova, V. (2023). A multisensory mindfulness experience: exploring the promotion of sensory awareness as a mindfulness practice [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 14 - 2023. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1230832
    Ganesan, S., Van Dam, N. T., Kamboj, S. K., Tsuchiyagaito, A., Sacchet, M. D., Misaki, M., Moffat, B. A., Lorenzetti, V., & Zalesky, A. (2025). Neurofeedback Training Facilitates Awareness and Enhances Emotional Well-being Associated with Real-World Meditation Practice: A 7-T MRI Study. Mindfulness, 16(10), 2787-2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-025-02671-z
    Garfinkel, S. N., Seth, A. K., Barrett, A. B., Suzuki, K., & Critchley, H. D. (2015). Knowing your own heart: Distinguishing interoceptive accuracy from interoceptive awareness. Biological Psychology, 104, 65-74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.11.004
    Gethin, R. (2011). On some definitions of mindfulness. Contemporary Buddhism, 12(1), 263-279. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639947.2011.564843
    Goldberg, S. B., Jiwani, Z., Dahl, C. J., Tatar, R., Dunne, J. D., Davidson, R. J., & Hirshberg, M. J. (2026). Sitting and Active Meditation Practice: Utilization and Associations with Outcomes in Naturalistic and Clinical Trial Data. Mindfulness, 17(4), 1120-1137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-026-02787-w
    Harrison, R., Flood, D., & Duce, D. (2013). Usability of mobile applications: literature review and rationale for a new usability model. Journal of Interaction Science, 1(1), 1.
    Howarth, A., Smith, J. G., Perkins-Porras, L., & Ussher, M. (2019). Effects of Brief Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Health-Related Outcomes: a Systematic Review. Mindfulness, 10(10), 1957-1968. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-019-01163-1
    Immanuel, S., Teferra, M. N., Baumert, M., & Bidargaddi, N. (2023). Heart rate variability for evaluating psychological stress changes in healthy adults: a scoping review. Neuropsychobiology, 82(4), 187-202.
    J. Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Context: Past, Present, and Future. Clinical psychology., 10(2), 144-156. https://doi.org/info:doi/
    Kabat-Zinn, J. (2003). Mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR). Constructivism in the human sciences, 8(2), 73.
    Kelly, R. M., Seabrook, E. M., Foley, F., Thomas, N., Nedeljkovic, M., & Wadley, G. (2022). Design Considerations for Supporting Mindfulness in Virtual Reality [Original Research]. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, Volume 2 - 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2021.672556
    Khoury, B., Sharma, M., Rush, S. E., & Fournier, C. (2015). Mindfulness-based stress reduction for healthy individuals: A meta-analysis. Journal of psychosomatic research, 78(6), 519-528.
    Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A Wandering Mind Is an Unhappy Mind. Science, 330(6006), 932-932. https://doi.org/doi:10.1126/science.1192439
    Lau, M. A., Bishop, S. R., Segal, Z. V., Buis, T., Anderson, N. D., Carlson, L., Shapiro, S., Carmody, J., Abbey, S., & Devins, G. (2006). The toronto mindfulness scale: Development and validation. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(12), 1445-1467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20326
    Laukkonen, R. E., & Slagter, H. A. (2021). From many to (n)one: Meditation and the plasticity of the predictive mind. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 128, 199-217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.021
    Lehrer, P. M., & Gevirtz, R. (2014). Heart rate variability biofeedback: how and why does it work? [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 5 - 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756
    Lesage, F.-X., Berjot, S., & Deschamps, F. (2012). Clinical stress assessment using a visual analogue scale. Occupational Medicine, 62(8), 600-605. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqs140
    Li, Y., Piao, Z., & Xia, G. (2021). A wearable haptic interface for breath guidance in vocal training. International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression,
    Lima-Araujo, G. L. d., de Sousa Júnior, G. M., Mendes, T., Demarzo, M., Farb, N., Barros de Araujo, D., & Sousa, M. B. C. d. (2022). The impact of a brief mindfulness training on interoception: A randomized controlled trial. PLoS One, 17(9), e0273864.
    Linardon, J. (2023). Rates of attrition and engagement in randomized controlled trials of mindfulness apps: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 170, 104421. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2023.104421
    Linardon, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2020). Attrition and adherence in smartphone-delivered interventions for mental health problems: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 88(1), 1.
    Ma, X., Yue, Z.-Q., Gong, Z.-Q., Zhang, H., Duan, N.-Y., Shi, Y.-T., Wei, G.-X., & Li, Y.-F. (2017). The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing on Attention, Negative Affect and Stress in Healthy Adults [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 8 - 2017. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00874
    Malaver, S., Segrovets, I., Chernyshov, G., Han, J., Kim, C., & Kunze, K. (2022). Ethereal Phenomena - Interactive Art, Meditation, and Breathing Biofeedback: From Mind and Body Wellness Towards Self-Transcendence. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490149.3505567
    Mani, M., Kavanagh, D. J., Hides, L., & Stoyanov, S. R. (2015). Review and Evaluation of Mindfulness-Based iPhone Apps [Original Paper]. JMIR mHealth uHealth, 3(3), e82. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.4328
    Mantzios, M., & Giannou, K. (2019). A real-world application of short mindfulness-based practices: a review and reflection of the literature and a practical proposition for an effortless mindful lifestyle. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, 13(6), 520-525.
    Martinez, M. E., Kearney, D. J., Simpson, T., Felleman, B. I., Bernardi, N., & Sayre, G. (2015). Challenges to Enrollment and Participation in Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Among Veterans: A Qualitative Study. The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 21(7), 409-421. https://doi.org/10.1089/acm.2014.0324
    MCEWEN, B. S. (2004). Protection and Damage from Acute and Chronic Stress: Allostasis and Allostatic Overload and Relevance to the Pathophysiology of Psychiatric Disorders. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1032(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1314.001
    McVay, J. C., Kane, M. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2009). Tracking the train of thought from the laboratory into everyday life: An experience-sampling study of mind wandering across controlled and ecological contexts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(5), 857-863. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.5.857
    Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PLoS One, 7(11), e48230.
    Mrazek, A. J., Mrazek, M. D., Cherolini, C. M., Cloughesy, J. N., Cynman, D. J., Gougis, L. J., Landry, A. P., Reese, J. V., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). The future of mindfulness training is digital, and the future is now. Current Opinion in Psychology, 28, 81-86. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.11.012
    O'Daffer, A., Colt, S. F., Wasil, A. R., & Lau, N. (2022). Efficacy and conflicts of interest in randomized controlled trials evaluating Headspace and Calm apps: systematic review. JMIR mental health, 9(9), e40924.
    Osborne, E. L., Ainsworth, B., Hooper, N., & Atkinson, M. J. (2023). Experiences of Using Digital Mindfulness-Based Interventions: Rapid Scoping Review and Thematic Synthesis [Review]. J Med Internet Res, 25, e44220. https://doi.org/10.2196/44220
    Ostojic, K., Sharp, N., Paget, S., Khut, G., & Morrow, A. (2022). BrightHearts: A pilot study of biofeedback assisted relaxation training for the management of chronic pain in children with cerebral palsy. Paediatric and Neonatal Pain, 4(1), 33-42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12062
    Price, C. J., & Hooven, C. (2018). Interoceptive Awareness Skills for Emotion Regulation: Theory and Approach of Mindful Awareness in Body-Oriented Therapy (MABT) [Conceptual Analysis]. Frontiers in Psychology, Volume 9 - 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00798
    Rajan, A., Kumar, M., & Raj P, P. (2026). Effects of mindfulness-based interventions on perceived stress among non-clinical adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. npj Mental Health Research, 5(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44184-026-00188-4
    Rohleder, N. (2019). Stress and inflammation – The need to address the gap in the transition between acute and chronic stress effects. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 105, 164-171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2019.02.021
    Russ, S. L., Maruyama, G., Sease, T. B., & Jellema, S. (2017). Do early experiences matter? Development of an Early Meditation Hindrances Scale linked to novice meditators’ intention to persist. Psychology of Consciousness: Theory, Research, and Practice, 4(3), 274-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/cns0000129
    Schommer, N. C., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2003). Dissociation between reactivity of the hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis and the sympathetic-adrenal-medullary system to repeated psychosocial stress. Psychosom Med, 65(3), 450-460. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000035721.12441.17
    Selye, H. (1946). The general adaptation syndrome and the diseases of adaptation. The journal of clinical endocrinology, 6(2), 117-230.
    Sinnett, S., Spence, C., & Soto-Faraco, S. (2007). Visual dominance and attention: The Colavita effect revisited. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(5), 673-686. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193770
    Skoluda, N., Strahler, J., Schlotz, W., Niederberger, L., Marques, S., Fischer, S., Thoma, M. V., Spoerri, C., Ehlert, U., & Nater, U. M. (2015). Intra-individual psychological and physiological responses to acute laboratory stressors of different intensity. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 51, 227-236. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2014.10.002
    Stern, S., Linker, S., Vadodaria, K. C., Marchetto, M. C., & Gage, F. H. (2018). Prediction of response to drug therapy in psychiatric disorders. Open biology, 8(5).
    Tamim, Y., Maimon, A., Dobrushina, O., Wald, I., & Amedi, A. (2024). Interoceptive training with real‐time haptic versus visual heartbeat feedback. Psychophysiology, 61(11), e14648. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.14648
    Tanay, G., & Bernstein, A. (2013). State Mindfulness Scale (SMS): development and initial validation. Psychological assessment, 25(4), 1286.
    Teasdale, J. D. (1999). Emotional processing, three modes of mind and the prevention of relapse in depression. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 37, S53-S77. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7967(99)00050-9
    Treves, I. N., Chen, Y.-Y., Wilson, C. L., Verdonk, C., Qina'au, J., Pustejovsky, J. E., Goldberg, S. B., Mehling, W., Schuman-Olivier, Z., & Khalsa, S. S. (2025). Minding the Body: A Meta-analysis of the Effects of Mindfulness Meditation Training on Self-reported Interoception. Research Square, rs. 3. rs-6792067.
    Vazan, R., Filcikova, D., & Mravec, B. (2017). Effect of the Stroop test performed in supine position on the heart rate variability in both genders. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 208, 156-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autneu.2017.10.009
    Wickens, C. D. (2002). Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 3(2), 159-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639220210123806
    Yu, B., Feijs, L., Funk, M., & Hu, J. (2015, 2015//). Breathe with Touch: A Tactile Interface for Breathing Assistance System. Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2015, Cham.
    Yu, B., Funk, M., Hu, J., Wang, Q., & Feijs, L. (2018). Biofeedback for Everyday Stress Management: A Systematic Review [Review]. Frontiers in ICT, Volume 5 - 2018. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00023
    Yu, B., Hu, J., Funk, M., & Feijs, L. (2018). DeLight: biofeedback through ambient light for stress intervention and relaxation assistance. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 22, 787-805.
    Zawadzki, M. J., Torok, Z. A., Peña, M., & Gavrilova, L. (2025). App-based mindfulness meditation reduces stress in novice meditators: a randomized controlled trial of headspace using ecological momentary assessment. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 59(1), kaaf025. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaaf025
    Zhu, B., Hedman, A., Feng, S., Li, H., & Osika, W. (2017). Designing, Prototyping and Evaluating Digital Mindfulness Applications: A Case Study of Mindful Breathing for Stress Reduction. J Med Internet Res, 19(6), e197. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6955

    QR CODE