| 研究生: |
胡天鎮 Hu, Tien-Chen |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
應用平衡計分卡於銅金屬化學機械研磨新製程上線之管理評估 The Scorecard Application on Cu CMP New Process Release Management and Evaluation |
| 指導教授: |
王駿發
Wang, J.F |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程管理碩士在職專班 Engineering Management Graduate Program(on-the-job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2005 |
| 畢業學年度: | 93 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 68 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 績效評估 、平衡計分卡 、半導體 、化學機械研磨 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Balanced scorecard, Performance measurement, CMP : Chemical Mechanical Polishing., Semiconductor |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:104 下載:7 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
半導體製程技術一直以超乎預期的速度不斷地進步。在新的晶圓製程的上線上的評估,已不再似0.18μm以前。在現今新的晶圓中,每一個製程的參數上的改變,往往對最後的晶圓生產上的良率(Yield)有重大的影響。所以在晶圓的製程中新的製程上線前的評定方式就顯的非常的重要了。在以往的新製程的上線往往只重視,本身製程上的改善,而忽略了重要的整體整合上的影響,本身的參數的改善很有可能對整體製程整合的參數改變有了重大的影響,而變成在晶圓良率上的重大的損失。
本研究就是以平衡計卡的方法來針對,在先進的半導體中新的製程的上線中的參數加以探討。以在半導體製程中的一項比較新且較複雜的技術- 銅金屬化學機械研磨(Copper Chemical Mechanical Polishing, CMP)來說明如何將其結合平衡計分法的應用,使得製程的上線利用本方法可以提供一種更有效的方式。並利用平衡計分卡的方法,再加依參數在整體製程整合中的重要性與影響程度,給予不同的權重。依據新製程的參數結果再以權重來取得的綜合成效。如此再將計分卡予以分析,將可以清楚的瞭解到新製程對整體整合的影響程度。
Semi-conductor process technology is advancing promptly unexpected. The new evaluation procedures on wafer production is unlike what it used to be with 0.18μprocess. In the new age of process technology, production yield is eventually influenced by the parameters changed in process. Therefore, the methods in evaluating the changes in new process technology on production line are essentially important. The focus of new process is primarily on the changes in process in the past; it is normally neglected with its effects to overall process integration. The changed parameters in new process may give great effects to process integration parameters, thereby; a great loss may be resulted in wafer yields.
The research on new process technology will adapt the use of balanced scorecard to investigate the possible effects from the process changes. In semi-conductor processes, an advanced and complicated technology, Copper Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP), will demonstrate the application with the scorecard, which provides an effective way for new process changes on the production line. The use of balanced scorecard provides a various emphasis to the process integration parameters. Performance measurement is achieved based the result of the balanced scorecard. A thorough analysis on the scorecard result can easily realize on how new process changes influence overall process integration.
中文文獻:
【1】朱道凱 編譯 ,平衡計分法 – 資訊時代的策略管理工具, 臉譜出版杜, 1999年 6月,PP-37
【2】朱道凱 編譯 ,平衡計分法 – 資訊時代的策略管理工具, 臉譜出版杜, 1999年 6月,PP56
【3】朱子雄, 企業績效衡量之動態模式 , 義守大學, 管理研究所碩士論文 ,民92
【4】吳彥輝,運用模糊層級分析法與管理才能評鑑模式之研究, 國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文,民88
【5】洪榮昭,李大偉, 我國電機技術人力所需知識建構之研究-知識項目分析, 行政院國科會專題研究報告,台北,民84
【6】洪雪珍, 員工工作滿意與士氣之研究-中國某企業之證實研究-國立中山大學人力資訊管理研究所碩士論文,民91
【7】張淑玲, 併購動機、整合機制與績效評估-以平衡計分卡為例, 成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民93
【8】曾國雄、鄧振源,”層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上),中國統計學報,民78,27 (6),P6-22
【9】曾國雄、鄧振源,”層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(下),中國統計學報,民78,27 (7),PP1-19
【10】羅正忠,張鼎張譯, 半導體製程技術導論, 歐亞書局有限公司,民91,PP481-490
【11】羅正忠,張鼎張譯, 半導體製程技術導論, 歐亞書局有限公司,民91,PP427-479
英文文獻:
【12】Beer M, Eisenstat. R, and Biggadike. R, “Developing an Organization Capable of Strategy Implementation and Reformulation,” in Organizational Learning and Competitive Advantage, ed. B. Moingon and A. Edmonson, London: 1996
【13】Birkinshaw, J., H. Bresman & L. Hakanson “Managing the post-acquisition integration process “
【13】Chan,” Discovering the True Value of Customer: Oracle Balanced Scorecard? Oracle 企業策略研討會, 8月,2001
【15】Earnest H. Drew, ”Scaling the Productivity of Investment,” Chief Executive July/Aug 1993
【16】Eliyahu Goldratt and Jeff Cox, “The Goal: A Process of Ongoing Improvement “ Croton on Hudson, N. Y. North River Press, 1986
【17】Frigo, M.L, “Nonfinancial performance measures and strategy execution” Strategic Finance, vol.84, 2002
【18】Gar Hamel and C.K. Prahalad,”Competing for the Future: Breakthrough Strategies for Seizing Control of Your Industry and Greating the Markets of Tomorrow ” Harvard Business School Press, 1994, PP84,
【19】 Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton, “Linking the Balanced Scorecardto Strategy? California Management Review” ,1996 Fall, Vol39, PP54
【20】Kaplan, R. S. and D. P. Norton,“Using the balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System”,Harvard Business Review,1996
【21】Kaplan, R.S. and D.P. Norton,” The Strategy-Focused Organization”, Harvard Business School, 2001, PP24
【22】Lebas. M, ”Managerial Accounting in Franc : Overview of Past Tradition and Current Practice”, European Accounting Review 3, No.3, 1994, PP471-487
【23】MacMillan. I.C, “Seizing Competitive Initiative”, Journal of Business Strategy, Spring 1982, PP43-57
【24】Olson, E.M. & S.F. Slater, “The balanced scorecard, competitive strategy and performance”, Business Horizons, vol.45, 2002, PP11-16
【25】Robert S. Kaplan and David P. Norton, “The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action” Harvard Business School Press, 1990, PP269
【26】Robin Cooper and W. Bruce Chew, “Control Tomorrow’s Costs Through Today’s Designs,” Harvard Business Review, Jan-Feb 1996, PP88-97
【27】Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Nortin “The Balanced Score card: Translating Strategy into Action” Harvard Business Press, 1996 Jan PP269
【28】Robert S. Kaplan & David P. Norton “The Balanced Scorecard : Translating strategy into Action” Harvard Business School Presss, 1996 Jan
【29】Rowe, R.Wright, G.and Bolger, F. “Dephi: A revaluation of research and theory”, Technological Forecasting and social change, 39(3) 1991,PP.235-250
【30】Saaty, T.L, The analytic Hierarchy Process”, New York, McGraw-Hill,1980
【31】Senge. P, “The Fifth Discipline : The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization” Currency Doubleday, 1990
【32】 Simons, “Levers of Control : How managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal” Harvard Business School Press, 1995 PP.134
【33】Simons, R.,”Accounting Control Systems and Business Strategy: An Empirical Analysis? Accounting Organizations and Society” Vol.12, July, PP357-374
【34】Slater, S.F., E.M. Olson & V.K. Reddy, “Strategy-based performance measurement” Business Horizons, Vol.40, 1997, PP37-44,
【35】Sziliagyi, A.D,” Management and Performance.”, California Goodyear Publishing Company.,1981
【36】Venkatrtraman, N. and Vasudevan Ramanujan, "Measurement of Business Performance on Strategy Research: Acomparison of Approaches," Academy of Management Review, Vol. 11,No.4, 1986, PP801-814
【37】Wrschka. P , Hernandez. J, Oehrlein. G.S, and King. J, “Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Copper Damascene Structures”, Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 1999,PP147
【38】Youngblood, A.D. & T.R. Collins, “Addressing balanced scorecard trade-off issues between performance metrics using multi-attribute utility theory” Engineering Management Journal, Vol. 15,2003, PP11-17
相關網站
【39】http://www.rebeccaz.com.tw
【40】http://www.mmh.org.tw/taitam/mmhproj/bsc.htm
【41】http://www.amt.com.tw/product/Process01.asp