簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 江振魁
Chiang, Jhen-Kuei
論文名稱: 高維度總體經濟預測中的兩步驟選後估計:OCMT 結合貝氏模型平均之應用
Two-Stage Post-Selection Estimation in High-Dimensional Macroeconomic Forecasting: Combining OCMT with Bayesian Model Averaging
指導教授: 陳奕奇
Chen, Yi-Chi
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 經濟學系
Department of Economics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 111
中文關鍵詞: 高維預測變數選擇貝氏模型平均總體經濟預測後驗包含機率OCMT
外文關鍵詞: High-dimensional forecasting, Variable selection, Bayesian model averaging, OCMT, Macroeconomic forecasting, Posterior inclusion probability
相關次數: 點閱:3下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 本文探討高維總體經濟資料下之預測問題,並提出一套兩階段方法,以處理變數選擇問題與模型不確定性。我們提出一套結合單一共變數逐一多重檢定(One Covariate at a Time Multiple Testing, OCMT)與 BMA 的兩階段預測方法。此方法之第一階段透過多重邊際顯著性檢定,有效縮減因共線性與維度災難所衍生之龐大模型空間;第二階段則運用 BMA 演算法,於縮減後之模型空間中計算後驗機率並進行預測加權。

    本文將此兩階段架構應用於美國 109 個季頻總體經濟指標,進行 GDP 成長率與 CPI 通膨變動率之樣本外預測。實證結果顯示,結合 OCMT 預先篩選能有效克服維度詛咒,大幅改善純 BMA 的預測表現。本架構的核心貢獻在於,在維持預測精準度的同時,能直接針對原始變數計算後驗包含機率(PIP),突破了傳統因子模型缺乏經濟意涵的限制。透過 PIP 之分析,我們發現 GDP 成長率的預測動能主要來自房市實體指標與服務業消費;而 CPI 通膨變動率的表現則高度反映通膨變動率的自我迴歸慣性。最後,先驗穩健性檢定亦支持上述實證發現不受特定參數設定所主導。

    This thesis proposes a two-stage framework combining One Covariate at a Time Multiple Testing (OCMT) and Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) to address variable selection and model uncertainty in high-dimensional macroeconomic forecasting. In the first stage, OCMT pre-screens potential predictors via marginal significance testing to mitigate the curse of dimensionality. Subsequently, BMA constructs weighted forecasts within the reduced model space by accounting for the joint distribution of candidate variables.Applying this approach to 109 U.S. macroeconomic indicators for out-of-sample forecasting of real GDP growth and changes in CPI inflation, the OCMT-BMA framework offers enhanced variable interpretability while maintaining competitive predictive accuracy compared to Lasso and factor-augmented autoregressive (FA-AR) models. Specifically, by computing the posterior inclusion probabilities (PIP) for the original variables, this framework overcomes the interpretability limitations of standard factor models, which often struggle to map extracted factors back to specific economic indicators.The PIP analysis further clarifies the relative importance of the selected variables: real GDP growth forecasts are primarily driven by real residential investment and service consumption, whereas predictions of changes in CPI inflation rely heavily on their autoregressive persistence. These empirical findings carry clear economic intuition and remain robust across different prior specifications. Overall, the OCMT-BMA framework provides a structured approach to evaluate the relative importance of individual economic variables under model uncertainty, serving as a valuable complement to existing high-dimensional predictive methods.

    中文摘要 i Abstract ii 誌謝 vii 目錄 viii 表目錄 xi 圖目錄 xiii 第一章 緒論 1 1-1. 研究動機 1 1-2. 文獻回顧 3 1-3. 本文貢獻 6 1-4. 本文架構 6 第二章 理論基礎與計量方法 8 2-1. 基本預測模型 8 2-2. 第一階段:OCMT 變數篩選方法 9 2-2.1 變數的理論分類與隱藏訊號 9 2-2.2 多階段迭代篩選機制 11 2-2.3 OCMT 之漸近性質 11 2-3. 第二階段:貝氏模型平均法 (Bayesian Model Averaging) 14 2-3.1 先驗設定:模型先驗與參數先驗 15 2-3.2 模型平均預測 17 2-3.3 變數重要性衡量 18 2-4. OCMT-BMA 兩階段預測架構 18 第三章 蒙地卡羅模擬 21 3-1. 蒙地卡羅模擬與方法比較 21 3-1.1 模擬結果與分析 23 3-2. 模擬高維度總體經濟預測誤差 25 3-2.1 預測誤差分析與 RMSFE 結果 27 第四章 實證分析 34 4-1. 變數定態化與資料前處理 34 4-1.1 基準與競爭模型介紹 35 第五章 實證結果 42 5-1. 預測機制與 OCMT 檢定門檻參數測試 42 5-1.1 預測變數之結構性轉變與 BMA 之必要性 43 5-1.2 OCMT 門檻敏感性分析 47 5-1.3 關鍵變數 PIP 之參數敏感性分析 48 5-2. 貝氏模型平均 (BMA) 與先驗設定 50 5-2.1 模型先驗:均勻模型先驗 (Uniform Model Prior) 53 5-2.2 參數先驗:單位資訊先驗 (Unit Information Prior, UIP) 53 5-3. 關鍵預測變數之演變與後驗包含機率 (PIP) 54 5-3.1 GDP 成長率之關鍵預測變數與動態特徵 54 5-3.2 CPI 通膨變動率之關鍵預測變數與動態特徵 57 5-4. OCMT 初步篩選與 BMA 後驗重要性之對比分析 59 5-4.1 GDP 成長率:OCMT 選取頻率與 BMA 後驗機率之比較 60 5-4.2 CPI 通膨變動率:OCMT 選取頻率與 BMA 後驗機率之比較 60 5-4.3 兩階段變數篩選結果總結 61 5-5. 樣本外預測績效評估 (Out-of-sample Forecast Evaluation) 65 5-5.1 樣本外預測績效比較結果與分析 66 5-5.2 Diebold-Mariano 檢定 68 5-6. 先驗穩健性檢定 (Prior Robustness Check) 69 5-6.1 不同先驗下的 PIP 穩健性分析 72 第六章 結論 78 第七章 附錄 80 7-1. 完整實證資料 80 7-2. 核心預測目標變數之轉換 81 7-3. 實證資料與變數轉換說明 (Data Appendix) 81 7-4. BMA 的 M-closed 假設與 OCMT 理論連結 89 參考文獻 93

    [1] Alexandre Belloni, Victor Chernozhukov, and Christian Hansen. High-dimensional methods and inference on structural and treatment effects. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28(2):29–50, 2014.
    [2] José M. Bernardo and Adrian F. M. Smith. Bayesian Theory. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, 1994.
    [3] Patrick Breheny and Jian Huang. Coordinate descent algorithms for nonconvex penalized regression, with applications to biological feature selection. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 5(1):232–253, 2011.
    [4] Alexander Chudik, George Kapetanios, and M. Hashem Pesaran. A one covariate at a time, multiple testing approach to variable selection in high-dimensional linear regression models. Econometrica, 86(4):1479–1512, 2018.
    [5] David Draper. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1):45–70, 1995.
    [6] Carmen Fernández, Eduardo Ley, and Mark F. J. Steel. Benchmark priors for bayesian model averaging. Journal of Econometrics, 100(2):381–427, 2001.
    [7] Peter L. Flom and David L. Cassell. Stopping stepwise: Why stepwise and similar selection methods are bad, and what you should use. In NorthEast SAS Users Group Inc 20th Annual Conference, pages 1–5, 2007.
    [8] Frank E. Harrell. Regression Modeling Strategies: With Applications to Linear Models, Logistic Regression, and Survival Analysis. Springer, 2001.
    [9] James S. Hodges. Uncertainty, policy analysis and statistics. Statistical Science, 2(3):259–275, 1987.
    [10] Jian Huang, Shuangge Ma, and Cun-Hui Zhang. Adaptive lasso for sparse high-dimensional regression models. Statistica Sinica, 18(4):1603–1618, 2008.
    [11] Robert E. Kass and Larry Wasserman. A reference bayesian test for nested hypotheses and its relationship to the schwarz criterion. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90(431):928–934, 1995.
    [12] Gary Koop and Simon M. Potter. Forecasting in dynamic factor models using bayesian model averaging. The Econometrics Journal, 7(2):550–565, 2004.
    [13] Edward E. Leamer. Housing is the business cycle. In Proceedings - Economic Policy Symposium - Jackson Hole, pages 149–233. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 2007.
    [14] Eduardo Ley and Mark F. J. Steel. On the effect of prior assumptions in bayesian model averaging with applications to growth regression. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 24(4):651–674, 2009.
    [15] Feng Liang, Rui Paulo, German Molina, Merlise A. Clyde, and Jim O. Berger. Mixtures of g priors for bayesian variable selection. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 103(481):110–123, 2008.
    [16] Serena Ng and Jonathan H. Wright. Facts and challenges from the great recession for forecasting and macroeconomic modeling. Journal of Economic Literature, 51(4):1120–1154, 2013.
    [17] Mark F. J. Steel. Model averaging and its use in economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 58(3):644–719, 2020.
    [18] James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson. Forecasting inflation. Journal of Monetary Economics, 44(2):293–335, 1999.
    [19] James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson. Macroeconomic forecasting using diffusion indexes. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 20(2):147–162, 2002.
    [20] James H Stock and Mark W Watson. Has the business cycle changed and why? NBER Macroeconomics Annual, 17:159–218, 2003.
    [21] James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson. Why has u.s. inflation become harder to forecast? Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 39(s1):3–33, 2007.
    [22] James H. Stock and Mark W. Watson. Generalized shrinkage methods for forecasting using many predictors. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 30(4):481–493, 2012.
    [23] Robert Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 58(1):267–288, 1996.
    [24] Jonathan H. Wright. Forecasting US inflation by bayesian model averaging. Journal of Forecasting, 28(2):131–144, 2009.
    [25] Arnold Zellner. On assessing prior distributions and bayesian regression analysis with g-prior distributions. In Bayesian Inference and Decision Techniques: Essays in Honor of Bruno de Finetti, pages 233–243. Elsevier, 1986.
    [26] Peng Zhao and Bin Yu. On model selection consistency of lasso. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 7:2541–2563, 2006.
    [27] Hui Zou. The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(476):1418–1429, 2006.
    [28] Hui Zou and Trevor Hastie. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 67(2):301–320, 2005.

    QR CODE