簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 鍾易達
Chung, Yi-Da
論文名稱: 應用空氣噴入技術移除煉焦爐內壁積碳之數值研究與參數分析
Numerical Study and Parametric Analysis of Removing Carbon Deposits Process via Air Injection Technique in Coke Oven
指導教授: 張克勤
Chang, Keh-Chin
學位類別: 博士
Doctor
系所名稱: 工學院 - 航空太空工程學系
Department of Aeronautics & Astronautics
論文出版年: 2026
畢業學年度: 114
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 155
中文關鍵詞: 煉焦爐積碳移除空氣噴入技術熱氣動脈動循環紊流反應流
外文關鍵詞: coke oven, removal of carbon deposits, air-injection technique, thermo-aeraulic pulsatile cycle, turbulent reacting flow
相關次數: 點閱:5下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 工業煉焦爐耐火磚牆上積碳(carbon deposits)的持續累積,是冶金工程中一項關鍵的營運問題。雖然在煉焦爐內導入空氣噴入技術為一實用的積碳移除策略,但爐內的高溫環境(1000 - 1100 °C)對於直接進行原位(in-situ)量測的可行性頗具難度,導致將此移除技術應用於實際煉焦爐操作時,往往僅能仰賴試誤法(trial-and-error)。為突破此限制,本研究旨在開發一個暫態、三維的計算模型,以模擬煉焦爐內紊流狀態下的積碳燃燒消除過程。
    本模型透過結合 SST k-ω 紊流模型與雙膜反應模型(two-film reaction model),解決了此高度耦合的物理問題。為了精確捕捉紊流與化學反應之交互作用,模型中導入了預設 β 形狀機率密度函數(presumed β-PDF)方法。經由實驗室尺度的熱重分析數據(thermo-gravimetric data; TG data)進行驗證後,本研究進一步擴展計算尺度,模擬中國鋼鐵公司(China Steel Corporation, CSC)的全尺寸工業煉焦爐膛。
    模擬結果揭示,在通風受限(欠氧)的煉焦爐環境中持續噴入空氣,並不會產生穩態流場;相反地,它會觸發一種自我維持的熱氣動脈動循環(thermo-aeraulic pulsatile cycle),此現象在宏觀上呈現出「呼吸狀」(breathing-like)特徵。本研究進一步進行了基於循環特性的參數分析,評估噴槍插入深度、裝煤孔位置選擇以及空氣噴注流量對積碳移除效率的影響。
    研究發現,高效率的積碳移除主要取決於如何有效利用誘發的自然通風(natural draft)效應,而非僅僅增加主動噴入空氣的流速。此外,研究發現在極端的高噴注率下會產生噴流「僵化效應」(stiffening effect),這將破壞爐膛從裝煤孔被動卷吸空氣的能力,進而導致整體的積碳清除效能下降。本研究建構之理論模型與數值方法,成功為實際煉焦爐操作中的空氣噴入進行除碳(decarbonization)過程,建立了一個嚴謹且基於物理機制的基礎。

    Progressive accumulation of pyrolytic carbon deposits on the refractory walls of industrial coke ovens presents a critical operational problem in metallurgical engineering. While the implementation of air injection in the coke oven is a practical removal strategy, the severe thermal environment (1000 – 1100 °C) precludes direct in-situ measurement within coke oven, resulting in a way that the trial-and-error approach must be employed for applying this removal technique to a practical coke oven. To bypass this restriction, the study aims at developing a transient, three-dimensional computation model to simulate the turbulent carbon-deposit burning-off process in a coke oven.
    The model resolves the highly coupled physical problem by integrating the SST k-ω turbulence model with a two-film reaction model. To accurately capture the turbulence-chemistry interactions, a presumed β-shape probability density function (PDF) approach is employed in the modeling. Following a validation against the laboratory-scale thermogravimetric data, the study is upscaled to simulate a full-scale industrial coke oven chamber in China Steel Corporation. The simulations reveal the fact that the continuous injection of air in the coke oven with under-ventilated environment does not produce a steady-state flow field. Instead, it triggers a self-sustaining thermo-aeraulic pulsatile cycle which is observed as “breathing-like” phenomenon. A cycle-based parametric study is conducted to evaluate the influences on removal efficiency in terms of the blowing lance insertion depth, charging-hole selection for inserting, and air injection rates.
    The findings show that efficient carbon removal is governed primarily by exploiting the induced natural draft rather than merely increasing the active air-injection flow rate velocity. Furthermore, the study identifies a stiffening effect at extreme injection rates, which disrupts the chamber's passively entraining capability from the charging holes and consequently degrades overall cleaning performance for deposited carbon. This research study develops a theoretical modeling and numerical approach enabling establish a rigorous, physics-driven basis on the decarbonization process via air injection technique for the practical operation of coke oven.

    博士論文合格證明書 中文摘要 i 第一章:緒論 ii 第二章:物理模型與數學推導 iii 第三章:數值方法與計算架構 iv 第四章:模型驗證 v 第五章:結果與討論 vi 第六章:結論與未來展望 vii ABSTRACT viii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix TABLE OF CONTENTS xi LIST OF TABLES xiv LIST OF FIGURES xv NOMENCLATURE xix CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Literature Survey 3 1.1.1 Industrial relevance 4 1.1.2 Formation and properties of carbon deposits 5 1.1.3 Removing methods for carbon deposits 8 1.1.4 Chemical kinetics of the combustion for carbon deposits 10 1.1.5 Interaction between turbulence and chemistry 12 1.1.6 Review of industrial patents for removing carbon deposits by air injection technique 13 1.1.7 Thermo-aeraulic oscillatory behaviors in confined enclosures 16 1.2 Motivation and Objectives 19 CHAPTER 2 PHYSICAL MODELLING AND MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION 22 2.1 Governing Equations 22 2.2 Constitutive Relations 23 2.2.1 Ideal gas law 23 2.2.2 Viscous stress tensor 24 2.2.3 Diffusion flux 24 2.2.4 Chemical reaction rate 26 2.2.5 Energy flux representation and caloric equation of state 28 2.3 Gas-phase Mixture and TCI Modelling 29 2.4 Turbulent Model 31 2.4.1 Favre averaging 31 2.4.2 RANS turbulent modeling 33 2.4.3 Generalized form of governing equation 38 2.4.4 Reaction-diffusion balance of wall surface reactions 39 2.5 Quantities of Carbon Deposits Removal and Air Injection Rates 41 2.6 Preliminary Near-wall Assessment 43 CHAPTER 3 NUMERICAL ASPECTS 45 3.1 Specification of the Simulated Problem and Numerical Framework 45 3.2 Sub-Grid Mixing and UDF Framework 50 3.3 Numerical Schemes and Solution Algorithm 54 3.4 Grid Independent Test 54 3.5 Convergence Criteria and Under-relaxation 55 3.6 Boundary and Initial conditions 56 CHAPTER 4 MODEL VALIDATION 62 4.1 TG Tube Configuration 63 4.2 Modeling Aspects of TG Test 66 4.2.1 Model 1: two-film model and β shape-PDF 66 4.2.2 Model 2: one-film model 67 4.2.3 Model 3: two-film model and EDM 68 4.3 Numerical Aspects of TG Test 70 CHAPTER 5 RESULTS & DISCUSSIONS 81 5.1 Carbon Removal Process with Air Injection in Coke Oven 81 5.1.1 Upscaled physical considerations 81 5.1.2 Pulsatile phenomena and cycle-based analysis of performance 85 5.2 Parametric Study 98 5.2.1 Effect of insertion depth of the air lance in the chamber 98 5.2.2 Effect of charging hole selection for inserting air lance in the chamber 103 5.2.3 Effect of air injection flow rate on the carbon-deposit removal process 103 CHAPTER 6 CONCLUSIONS 107 6.1 Summary of Study 107 6.2 Recommendations for Future Work 109 REFERENCES 110 Appendix A Derivation of the Radiative Wall Boundary Condition for the P-1 Radiation Model 117 Appendix B Derivation of the Favre-Averaged Formulation of the Mixture Fraction (f) and Variance (g) 120 Appendix C Supplementary Details on Computational Mesh and Grid Convergence 125

    [1] Hang, J. G., Chang, K. C., Hsu, U. K., & Wang, D. H. (2015). Feasibility study of burning-off carbon deposits in coke oven by means of air injection process. Journal of the Chinese Society of Mechanical Engineers, 36(3), 233–240. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283425528_Feasibility_Study_of_Burning-Off_Carbon_Deposits_in_Coke_Oven_by_Means_of_Air_Injection_Process
    [2] Wang, H., Jin, B., Wang, X., & Tang, G. (2019). Formation and evolution mechanism for carbonaceous deposits on the surface of a coking chamber. Processes, 7(8), Article 508. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr7080508
    [3] Shi, R., Li, H. J., Yang, Z., & Kang, M. K. (1997). Deposition mechanism of pyrolytic carbons at temperature between 800–1200 °C. Carbon, 35, 1789–1792. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-6223(97)00140-1
    [4] Sugiura, M., Nakagawa, T., Arima, T., Kato, K., Sakaida, M., Morizane, Y., Sano, A., & Irie, K. (2013). Quantitative influence of coke oven wall irregularity on pushing force. ISIJ International, 53(4), 583–589. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.53.583
    [5] Yuan, Y., Rong, T., Yu, H., Guo, H., Gao, Y., Wang, J., Xue, Q., & Zuo, H. (2024). Investigation on formation and combustion process of carbon deposits from coke oven riser during waste heat recovery. Fuel, 373, Article 132311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2024.132311
    [6] Nakagawa, K., Kato, K., & Naito, T. (2006). Growth rate of carbon deposit by pyrolysis reaction of carbonization gas. Proceedings of the International Congress on the Science and Technology of Ironmaking, 406–409. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242736865_Carbon_Deposition_Mechanism_in_Coke_Oven_Chamber_Influence_of_Fine_Particles_on_Formation_Rate_of_Carbon_Deposits
    [7] Nakagawa T, Kudo T, Kamada Y, & Suzuki T. (2002). Control of carbon deposition in the free space of coke oven chamber by injecting atomized water. Tetsu-to-Hagané, 88(7), 386-392. (in Japanese). https://doi.org/10.2355/tetsutohagane1955.88.7_386
    [8] Zymla, V., & Honnart, F. (2007). Coke oven carbon deposits growth and their burning off. ISIJ International, 47(10), 1422–1431. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.47.1422
    [9] Abe, Y., & Sugiura, M. (2022). Behavior of carbon adhesion on aged coking-chamber walls to pushing load. ISIJ International, 62(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2021-057
    [10] Turn, S. R. (2012). An introduction to combustion: Concepts and applications (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
    [11] Wang, D. H., Chuang, Y. W., & Tsai, C. H. (2017). The simulation of burning-off the deposited carbon in a coke oven. China Steel Technical Report, 30, 12–19. https://www.csc.com.tw/csc/ts/ena/pdf/no30/pages/3-The%20Simulation%20of%20Burning-off%20the%20Deposited%20Carbon%20in%20a%20Coke%20Oven.pdf
    [12] Smoot, L. D., & Smith P. J. (1985). Gasification of Coal in Practical Flames. Coal Combustion and Gasification. 1st ed. Springer Science and Business Media LLC. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-9721-3_6
    [13] Libby, P. A., & Blake, T. R. (1981). Burning carbon particles in the presence of water vapor. Combust Flame, 41, 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(81)90047-X
    [14] Hla, S. S., Harris, D. J., & Roberts, D. G. (2005, October). A coal conversion model for interpretation and application of gasification reactivity data. International Conference on Coal Science and Technology. Okinawa, Japan.
    [15] Gu, M., Chen, G., Zhang, M., Huang, D., Chaubal, P., & Zhou, C. Q. (2010). Three-dimensional simulation of the pulverized coal combustion inside blast furnace tuyere. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 34(11), 3536-3546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.004
    [16] Yi F., Fan J., Ki D., Lu S., & Luo K. (2011). Three-dimensional time-dependent numerical simulation of a quiescent carbon combustion in air, Fuel, 90 (4),1522–1528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.10.051
    [17] Magnussen, B. F., & Hjertager, B. H. (1977). On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion. Symposium (International) on Combustion, 16(1), 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80366-4
    [18] Pope, S. B. (1985). PDF methods for turbulent reacting flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 11(2), 119–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(85)90002-4
    [19] Stöllinger, M., Naud, B., Roekaerts, D., Beishuizen, N., & Heinz, S. (2013). PDF modeling and simulations of pulverized coal combustion – Part 1: Theory and modeling. Combustion and Flame, 160(2), 384–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2012.10.010
    [20] Zhao, X. Y., & Haworth, D. C. (2014). Transported PDF modeling of pulverized coal jet flames. Combustion and Flame, 161(7), 1866–1882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2013.12.024
    [21] Poinsot, T., & Veynante, D. (2012). Theoretical and numerical combustion (3rd ed.). CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
    [22] Takahashi, T., Uchida, T., & Matsuda, K. (1996). Clearing apparatus for deposited carbon in carbonizing chamber of coke oven (Japan Patent No. JP2561787B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/012436951/publication/JP2561787B2?q=JP2561787B2
    [23] Ota, Y., Okanishi, K., & Kikuchi, A. (2002). Removal of carbon attached to space part at top of furnace of carbonizing chamber of coke oven (Japan Patent No. JP3247288B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/018332128/publication/JP3247288B2?q=JP3247288B2
    [24] Suzuki, K., Nakamura, O., & Shinohara, K. (2011). Lance for burning to remove carbon in carbonizing chamber of coke oven (Japan Patent No. JP4760388B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/038341962/publication/JP4760388B2?q=JP4760388B2
    [25] Wang, D. H., & Wu, Y. L. (2022). Method for burning-off deposited carbon inside coke oven (Taiwan Patent No. TWI762408B). Taiwan Intellectual Property Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/082198819/publication/TWI762408B?q=TWI762408B
    [26] Nakamura, T. (2018). Method of burning removal of deposit carbon in carbonization chamber of coke oven (Japan Patent No. JP6278185B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/054254457/publication/JP6278185B2?q=JP6278185B2
    [27] Yoshimori, Y., Yatsugayo, K., Takeo, S., & Ikemoto, S. (2024). Deposit carbon removal method in coke oven carbonization chamber (Japan Patent No. JP2024016577A). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/089806291/publication/JP2024016577A?q=JP2024016577A
    [28] Umeda, K. (2020). Method of removing adhered carbon on furnace wall of coking chamber during operation of coke oven (Japan Patent No. JP6769225B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/061909737/publication/JP6769225B2?q=JP%206769225B2
    [29] Oishi, H., & Ishioka, M. (2011). Method for removing adhered carbon in carbonization chamber of coke oven (Japan Patent No. JP4736400B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/036719596/publication/JP4736400B2?q=JP4736400B2
    [30] Fukazawa, Y., Koga, M., Tsutsumi, T., Ito, K., & Sakai, K. (2011). Method for incinerating carbon attached to coke oven carbonization chamber (Japan Patent No. JP4676875B2). Japan Patent Office. https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/038296518/publication/JP4676875B2?q=%2C%20JP4676875B2%2C
    [31] Kawagoe, K. (1958). Fire behavior in rooms (Report No. 27). Building Research Institute, Ministry of Construction.
    [32] Takeda, H. (1985). Oscillatory phenomenon in compartment fires. Combustion and Flame, 61(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(85)90076-8
    [33] Kim, K. I., Ohtani, H., & Uehara, Y. (1993). Experimental study on oscillating behaviour in a small-scale compartment fire. Fire Safety Journal, 20(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(93)90056-V
    [34] Acherar, L., Wang, H. Y., Garo, J. P., & Coudour, B. (2020). Impact of air intake position on fire dynamics in mechanically ventilated compartment. Fire Safety Journal, 118, Article 103210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2020.103210
    [35] Prétrel, H., Suard, S., & Audouin, L. (2016). Experimental and numerical study of low frequency oscillatory behaviour of a large-scale hydrocarbon pool fire in a mechanically ventilated compartment. Fire Safety Journal, 83, 38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.04.001
    [36] Prétrel, H., Kondorkuzhi, B., Savino, A., & Suard, S. (2026). Oscillatory combustion phenomenon in mechanically ventilated enclosure with propane gas fire. Fire Safety Journal, 161, Article 104653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2026.104653
    [37] Merk, H. J. (1958). The macroscopic equations for simultaneous heat and mass transfer in isotropic, continuous and closed systems. Applied Scientific Research, 8, 73–99.
    [38] Hirschfelder, J. O., Curtiss, C. F., & Bird, R. B. (1954). Molecular theory of gases and liquids. John Wiley & Sons.
    [39] McGee, H. A. (1991). Molecular engineering. McGraw-Hill.
    [40] Howell, J. R., Siegel, R., & Mengüç, M. P. (2011). Thermal radiation heat transfer (5th ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439894552
    [41] Smith, T. F., Shen, Z. F., & Friedman, J. N. (1982). Evaluation of coefficients for the weighted sum of gray gases model. Journal of Heat Transfer, 104(4), 602–608. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3245174
    [42] ANSYS Inc. (2024). ANSYS Fluent user's guide, release 2024 R2. ANSYS Inc.
    [43] Jones, W. P., & Whitelaw, J. H. (1982). Calculation methods for reacting turbulent flows: A review. Combustion and Flame, 48, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(82)90112-2
    [44] Soong, H. S., & Chang, K. C. (1992). Examination of interactions between turbulence and combustion in diffuse flame. International Journal of Turbo and Jet-Engines, 9(3), 227–238.
    [45] Haworth, D. C. (2010). Progress in probability density function methods for turbulent reacting flows. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 36(2–3), 168–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2009.09.003
    [46] Menter, F. R. (1994). Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA Journal, 32(8), 1598–1605. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.12149
    [47] Hinze, J. O. (1975). Turbulence. McGraw-Hill.
    [48] Menter, F. R., Kuntz, M., & Langtry, R. (2003). Ten years of industrial experience with the SST turbulence model. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Turbulence, Heat and Mass Transfer, 625–632. Begell House, Inc.
    [49] Jongen, T. (1995). Simulation and modelling of turbulent incompressible flows (phD thesis).
    [50] Shih T. H., Liou W. W., Shabbir A., Yang Z., & Zhu J. (1995). A new k-ε eddy-viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows – model development and validation. Computer Fluids, 23(3), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-7930(94)00032-T.
    [51] Chung, Y. D., & Chang, K. C. (2024). Aspects on numerical modeling of the burning-off process for the removal of deposited carbon in a coke-oven chamber. Journal of Aeronautics, Astronautics and Aviation, 56(4), 857–878. https://doi.org/10.6125/JoAAA.202409_56(4).07
    [52] Gentry, R. A., Martin, R. E., & Daly, B. J. (1966). An Eulerian differencing method for unsteady compressible flow problems. Journal of Computational Physics, 1(1), 87–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(66)90014-3
    [53] Tannehill, J. C., Anderson, D. A., & Pletcher, R. H. (1997). Computational fluid mechanics and heat transfer (2nd ed.). Taylor & Francis.
    [54] Metais, B., & Eckert, E. R. G. (1964). Forced, mixed, and free convection regimes. Journal of Heat Transfer, 86(2), 295–296. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.3687128
    [55] Mianowski, A., Bigda, R., & Zymla, V. (2006). Study on kinetics of combustion of brick-shaped carbonaceous materials. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 84(3), 563–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-005-6973-4
    [56] Uebo, K., Chikata, T., & Yoshida, S. (2002). Carbon deposition on coke oven chamber and its control technologies. CAMP-ISIJ, 15(2), 69.
    [57] Sugiura, M., Sakaida, M., Fujikake, Y., & Irie, K. (2011). Damage diagnosis for high temperature coke-oven chamber walls. Transactions of the Society of Instrument and Control Engineers, 47(10), 435–441. (In Japanese) https://doi.org/10.9746/sicetr.47.435
    [A-1] Marshak, R. E. (1947). Note on the spherical harmonics methods as applied to the Milne problem for a sphere. Physical Review, 71, 443–446. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.71.443
    [A-2] Liu, F., Swithenbank, J., & Garbett, E. S. (1992). The boundary condition of the PN-approximation used to solve the radiative transfer equation. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 35(8), 2043–2052. https://doi.org/10.1016/0017-9310(92)90205-7
    [A-3] American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2009). Standard for verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics and heat transfer (ASME V&V 20-2009).
    [A-4] Tanaka, M. (2014). Investigation of V&V process for thermal fatigue issue in a sodium cooled fast reactor–Application of uncertainty quantification scheme in verification and validation with fluid-structure thermal interaction problem in T-junction piping system. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 279, 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2014.03.006

    QR CODE