| 研究生: |
黃郁婷 Huang, Yu-Ting |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
建築震害中功能性設施損壞及修復金額機率曲線研究 A Study of Operational and Functional Components Damage and the Repair Cost Probability Curves on Seismic Damage of Buildings |
| 指導教授: |
姚昭智
Yao, George. C. |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系 Department of Architecture |
| 論文出版年: | 2010 |
| 畢業學年度: | 98 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 145 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 醫院 、學校 、功能性設施 、修復金額機率曲線 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | hospital, school buildings, nonstructural component, operational and functional component, probability of repair cost |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:97 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
從921集集地震或是國際間之震害經驗,我們都一再地看到,醫院建築及學校建築是災後救援過程中相當重要的一環——醫院建築提供醫療救護之功能,學校建築則是緊急災難時當地居民最主要之公共避難空間。醫院建築在大震不倒之設計前提下,結構體儘管遭受破壞仍具有承載能力;然而由於醫院功能性設施受損,不僅無法保障原先院內之病患,更無法有效提供緊急醫療工作。因此,決定醫院建築能否於震後繼續提供其醫療能力者,實為功能性設施之耐震能力。學校建築有別於醫院建築,雖無明顯之機能性空間,然因使用者尚年幼,以及學校建築需於災後提供作為救濟大眾之重要建築物,維持建築空間中之基本使用性能仍為一重要之課題。有鑑於此,本研究以問卷方式,分別調查921集集地震之醫院建築及0304甲仙地震之學校建築,分析其功能性設施之損壞以及修復金額機率曲線。
彙整問卷調查表內各項功能性設施之損壞情形,將之分為無損壞、輕度損壞、中度損壞、重度損壞進行分析。再由易損性曲線之基本架構:以PGA 為工程需求參數,應用對數常態分佈、MCEER存活率分析、非線性曲線迴歸之概念延伸發展,將應變數由損壞機率變更為某一修復金額之發生機率,建立修復金額機率曲線。從修復金額機率曲線之判讀,吾人可以得知功能性設施在經歷某PGA時,某修復金額的發生機率,故可於災後迅速評估災損,或提供業主於建築設計階段評估耐震性能之考量,以及若不予以改善所需面對之損失金額與可能機率。
From the Chi-Chi earthquake and many severe seismic events abroad, we’ve learned that the public buildings played important roles in post-disaster rescues. For example, hospitals and school buildings provided medical treatment for the injuries and the emergent shelters for the local residents, respectively.
For hospital buildings, they could be seriously damaged but should never be collapsed under severe earthquakes; therefore, the structures of the hospital buildings usually did not lose their bearing capacity after earthquakes. However, the damage to the operational and functional components (OFCs) in the hospitals would lead to a more critical situation than did structural damages. Due to damaged OFCs in hospitals, not only the patients affected, but also the treatment for the emergency cases impeded. Thus, instead of only aiming at the structural safety of the hospitals, the seismic capacity of the OFCs should be seriously considered to maintain their post-earthquake emergent medical capability. For school buildings, this paper focuses only on investigating the OFCs which are needed in maintaining the basic function for young students in schools and providing the emergent shelters for the local residents after earthquakes. Hence, this study investigated the damaged OFCs in hospitals and in school buildings during the 921 Chi-Chi earthquake in 1999 and the 304 Jia-Sian earthquake in 2010, respectively. By using questionnaire, the damages to OFCs were surveyed and their repair cost probability curves were analyzed.
The damage levels of OFCs in the questionnaire were first classified into no, minor, moderate, and severe damages. Then the algorithms of the log normal distribution curve fitting were used to plot their corresponding repair cost probability curves. This concept was based on the fragility curve and using the PGA as the independent variable.
From the repair cost probability curves of OFCs, we can predict and evaluate the probability of repair cost of OFCs under a certain PGA either in the design or post- earthquakes stage. The building owners can therefore consider the seismic capacity of the OFCs, their seismic loss probability and the corresponding repair cost.
1. Lewis, Jay, Amir Mohseni, Mark de Koning, “Overcoming Hurdles on the Road to Nonstructural Seismic Resilience for Buildings,” Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 876, San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 18-22, 2006.
2. 莊佳璋等,「台南地區急救責任醫院救護設備之防震措施評估」,衛生署DOH89-TD-1223,2000。
3. 莊佳璋等,「南部地區醫院防震及救災能力評估」,衛生署DOH91-TD-1133,2002。
4. 張嘉祥等,「學校建築震害」,九二一集集大地震建築物災害調查分析,財團法人成大建築文教基金會,台南,台灣,2000。
5. 林淑鎂,「地方層級都市安全防災規劃內容架構與地震災害評估模式之研究」,碩士論文,國立台北科技大學,台北,台灣,2003。
6. Taghavi, S. and E. Miranda, Response Assessment of Nonstructural Building Elements, Report PEER 2003/5, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Richmond, CA, USA, 2003.
7. 姚昭智,「功能性設施之損壞」,九二一集集大地震建築物災害調查分析,財團法人成大建築文教基金會,台南,台灣,2000。
8. 姚昭智、凃英烈、顏志偉,「醫院建築中非結構物之易損性曲線研究」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第二十卷,第四期,第539-553頁,2008。
9. Reitherman, R “How to Prepare a Hospital for An Earthquake,” The Journal of Emergency Medicine, Vol. 4, pp. 119-131, 1986.
10. Holmes, W. T. and L. Burkett, “Seismic Vulnerability of Hospitals Based on Historical Performance in California,” Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 507, San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 18-22, 2006.
11. Seismic Safety Commission, A Compendium of Background Reports on the Northridge Earthquake for Executive Order W-78-94, SSC94-08, Sacramento, CA, USA, 1994.
12. William, E., “Lessons Learned from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake on the Vulnerability of Nonstructural Systems,” ATC29-1, USA, 1998.
13. 姚昭智譯,「醫院設備在神戶地震中的影響」,摘錄自 “Observations on Hospitals Performance in the Great Hanshin-Awaji,(Kobe) Earthquake of Jan. 17, 1995, OSHPD, USA”,台南,台灣,1998。
14. 姚昭智、練乃齊,「嘉義瑞里地震非結構體震害」,結構工程,第十三卷,第三期,第93-104頁,1998。
15. 姚昭智、林其璋,「集集地震建築物功能性設施之震害及分析」,結構工程,第十四卷,第三期,第139-145頁,1999。
16. Bose, A., P. R. Bose, A. Sinvhal, A. Verma and A. A. Khan, “Impact of Kutch Earthquake on Non-structural Elements and Appendages of Buildings,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 2054, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Aug. 1-6, 2004.
17. Kuo, K. C., Y. Hayashi and H. Kambara, “Relationship between Damages of Hospital Facilities and Seismic Intensity Based on Questionnaire Survey,” Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, AIJ, No. 586, pp. 63-69, 2004.
18. Kambara, H., Y. Hayashi and K. Tamura, “Relationship between Damage to Nonstructural Building Elements and the Seismic Intensities of Recent Earthquakes in Japan,” First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Paper No. 726, Geneva, Switzerland, Sep. 3-8, 2006.
19. Griffin, M. J., “Earthquake Performance of Nonstructural Components and Systems Difficulties in Achieving Enhanced Earthquake Performance,” Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1798, San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 18-22, 2006.
20. 凃英烈、姚昭智、洪李陵,「學校建築中非結構物破壞易損性及修復金額和修復工期機率曲線研究」,中國土木水利工程學刊,第二十一卷,第四期,第409-425頁,2009。
21. 倪伯聰,「懸吊式輕鋼架天花板之破壞試驗與分析」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,1998。
22. 郭耕杖,「醫院建築功能性設施耐震評估」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2001。
23. 鍾育霖,「展示館功能性設施耐震性能評估」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2001。
24. 黃中興,「移動式設備物之滑磁耐震機制探討」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2003。
25. 黃喬俊,「消防灑水系統耐震問題研究」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2003。
26. Nazer, H. M. and F. N. Elahi, “Seismic Vulnerability of Nonstructural Components of Hospitals,” 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1250, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, Aug. 1-6, 2004.
27. 黃昶閔,「醫院重要醫療空間內設備物耐震性能評估之研究」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2009。
28. Tien, Y. M. and C. H. Pai, “Development of Fragility Curves for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake,” Proceedings of the 8th U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 401, San Francisco, CA, USA, Apr. 18-22, 2006.
29. Kuo, K. C., Y. Suzuki, Y. Hayashi, and H. Kambara, “Evaluation of Nonstructural Component Fragilities in Risk Assessment of Hospitals,” 4th International Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 244, Taipei, Taiwan, Oct. 12-13, 2006.
30. Porter, K., “Fragility of Hydraulic Elevators for Use in Performance-Based Earthquake Engineering,” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 459-469, May, 2007.
31. Lin, L. and J. Adams, “Lessons for the Fragility of Canadian Hydropower Components under Seismic Loading,” 9th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Paper No. 1186, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, Jun. 26-29, 2007.
32. 周學政,「GIS辭典」,崧旭資訊股份有限公司,台北,台灣,2004。
33. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Pre-standard and Commentary for The Seismic Rehabilitation of Building, FEMA356, USA, 2000.
34. 顏志偉,「醫院建築中非結構物之易損性曲線研究」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2007。
35. 蘇彥豪,「建築物連牆出入口地震力破壞實驗探討」,碩士論文,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2002。
36. 蔡益超譯,「工程或然率」,中國土木水利工程學會,台北,第80-106頁,1979。
37. 洪李陵,「地震工程學講義」,國立成功大學建築研究所,台南,台灣,2006。
38. Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research(MCEER), Seismic Reliability Assessment of Critical Facilities: A Handbook, Supporting Documentation, and Model Code Provision, Technical Report MCEER-99-0008, 1999.
39. John A. Martin & Associates, Inc., Automated Post-Earthquake Damage Assessment and Safety Evaluation of Instrumented Buildings, JAMA Report Number: 2005-10639, USA, 2005.