簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 莊舒婷
Chuang, Shu-Ting
論文名稱: 環境不確定性下策略性採購、供應鏈敏捷性與組織績效關係之研究-以資訊電子業為例
Environmental Uncertainty, Strategic Sourcing, Supply Chain Agility and Organizational Performance in the Information Technology Industry
指導教授: 林珮珺
Lin, Pei-Chun
共同指導教授: 孫雅彥
Sun, Ya-Yen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 交通管理科學系
Department of Transportation and Communication Management Science
論文出版年: 2014
畢業學年度: 102
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 99
中文關鍵詞: 資訊電子業策略性採購供應鏈敏捷性組織績效環境不確定性
外文關鍵詞: Information Technology Industry, Strategic Sourcing, Supply Chain Agility, Organizational Performance, Environmental Uncertainty
相關次數: 點閱:158下載:13
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本研究以台灣資訊電子業為例,探討策略性採購、供應鏈敏捷性與組織績效間的影響關係,並以環境不確定性作為調節變數。經過民國102年12月至民國103年3月的問卷發放,共回收了163份有效樣本,透過結構方程模式(SEM)分析後,發現台灣資訊電子產業中策略性採購對供應鏈敏捷性有正向影響關係,供應鏈敏捷性對組織績效亦存在正向影響關係,然而策略性採購對於組織績效之研究假設並無得到顯著支持,但研究結果得知策略性採購可透過提升供應鏈敏捷性間接影響組織績效。另外,本研究透過階層迴歸進行調節效果分析,發現環境不確定性對於策略性採購與供應鏈敏捷性之影響中具有調節效果,環境不確定性對於供應鏈敏捷性與組織績效之影響中亦具有調節效果,但環境不確定性對策略性採購與組織績效之影響中不具有調節效果。最後根據本研究結果提出相關之建議,以供台灣資訊電子業者參考。

    This study aims to evaluate the impact of strategic sourcing on supply chain agility and organizational performance in the information technology industry, and considering the moderating effects of environmental uncertainty. During four months of questionnaires distributed, a total of 163 valid samples were collected. A structural equation modeling (SEM) approach was used to test the research hypotheses. Result indicated that strategic sourcing had a positive effect on supply chain agility, and supply chain agility had a positive effect on organizational performance. The impact of strategic sourcing on organizational performance was not supported in this study, however, strategic sourcing had an indirect effect on organizational performance mediated by supply chain agility. Otherwise , this study used hierarchical regression analysis to analyze whether moderating effects existed or not. Result indicated that environmental uncertainty had a negative moderating effect between strategic sourcing and supply chain agility, and which had a positive moderating effect between supply chain agility and organizational performance. But environmental uncertainty didn’t exist moderating effect between strategic sourcing and organizational performance. Practical implications of the research findings for information technology companies were discussed.

    目錄 i 表目錄 iv 圖目錄vi 第一章 緒論1 1.1研究背景與動機1 1.2研究目的5 1.3研究範圍5 1.4研究流程5 第二章 文獻回顧8 2.1資訊電子業8 2.2策略性採購12 2.3供應鏈敏捷性17 2.4組織績效20 2.5環境不確定性23 第三章 研究方法27 3.1研究模式與假設27 3.2研究設計28 3.3資料分析方法與應用32 3.3.1敘述性統計分析32 3.3.2因素分析32 3.3.3信度與效度分析33 3.3.4變異數分析33 3.3.5結構方程模式34 3.3.6調節效果分析35 第四章 環境不確定性下策略性採購、供應鏈敏捷性與組織績效關係之分析37 4.1問卷回收結果與樣本結構分析37 4.1.1樣本結構分析38 4.2策略性採購、供應鏈敏捷性、組織績效與環境不確定性敘述性統計40 4.2.1策略性採購敘述性統計分析40 4.2.2供應鏈敏捷性敘述性統計分析42 4.2.3組織績效敘述性統計分析44 4.2.4環境不確定性敘述性統計分析44 4.3策略性採購、供應鏈敏捷性、組織績效與環境不確定性之信度分析46 4.4填答者特性與構面之變異數分析47 4.4.1填答者職位與各構面之變異數分析47 4.4.2公司營運型態與各構面之變異數分析48 4.4.3公司成立年數與各構面之變異數分析49 4.4.4公司營業額與各構面之變異數分析50 4.4.5公司規模與各構面之變異數分析52 4.5收斂效度與區別效度53 4.6結構方程式分析結果55 4.6.1結構方程模式分析與校估56 4.6.2中介效果驗證59 4.6.3策略性採購、供應鏈敏捷性與組織績效之因素SEM分析61 4.6.4不同企業規模之SEM分析66 4.7 調節效果68 第五章 結論與建議74 5.1結論74 5.2實務建議79 5.3研究貢獻81 5.4後續研究建議82 參考文獻83 一、中文部分83 二、英文部分84 三、網站部分94 附錄一 正式問卷95

    一、中文部分
    1.工商時報,「強化製造力的兩大決勝關鍵」,經營知識,民國94年。
    2.天下雜誌,「隱型冠軍出列!」,第522期,民國102年。
    3.王長青、鄭博化,「掌握先機~更智慧的供應鏈管理」,採購專欄,財團法人供應管理協會,民國100年。
    4.吳萬益,「企業研究方法」,第四版,華泰書局,民國100年。
    5.林震岩,「多變量分析:SPSS的操作與應用」,智勝文化,民國96年。
    6.陳順宇,「多變量分析」,第四版,華泰書局,民國94年。
    7.許振邦、中華採購供應管理協會,「採購與供應管理」,第三版,智勝文化,民國100年。
    8.新紀元週刊,「地震衝擊日本產業供應鏈」,第221期,民國100年。
    9.趙李英紀,「企業關係滿意、信任、與承諾交互影響以關係價值干擾因子探討─以科技公司與廠商連鎖性互動行銷為例」,第八屆知識社群國際研討會,民國101年。
    10.聯合報,「台幣Q3勁升電子業匯損壓力大」,民102。
    11.劉國棟,「電子產業,懂這些就夠了」,大是文化,民國95年。

    二、英文部分
    1.Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. (2007). Modeling agility of supply chain. Industrial Marketing Management, 36(4), 443-457.
    2.Anderson, M. G., & Katz, P. B. (1998). Strategic sourcing. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 9(1), 1-13.
    3.Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 71-88.
    4.Banfield, E. (1999). Harnessing value in the supply chain: strategic sourcing in action:John Wiley & Sons.
    5.Barragan, S., Cappellino, C., Dempsey, N., & Rothenberg, S. (2003). A framework for sourcing product development services. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(3), 271-280.
    6.Boyle, E., Humphreys, P., & McIvor, R. (2008). Reducing supply chain environmental uncertainty through e-intermediation: An organisation theory perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 114(1), 347-362.
    7.Braunscheidel, M. J., & Suresh, N. C. (2009). The organizational antecedents of a firm’s supply chain agility for risk mitigation and response. Journal of Operations Management, 27(2), 119-140.
    8.Brown, S. L. (1998). Competing on the edge: Strategy as structured chaos: Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
    9.Carr, A. S., & Pearson, J. N. (2002). The impact of purchasing and supplier involvement on strategic purchasing and its impact on firm’s performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 22(9), 1032-1053.
    10.Carr, A. S., & Smeltzer, L. R. (1997). An empirically based operational definition of strategic purchasing. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 3(4), 199-207.
    11.Carroll, S. J., & Schneier, C. E. (1982). Performance Appraisal and Review Systems: The Identification, Measurement, and Development of Performance In Organizations: Scott, Foresman Glenview, IL.
    12.Chan, T. C., & Chin, K.-S. (2007). Key success factors of strategic sourcing: an empirical study of the Hong Kong toy industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 107(9), 1391-1416.
    13.Chen, J., & Guo, Z. (2013). Strategic sourcing in the presence of uncertain supply and retail competition.Production and Operations Management.
    14.Chiang, C.-Y., Kocabasoglu-Hillmer, C., & Suresh, N. (2012). An empirical investigation of the impact of strategic sourcing and flexibility on firm's supply chain agility. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(1), 49-78.
    15.Chow, G., Heaver, T. D., & Henriksson, L. E. (1994). Logistics performance: definition and measurement. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 24(1), 17-28.
    16.Christopher, M. (2000). The agile supply chain: competing in volatile markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 37-44.
    17.Churchill Jr, G. A., & Iacobucci, D. (2009). Marketing Research: Methodological Foundations: Cengage Learning.
    18.Cleveland, G., Schroeder, R. G., & Anderson, J. C. (1989). A Theory of Production Competence*. Decision Sciences, 20(4), 655-668.
    19.Daft, R. L., Sormunen, J., & Parks, D. (1988). Chief executive scanning, environmental characteristics, and company performance: an empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 9(2), 123-139.
    20.Duncan, R. B. (1972). Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(3), 313-327.
    21.Eshlaghy, A. T., Mashayekhi, A. N., Rajabzadeh, A., & Razavian, M. M. (2010). Applying path analysis method in defining effective factors in organisation agility. International Journal of Production Research, 48(6), 1765-1786.
    22.Federgruen, A., & Yang, N. (2008). Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks. Operations Research, 56(4), 916-936.
    23.Freytag, P. V., & Kirk, L. (2003). Continuous strategic sourcing. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 9(3), 135-150.
    24.Fynes, B., De Búrca, S., & Marshall, D. (2004). Environmental uncertainty, supply chain relationship quality and performance. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 10(4), 179-190.
    25.Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation: California Management Review, University of California.
    26.Greaver, M. F. (1999). Strategic Outsourcing: A Structured Approach to Outsourcing Decisions and Initiatives: Amacom.
    27.Hair, J. F. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective-7/E: Prentice Hall.
    28.Henry, D., Cooke, S., Buckley, P., Dumagan, J., Gill, G., Pastore, D., & LaPorte, S. The emerging digital economy II.
    29.Humphreys, P., Lo, V., & McIvor, R. (2000). A decision support framework for strategic purchasing. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 107(1), 353-362.
    30.Ismail, H. S., & Sharifi, H. (2006). A balanced approach to building agile supply chains. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(6), 431-444.
    31.Jain, V., Benyoucef, L., & Deshmukh, S. (2008). What's the buzz about moving from ‘lean’to ‘agile’integrated supply chains? A fuzzy intelligent agent-based approach. International Journal of Production Research, 46(23), 6649-6677.
    32.Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, F. P. (1991). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
    33.Justin Tan, J., & Litsschert, R. J. (1994). Environment‐strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of the chinese electronics industry. Strategic Management Journal, 15(1), 1-20.
    34.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard business review, 74(1), 75-85.
    35.Katayama, H., & Bennett, D. (1999). Agility, adaptability and leanness: a comparison of concepts and a study of practice. International Journal of Production Economics, 60-61, 43-51.
    36.Khan, A., & Pillania, R. K. (2008). Strategic sourcing for supply chain agility and firms' performance: a study of Indian manufacturing sector. Management Decision, 46(10), 1508-1530.
    37.Kim, S. W. (2006). Effects of supply chain management practices, integration and competition capability on performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(3), 241-248.
    38.Kocabasoglu, C., & Suresh, N. C. (2006). Strategic sourcing: an empirical investigation of the concept and its practices in US manufacturing firms. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 42(2), 4-16.
    39.Krause, D. R., Handfield, R. B., & Tyler, B. B. (2007). The relationships between supplier development, commitment, social capital accumulation and performance improvement. Journal of Operations Management, 25(2), 528-545.
    40.Krishnan, R., Martin, X., & Noorderhaven, N. G. (2006). When does trust matter to alliance performance? Academy of Management Journal, 49(5), 894-917.
    41.Kumar, S., Bragg, R. and Creinin, D. (2003). Managing supplier relationships, Quality Progress, 36(1), 9-16.
    42.Lawson, B., Cousins, P. D., Handfield, R. B., & Petersen, K. J. (2009). Strategic purchasing, supply management practices and buyer performance improvement: an empirical study of UK manufacturing organisations. International Journal of Production Research, 47(10), 2649-2667.
    43.Lee, H. L. (2004). The triple-A supply chain. Harvard Business Review, 82(10), 102-113.
    44.Lee, P. K., Yeung, A. C., & Edwin Cheng, T. (2009). Supplier alliances and environmental uncertainty: an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 190-204.
    45.Li, S., Ragu-Nathan, B., Ragu-Nathan, T., & Subba Rao, S. (2006). The impact of supply chain management practices on competitive advantage and organizational performance. Omega, 34(2), 107-124.
    46.Li, X., Chung, C., Goldsby, T. J., & Holsapple, C. W. (2008). A unified model of supply chain agility: the work-design perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management, The, 19(3), 408-435.
    47.Lin, C.-T., Chiu, H., & Chu, P.-Y. (2006). Agility index in the supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 285-299.
    48.Liu, G. J., Shah, R., & Babakus, E. (2012). When to Mass Customize: The Impact of Environmental Uncertainty*. Decision Sciences, 43(5), 851-887.
    49.Mason, S. J., Cole, M. H., Ulrey, B. T., & Yan, L. (2002). Improving electronics manufacturing supply chain agility through outsourcing. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 32(7), 610-620.
    50.Melnyk, S., Lummus, R., Vokurka, R., & Sandor, J. (2009). Mapping the future of the strategic supply chaint: a Delphi study. International Journal of Production Research, 47(16), 4629-4653.
    51.Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1984). Fit, failure and the hall of fame. California Management Review, 26(3), 10-28.
    52.Milliken, F. J. (1987). Three types of perceived uncertainty about the environment: State, effect, and response uncertainty. Academy of Management Review, 12(1), 133-143.
    53.Momme, J., & Hvolby, H.-H. (2002). An outsourcing framework: action research in the heavy industry sector. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(4), 185-196.
    54.Merschmann, U., & Thonemann, U. W. (2011). Supply chain flexibility, uncertainty and firm performance: an empirical analysis of German manufacturing firms. International Journal of Production Economics, 130(1), 43-53.
    55.Nagel, R. N., & Dove, R. (1991).21st Century Manufacturing Enterprise Strategy: An Industry-Led View:DIANE publishing.
    56.Narasimhan, R., & Das, A. (1999). An empirical investigation of the contribution of strategic sourcing to manufacturing flexibilities and performance*. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 683-718.
    57.Newkirk, H. E., & Lederer, A. L. (2006). The effectiveness of strategic information systems planning under environmental uncertainty. Information & Management, 43(4), 481-501.
    58.Novack, R. A., & Simco, S. W. (1991). The industrial procurement process: a supply chain perspective. Journal of Business Logistics, 12(1), 145-167.
    59.Overby, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Sambamurthy, V. (2006). Enterprise agility and the enabling role of information technology. European Journal of Information Systems, 15(2), 120-131.
    60.Paulraj, A., & Chen, I. J. (2005). Strategic supply management and dyadic quality performance: a path analytical model.Journal of Supply Chain Management, 41(3), 4-18.
    61.Prater, E., Biehl, M., & Smith, M. A. (2001). International supply chain agility-Tradeoffs between flexibility and uncertainty. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(5/6), 823-839.
    62.Quélin, B., & Duhamel, F. (2003). Bringing together strategic outsourcing and corporate strategy: Outsourcing motives and risks. European Management Journal, 21(5), 647-661.
    63.Quayle, M. (2002). Purchasing in small firms. European Journal of Purchasing & Supply Management, 8(3), 151-159.
    64.Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2002). Management, 7”'edition: Prentice Hall Inc., New Jersey.
    65.Russell, R., & Taylor III, B. (2000). Operations Management. 3. Auflage, London.
    66.Ryu, I., So, S., & Koo, C. (2009). The role of partnership in supply chain performance. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 109(4), 496-514.
    67.Sislian, E., & Satir, A. (2000). Strategic sourcing: a framework and a case study.Journal of Supply Chain Management, 36(3), 4-11.
    68.Smeltzer, L. R., Manship, J. A., & Rossetti, C. L. (2003). An Analysis of the Integration of Strategic Sourcing and Negotiation Planning. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 39(4), 16-25.
    69.Spekman, R. E., Kamauff Jr, J. W., & Myhr, N. (1998). An empirical investigation into supply chain management: a perspective on partnerships. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 3(2), 53-67.
    70.Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Daugherty, P. J. (2001). Supply chain collaboration and logistical service performance. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(1), 29-48.
    71.Su, Q., Song, Y.-t., Li, Z., & Dang, J.-x. (2008). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on cooperative strategy. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 14(4), 263-272.
    72.Swafford, P. M., Ghosh, S., & Murthy, N. (2008). Achieving supply chain agility through IT integration and flexibility. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(2), 288-297.
    73.Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2004). A methodology for strategic sourcing. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 236-250.
    74.Tracey, M., Lim, J.-S., & Vonderembse, M. A. (2005). The impact of supply-chain management capabilities on business performance. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 10(3), 179-191.
    75.Tseng, F.-M., Chiu, Y.-J., & Chen, J.-S. (2009). Measuring business performance in the high-tech manufacturing industry: a case study of Taiwan's large-sized TFT-LCD panel companies. Omega, 37(3), 686-697.
    76.Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of business performance in strategy research: a comparison of approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
    77.Verdu, A. J., Tamayo, I., & Ruiz-Moreno, A. (2012). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between real options and technological innovation in high-tech firms. Technovation, 32(9), 579-590.
    78.Vickery, S., Droge, C., Setia, P., & Sambamurthy, V. (2010). Supply chain information technologies and organisational initiatives: complementary versus independent effects on agility and firm performance. International Journal of Production Research, 48(23), 7025-7042.
    79.Wang, L., Yeung, J. H. Y., & Zhang, M. (2011). The impact of trust and contract on innovation performance: The moderating role of environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 134(1), 114-122.
    80.Wheel Wright, S. C. (1984). Manufacturing strategy: defining the missing link. Strategic Management Journal, 5(1), 77-91.
    81.Wong, C. W., Lai, K.-h., & Ngai, E. (2009). The role of supplier operational adaptation on the performance of IT-enabled transport logistics under environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(1), 47-55.
    82.Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Operations Management, 29(6), 604-615.
    83.Yeung, K., Lee, P.C.K., Yeung, A.C.L., & Cheng, T.C.E. (2013). Supplier partnership and cost performance:The moderating roles of specific investments and environmental uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 546-559.
    84.Yu, Z., Yan, H., & Cheng, T. E. (2001). Benefits of information sharing with supply chain partnerships. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 101(3), 114-121.
    85.Yusuf, Y., Gunasekaran, A., Adeleye, E., & Sivayoganathan, K. (2004). Agile supply chain capabilities: Determinants of competitive objectives. European Journal of Operational Research, 159(2), 379-392.
    86.Yusuf, Y. Y., Gunasekaran, A., Musa, A., Dauda, M., El-Berishy, N., & Cang, S. (2012). A relational study of supply chain agility, competitiveness and business performance in the oil and gas industry. International Journal of Production Economics.
    87.Yusuf, Y. Y., Sarhadi, M., & Gunasekaran, A. (1999). Agile manufacturing:: The drivers, concepts and attributes. International Journal of Production Economics, 62(1), 33-43.
    88.Zeng, A. Z. (2003). Global sourcing: process and design for efficient management. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 8(4), 367-379.

    三、網站部分
    1.Digitimes:http://www.digitimes.com.tw/tw/dt/p360.asp?CnlID=10
    2.工業技術研究院:https://www.itri.org.tw/chi/iek/p11.asp?RootNodeId=070&NavRootNodeId=0753&NodeId=07534&ArticleNBR=4374
    3.台灣經濟研究院:http://tie.tier.org.tw/index.asp
    4.恩汎理財網:http://symy04.pixnet.net/blog/category/210187
    5.財政部統計處:http://www.mof.gov.tw/mp.asp?mp=62

    下載圖示 校內:2018-07-14公開
    校外:2018-07-14公開
    QR CODE