簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳柏成
Chen, Po-Cheng
論文名稱: 運用超音波預測大範圍旋轉肌袖撕裂傷手術結果:橫斷面研究
Ultrasound to Predict the Surgical Outcome of Large-to-Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: A cross-sectional study
指導教授: 余聰
Yu, Tsung
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 醫學院 - 公共衛生研究所碩士在職專班
Graduate Institute of Public Health(on the job class)
論文出版年: 2021
畢業學年度: 109
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 44
中文關鍵詞: 旋轉肌袖撕裂傷手術核磁共振超音波
外文關鍵詞: large-to-massive rotator cuff tears, surgical reparability, MRI, ultrasound
相關次數: 點閱:106下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 前言
    大部分大範圍旋轉肌袖撕裂傷(large-to-massive rotator cuff tears)需要接受開刀治療,而手術修復性與旋轉肌袖肌肉品質有關,如果旋轉肌袖肌肉品質不佳,有可能會導致手術無法做到完全修復(complete repair)。手術中骨科醫師根據肌腱撕裂傷斷端(torn stump)是否能復位回原本的解剖位置來判斷是否可以進行完全修復,而這從術前的核磁共振(magnetic resonance imaging, MRI)便可以預測大部分狀況;然而,由於核磁共振的可近性不高,超音波開始被用於旋轉肌袖撕裂傷術前評估。我們假設超音波(ultrasound)可以預測大範圍旋轉肌袖撕裂傷的手術修復性。

    方法
    這是一個橫斷面研究(cross-sectional study),受試者為即將接受大範圍旋轉肌袖撕裂傷手術之病人。研究者會評估受試者的臨床表現,例如術前肩功能,包括主動關節活動及UCLA肩功能量表;之後用超音波評估受試者旋轉肌袖肌肉(包括棘上肌(supraspinatus)和棘下肌(infraspinatus))的肌肉品質,為了檢測超音波之信度(reliability),由兩位醫師分別針對其中收案的25位受試者做信度測試。另外,核磁共振會被用來評估撕裂傷大小、肌腱回縮的程度、脂肪浸潤、以及肌肉萎縮程度。手術中,會由兩位資深的骨科醫師開刀並且判斷是否可完全修復。統計分析部分,先以相關性分析(correlational analysis)找出超音波、核磁共振、臨床表徵之關聯性,後續使用接收者操作特徵曲線(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC curve)分析超音波對於手術修復性的預測能力。

    結果
    總共收錄50位受試者,其中包括32位完全縫合(complete repair)以及18位部分縫合(partial repair)的病人。棘上肌(supraspinatus)和棘下肌(infraspinatus)肌肉的超音波測量部分,施測者間信度(inter-rater reliability)和施測者內信度(intra-rater reliability)皆是良好的,超音波與核磁共振(MRI)影像參數之間的相關性皆呈現中度至高度效應(相關係數0.4 ~ 0.8)。核磁共振影像中,棘下肌(infraspinatus)的Goutallier classification對於手術修復性有最佳的鑑別力(AUC = 0.89, 95% CI 0.81 to 0.98);超音波影像中,棘下肌(infraspinatus)的Heckmatt scale則是對於手術修復性的預測力是最好的(AUC = 0.85, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.96),然而,不管是核磁共振還是超音波,這些影像參數的曲線下面積(AUC)並沒有顯著的差異。

    結論
    超音波是一個可靠的檢查工具,而且對於大範圍旋轉肌袖撕裂傷的手術修復性的預測能力與核磁共振是相似的。

    The objective of this study was to investigate the predictive validity of ultrasound for surgical reparability in patients with large-to-massive rotator cuff tears. Patients with ultrasound or MRI confirmed large-to-massive rotator cuff tears and ready for surgeries were enrolled into this study. The ultrasound was used to evaluate the muscle quality of supraspinatus and infraspinatus using Heckmatt scale, and the MRI was used to evaluate the torn size, degree of tendon retraction (Patte classification), fatty infiltration (Goutallier classification), and muscle atrophy (Tangent sign). Whether the torn stumps could be completely repaired during the surgeries was defined by two experienced orthopedic surgeons. Among the imaging predictors of MRI, the Goutallier classification of infraspinatus had the best discriminative ability for surgical reparability. Among the imaging predictors of ultrasound, the Heckmatt scale of infraspinatus had the best predictive power for surgical reparability. The predictability of the above two imaging predictors had no significant difference. We concluded that the ultrasound is a reliable exam tool to predict the surgical reparability of large-to-massive rotator cuff tears, and its predictability is similar to that of MRI.

    1. 導論 1 1.1 背景 1 1.2 目的 2 2. 文獻回顧 3 2.1 核磁共振(Magnetic resonance imaging, MRI) 3 2.2 超音波 5 3. 研究方法 7 3.1 研究設計 7 3.2 倫理考量 7 3.3 受試者 7 3.4 資料來源及測量 8 3.5 量性變項 9 3.6 手術方式 11 3.7 術後復健 12 3.8 統計方法 13 3.9 樣本數估計 14 4. 結果 15 4.1 基本資料 15 4.2 施測者間信度(inter-rater reliability)和施測者內信度(intra-rater reliability) 15 4.3 核磁共振與超音波之參數分布情形 15 4.4 預測效度 16 5. 討論 18 6. 參考文獻 22

    1. Factor D, Dale B. Current concepts of rotator cuff tendinopathy. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2014;9(2):274-288.
    2. Harris JD, Pedroza A, Jones GL, Group MS. Predictors of pain and function in patients with symptomatic, atraumatic full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a time-zero analysis of a prospective patient cohort enrolled in a structured physical therapy program. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(2):359-366.
    3. Harryman DT, Hettrich CM, Smith KL, Campbell B, Sidles JA, Matsen FA. A prospective multipractice investigation of patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tears: the importance of comorbidities, practice, and other covariables on self-assessed shoulder function and health status. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(4):690-696.
    4. Rhee YG, Cho NS, Yoo JH. Clinical outcome and repair integrity after rotator cuff repair in patients older than 70 years versus patients younger than 70 years. Arthroscopy. 2014;30(5):546-554.
    5. Sayampanathan AA, Andrew TH. Systematic review on risk factors of rotator cuff tears. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2017;25(1):2309499016684318.
    6. Minagawa H, Yamamoto N, Abe H, et al. Prevalence of symptomatic and asymptomatic rotator cuff tears in the general population: From mass-screening in one village. J Orthop. 2013;10(1):8-12. doi:10.1016/j.jor.2013.01.008
    7. Yoo JC, Ahn JH, Yang JH, Koh KH, Choi SH, Yoon YC. Correlation of arthroscopic repairability of large to massive rotator cuff tears with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging scans. Arthroscopy. 2009;25(6):573-582.
    8. Davidson JF, Burkhart SS, Richards DP, Campbell SE. Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging to predict rotator cuff tear pattern and method of repair. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(12):1428.
    9. Sugihara T, Nakagawa T, Tsuchiya M, Ishizuki M. Prediction of primary reparability of massive tears of the rotator cuff on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003;12(3):222-225.
    10. Dwyer T, Razmjou H, Henry P, Gosselin-Fournier S, Holtby R. Association between pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging and reparability of large and massive rotator cuff tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015;23(2):415-422.
    11. Kim JY, Park JS, Rhee YG. Can Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predict the Reparability of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears? Am J Sports Med. 2017;45(7):1654-1663.
    12. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J, Lavau L, Voisin MC. Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;(304):78-83.
    13. Zanetti M, Gerber C, Hodler J. Quantitative assessment of the muscles of the rotator cuff with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Radiol. 1998;33(3):163-170.
    14. Patte D. Classification of rotator cuff lesions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(254):81-86.
    15. Khoury V, Cardinal É, Brassard P. Atrophy and Fatty Infiltration of the Supraspinatus Muscle: Sonography Versus MRI. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2008;190(4):1105-1111. doi:10.2214/AJR.07.2835
    16. Codsi MJ, Rodeo SA, Scalise JJ, Moorehead TM, Ma CB. Assessment of rotator cuff repair integrity using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014;23(10):1468-1472. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2014.01.045
    17. Tse AK, Lam PH, Walton JR, Hackett L, Murrell GA. Ultrasound determination of rotator cuff tear repairability. Shoulder Elbow. 2016;8(1):14-21.
    18. Cofield RH, Parvizi J, Hoffmeyer PJ, Lanzer WL, Ilstrup DM, Rowland CM. Surgical repair of chronic rotator cuff tears. A prospective long-term study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83-A(1):71-77.
    19. Zumstein MA, Jost B, Hempel J, Hodler J, Gerber C. The clinical and structural long-term results of open repair of massive tears of the rotator cuff. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(11):2423-2431.
    20. Hamada K, Fukuda H, Mikasa M, Kobayashi Y. Roentgenographic findings in massive rotator cuff tears. A long-term observation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;(254):92-96.
    21. Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1981;(155):7-20.
    22. Heckmatt JZ, Leeman S, Dubowitz V. Ultrasound imaging in the diagnosis of muscle disease. J Pediatr. 1982;101(5):656-660. doi:10.1016/s0022-3476(82)80286-2
    23. Cuff DJ, Pupello DR. Prospective randomized study of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using an early versus delayed postoperative physical therapy protocol. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012;21(11):1450-1455. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.01.025
    24. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36. doi:10.1148/radiology.143.1.7063747
    25. Iagulli ND, Field LD, Hobgood ER, Ramsey JR, Savoie FH. Comparison of partial versus complete arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(5):1022-1026.
    26. Jain NB, Collins J, Newman JS, Katz JN, Losina E, Higgins LD. Reliability of magnetic resonance imaging assessment of rotator cuff: the ROW study. PM R. 2015;7(3):245-254.e3; quiz 254. doi:10.1016/j.pmrj.2014.08.949
    27. Karvelas KR, Xiao T, Langefeld CD, et al. Assessing the accuracy of neuromuscular ultrasound for inclusion body myositis. Muscle Nerve. 2019;59(4):478-481. doi:10.1002/mus.26411
    28. Moreta MC, Fleet A, Reebye R, et al. Reliability and validity of the Modified Heckmatt scale in evaluating muscle changes with ultrasound in spasticity. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. Published online July 1, 2020:100071. doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100071
    29. Battisti N, Milletti D, Miceli M, Zenesini C, Cersosimo A. Usefulness of a Qualitative Ultrasound Evaluation of the Gastrocnemius–Soleus Complex with the Heckmatt Scale for Clinical Practice in Cerebral Palsy. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. 2018;44(12):2548-2555. doi:10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.006
    30. Kim JR, Cho YS, Ryu KJ, Kim JH. Clinical and radiographic outcomes after arthroscopic repair of massive rotator cuff tears using a suture bridge technique: assessment of repair integrity on magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med. 2012;40(4):786-793. doi:10.1177/0363546511434546

    無法下載圖示 校內:2026-07-01公開
    校外:2026-07-01公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE