簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 魏如羚
Wei, Ru-Ling
論文名稱: 論金‧紐曼《德古拉元年》:吸血變異做為變遷與適應
Vampirism as Change and Adaptation in Kim Newman’s "Anno Dracula"
指導教授: 林明澤
Lin, Min-Tser
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 外國語文學系
Department of Foreign Languages and Literature
論文出版年: 2019
畢業學年度: 107
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 89
中文關鍵詞: 《德古拉元年》吸血變異演化進步與衰退優生學
外文關鍵詞: Anno Dracula, vampirism, evolution, progress, degeneration, eugenics
相關次數: 點閱:110下載:12
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 金‧紐曼的《德古拉元年》(1992年初版)改寫自伯蘭‧史杜克的《德古拉》(1897年初版)故事情節,描述了德古拉打敗凡赫辛一行人並佔領英國後的情況。故事中,在德古拉的統治之下,吸血變異在英國流行興起,不僅在生物學上作為一種人類演化的象徵,也隱喻了社會各層面因應時代轉變所呈現的反應。一方面,倫敦東區的貧民窟狀況依舊每況愈下,似乎暗指吸血變異加深歷來的衰退意象。另一方面,也開始有人試圖證明吸血變異帶來人類文明進步的可能性,如小說中的傑奇博士與莫羅博士一般。總之,《德古拉元年》重新標誌十九世紀晚期也是二十世紀晚期的現象,整體社會在嶄新事物的逐漸興盛下產生焦慮,不知是進步或倒退的表徵。諷刺的是,當故事說到社會大眾批判德古拉政策的實施,似乎小說也暗暗質疑了二十世紀末葉,柴契爾夫人回歸維多利亞精神的倡議。不同於史杜克的是,紐曼透過血脈的探討與其他經典吸血鬼角色介入,呈現不同於《德古拉》的面貌:「吸血變異」不再只被賦予負面意義,從生物學出發,新氣象風貌的多樣性給予了更多元的社會想像空間與願景,標誌了二十世紀末對相似社會動盪採取的相對積極意義上的回應。論文從達爾文演化論角度出發,探討金‧紐曼《德古拉元年》中吸血鬼勢力在英國社會興起所引發對上述進步與衰退的思辯。整個討論將分別從文化歷史、生物學與政治社會學三個面向討論,重啟對優生學概念的詮釋。

    Adapted from Bram Stoker’s "Dracula" (1897), Kim Newman’s "Anno Dracula" (1992) represents an alternative history of late 19th century England where Dracula would defeat the Van Helsing group and rule over the whole nation. In the novel, Dracula’s reign leads to spread of vampirism in the whole society, which not only signals a biological evolution of human beings but also symbolizes the emergence of the “new order of beings” that Van Helsing imagines in the original "Dracula" (Stoker 352). On the one hand, the worsening conditions in the slum of East London seem to suggest a regressive effect of vampirism. On the other hand, there are also some trying to prove its progressivity, such as Dr. Jekyll and Dr. Moreau. Whichever position is taken, it suggests a sense of anxiety about the dual possibility of progress and degeneration in the late 19th century in face of “an era of new beginnings” (Marshall 5). Ironically, in the novel there also seems to be a hint of indirect questioning of Madame Thatcher’s calls for a return to the “Victorian values”. With the overlapping images of the two 80s, Newman also provides a historical reflection on the late 20th century English conditions through an imaginative representation of the late 19th century. In this thesis, based on Darwinian evolutionary theory, I am going to look into the changes that vampirism as a symbol of biological and social evolution brings into the English society and discuss the debate about progress and degeneration in Kim Newman’s "Anno Dracula". By returning to a re-interpretation of eugenics, the whole discussion will proceed from cultural-historical, biological and socio-political perspectives.

    Introduction 1 Chapter One “Written By the Victors”: Vampirism and Cultural-Historical Reflection on Progress 17 Chapter Two “You Could Be Humanity Perfected”: Vampirism and Biological Reflection on Progress 34 Chapter Three Co-existence of Vampires and Human Beings: Vampirism and Socio-Political Reflection on Progress 59 Conclusion 79 Works Cited 85

    陳重仁。《文學、帝國與醫學想像》。台北:書林,2013。
    Armstrong, Tim. “The Seventies and the Cult of Culture.” The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century English Literature. Eds. Marcus, Laura and Peter Nicholls. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. 585-99. Print.
    Auerbach, Nina. Introduction. Our Vampires, Ourselves. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1995. 1-9. Print.
    Bird, Kathryn. “‘Civilised Society doesn’t just happen’: The Animal, the Law, and ‘Victorian Values’ in Kim Newman’s Anno Dracula.” Neo-Victorian Studies 7.1 (2014): 1-24. Neo-Victorian Studies. Web. 29 Sept. 2017.
    Boehm-Schnitker, Nadine and Susanne Gruss. “Introduction: Fashioning the Neo-Victorian – Neo-Victorian Fashions.” Boehm-Schnitker and Gruss 1-17.
    Boehm-Schnitker, Nadine and Susanne Gruss, eds. Neo-Victorian Literature and Culture: Immersions and Revisitations. NY: Routledge, 2014. Print.
    Chamberlin, J. Edward and Sander L. Gilman. “Degeneration: An Introduction.” Chamberlin and Gilman ix-xiv.
    Chamberlin, J. Edward and Sander L. Gilman, eds. Degeneration: The Dark Side of Progress. NY: Columbia UP, 1985. Print.
    Chapman, Edgar L. “Introduction: Three Stages of Alternate History Fiction and the ‘Metaphysical If’”. Classic and Iconoclastic Alternate History Science Fiction. Eds. Edgar L. Chapman and Carl B. Yoke. Lewiston: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2003. 1-27. Print.
    Chen, Eva Yin-I. “Stalking the East End: Iain Sinclair’s White Chappell, Scarlet Tracings and Lights Out for the Territory.” NTU Humanitas Taiwanica 64 (2006): 225-53. NTU Humanitas Taiwanica. Web. 12 Oct. 2018.
    Conlin, Jonathan. “Progressive Evolution? Herbert Spencer, Social Science and ‘Social Darwinism’.” Evolution and the Victorians: Science, Culture and Politics in Darwin’s Britain. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2014. 153-72. Print.
    Craft, Christopher. “‘Kiss me with Those Red Lips’: Gender and Inversion in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.” Representations, No. 8 (1984): 107-33. JSTOR. Web. 17 Feb. 2016.
    Daly, Nicholas. “Incorporated Bodies: Dracula and Professionalism.” Modernism, Romance and the Fin De Siecle: Popular Fiction and British Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999. 30-52. Print.
    Darwin, Charles. “Natural Selection; or the Survival of the Fittest.” The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 1859. Great books of the Western world: 49. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc., 1990. 40-64. Print.
    Dickens, Peter. Social Darwinism: Linking Evolutionary Thought to Social Theory. Buckingham: Open UP, 2000. Print.
    Esser, Helena. “Yesterday’s Tomorrows: Retrofuturist Visions of London’s Alternative Pasts in Steampunk Fiction.” The Literary London Journal, 11.2 (2014): 18-34. The Literary London Journal. Web. 29 Sept. 2017.
    Evans, Eric J. Thatcher and Thatcherism. 3rd ed. London: Routledge, 2013. Print.
    Forman, Ross G. “Empire.” Marshall 91-111.
    Glendening, John. “What ‘“Modernity” Cannot Kill’: Evolution and Primitivism in Stoker’s Dracula.” The Evolutionary Imagination in Late-Victorian Novels: An Entangled Bank. Hampshire: Ashgate, 2007. 107-36. Print.
    Guitton, Matthieu J. and Cecile Cristofari. “The Steampunk Doctor: Practicing Medicine in a Mechanical Age.” Advances in Anthropology 4 (2014): 89-98. Scientific Research. Web. 23 Nov. 2017.
    Hardaway, Elizabeth. “‘Ourselves Expanded’: The Vampire’s Evolution from Bram Stoker to Kim Newman.” The Blood Is the Life: Vampires in Literature. Eds. Leonard G. Heldreth and Mary Pharr. Bowling Green: Bowling Green State University Popular Press, 1999. 177-86. Print.
    Hills, Matt. “Counterfictions in the Work of Kim Newman: Rewriting Gothic SF as ‘Alternate-Story Stories’.” Science Fiction Studies, 30.3 (2003): 436-55. JSTOR. Web. 29 Sept. 2017.
    Ho, Elizabeth. Neo-Victorianism and the Memory of Empire. UK: Continuum, 2012. Print.
    Hollekson, Karen. The Alternate History: Refiguring Historical Time. Kent: The Kent State UP, 2001. Print.
    Kaye, Richard A. “Sexual Identity at the Fin De Siècle.” Marshall 53-72.
    Kohlke, Marie-Luise and Christian Gutleben. “The (Mis)Shapes of Neo-Victorian Gothic: Continuations, Adaptations, Transformations.” Neo-Victorian Gothic: Horror, Violence and Degeneration in the Re-Imagined Nineteenth Century. Eds. Marie-Luise Kohlke and Christian Gutleben. Amsterdam: Rodopi B.V., 2012. 1-48. Print.
    Ledger, Sally and Scott McCracken. Introduction. Ledger and McCracken 1-10.
    Ledger, Sally and Scott McCracken, eds. Cultural Politics at the Fin De Siècle. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995. Print.
    Marshall, Gail. Introduction. Marshall 1-12.
    Marshall, Gail, ed. The Cambridge Companion to the Fin De Siècle. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Print.
    Melton, J. Gordon. “Nosferatu.” The Vampire Book: The Encyclopedia of the Undead. 2nd ed. Detroit: Visible Ink Press, 1999. 496-97. Print.
    Mormne von Sydow, Heidelberg. “‘Survival of the Fittest’ in Darwinian Metaphysics: Tautology or Testable Theory?” Reflecting on Darwin. Voigts, E., B. Schaff and M. Pietrzak-Franger. London: Ashgate, 2014. ResearchGate. Web. 199-222. 10 Dec. 2018.
    Newman, Kim. Anno Dracula. 1992. US: Titan, 2011. Print.
    Nietzsche, Friedrich. The Will to Power. Ed. Kaufmann, Walter. NY: Vintage Books, 1968. Print.
    Nye, Robert A. “Sociology and Degeneration: The Irony of Progress.” Chamberlin and Gilman 49-71.
    Roth, Phyllis A. “Suddenly Sexual Women in Bram Stoker’s Dracula.” 1977. Dracula: Contemporary Critical Essays. Ed. Byron, Glennis. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999. 30-42. Print.
    Schaffer, Talia. “The Victorian Novel and the New Woman.” The Oxford Handbook of the Victorian Novel. Ed. Rodensky, Lisa. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2013. 729-45. Print.
    Scott, Keith. “Blood, Bodies, Books: Kim Newman and the Vampire as Cultural Text.” The Modern Vampire and Human Identity. Ed. Mutch, Deborah. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. 18-36. Print.
    Searle, Geoffrey R. “Eugenics: The Early Years.” Essays in the History of Eugenics. Ed. Peel, Robert A. London: The Galton Institute, 1998. 20-35. Print.
    Seldon, Anthony and Daniel Collings. “Thatcherism in History.” Britain under Thatcher. Harlow: Longman, 2000. 79-94. Print.
    Shanahan, Timothy. The Evolution of Darwinism: Selection, Adaptation, and Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Print.
    Showalter, Elaine. Introduction. Sexual Anarchy: Gender and Culture at the Fin De Siècle. NY: Penguin, 1991. 1-12. Print.
    Smith, Michelle J. “Neo-Victorianism: An Introduction.” Australasian Journal of Victorian Studies, 18.3 (2013): 1-3. The Victorian Web. Web. 17 Oct. 2018.
    Stepan, Nancy. “Biological Degeneration: Races and Proper Places.” Chamberlin and Gilman 97-120.
    Stephanou, Aspasia. Reading Vampire Gothic Through Blood: Bloodlines. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Print.
    Stoker, Bram. Dracula. 1897. London: Penguin books, 2012. Print.
    Voigts, Eckart. “Bio-Fiction: Neo-Victorian Revisions of Evolution and Genetics.” Boehm-Schnitker and Gruss 79-92.
    Warwick, Alexandra. “Vampires and the Empire: Fears and Fictions of the 1890s.” Ledger and McCracken 202-20.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:立即公開
    QR CODE