簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 陳冠甫
Chen, Guan-Fu
論文名稱: 電子軟焊接點之可靠度評價方式及合金效應分析
An evaluation method of reliability and analyses of alloying effects for electronic soldering joints
指導教授: 林士剛
Lin, Shih-Kang
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 工學院 - 材料科學及工程學系
Department of Materials Science and Engineering
論文出版年: 2017
畢業學年度: 105
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 84
中文關鍵詞: 無鉛銲錫可靠度掉落測試溫度循環測試
外文關鍵詞: Pb-free solder, Reliability, drop test, thermal cycling test
相關次數: 點閱:100下載:33
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 隨著電子產品輕薄短小的發展,電子構裝技術成為業界重要的領域,目前電子構裝技術中,球柵陣列封裝為最常見的方式,其中影響銲錫接點可靠度的因素包含錫球成分、尺寸和表面處理、迴焊條件等,本研究將針對銲錫錫球成分的改變作探討,並將研究分為兩大部分探討,一為電子軟焊接點之可靠度評價方式,另一為合金效應分析。
    在過去的電子構裝技術中,人們大量使用Sn-Pb合金,然而Pb會使人染上疾病,所以歐盟在2003年時,通過危害物質限制令來限制Pb的使用,自此人們便開始尋找其他替代的合金,而最終得到目前廣泛使用的Sn-3Ag-0.5Cu合金,其擁有良好的潛變性質,不過亦有較弱的抗衝擊性質,並且高銀含量亦會造成成本提升,所以為了解決此問題,本研究藉由添加金屬元素來改變其合金組成,試圖降低Ag的使用,並提升接點可靠度。
    首先本研究使用Sn-1Ag-0.8Cu做為基礎銲料,並在其中添加Ni、Co、Bi三種元素,用田口法配置32組試片,經歷一系列的研磨、拋光、微結構觀察之後,在過程中我們找到較省時的可靠度評價方法,並且有效率找出在掉落測試中表現最佳的銲料,汲取過去的經驗建立一套評價方式。之後再根據近年文獻中報導,提取對銲料接點可靠度有幫助的元素如Mn、Ti、Al、Fe、Ga等元素做添加,以計算熱力學輔助,經歷晶粒大小分析、硬度分析、高速拉推球試驗等可靠度評價方式之後,實際去做業界認可的可靠度評價方式,如掉落測試、溫度循環測試,最終達到建立可靠度評價方式,並且提供合金效應分析之結果供學界使用。

    Lead-free soldering has been widely adopted by the electronics industry, with SnAgCu (SAC) having high Ag content being the initial main stream of choice. This selection was challenged later by the fragility of solder joint toward drop and the high cost of Ag. As a result, low Ag SAC was considered a solution for resolving both issues. In this study, we chose low Ag SAC alloy, designed the components by CALPHAD thermodynamic modeling, doped with Ni, Co, Bi, Mn, Ga, Al, Ti, Fe, these solders were evaluated under intermetallic compound thickness and roughness measurement, high speed shear and pull test, Vickers hardness test, grain size measurement, JEDEC drop test, thermal cycling test condition against SAC305, SAC105 and LF35(SAC1205-0.05Ni) alloys. After that we know the best evaluated method. Simultaneously, we found that SAC108-0.05Co and Sn-0.8Cu-1Ga have good drop performance, and SAC108Co also show good thermal cycling performance which is the potential solder to replace commercial Pb-Free solder.

    目錄 口試委員會審定書 # 中文摘要 i Abrstract ii 致謝 vii 目錄 viii 圖目錄 xi 表目錄 xvi Chapter 1 前言 1 Chapter 2 文獻回顧Equation Chapter (Next) Section 1 4 2.1 封裝技術發展 4 2.1.1 BGA 4 2.1.2 FC-BGA 4 2.2 銲錫接點性質測試方式 5 2.2.1 掉落測試 5 2.2.2 拉球試驗 6 2.2.3 推球試驗 6 2.3 Sn-Ag-Cu-X銲料發展 7 2.3.1 Sn-Ag-Cu銲錫摻雜Mn的文獻回顧 7 2.3.2 Sn-Ag-Cu銲錫摻雜Ti的文獻回顧 11 2.3.3 Sn-Ag-Cu銲錫摻雜Al的文獻回顧 14 2.3.4 Sn-Ag-Cu銲錫摻雜Fe的文獻回顧 16 2.3.5 Sn-Ag-Cu銲錫摻雜Ga的文獻回顧 18 Chapter 3 實驗方法 22 3.1Equation Chapter (Next) Section 1 試片製備 22 3.2 分析方法 23 3.2.1 微結構SEM 23 3.2.2 硬度Vickers 24 3.3 可靠度測試 24 3.3.1 掉落測試 24 3.3.2 溫度循環測試 24 Chapter 4 結果與討論 25 4.1 可靠度評價方式 25 4.1.1 介金屬化合物粗糙度 26 4.1.2 介金屬化合物厚度 30 4.1.3 硬度 35 4.1.4 掉落測試 37 4.1.5 高速拉推球試驗 44 4.2 合金效應分析 45 4.2.1 高速拉推球試驗 45 4.2.2 硬度 49 4.2.3 計算熱力學 56 4.2.4 晶粒大小 63 4.2.5 Drop test 72 4.2.6 Thermal cycle test 76 Chapter 5 結論 80 5.1 可靠度評價方式 80 5.2 合金效應分析 80 Chapter 6 參考文獻 82 圖目錄 圖2. 1. (a)SAC105之微結構 (b)SAC105-0.15Mn之微結構[6] 8 圖2. 2 .SAC105-Mn之機械性質。a.拉伸強度及伸長率。b.彈性模數[6] 8 圖2. 3接點solder/PCB(OSP)之IMC形貌[8] 9 圖2. 4.球柵陣列封裝(化學鎳金)/印刷電路板(有機保焊膜) 10 圖2. 5.球柵陣列封裝(化學鎳金)/印刷電路板(有機保焊膜) 之溫度循環測試韋伯圖 10 圖2. 6含0.02 wt.% 及不含Ti之SAC105之截面光學顯微鏡圖。[9] 11 圖2. 7電子顯微鏡形貌圖Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu-XTi (a)SAC (b) SAC-0.25 Ti (c) SAC-0.5 Ti (d) SAC- 1 Ti 12 圖2. 8各成分銲料之介金屬化合物(IMC)厚度比較。[9] 13 圖2. 9掉落測試結果韋伯圖[10] 13 圖2. 10 Sn-Cu-Ti 之473K相圖[19] 14 圖2. 11(a) SAC105 (b) SAC105-0.1Al (c) SAC105-0.2Al之錫球SEM形貌圖[13] 15 圖2. 12 SAC105、SAC105-0.1Al、SAC105-0.2Al錫球之拉伸試驗機械性質[13] 15 圖2. 13迴焊8次後接點電子顯微鏡形貌圖(a) Sn-3.5Ag-0.5Cu 16 圖2. 14 (a)SAC105,(b)SAC105-0.1Fe之微結構電子顯微鏡圖[15] 17 圖2. 15 SAC105、SAC105-0.1Fe、SAC105-0.3Fe錫求之拉伸性質 17 圖2. 16 (a)Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-0Ga (b)Sn-3.0Ag-0.5Cu-0.5Ga 19 圖2. 17電子顯微鏡形貌圖,初迴焊後(a)Sn-Ag-Cu/Cu (b)Sn-Ag-Cu-Ga/Cu界面, 180 °C下持溫4天後(c) Sn-Ag-Cu/Cu (d)Sn-Ag-Cu-Ga/Cu界面[20] 19 圖4. 1.32組試片界面BEI圖 25 圖4. 2. 32組試樣界面IMC平均厚度與粗糙度整理表 28 圖4. 3Ni含量對IMC粗糙度之影響 29 圖4. 4 Co含量對IMC粗糙度之影響 29 圖4. 5 Bi含量對IMC粗糙度之影響 30 圖4. 6 Ni含量對IMC平均厚度之影響 31 圖4. 7 Cu6Sn5晶體結構模擬圖 31 圖4. 8 Sn-Cu-Ni 240oC 三元相圖[17] 32 圖4. 9 Sn-Co-Cu 250oC 三元相圖[18] 32 圖4. 10 .Co含量對IMC平均厚度之影響 33 圖4. 11 Bi含量對IMC平均厚度之影響 34 圖4. 12 Ni、Co、Bi添加含量最佳比例 35 圖4. 13.30組式樣維氏硬度分析結果 36 圖4. 14. Ag、Ni、Co、Bi添加對硬度影響 37 圖4. 15掉落測試破斷模式分析定義 39 圖4. 16. 30組推球試驗結果之破斷面延性比例分析 43 圖4. 17文獻中SAC-Bi-Cr/Cu截面EDS線掃描[24] 44 圖4. 18. L08(SAC108-0.1Ni-0.025Co-3Bi) EPMA破斷面分析 44 圖4. 19. 硬度與推球試驗延性破斷比例相關圖 45 圖4. 20. 高速推球試驗破斷模式比例圖。 48 圖4. 21高速拉球試驗破斷模式比例圖。 48 圖4. 22. 21組試片延性破斷模式比例排序圖。 49 圖4. 23. 21組試片維氏硬度測試微結構。 53 圖4. 24.21組銲料5g荷重底部維氏硬度測試結果。 54 圖4. 25. 21組銲料5g荷重中間部分維氏硬度測試結果。 54 圖4. 26. 21組銲料5g荷重頂部維氏硬度測試結果。 55 圖4. 27. 21組試片20g荷重維氏硬度測試結果。 56 圖4. 28. Sn-Ag-Cu三元相圖之液相線投影圖 59 圖4. 29. SAC1205-0.05Ni 模擬凝固路徑。 60 圖4. 30. SAC108-Mn模擬凝固路徑。 60 圖4. 31. SAC108-Ti模擬凝固路徑。 61 圖4. 32. SAC108-Al模擬凝固路徑。 61 圖4. 33. SAC108-Fe模擬凝固路徑。 62 圖4. 34. 各元素添加對銲料凝固過程之Sn相成長溫度區間的影響 63 圖4. 35. Con1 SAC1205-0.05Ni 之微結構SEM圖。 64 圖4. 36. SAC108-0.05Co 之微結構SEM圖。 65 圖4. 37. SAC305 之微結構SEM圖。 65 圖4. 38. SAC108-0.015Mn 之微結構SEM圖。 66 圖4. 39. SAC108-0.03Mn 之微結構SEM圖。 66 圖4. 40. SAC108-0.045Mn 之微結構SEM圖。 67 圖4. 41. SAC108-0.015Al 之微結構SEM圖。 67 圖4. 42. SAC108-0.03Al 之微結構SEM圖。 68 圖4. 43. SAC108-0.045Al 之微結構SEM圖。 68 圖4. 44. SAC108-0.015Ti 之微結構SEM圖。 69 圖4. 45. SAC108-0.03Ti 之微結構SEM圖。 69 圖4. 46. SAC108-0.045Ti 之微結構SEM圖。 70 圖4. 47 SAC108-Mn之首要析出相Sn晶粒大小 70 圖4. 48. SAC108-Al之首要析出相Sn晶粒大小 71 圖4. 49.SAC108-Ti之首要析出相Sn晶粒大小 71 圖4. 50 SAC108-Fe之首要析出相Sn晶粒大小 71 圖4. 51 SAC108-Ga之首要析出相Sn晶粒大小 72 圖4. 52 Sn-0.8Cu-Ga之首要析出相Sn晶粒大小 72 圖4. 53. 6組試片掉落測試分析韋伯圖。 73 圖4. 54 .Con1(SAC1205-0.05Ni)-U3 破斷模式分析 74 圖4. 55. Con1(SAC1205-0.05Ni) -U8破斷模式分析 74 圖4. 56 Con2(SAC108-0.05Co) -U3破斷模式分析 74 圖4. 57 Con2(SAC108-0.05Co)-U8破斷模式分析 75 圖4. 58 L4(SAC108-1Ga)-U3破斷模式分析 75 圖4. 59.D7(SAC108-0.015Al)-U8破斷模式分析 75 圖4. 60. D14(SAC108-0.03Fe)-U3破斷模式分析 76 圖4. 61. D16 (Sn-0.8Cu-1Ga)-U3破斷模式分析 76 圖4. 62. 溫度循環測試結果與文獻比較 78 圖4. 63. SAC1205-0.05Ni 破斷模式分析 78 圖4. 64. SAC108-0.05Co破斷模式分析 79 圖4. 65. SAC305破斷模式分析 79

    1. Morando, C., et al., Thermal properties of Sn-based solder alloys. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2014. 25(8): p. 3440-3447.
    2. Shnawah, D., et al., High-Reliability Low-Ag-Content Sn-Ag-Cu Solder Joints for Electronics Applications. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2012. 41(9): p. 2631-2658.
    3. Kim, K.S., S.H. Huh, and K. Suganuma, Effects of fourth alloying additive on microstructures and tensile properties of Sn–Ag–Cu alloy and joints with Cu. Microelectronics Reliability, 2003. 43(2): p. 259-267.
    4. Anderson, I.E., et al., Alloying effects in near-eutectic Sn-Ag-Cu solder alloys for improved microstructural stability. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2001. 30(9): p. 1050-1059.
    5. Terashima, S., et al., Improvement of Thermal Fatigue Properties of Sn-Ag-Cu Lead-Free Solder Interconnects on Casio’s Wafer-Level Packages Based on Morphology and Grain Boundary Character. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2009. 38(1): p. 33-38.
    6. Sundelin, J.J., et al., Mechanical and microstructural properties of SnAgCu solder joints. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2006. 420(1): p. 55-62.
    7. Liu, Y.-C., et al., Intermetallic reactions in Sn-8Zn-20In solder ball grid array packages with Au/Ni/Cu and Ag/Cu pads. Journal of electronic materials, 2006. 35(1): p. 147-153.
    8. Liu, C., et al., Analysis of the micro-mechanical properties in aged lead-free, fine pitch flip chip joints. TRANSACTIONS-AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING, 2004. 126: p. 359-366.
    9. Yoon, J.-W., S.-W. Kim, and S.-B. Jung, Interfacial reaction and mechanical properties of eutectic Sn–0.7 Cu/Ni BGA solder joints during isothermal long-term aging. Journal of Alloys and compounds, 2005. 391(1): p. 82-89.
    10. Chia, J.Y.H., B. Cotterell, and T.C. Chai, The mechanics of the solder ball shear test and the effect of shear rate. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2006. 417(1): p. 259-274.
    11. Yeh, C.-L. and Y.-S. Lai, Transient fracturing of solder joints subjected to displacement-controlled impact loads. Microelectronics Reliability, 2006. 46(5): p. 885-895.
    12. Tsai, T.-Y., et al., Transient submodeling analysis for board-level drop tests of electronic packages. IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 2007. 30(1): p. 54-62.
    13. Lin, L.-W., et al., Alloying modification of Sn–Ag–Cu solders by manganese and titanium. Microelectronics Reliability, 2009. 49(3): p. 235-241.
    14. Liu, W. and N.-C. Lee, The effects of additives to SnAgCu alloys on microstructure and drop impact reliability of solder joints. JOM, 2007. 59(7): p. 26-31.
    15. Weiping, L., et al. Shock resistant and thermally reliable low Ag SAC solders doped with Mn Or Ce. in Electronics Packaging Technology Conference, 2009. EPTC '09. 11th. 2009.
    16. Chuang, C.L., et al., Effects of small amount of active Ti element additions on microstructure and property of Sn3.5Ag0.5Cu solder. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012. 558: p. 478-484.
    17. Weiping, L., P. Bachorik, and L. Ning-Cheng. The superior drop test performance of SAC-Ti solders and its mechanism. in Electronic Manufacturing Technology Symposium (IEMT), 2008 33rd IEEE/CPMT International. 2008.
    18. Son, J.Y., et al. Study on the characteristics of various dopants in Sn-1Ag-0.8Cu solder. in Electronics Packaging Technology Conference (EPTC), 2011 IEEE 13th. 2011.
    19. Laurila, T., V. Vuorinen, and M. Paulasto-Kröckel, Impurity and alloying effects on interfacial reaction layers in Pb-free soldering. Materials Science and Engineering: R: Reports, 2010. 68(1–2): p. 1-38.
    20. Sabri, M.F.M., et al., Microstructural stability of Sn–1Ag–0.5Cu–xAl (x = 1, 1.5, and 2 wt.%) solder alloys and the effects of high-temperature aging on their mechanical properties. Materials Characterization, 2013. 78: p. 129-143.
    21. Shnawah, D.-A., et al., The bulk alloy microstructure and mechanical properties of Sn–1Ag–0.5Cu–xAl solders (x = 0, 0.1 and 0.2 wt. %). Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2012. 23(11): p. 1988-1997.
    22. Gain, A.K., et al., The influence of addition of Al nano-particles on the microstructure and shear strength of eutectic Sn–Ag–Cu solder on Au/Ni metallized Cu pads. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2010. 506(1): p. 216-223.
    23. Shnawah, D.A.-A., et al., Novel Fe-containing Sn–1Ag–0.5Cu lead-free solder alloy with further enhanced elastic compliance and plastic energy dissipation ability for mobile products. Microelectronics Reliability, 2012. 52(11): p. 2701-2708.
    24. Shnawah, D.A.-A., et al., Microstructure, mechanical, and thermal properties of the Sn–1Ag–0.5Cu solder alloy bearing Fe for electronics applications. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2012. 551: p. 160-168.
    25. Shnawah, D., et al., Effect of Ag Content and the Minor Alloying Element Fe on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructural Stability of Sn-Ag-Cu Solder Alloy Under High-Temperature Annealing. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2013. 42(3): p. 470-484.
    26. G. Chen, J. S. Ma, Z. T. Geng, "Fabrication and Properties of Lead-Free Sn-Ag-Cu-Ga Solder Alloy", Materials Science Forum, Vols. 475-479, pp. 1747-1750, Jan. 2005. 2005. 475-479.
    27. Chen, H., et al., Influence of gallium addition in Sn–Ag–Cu lead-fee solder. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2015. 26(7): p. 5459-5464.
    28. Zhang, Q.K., et al., Effects of Ga addition on microstructure and properties of Sn–Ag–Cu/Cu solder joints. Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 2015. 622: p. 973-978.
    29. Luo, D.-x., S.-b. Xue, and Z.-q. Li, Effects of Ga addition on microstructure and properties of Sn–0.5Ag–0.7Cu solder. Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics, 2014. 25(8): p. 3566-3571.
    30. Li, C.-Y. and J.-G. Duh, Phase equilibria in the Sn-rich corner of the Sn–Cu–Ni ternary alloy system at 240 C. Journal of materials research, 2005. 20(11): p. 3118-3124.
    31. Chen, Y.-K., et al., Phase Equilibria of Sn-Co-Cu Ternary System. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A, 2012. 43(10): p. 3586-3595.
    32. Fubin, S., et al. High-Speed Solder Ball Shear and Pull Tests vs. Board Level Mechanical Drop Tests: Correlation of Failure Mode and Loading Speed. in Electronic Components and Technology Conference, 2007. ECTC '07. Proceedings. 57th. 2007.
    33. Jeon, S.-j., et al., Evaluation of drop reliability of Sn–37Pb solder/Cu joints using a high speed lap-shear test. Microelectronic Engineering, 2012. 91: p. 147-153.
    34. Fa Xing, C. and J.H.L. Pang, Study on Board-Level Drop Impact Reliability of Sn–Ag–Cu Solder Joint by Considering Strain Rate Dependent Properties of Solder. Device and Materials Reliability, IEEE Transactions on, 2015. 15(2): p. 181-190.
    35. Chen, Y.J., et al., Single-joint shear strength of micro Cu pillar solder bumps with different amounts of intermetallics. Microelectronics Reliability, 2013. 53(1): p. 47-52.
    36. Chaoran, Y., et al. Brittle fracture of intermetallic compounds in SAC solder joints under high speed ball pull/pin pull and Charpy impact tests. in Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), 2013 IEEE 63rd. 2013.
    37. Ju, G., et al. The comparative study on interfacial IMCs growth of three Cu/SnAgCu/Cu solder joints with Bi and Cr additions during thermal aging. in Electronic Packaging Technology and High Density Packaging (ICEPT-HDP), 2012 13th International Conference on. 2012. IEEE.
    38. Zhi-Quan, L., et al. Microstructural investigation on the interfacial evolution of SnBi/Cu interconnect during reflow and solid-state aging. in Electronic Packaging Technology & High Density Packaging, 2008. ICEPT-HDP 2008. International Conference on. 2008.

    下載圖示 校內:2022-07-25公開
    校外:2022-07-25公開
    QR CODE