簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳威丞
Chen, Wei-Cheng
論文名稱: 衝擊噴流霧化混合之分析
THE ANALYSIS ON THE BREAKUP AND MIXING OF THE IMPINGING JETS
指導教授: 袁曉峰
Yuan, Tony
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 航空太空工程學系
Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics
論文出版年: 2007
畢業學年度: 95
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 210
中文關鍵詞: 液態火箭衝擊噴流混合霧化
外文關鍵詞: impinging, doublet, NTO, MMH, mixing, PLIF
相關次數: 點閱:70下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 雙噴流衝擊霧化乃是利用液態噴流之相互衝擊而產生霧化及混合之效果,此種機構主要應用於液態火箭推進劑之霧化混合上。而噴流衝擊後之碎裂情形主要受了空氣動力及流體動力之不穩定因素所造成,故噴注器之操作與設計參數及流體之物理性質(密度、黏滯力及表面張力)皆為影響噴流衝擊霧化混合之重要因素。
    本研究應用PLIF技術配合影像分析方法,進行同質噴流衝擊霧化混合現象之觀察研究,探討噴流動量通量及表面張力對噴流衝擊霧化與混合現象之影響。實驗之噴注器孔口直徑為0.3㎜,而衝擊角則固定為60°。實驗結果顯示,同質噴流之衝擊霧化存在一特徵動量通量,當噴流動量通量達其特徵值時,衝擊噴流即會產生較佳的霧化,而霧化液滴亦明顯均勻的分布於霧化區內。而較低表面張力之流體,因其噴流較易因空氣
    與流體動力不穩定性而碎裂霧化,故相較於水之衝擊噴流,其噴流易於於較低之動量通量便碎裂霧化為微小液滴,且更均勻的分布於霧化區內。
    由噴流混合效率觀察顯示,噴流之混合效率主要受到噴流之相互穿透程度影響。噴流之混合現象因此而可區分為兩種形式,當衝擊噴流之霧化未達完全發展模式時,噴流之混合現象為液態噴流相互融合之混合;當衝擊噴流之霧化達完全發展模式時,噴流之混合現象則為霧化液滴相互穿透之混合。當噴流動量通量達其特徵值時,即衝擊噴流為有效的霧化,其霧化液滴之穿透率為最均衡的狀況,故衝擊噴流有最佳的混合效率。低表面張力噴流因其較易於碎裂霧化,造成其霧化液滴之穿透率均較高表面張力噴流(水)為高,使得其混合效率較為不佳。
    本研究亦進一步以韋伯數分析噴流霧化混合現象,顯示不同表面張力噴流可於相同特徵韋伯數(90,000)時,達到有效之霧化混合效率。故韋伯數為可用以定義噴流霧化混合現象之重要參數。
    本研究亦完成以NTO與MMH模擬液為工作流體之雙/三噴流衝擊霧化混合之冷流場觀察研究。實驗結果顯示,噴流的動量通量比與物理性質(表面張力或黏滯係數)可明顯影響噴流之質量與混合比分布;表面張力低者較易被衝擊霧化,噴流相對動量通量較高者,其噴流機率分布較為集中。當噴流O/F=1.18時,因兩噴流具相當之動量通量,整體與個別噴流的霧化液滴分布皆具最佳的對稱性與均勻度,且其亦有最佳之混合效率及平均特徵速度,顯示其有最佳的NTO/MMH反應燃燒效率。
    對於三噴流衝擊霧化而言,外側NTO噴流的衝擊動量增加將造成其霧化液滴分布更均勻,但MMH霧化液滴則並未隨著NTO噴流的衝擊動量增加而明顯改變。於同樣實驗條件下,三噴流衝擊霧化液滴均較雙噴流衝擊霧化對稱及均勻的分布於較小的霧化區域內,且當O/F=1.19-1.59時,NTO/MMH三噴流衝擊霧化有最佳的燃燒效率。
    本研究亦進行NTO/MMH開放空間自發性衝擊燃燒之實驗觀察。實驗結果顯示,當NTO/MMH噴流互相衝擊後,霧化之NTO/MMH液滴皆需一段距離的混合及氣化,方能產生劇烈的燃燒,而此一誘發劇烈燃燒的距離則與MMH液滴粒徑及粒徑分布有關。分析NTO/MMH燃燒現象顯示,隨著O/F之增加,燃燒反應則越趨劇烈,而火焰則會延續更長的長度,而最佳的霧化混合及燃燒反應則發生於O/F=1.2時。當O/F大於1.2,燃燒現象則逐漸以擴散火焰方式反應於未完全霧化之NTO區域外緣,其劇烈燃燒之火焰長度可延續達約80 mm。

    以所量測之NTO/MMH火焰溫度分布,與冷流場模擬NTO/MMH反應溫度分布比較顯示,冷流場模擬NTO/MMH反應溫度分布可用以預測真實NTO/MMH反應火焰溫度分布之高溫區的形狀與位置。但由於開放空間的NTO/MMH燃燒反應,存在強烈熱對流及熱輻射效應,使得所觀察的火焰溫度均低於冷流場模擬之反應溫度。

    The impingement of liquid jets is generally used for the breakup and mixing of the liquid propellants in the rocket injector design. While impinging, the jets become aerodynamic and hydrodynamic unstable thus disintegrating. The factors, such as momentum flux of the jets and the surface tension of the liquids, have a significant effect on the impinging spray. In this study, the effect of the momentum flux and surface tension on the impinging spray was experimentally investigated and a conceptual mixing mechanism has been established. For the design of a 5-lbf rocket, the cold-flow and hot-fire observations of the impingements of NTO/MMH system were also conducted.
    The spray phenomena of impinging jets were studied by a simple image technique as well as PLIF technique coupled with statistical analysis. From the PLIF observation, the mass probability distributions of the impinging spray were constructed. Thus, the uniformity and mixing efficiency of the impinging spray can be determined. For NTO/MMH impingements, the distributions of local mixture ratios and flame temperatures were deduced, and the characteristic exhaust velocities were estimated.
    The results demonstrated that the momentum flux as well as the fluid’s surface tensions crucially affected the spray pattern and mixing of the impinging jets. A characteristic momentum flux was observed which can be used to justify an effective breakup and mixing condition. Above the characteristic momentum flux, the spray uniformities were almost invariant while the droplets distributed in a progressively smaller area. Smaller surface tension of liquids leads to more uniform distribution with smaller characteristic momentum flux for their easier to be disintegrated.
    The mixing of the like-doublet impinging jets was mainly depended on the mutual penetration of the jets. However, the mixing phenomena can be differentiated into two types: merged liquid mixing at momentum flux lower than the fully developed condition, and droplet penetration mixing at momentum flux higher than fully developed condition. It also showed that, at the characteristic momentum flux, the optimum mixing efficiency occurred as the penetration was improved. Above the characteristic value, the penetration slightly increased and decreased the mixing of the jets. For lower surface tension liquid, higher penetration was shown, and it resulted in the poor mixing comparing with the higher surface tension liquid. Normalization of the characteristic momentum flux to eliminate the surface tension difference, the above described characteristic conditions appeared at Weber number at ~90,000.
    In the cold-flow study of the NTO/MMH system, triplet impingement showed its superior properties in symmetry and uniformity of the spray than that of the doublet impingement. Triplet impinging mixing was less sensitive to momentum flux ratio’s varying, however, for the operation of a 5-lbf NTO/MMH rocket, the optimum mixing efficiency and average characteristic exhaust velocity occurred at O/F1.2, corresponding to the unity momentum flux ratio, with doublet impingement.
    Comparison of the hot-fire and the prediction from the cold-flow observation of NTO/MMH impinging combustion, the results demonstrated that the predicted planar temperature distributions adequately described the shape and location of flame zones in the hot-fire observations. In view of the flame images, an induction distance after jets’ impingement always exists before reaching the intensive reaction zone, while the length of the induction distance was controlled by the MMH local evaporation rate. The analysis also verified that the impinging combustion of MMH and NTO followed the conventional spray combustion pattern. A maximum length of 80 mm of the intensive reaction zone was shown, while diffusion-type combustion occurred at high O/F conditions.

    CHINESE ABSTRACT i CHINESE CONCISE CHAPTERS v ABSTRACT xxiv CONTENTS xxvii LIST OF TABLES xxxi LIST OF FIGURES xxxiii NOMENCLATURE xliii I. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Overview of studies on impinging spray 1 1.2 Disintegration of a single jet 6 1.3 Liquid sheet disintegration 11 1.4 Observation of the propagating spray frequency of impinging jets 14 1.5 Disintegration of the impinging jet 16 1.6 The influence of physical properties of impinging jets 17 1.7 The effect of the injector design parameter 19 1.8 The mixing and mass distribution of the impinging jets 20 1.9 The reaction of NTO and MMH 27 1.10 Motivation and objective of the present study 31 II. THE PROPERTIES OF PROPELLANTS AND SIMULANTS 34 2.1 The properties of propellants 34 2.2 Properties of MMH (Monomethylhydrazine, CH3NHNH2) 34 2.3 Properties of NTO (Nitrogen tetroxide, N2O4) 35 2.4 The properties of the simulants of propellants 35 2.5 The properties of the simulants of MMH 36 2.6 The properties of the simulants of NTO 36 2.7 The solution used for the impinging spray of various surface tensions fluid 37 2.8 The measurement of the viscosity and surface tension of the test fluids 37 III. EXPERIMENTAL FACILITIES AND INSTRUMENTS 39 3.1 Propellant-feeding and flow-control system 39 3.2 The impinging system 41 3.3 The control and data acquisition system 42 3.4 The spray image acquisition system 42 3.5 PLIF and image acquisition system 42 3.6 The cooling system 43 3.7 Flame temperature measuring system 44 3.8 NTO/MMH combustion flame observation system 44 IV. EXPERIMENTAL METHOD AND PROCEDURE 45 4.1 The study of impinging spray 45 4.2 The observation of the impinging spray 47 4.3 The observations of the mass distribution and the mixing of the impinging jets 48 4.4 The statistics analysis method for the PLIF technique 52 4.5 The error analysis of the cold flow investigation of the impinging jets 56 4.6 Observation of the hot-fire phenomena of NTO/MMH impinging combustion 57 V. THE EFFECT OF MOMENTUM FLUX AND SURFACE TENSION ON THE IMPINGING SPRAY PHENOMENA 59 5.1 Spray pattern and mass distribution 60 5.1.1 Pure water impingement 60 5.1.2 The impingement of solution D 65 5.1.3 The unlike-doublet impingement of liquids with different surface tension …………………………………………………………………………...68 5.2 Penetration and mixing effect of like-doublet impingement 71 5.2.1 The impingement of water 71 5.2.2 The impingement of solution D 76 5.3 The effect of the Weber number on the impinging jet 78 VI. THE OBSERVATIONS OF THE IMPINGING SPRAY OF NTO/MMH SIMULANTS 82 6.1 Mass distribution of NTO/MMH simulants’ impinging spray 83 6.2 Mixing effect of the impinging spray 86 6.3 Adiabatic flame temperature distribution 89 6.4 Characteristic exhaust velocity ( ) 90 VII. THE INVESTIGATIONS OF NTO/MMH IMPINGING COMBUSTION PHENOMENA 92 7.1 The temperature distribution of NTO/MMH combustion 93 7.2 The comparison of the temperature distribution of the cold-flow simulation and the hot-fire measurement 94 7.3 The hypergolic reaction phenomena of the NTO/MMH impingement 94 7.4 The induction distance of the NTO/MMH impinging reaction 96 7.5 The intensive reaction of NTO/MMH impingement 97 7.6 The expansion of NTO/MMH combustion flame 98 CONCLUSION 99 SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTUR WORK 103 REFERENCES 107 TABLES 116 FIGURES 125 VITA 208 PUBLICATION LIST 209

    Anon., Hazard of Chemical Rocket Propellants, Vol. 3, CPIA Publications 394, September, 1984.
    Anon., “Liquid Rocket Engine Injectors”, NASA Space Vehicle Design Criteria Monograph, NASA-SP-8089, 1986.
    Ashgriz, N., Brocklehurst, W., and Tally, D., “Mixing Mechanism in a Pair of Impinging Jets,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 17, No. 3, May-June, 2001, pp. 736-749.
    Carlson, R. A., Elmendorf, H. M., Sackheim, R. L., “NASA/TRW Standard 5 Newton Thruster”, AIAA paper No.77-962, 1977.
    Catoire, L., Chaumeix, N., and Paillard, C., “Chemical Kinetic Model for Monomethylhydrazine/Nitrogen Tetroxide Gas-Phase Combustion and Hypergolic Ignition”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 20, No. 1, January-February 2004, pp. 87-92.
    Clark, C. J., and Dombrowski, N., “On the Formation of Drops from the Rims of Fan Spray Sheets”, Aerosol Science, Vol. 3, pp. 173-183, 1972.
    Crapper, G. D., Dombrowski, N., Jepson, W. P., and Pyott, G. A. D., “A Note on the Growth of Kelvin-Helmholtz Waves on Thin Liquid Sheet”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 57, part 4, 1973, pp. 671-672.
    Domann, R., and Hardalupas, Y., “Quantitative Measurement of Planar Droplet Sauter Mean Doameter in Sprays Using Planar Droplet Sizing”, Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on Application of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, Lisbon, Portugal, July, 2002.
    Dombrowski, N., and Hopper, P. C., “The Effect of Ambient Density on Drop Formation in Sprays”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 17, 1962, pp. 291-305.
    Dombrowski, N., and Hopper, P. C., “A Study if the Sprays Formed by Impinging Jets in Laminar and Turbulent Flow”, Journal of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 18, part 3, 1964, pp.392-400.
    Dombrowski, N., and Johns, W. R., “The Aerodynamics Instability and Disintegration of Viscous Liquid Sheets”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 18, 1963, pp. 203-214.
    Eckbreth, A. C., Laser Diagnostics for Combustion Temperature and Species, Gordon and Breach Publisher, 1996, pp. 390.
    Fraser, R. P., Eisenklam, P., Dombrowski, N., and Hasson, D., “Drop Formation from Rapidly Moving Liquid Sheet”, AIChE Journal, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 672-680, 1962.
    Fraser, R. P., Dombrowski, N., and Routley, J. H., “The Atomization of a Liquid Sheet by an Impinging Air Stream”, Chemical Engineering Science, Vol. 18, pp. 339-353, 1963.
    Ferrenberg, A., Hunt, K., and Duesberg, J., “Atomization and Mixing Study”, NASA-CR-178751, 1985.
    Hagerty, W. W., and Shea, J. F., ”A Study of the Stability of Plane Fluid Sheets”, J. Appl. Mech., Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 509-514, 1955.

    Heidmann, M. F., and Humphrey, J. C., “Fluctuations in a Spray Formed by Two Impinging Jets”, NACA-TN-2349, 1951.
    Heidmann, M. F., Priem, R. J., and Humphrey, J. C., “A Study of Sprays Formed by Two Impinging Jets”, NACA-TN-3835, March, 1957.
    Huang, J. C. P., “The Break-up of Axisymmetric Liquid Sheets”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 43, part 2, pp. 305-319, 1970.
    Huang, W., “Studies on the Characteristics of Like-Doublet Impingement Jets”, Ph. D Thesis, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan, R.O.C., 1998.
    Ibrahim, E. A., and Przekwas, A. J., “Impinging Jets Atomization”, Phys. Fluid A, Vol. 3, No. 12, pp. 2981-2987, 1991.
    Jung, K., Lim, B., Yoon, Y., and Koo, Ja-Ye, “Comparison of Mixing Characteristics of Unlike Triplet Injectors Using Optical Patternator,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 21, No. 3, May-June, 2005, pp. 442-449.
    Jung, K., Koh, H., and Yoon, Y., “Assessment of Planar Liquid-Laser-Induced Fluorescence Measurements for Spray Mass Distributions of Like-doublet Injectors”, Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 14, 2003, pp. 1387-1395.
    Lai, W. H., Huang, W., and Jiang, T. L., “Characteristic Study on the Like-doublet Impinging Jets Atomization”, Atomization and Sprays, vol. 9, 1999.
    Lawver, B. R., ”Photographic Observation of Reactive Stream Impingement”, NASA-79-0154, 1979.
    Lecourt, R., and Foucaud, R., “Hypergolic Propellant Burning Spray Visualization by Laser Sheet Method: Application to Droplet Size and Liquid Concentration Measurements,” Experimental and numerical flow visualization, 1993 :presented at the 1993 ASME Winter Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Louisiana, November, 1993, edited by B. Khalighi et al., Fed-Vol.172, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, 1993, pp. 173-181.
    Lee, C. H., Jung, Y. H., and Chung, S. H., “An Experiment on Flow Distribution and Mixing in Impinging Jet Sprays”, Atomization and Sprays, Vol. 9, pp. 193-213, 1999.
    Lefebvre, H., Atomization and Sprays, Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1989.
    Li, X., and Tankin, R. S., “On the Temporal Instability of a Two-dimensional Viscous Liquid Sheet”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 226, 1991, pp. 425-443.
    Lihara, S., Miyajima, H., and Nagashima, R., “Hydrazine/NTO Liquid Apogee Engine for the ETS-VI”, AIAA-87-1936, 1987.
    Marteney, P. J., and Kesten, A. S., “Catalyst Particle Wetting and Breakup in Hydrazine System”, Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, Vol. 13, No. 7, 1976.
    McCarthy, M. J., and Molloy, N. A., “Review of Stability of Liquid Jets and the Influence of Nozzle Design”, The Chemical Engineering Journal, Vol. 7, 1974, pp. 1-20.
    McHale, R. M., Nurick, W. H., and Clapp, S. D., “Injector Design Criteria Using Noncircular Orifice Geometry,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, Vol. 8, No. 4, April, 1971, pp. 408-410.

    McVey, J. B., Russell, S., and Kennedy, J. B., “High-resolution Patternator for the Characterization of Fuel Sprays”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 3, No. 3, 1987, pp. 202-209.
    Miyajima, H., Kuroda, Y., Nagashima, R., and Imachi, U., “Bipropellant Performance Comparison of N2H4, MMH and N2H4/MMH Mixed Fuels”, AIAA-86-1704, 1986.
    Nurick, W. H., and Clapp, S. D., “An Experimental Technique for Measurement of Injector Spray Mixing,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, Vol. 6, No. 11, November, 1969, pp. 1312-1314.
    Park, S., Cho, H., Yoon, I., and Min, K., “Measurement of Droplet Size Distribution of Gasoline Direct Injection Spray by Droplets Generator and Planar Image Technique”, Measurement Science and Technology, Vol. 13, 2002, pp. 859-864.
    Riebling, R. W., “Criteria for Optimum Propellant Mixing in Impinging-Jet Injector Elements,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, Vol. 4, No. 6, June, 1967, pp. 817-819.
    Rizk, N. K., and Lefebvre, A. H., “Influence of Liquid Film Thickness on Airblast Atomization”, Trans. ASME J. Eng. Power, Vol. 102, 1980, pp. 706-710.
    Rollbuhler, R. J., and Tomazic, W. A., “Comparison of Hydrazine-Nitrogen Tetroxide and Hydrazine- Chlorine Trifluoride in Small-Scale Rocket Chambers”, NASA TN D-131, 1959.
    Rupe, J. H., “The Liquid Phase Mixing of A Pair of Impinging Streams,” Jet Propulsion Lab., JPL Progress Rept. 20-195, California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1953.

    Rupe, J. H., “A Correlation Between the Dynamic Properties of a Pair of Impinging Streams and the Uniformity of Mixture Ratio Distribution in the Resulting Spray,” Jet Propulsion Lab., JPL Progress Rept. 20-209, California Inst. of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 1956.
    Russi, M. J., “A Survey of Monopropellant Hydrazine Thruster Technology”, AIAA paper No.73-1263, 1973.
    Ruttle., D., and Fitzsimmons, M., “Development of Miniature 35-lbf Fast Response Bipropellant Divert Thruster”, AIAA-93-2585, 1993.
    Sankar, S. V., Maher, K.E., Robart, D. M., and Bachalo, W. D., “Rapid Characterization of Fuel Atomizers Using an Optical Patternator,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, Vol. 121, July, 1999, pp. 409-414.
    Schindler, R. C., and Schoenman, L., “Development of a Five-Pound Thrust Bipropellant Engine”, Journal of Spacecraft and Rocket, Vol. 13, No. 7, July, 1976.
    Schoenman, L., “4000F Material for Low Thrust Rocket Engines”, AIAA-93-2406, 1993.
    Schoenman, L., Rosenberg, S. D., and Jassowski, D. M., “Test Experience, 490N High Performance [321 Sec Isp] Engine”, AIAA-92-3800, 1992
    Schweitzer, P. H., “Mechanism of Disintegration of Liquid Jets”, Journal of Applied Physics, Vol. 8, 1937, pp. 513-521.
    Schwende, M. A., Munding, G., and Schulte, G., “Bipropellant Thruster Family for Spacecraft Propulsion”, AIAA-92-3860, 1992.
    Seamans, T. F., and Vanpee, M., “Development of a Fundamental Model of Hypergolic Ignition in Space-Ambient Engines,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 5, No. 9, September, 1967, pp. 1616-1624.
    Shaddix, C. R., “Correcting Thermocouple Measurements for Radiation Loss: A Critical Review”, Proceedings of the 33rd National Heat Transfer Conference, paper HTD99-282, 1999.
    Squire, H. B., “Investigation of the Instability of a Moving Liquid Film”, Br. J. Appl. Phys., Vol. 4, 1953, pp. 167-169.
    Stechman, R. C. and Smith, J. A., “Monomethyl Hydrazine vs. Hydrazine Fuels: Test Results Using Flight Qualified 100 lbf and 5 lbf Bipropellant Engine Configurations”, AIAA-83-1257, 1983
    Sterling, A. M., and Sleicher, C. A., “The Instability of Capillary Jets”, J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 68, 1975, pp. 477-495.
    Summers, W. H., and McMullen, E. T., “Combustion of the N2H4/N2O4 Propellant System”, AIAA-66-662, 1966.
    Sutton, G. P., Rocket Propulsion Elements, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1992.
    Talley, D. G., J. F., Verdieck, Lee, S. W., Mcdonell, V. G. and Samuelsen, G. S., “Accounting for Laser Sheet Extinction in Applying PLLIF to Sprays,” AIAA-96-0469, 1996.
    Tate, R. W., “Spray Patternation,” Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol. 52, No. 10, October, 1960, pp. 49A-53A.
    Tian, Z. Y., “Experimental Studies on Simulated Impinging Jets of Liquid Propellants”, Master Degree Thesis, Department of Mechanical and Automation Engineering, Da-Yeh University, 2001.
    Ueda, S., Kuroda, Y., Miyajima, H., and Kuwahara, T., “Bipropellant Performance of N2H4/MMH Mixed Fuel in a Regeneratively Cooled Engine”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 10, No. 5, pp. 646-652, 1994
    Van de Hulst, H. C., Light Scattering by Small Particles, Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1981.
    Vassallo, P., Ashgriz, N., and Boorady, F. A., “Effect of Flow Rate on the Spray Characteristics of Impinging Water Jets”, Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 980-986, Sep-Oct, 1992.
    Whitaker, S., “Forced Convection Heat Transfer Correlations for Flow in Pipes, Past Flat Plates, Single Cylinders, Single Spheres, and for Flow in Packed Beds and Tube Bundles”, AIChE Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 361-371, 1972.
    Won, Y. D., Cho, Y. H., Lee, S. W., and Yoon, W. S., “Effect of Momentum Ratio on the Mixing Performance of Unlike Split Triplet Injectors,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, Vol. 18, No. 4, July-August, 2002, pp. 847-854.
    York, J. L., Stubbs, H. F., and Tek, M. R., “The Mechanism of Disintegration of Liquid Sheet”, Trans ASME, Vol. 75, pp. 1279-1286, 1953.
    Yuan, T. and Chen, C., “An Observation of the Spray Phenomena of Unlike-triplet Impinging Jets”, 13th Annual National Conference on Combustion, Taiwan, 2002.
    Yuan, T., Chen, C., and Huang, B., “The Effects of Physical Properties on the Impinging Spray”, 2006 AASRC/CCAS Joint Conference, 27-25, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County, Taiwan, 2006.
    Yuan, T., Chen, C., Zhung, Y. Q., and Huang, B., “Observations of the Spray Phenomena of Unlike-doublet Impinging Jets”, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium on Flow Visualization, F064, IN, USA, August, 2004.
    Yuan, T., Yeh, W. T., and Lin, W. L., “A Study of Like-Doublet Impinging Spray Affected by Orifice Size”, 2006 AASRC/CCAS Joint Conference, 04-03, Jhongli City, Taoyuan County, Taiwan, 2006.
    Zelina, J., Rodrigue, A., and Sankar, S., “Fuel Injector Characterization Using Laser Dianostics at Atmospheric and Elevated Pressures”, AIAA-98-0148, 1998.
    Zung, L. B., and White, J. R., ”Combustion Process of Impinging Hypergolic Propellants”, NASA-CR-1704, 1971.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2007-08-28公開
    QR CODE