簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 梁嘉玲
Liem, Velly Leonard
論文名稱: 以PROMETHEE與模糊推論系統之混合模式發展可量化SWOT分析評估方法
Developing a Quantitative SWOT Evaluation Method Based on the Hybrid Model of PROMETHEE and Fuzzy Inference System
指導教授: 陳梁軒
Chen, Liang-Hsuan
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 工業與資訊管理學系
Department of Industrial and Information Management
論文出版年: 2011
畢業學年度: 99
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 91
外文關鍵詞: SWOT analysis, Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM), PROMETHEE, Fuzzy Inference System
相關次數: 點閱:81下載:1
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • In the era of globalization, many enterprises were forced to face the fierce market competition. Enterprises have to implement proper strategies to enhance their competitive position on market competition. Prior to strategy formulation, an analysis of organization’s internal and external environments is executed. SWOT is used to identify enterprise’s internal strengths and weakness as well as external opportunities and threats. The conventional SWOT is often presented by only imprecise listing or an incomplete qualitative examination of internal and external factors. On the other hand, the quantitative SWOT methods are used to analyze data statistically, and it is much more objective for the analytical results than the subjective assessment in words. However, these methods only analyzed the firm’s relative competitiveness; they are unable to display or compare the competitive relationships between several enterprises simultaneously.

    In this study, we intend to construct an evaluation method that quantifies the SWOT analysis of several enterprises to analyze the competitive relationships between them. We introduced Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) concept to the evaluation model in which all competitors are evaluated with same internal and external criteria. Then, we propose a hybrid approach of PROMETHEE and Fuzzy Inference System as our evaluation method. PROMETHEE is used to analyze internal strengths and weaknesses and external opportunities and threats between competitors quantitatively. Next, we use fuzzy inference system to construct the rule based evaluation method to infer the internal and external performances of competitors based on their SWOT values. Then, the relative competitive advantage of firms can be evaluated based on their internal and external reasoning.

    Table of Contents ABSTRACT I ACKNOWLEDGEMENT III Table of Contents IV List of Figures VII List of Tables VI Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION 9 1.1 Background and Motivation 9 1.2 Objectives 11 1.3 Thesis Organization 12 Chapter 2 LITERATURE REVIEW 14 2.1 Introduction to Environmental Analysis 14 2.1.1 SWOT Analysis 14 2.1.2 Quantitative SWOT 16 2.2 Introduction to Fuzzy set theory 19 2.2.1 Fuzzy Sets 20 2.2.2 Fuzzy Number 20 2.2.3 Linguistic variable 23 2.3 Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) 24 2.3.1 Preference Ranking Organization Method for Enrichment Evaluation (PROMETHEE) 25 2.3.2 Fuzzy in PROMETHEE 30 2.4 Fuzzy Inference System 32 2.4.1 Application of fuzzy inference system 33 Chapter 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 38 3.1 Research Structure 38 3.2 Evaluation Method 39 3.2.1 Evaluation Limitation and Assumption 39 3.2.2 Evaluation Process 41 Chapter 4 NUMERICAL ANALYSIS 54 4.1 Numerical Example 54 4.2 Result Discussion 71 4.3 Research Findings 73 Chapter 5 CONCLUSION AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 75 5.1 Conclusion 75 5.2 Future Directions 76 References 78 Appendix 84

    Amin, S. H., Razmi, J., & Zhang, G. (2011). Supplier selection and order allocation based on fuzzy SWOT analysis and fuzzy linear programming. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(1), 334-342.

    Azadi, H., van den Berg, J., Shahvali, M., & Hosseininia, G. (2009). Sustainable rangeland management using fuzzy logic: A case study in Southwest Iran. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 131(3-4), 193-200.

    Behzadian, M., Kazemzadeh, R. B., Albadvi, A., & Aghdasi, M. (2010). PROMETHEE: A comprehensive literature review on methodologies and applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 200(1), 198-215.

    Bernroider, E. (2002). Factors in SWOT Analysis Applied to Micro, Small-to-Medium, and Large Software Enterprises:: an Austrian Study. European Management Journal, 20(5), 562-573.

    Chang, H., & Huang, W. (2006). Application of a quantification SWOT analytical method. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 43(1-2), 158-169.

    Chang, S. (2005). The TFT–LCD industry in Taiwan: competitive advantages and future developments. Technology in Society, 27(2), 199-215.
    David, F. R. (2009). Strategic management :concepts and cases. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall,Pearson Education, Inc.

    Dubois, D., & Prade, H. (1978). Operations on fuzzy numbers. International Journal of Systems Science, 9(6), 613.

    Dweiri, F., & Kablan, M. (2006). Using fuzzy decision making for the evaluation of the project management internal efficiency. Decision Support Systems, 42(2), 712-726.

    Fasanghari, M., & Montazer, G. A. (2010). Design and implementation of fuzzy expert system for Tehran Stock Exchange portfolio recommendation. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(9), 6138-6147.

    Fernández, A., Calderón, M., Barrenechea, E., Bustince, H., & Herrera, F. (2010). Solving multi-class problems with linguistic fuzzy rule based classification systems based on pairwise learning and preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(23), 3064-3080.

    Gao, C. Y., & Peng, D. H. (2011). Consolidating SWOT analysis with nonhomogeneous uncertain preference information. Knowledge-Based Systems.

    Geldermann, J., Spengler, T., & Rentz, O. (2000). Fuzzy outranking for environmental assessment. Case study: iron and steel making industry. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(1), 45-65.

    Ghazinoory, S., Esmail Zadeh, A., & Memariani, A. (2007). Fuzzy SWOT analysis. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 18(1), 99-108.

    Giannopoulos, D., & Founti, M. (2010). A fuzzy approach to incorporate uncertainty in the PROMETHEE multicriteria method. International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 1, 80-102.

    Gokmen, G., Akinci, T. Ç., Tektaş, M., Onat, N., Kocyigit, G., & Tektaş, N. (2010). Evaluation of student performance in laboratory applications using fuzzy logic. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 902-909.

    Goumas, M., & Lygerou, V. (2000). An extension of the PROMETHEE method for decision making in fuzzy environment: Ranking of alternative energy exploitation projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 123(3), 606-613.

    Halouani, N., Chabchoub, H., & Martel, J. M. (2009). PROMETHEE-MD-2T method for project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(3), 841-849.

    Herrera-Viedma, E., & Peis, E. (2003). Evaluating the informative quality of documents in SGML format from judgements by means of fuzzy linguistic techniques based on computing with words. Information Processing & Management, 39(2), 233-249.

    Herrera, F., & Martinez, L. (2000). A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. Fuzzy Systems, IEEE Transactions on, 8(6), 746-752.

    Hong, T. P., & Chen, J. B. (1999). Finding relevant attributes and membership functions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 103(3), 389-404.

    Hyde, K., Maier, H. R., & Colby, C. (2003). Incorporating uncertainty in the PROMETHEE MCDA method. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(4-5), 245-259.

    Kangas, J., Kangas, A., Leskinen, P., & Pykäläinen, J. (2001). MCDM methods in strategic planning of forestry on state-owned lands in Finland: applications and experiences. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 10(5), 257-271.

    Kurttila, M., Pesonen, M., Kangas, J., & Kajanus, M. (2000). Utilizing the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) in SWOT analysis -- a hybrid method and its application to a forest-certification case. Forest Policy and Economics, 1(1), 41-52.

    Le Téno, J. F., & Mareschal, B. (1998). An interval version of PROMETHEE for the comparison of building products' design with ill-defined data on environmental quality. European Journal of Operational Research, 109(2), 522-529.

    Lee, K., & Lin, S. (2008). A fuzzy quantified SWOT procedure for environmental evaluation of an international distribution center. Information Sciences, 178(2), 531-549.

    Li, W. X., & Li, B. Y. (2010). An extension of the Promethee II method based on generalized fuzzy numbers. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(7), 5314-5319.

    Liu, F., Geng, H., & Zhang, Y. (2005). Interactive Fuzzy Interval Reasoning for smart Web shopping. Applied Soft Computing, 5(4), 433-439.

    Mouzakitis, S., Karamolegkos, G., Ntanos, E., & Psarras, J. (2011). A Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Outranking Approach in Support of Business Angels’ Decision Analysis Process for the Assessment of Companies as Investment Opportunities. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications.

    Radojevic, A., Petrovic, S., & Radojevic, D. (1997). A Fuzzy Approach to Preference Structure in Multicriteria Ranking. International Transactions in Operational Research, 4(5-6), 419-430.

    Shahsavari Pour, N., Kheranmand, M., Fallah, M., & Zeynali, S. (2011). A new method for critical path method with fuzzy processing time. Management Science Letters, 347-354.

    Shinno, H., Yoshioka, H., Marpaung, S., & Hachiga, S. (2006). Quantitative SWOT analysis on global competitiveness of machine tool industry. Journal of Engineering Design, 17(3), 251-258.

    Tuzkaya, G., Gülsün, B., Kahraman, C., & Özgen, D. (2010). An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2853-2863.

    Vincke, J. P., & Brans, P. (1985). A preference ranking organization method. The PROMETHEE method for MCDM. Management Science 31, 641-656.

    Yoon, K. P., & Hwang, C.L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences): Sage Pubn Inc.

    Yuksel, I., & Dagdeviren, M. (2007). Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis – A case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences, 177(16), 3364-3382.

    Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353.

    下載圖示 校內:2014-07-19公開
    校外:2015-07-19公開
    QR CODE