成功大學博碩士論文系統

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

回結果列表

研究生：	陳靖騏 Chen, Ching-Chi
論文名稱：	員工自我監控性及社會關係聯結強度對組織內隱性知識分享的影響 The Effect of Employees’ Self-monitoring Personality and Tie Strength on Tacit Knowledge Sharing
指導教授：	王瑜琳 Wang, Yu-Lin
學位類別：	碩士 Master
系所名稱：	管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration
論文出版年：	2011
畢業學年度：	99
語文別：	英文
論文頁數：	50
中文關鍵詞：	員工自我監控性、社會關係聯結強度、知識分享
外文關鍵詞：	self-monitoring, tie strength, knowledge sharing
相關次數：	點閱：85 下載：4
分享至:	分享至facebook 分享至twitter

查詢本校圖書館目錄查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統勘誤回報

本研究旨在探討員工自我監控性及社會關係聯結強度之關係，進而探討其如何影響到組織內隱性知識分享，並藉由加入社會關係聯結強度以討論員工自我監控性是否影響組織內隱性知識分享，期以提供後續相關知識管理及人力資源管理相關基礎。
本研究針對90位目前服務於研發、MIS部門或有參與特定專案的在職員工進行問卷調查。分析結果顯示，員工自我監控性正向影響社會關係聯結強度，但並沒有顯著影響組織內隱性知識分享行為，但控制住社會聯結強度後，員工自我監控性與組織內隱性知識分享行為有顯著負向影響。此外，員工間之社會關係聯結強度與組織內隱性知識分享行為有顯著正向影響。最後，文末也提供本研究相關討論及研究限制，並對管理實務及未來研究上提供建議。

This study aims to bridge the gap of relationship between self-monitoring inclination of employees and social tie strength, and tends to find out further influence on tacit knowledge sharing in organization. By taking tie strength into account in the relationship between self-monitoring trait and tacit knowledge sharing in organization, this study offers microfoundation for future knowledge management and human resource management.
Based on the questionnaire survey of 90 employees working in R&D, MIS department or engaging specific projects, the result shows there’s positive relationship between self-monitoring trait and tie strength, but there’s no direct significant relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing unless the impact of social tie strength is controlled. In the end, this study offers related discussion and points out the research limitation, the implication for practice and future research as well.

Contents
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION	1
1.1 Background to the problem	1
1.2 Problem statement	3
1.3 Purpose of study	5
CHAPETER TWO  LITERATURE REVIEW AND RESEARCH HYPOTHESIS	6
2.1 Self-monitoring	6
2.2 Tie strength	7
2.3 The relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength	8
2.4 Tacit Knowledge	11
2.5 The relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing	14
CHAPTER THREE METHOD	16
3.1 Research design	16
3.2Instrumentation	16
3.2.1 Tacit knowledge sharing	16
3.2.2 Self-monitoring trait	17
3.2.3 Tie strength	19
3.3 Research sample	19
3.4 Data collection procedure	20
3.5 Data analysis	21
3.5.1 Reliability	21
3.5.2 Validity	21
3.5.3 Regression Analysis	21
CHAPETER FOUR RESULTS	23
4.1 Psychometric properties of the instrument	23
4.2 Demographics of Participants	25
4.3 Test of Hypothesis	27
4.3.1 Correlation analysis	27
4.3.2 Regression analysis	29
4.3.2.1 The relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength	29
4.3.2.2 The relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing	30
4.3.2.3 The relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing	31
4.4 Summary of Hypothesis Testing	32
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSION	33
5.1 Summary	33
5.2 Discussion with Relevant Literature and Conclusion	34
5.2.1 Relationship between self-monitoring and tie strength	34
5.2.2 Relationship between tie strength and tacit knowledge sharing	35
5.2.3 Relationship between self-monitoring and tacit knowledge sharing	35
5.2.4 Significance of this study	36
5.3 Implication for Practice	38
5.4 Limitation	39
5.5 Recommendation for Future Research	40
References	41

 
Figures  Content
Figure 1 Research model	15
Table Content
Table 1 Items and Source of Tacit Knowledge Sharing	17
Table 2 Items and Source of Self-monitoring	18
Table 3 Items and Source of Tie Strength	19
Table 4 Factor Loading and Cronbach's α of the Constructs and Items	24
Table 5 Demographic Characteristics of the Sample (n=90)	26
Table 6 Correlation Analysis of Variables	28
Table 7 Relationship between Self-monitoring and Tie strength	30
Table 8 Relationship between Tie strength and Tacit Knowledge Sharing	30
Table 9 Relationship between Self-monitoring and Tacit Knowledge Sharing- Tie Strength as the Mediator	31
Table 10 Summary of Hypothesis Testing	32
Table 11 Comparisons between Past Research and the Findings of Current Study	37

                                    

References
Bock, G.W. ＆ Kim, Y.G. (2002), Breaking the Myths of Rewards: An Exploratory Study ofAttitudes About Knowledge Sharing, Information Resources Management Journal, 15(2), 14-21.
Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavior intention formation in knowledge sharing: examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological forces, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1991). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learing, and innovating. Organization Science, 2(1), 40-57.
Burt, R.S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
Cabrera, Á., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
Chow, W. S., & Chan, L. S. (2008). Social network, social trust and shared goals in organizational knowledge sharing. Information & Management, 45(7), 458-465.
Damodaran, L., & Olphert, W. (2000). Barriers and facilitators to the use of knowledge management systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 19(6), 405-413.
Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301.
Day D.V. & Kilduff M. (2003). Self-monitoring personality and work relationships: Individual differences in social networks. In: M.R. Barrick and A.M. Ryan, Editors, Personality and work: Reconsidering the role of personality in organizations, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA (2003), 205–228.
Granovetter, Mark. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481.
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82-111.
Hsu, I.-C. (2006). Enhancing employee tendencies to share knowledge – Case studies of nine companies in Taiwan. International Journal of information management, 26, 326-338.
Kalling, T. (2003). Organization-internal transfer of knowledge and the role of motivation: a qualitative case study. Knowledge & Process Management, 10(2), 115-126.
Kavak, B., Gürel, E., Eryiğit, C., & Tektaş, Ö. (2009). Examining the Effects of Moral Development Level, Self-Concept, and Self-Monitoring on Consumers’ Ethical Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 115-135.
Kim S.-K. & Kim M.-J. (2007), Mentoring network and self-monitoring personality,
Management Revue, 18(1), 42-54.
Krackhardt, D., & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123-140.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Lin, C.-P. (2007). To Share or Not to Share: Modeling Tacit Knowledge Sharing, Its Mediators and Antecedents. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(4), 411-428.
Lin, H.-F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: an empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3), 315-332.
Marsden, P. V., & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring Tie Strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482-501.
Minbaeva, D., Foss, N., & Snell, S. (2009). Bringing the knowledge perspective into HRM. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 477-483.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital ,and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organizational Science, 5(1), 14-37.
Oh, H., & Kilduff, M. (2008). The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1155-1164.
Osterloh, M., & Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 11(5), 538-550.
Polanyi, M. (1966). The Tacit Dimension. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, UK.
Prusak, L., & Cohen, D. (2001). How to Invest in Social Capital. Harvard Business Review, 79(6), 86-93.
Reychav, I., & Weisberg, J. (2009). Good for workers, good for companies: How knowledge sharing benefits individual employees. Knowledge & Process Management, 16(4), 186-197.
Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where Do Creative Interactions Come From? The Role of Tie Content and Social Networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1-21.
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526-537.
Snyder, M. & Gangestad, S. (1982). Choosing social situations: two investigations of self-monitoring processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(1), 123-135.
Snyder, M. and Gangestad, S. (1986). On the nature of self-monitoring: Matters of assessment, matters of validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(1), 125-139.
Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by Knowledge-intensive Firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713-740.
Wang, C.-C. (2004). The Influence of Ethical and Self-interest Concerns on Knowledge Sharing Intentions among Managers: An Empirical Study. International Journal of Management, 21(3), 370-381.
Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
Yang, S.-C., & Farn, C.-K. (2009). Social capital, behavioural control, and tacit knowledge sharing—A multi-informant design. International Journal of Information Management, 29(3), 210-218.
Zupan, N., & Kase, R. (2007). The Role of HR Actors in Knowledge Networks. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3-4), 243-259.

校內：2021-12-31公開
校外：2021-12-31公開

簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

相關論文