臺灣的設計教育強調理論與實踐相結合，提倡透過產業實習和產學合作提升學生的設計能力和就業競爭力。然而，在產業實務導向與國際化視野等的趨勢下，年輕世代受全球趨勢影響，對臺灣設計領域帶來衝擊。同時，臺灣工業設計教育面臨資源不足、市場競爭激烈等挑戰，急需改進和創新。為此，設計教育需更關注行業和社會對設計人才的需求，將教育與設計行業之人才需求結合，提高培育之設計人才素質以及其與市場接軌之競爭力，進而推動臺灣工業設計產業發展。

師徒制度作為歷史悠久、傳統且有效的教育與學習方式，自古以來便被廣泛應用於包括知識學習與工藝訓練等各種領域，被視為一種有效的教育傳承方式。因此，現代教育體系應將師徒制度與現代教育模式結合，實現理論融合實踐，滿足行業需求，將會是未來設計教育研究的重要課題。

因此，本研究以傳統師徒制度為基礎，構建一套設計教育師徒傳承模型，並探討其在設計教育領域中的應用成效。本研究透過回顧師徒制度的歷史發展、師徒傳承教育的現狀，以及臺灣工業設計教育的相關發展等文獻，構建一個適用於設計教育之師徒傳承理論框架，並進行為期七年的實際教學應用，驗證該模型的有效性。並且通過案例觀察、訪談和量表評估，探討設計教育師徒傳承模型的實際應用情況與成果。

研究結果顯示，設計教育師徒傳承模型形塑了「上對下的指導監督」、「上對下的引導討論」、「上下間互助學習」三種關鍵傳承模式。研究發現，這樣的傳承模式對學生在創新思維、美學能力、電腦繪圖、原型製作以及溝通傳達等方面的綜合設計能力有顯著幫助。並且，這些機制不僅傳承了設計專業知識和技能，同時也促使學生挖掘個人優勢，依據自身特長發展成為「技術導向型」、「行銷溝通型」、「協作管理型」或「工藝實踐型」等四種不同特質取向的設計師。同時，此執行模型的過程中，亦能有效形塑學生的團隊合作精神，同時培養學生的領導能力，為其未來職業發展奠定基礎。

綜上所述，設計教育的師徒制是一個動態的系統，融合學術理論與實務經驗， 隨著設計流程的推演衍生多層次的師徒(資深者與資淺者)互動關係，促進團隊發展 與傳承。

Design education in Taiwan emphasizes the integration of theory and practice, advocating for the enhancement of students’ design capabilities and employment competitiveness through industry internships and industry-academia collaborations. However, under the trends of industry practice orientation and international perspectives, the younger generation, influenced by global trends, has brought significant impacts to Taiwan’s design field. At the same time, Taiwan’s industrial design education faces challenges such as insufficient resources and intense market competition, necessitating improvements and innovations. Thus, design education must focus more on the needs of the industry and society for design talent, aligning educational programs with industry demands. This alignment aims to enhance the quality of design talent and their competitiveness in the market, ultimately driving the development of Taiwan's industrial design industry.

The apprenticeship system, as a time-honored, traditional, and effective method of education and learning, has been widely applied since ancient times in various fields, including knowledge acquisition and craftsmanship training. It is regarded as an effective means of educational inheritance. Therefore, integrating the apprenticeship system with modern educational models to achieve a fusion of theory and practice, meeting industry demands, will be a crucial topic for future research in design education.

Therefore, this study constructs a mentorship inheritance education model suitable for design education, based on the traditional apprenticeship system, and explores its application in the field of design education. By reviewing the historical development of the apprenticeship system, the current situation of mentorship inheritance education, and the relevant developments in Taiwan’s industrial design education, a theoretical framework “Design Education Mentorship Inheritance Model” is constructed. This framework was validated through seven years of practical teaching applications. The study employed case observations, interviews, and scale assessments to explore the practical application outcome and effects of the model.

The research results indicate that the design education mentorship inheritance model shapes three key inheritance modes: ‘top-down education and supervision,’ ‘top-down guidance and discussions,’ and ‘mutual assistance and learning between levels.’ The study found that these inheritance modes significantly enhance students' comprehensive design abilities in innovative thinking, aesthetic capability, computer-aided design, prototyping, and communication. Moreover, these inheritance modes not only transmit design expertise and skills but also enable students to uncover their personal strengths and develop into designers with distinct orientations: "Technically-Oriented," “Marketing Communication-Oriented," “Collaborative Management-Oriented," or “Craftsmanship-Oriented." Additionally, the implementation of this model also effectively fosters team spirit and leadership skills among students, laying a solid foundation for their future career development.

In summary, the mentorship model in design education is a dynamic system that integrates academic theory with practical experience. As the design process evolves, it generates multi-layered mentor-mentee (senior-junior) interactions, fostering team development and knowledge transfer.

余鑑, 于俊傑, 黃美萍, & 余采芳. (2011). 知覺組織支持對知識移轉程度之研究－以師徒功能爲中介變項 [The Study of Perceived Organizational Support on Degree of Knowledge Transfer: The Mediating Role of Mentoring Function]. 管理實務與理論研究, 5(3), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.29916/jmpp.201109.0001
吴清基. (1998). 技職教育的轉型與發展: 提升國家競爭力的作法. 師大書苑有限公司.
技專院校招生策略委員會. 
技術與職業教育司.  https://depart.moe.edu.tw/ED2300/Default.aspx
李昭蓉. (2012). 師徒怎麼配? 論師徒功能, 員工知識分享與創新行為關係中師徒類型之調節角色. 人力資源管理學報, 12(4), 81-105.
洪秀燕, 朱柏穎, 吳志富, & 劉又榕. (2015). 不同學習背景工業設計所研究生概念發展階段之能力差異 [The Capacity Variance in Concept Development Stage between Industrial Design Graduate Students with Different Learning Backgrounds]. 藝術教育研究(29), 47-73.
孫麗卿. (2015). 運用認知師徒制於師資生藝術活動設計. 兒童照顧與教育(5), 25-35.
張仁家, & 林美芳. (2017). 德國, 奧地利及瑞士師徒制教育對台灣技職教育之借鑑. 台灣國際研究季刊, 13(1), 121-139.
張智銘, & 游萬來. (2012). 工業設計師應具備之能力-國內外文獻回顧. 工業設計(126), 20-25.
張源泉. (2019). 德國師徒制之現代化轉型及其 社會建構. Bulletin of Educational Research, 65(2).
教育部優化技職校院實作環境計畫補助要點.  https://edu.law.moe.gov.tw/LawContent.aspx?id=GL001685
陸定邦, & 呂佳珍. (2012). 工業設計課程規劃之分析: 以成功大學工業設計系為例. 設計學研究, 15(1), 25-38. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/15629708-201207-201208170019-201208170019-25-38
勞動部勞動力發展署.  https://www.wda.gov.tw/
黃予岑, & 鄭瑩妮. (2019). 師父溝通風格對於師徒功能, 離職傾向, 社會化與表現之影響. 復興崗學報(114), 87-126.
黃瓊玉. (2005). 師徒功能認知, 工作滿足與組織公民行為關聯性之研究, 中原大學企業管理研究所未出版之碩士論文.
楊靜. (2003). 1950 至 1960 年代台灣從手工業到工業設計的推展機構之探索(II)-中國生產力中心對工業設計推廣活動及其成果(國科會專題研究成果精簡報告，NSC 92-2411-H-224-007)。雲林: 國立雲林科技大學。.
楊靜. (2010). 1960 年代外國專家來台指導 [工業設計訓練班] 的過程及其影響. 設計學報 (Journal of Design), 15(4).
蔡情美. (2020). 雙向師徒制量表發展之研究——以新世代核心職能為基礎. 清華大學教育心理與諮商學系學位論文, 2020, 1-141.
鄭聰興. (2004). 設計工作者能力分析模式建構之研究 (Publication Number 2004年) 國立臺灣師範大學]. AiritiLibrary.
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E., & Lima, L. (2004). Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis. Journal of applied psychology, 89(1), 127.
Aryee, S., Chay, Y. W., & Chew, J. (1996). The motivation to mentor among managerial employees: An interactionist approach. Group & Organization Management, 21(3), 261-277.
Browning, T. R. (2018). Building models of product development processes: An integrative approach to managing organizational knowledge. Systems Engineering, 21(1), 70-87.
Burke, R. J., & McKeen, C. A. (1990). Mentoring in organizations: Implications for women. Journal of business ethics, 9, 317-332.
Chan, C. K., & Luo, J. (2022). Towards an inclusive student partnership: rethinking mentors’ disposition and holistic competency development in near-peer mentoring. Teaching in higher education, 27(7), 874-891.
Chao, G. T., Walz, P., & Gardner, P. D. (1992). Formal and informal mentorships: A comparison on mentoring functions and contrast with nonmentored counterparts. Personnel psychology, 45(3), 619-636.
Cosco, G., & Garaj, V. (2020). The Practice of Design Innovation in the Academic Context: The Project Portfolio by Brunel Design.
De Munck, B., Kaplan, S. L., & Soly, H. (2007). Learning on the shop floor: Historical perspectives on apprenticeship (Vol. 12). Berghahn books.
Dorst, K., & Cross, N. (2001). Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Design studies, 22(5), 425-437.
Douglass, A. G., Smith, D. L., & Smith, L. J. (2013). An exploration of the characteristics of effective undergraduate peer-mentoring relationships. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 21(2), 219-234.
Droste, M. (2002). Bauhaus, 1919-1933. Taschen.
Euler, D. (2013). Germany's dual vocational training system: a model for other countries?
Evans, K., Hodkinson, P., & Unwin, L. (2002). Working to learning: Transforming workplace learning. London: Routledge.
Fagenson-Eland, E. A., Marks, M. A., & Amendola, K. L. (1997). Perceptions of mentoring relationships. Journal of vocational behavior, 51(1), 29-42.
Findeli, A. (2001). Rethinking design education for the 21st century: Theoretical, methodological, and ethical discussion. Design issues, 17(1), 5-17.
Fisher, B. (1994). Mentoring. Library Training Guides Series. ERIC.
Forret, M. L. (1996). Issues facing organizations when implementing formal mentoring programmes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 17(3), 27-30.
Hummelsheim, S., & Baur, M. (2014). The German dual system of initial vocational education and training and its potential for transfer to Asia. Prospects, 44, 279-296.
Hunt, D. M., & Michael, C. (1983). Mentorship: A career training and development tool. Academy of management Review, 8(3), 475-485.
Jonassen, D. H. (2008). Instructional design as design problem solving: An iterative process. Educational Technology, 21-26.
Justice, L. (2012). China's design revolution (Vol. 2). MIT Press.
Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management journal, 26(4), 608-625.
Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. University Press of America.
Kuczmarski, S. S., & Kuczmarski, T. D. (2002). Values-Based Leadership: Rebuilding Employee Commitment, Performance, and Productivity. DIANE Publishing Company. https://books.google.com.tw/books?id=0fQaAAAACAAJ
Lahti, H., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2005). Towards participatory design in craft and design education. CoDesign, 1(2), 103-117.
Laske, G. (2001). Profession and occupation as medium of socialization and identity formation. Project papers: vocational identity, flexibility and mobility in the European labour market (FAME). Bremen: University of Bremen, 11.
Lo, K. W., Ngai, G., Chan, S. C., & Kwan, K.-p. (2022). How students’ motivation and learning experience affect their service-learning outcomes: A structural equation modeling analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 825902.
Löbach, B. (2001). Design industrial. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher.
Ma, Y., Mukherjee, S., & Uzzi, B. (2020). Mentorship and protégé success in STEM fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(25), 14077-14083.
Merriam, S. B., & Brockett, R. G. (2011). The profession and practice of adult education: An introduction. John Wiley & Sons.
Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49.
Mullen, E. J. (1994). Framing the mentoring relationship as an information exchange. Human Resource Management Review, 4(3), 257-281.
Noe, R. A. (1988). An investigation of the determinants of successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel psychology, 41(3), 457-479.
Raelin, J. A. (2008). Work-based learning: Bridging knowledge and action in the workplace. John Wiley & Sons.
Ragins, B. R., & Cotton, J. L. (1999). Mentor functions and outcomes: a comparison of men and women in formal and informal mentoring relationships. Journal of applied psychology, 84(4), 529.
Rattner, S. (2014). The myth of industrial rebound. The New York Times, January, 26.
Sakamoto, M., & Tamanyu, L. (2014). Mentorship in a Japanese graduate school: learning through apprenticeship. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 3(1), 32-50.
Scandura, T. A. (1992). Mentorship and career mobility: An empirical investigation. Journal of organizational behavior, 13(2), 169-174.
Schrubbe, K. F. (2004). Mentorship: a critical component for professional growth and academic success. Journal of dental education, 68(3), 324-328.
Scott, J. L., & Sarkees-Wircenski, M. (2004). Overview of career and technical
education (3rd ed. ed.). American Technical Publishers.
Suyitno, S., Kamin, Y., Jatmoko, D., Nurtanto, M., & Sunjayanto, E. (2022). Industrial apprenticeship model based on work-based learning for pre-service teachers in automotive engineering. Frontiers in Education,
Tenenbaum, H. R., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of vocational behavior, 59(3), 326-341.
Tuomikoski, A.-M., Ruotsalainen, H., Mikkonen, K., Miettunen, J., & Kääriäinen, M. (2018). The competence of nurse mentors in mentoring students in clinical practice–A cross-sectional study. Nurse education today, 71, 78-83.
WDO. (2015). WDO | About | Definition of Industrial Design. World Design Organizaition. https://wdo.org/about/definition/
Wilson, J. A., & Elman, N. S. (1990). Organizational benefits of mentoring. Academy of Management Perspectives, 4(4), 88-94.
Yalman, Z., & Yavuzcan, H. G. (2015). Co-design practice in industrial design education in Turkey a participatory design project. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 2244-2250.
Yang, C.-w. (2015). Business Ethics of the Mentoring System in Taiwan National Central University].
Yang, M.-Y., You, M., & Chen, F.-C. (2005). Competencies and qualifications for industrial design jobs: implications for design practice, education, and student career guidance. Design studies, 26(2), 155-189.
Yang, M.-Y., You, M.-L., & Lin, S.-H. (2003). Preliminary study of learning situations and career issues for university ID students. Journal of Design, 8(3), 75-90.
Zhao, R., Watson, R., & Chen, Y. (2018). Validation of Mentors' Behavior Scale among mentors. Nurse education today, 71, 180-184.