簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 高鈺倫
Kao, Yu-Lun
論文名稱: 員工認股酬勞在面額法與公平價值法下對公司績效的影響
Influence of Stock Compensation on Firm's Performance:Statement Presentation of Par value and Fair Value
指導教授: 林軒竹
Lin, Hsuan-Chu
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 財務金融研究所
Graduate Institute of Finance
論文出版年: 2010
畢業學年度: 98
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 46
中文關鍵詞: SFAS 123意見書員工認股選擇權限制性股票公平價值法面額法EPS財務績效
外文關鍵詞: SFAS 123R, stock option, restricted stock, fair value method, par value, EPS, financial performance
相關次數: 點閱:146下載:0
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 美國於2004年12月,為了改善財務報導並且與國際會計準則IFRS第2號share-based payment接軌,再發佈SFAS 123意見書之修正版SFAS 123R,規定員工認股選擇權之會計處理,應採公平價值法,不允許再採用內含價值法,並且應將此費用認列於當期損益中。然而,在公平價值法下,股價因為容易遭受到企業生命週期、政治現況、管理者行為、以及總體因素影響,導致當利用員工認股酬勞來衡量公司財務績效時,以股票的市價為計價基準會比面額計價,較無法解釋公司的財務績效。本篇研究以員工認股權和限制性股票為研究標的,分別探討在公平價值法下及面額法下,員工認股酬勞對公司財務績效的影響。
    根據實證結果,公司成長性、規模、固定資產週轉率都顯著的與EPS存在正向關係;負債比率則與EPS存在顯著負向關係。員工認股酬勞若以股票面額為計價基準,將使EPS顯著上升0.68%;然而,若以市價為計價基準,其結果雖使EPS上升0.16%但該控制變數卻不顯著。員工認股酬勞若以股票面額為計價基準,將使得模型有60.5%的解釋能力,與市價計價的60.2%.相差不大。因此可以說明,利用以公平價值計價的員工酬勞來衡量公司財務績效並不會產生偏差。

    The FASB has converged SFAS 123R with IFRS No.2, which simultaneously defines that the value of stock compensation is an expense under fair value method that must be recognized in the current statement of operations. However, under the fair value method, volatility of the market value of stock is easily subjected to the business cycle, political condition, managerial behavior, and macroeconomic factors, which results in a poor explanatory index than par value method. This paper limits the research target to stock option and restricted stock as incentive vehicles only, and investigates separately influence of stock compensation on firm's financial performance under par value and fair value.
    According to the empirical results, growth, firm size, and fixed asset turnover are all significant and positively correlated with EPS; debt ratio is significant and negatively correlated with EPS. Stock compensation presented in par value is significant in t value and increases EPS by 0.68% while stock compensation presented in fair value isn’t. Stock compensation presented in par value of 60.5% R-square seems that there’s no better explanation on the firm’s financial performance than that in fair value of 60.2%. Therefore, using fair value method doesn’t deviate the influence of stock compensation on firm's financial performance.

    CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 ACCOUNTING BACKGROUND 2 1.1.1 Stock option 2 1.1.2 Accounting of Restricted Stocks 3 1.1.3 Comparison to stock option 4 1.2 RESEARCH TARGET 5 1.3 MOTIVATION 5 CHAPTER 2. LITERATURE REVIEW 8 2.1 INDEPENDENT VARIABLE 8 2.1.1 The Firm Growth Effect 8 2.1.2 The Size Effect 9 2.1.3 The Financing Policy 10 2.1.4 The efficiency of operating asset 11 2.1.5 Employee stock compensation 13 2.2 DEPENDENT VARIABLE 16 2.2.1 Measurement of financial performance 16 CHAPTER 3. METHODOLOGY 18 3.1 DATA SELECTION 18 3.2 MODEL DESIGN AND STATISTIC PROCEDURE 18 3.2.1 Model design 18 3.2.2 Statistic Methods 21 3.2.3 Statistic Procedure 25 CHAPTER 4. EMPIRICAL RESULT 27 4.1 DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS 27 4.2 MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS 28 4.2.1 Compared empirical results with Lin (2004) 28 4.2.2 Influence of stock compensation on firm’s financial performance 30 4.2.3 Explanatory power of stock compensation under fair value and par value 31 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION 32 REFERENCE 33

    Aboody, D. (1996). "Market valuation of employee stock options." Journal of Accounting & Economics 22(1-3): 357-391.
    Aboody, D., M. E. Barth, Kasznik, R. (2004). "SFAS No. 123 stock-based compensation expense and equity market values." Accounting Review 79(2): 251-275.
    Bell, T. B., W. R. Landsman, Miller, B. L., Yeh, S. (2002). "The valuation implications of employee stock option accounting for profitable computer software firms." Accounting Review 77(4): 971-996.
    Black, F., and M. Scholes. (1973). "The pricing of options and corporate liabilities." The Journal of Political Economy 81: 637-654.
    Board, A. P. (1972). "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. ." APB Opinion 25.
    Botosan, C. A. and M. A. Plumlee (2001). "Stock Option Expense: The Sword of Damocles Revealed." Accounting Horizons 15(4): 311-327.
    Campello, M. (2006). "Debt financing: Does it boost or hurt firm performance in product markets?" Journal of Financial Economics 82(1): 135-172.
    Cheng Hsiao. (1996). "Analysis of Panel Data, 2nd edition." Cambridge University Press.
    Conte, M. A. (1992). "Contingent Compensation: (How) Does It Affect Company Performance?" Journal of Economic Issues (Association for Evolutionary Economics) 26(2): 583.
    Cui, H. and Y. T. Mak (2002). "The relationship between managerial ownership and firm performance in high R&D firms." Journal of Corporate Finance 8(4): 313-336.
    Fairfield, P. M. and T. Yohn (2001). "Using Asset Turnover and Profit Margin to Forecast Changes in Profitability." Review of Accounting Studies 6(4): 371-385.
    Fama, E. F. and K. R. French (1995). "Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns." Journal of Finance 50(1): 131-155.
    Feltham, G. A. and J. A. Ohlson (1995). "Valuation and Clean Surplus Accounting for Operating and Financial Activities." Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 689-731.
    Frank H. Wagner, Mark J. Kazmierowski. (2006). "High-Technology Equity Programs:Powerful Forces for Change" WorldatWork Journal.
    Gerstner, L. V. (2003). "Who says elephants can't dance?:inside IBM's historic turnaround." Harperaudio.
    Gupta, M. C. (1969). "The Effect of Size, Growth, and Industry on the Financial Structure of Manufacturing Companies." The Journal of Finance 24(3): 517-529.
    Jensen, M. C. (1986). "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate-Finance, and Takeovers." American Economic Review 76(2): 323-329.
    Keating, E. K., T. Z. Lys, Magee, Robert P. (2003). "Internet downturn: finding valuation factors in Spring 2000." Journal of Accounting and Economics 34(1-3): 189-236.
    Kim, S. (1998). "Does profit sharing increase firms' profits?" Journal of Labor Research 19(2): 351-370.
    Marie Brinkman, VP. (2007). "Curtailing Turnover in Asia Leveraging Incentive Plans for Retention" Radford International Survey.
    Miller, J. C. and B. Pras (1980). "The Effects of Multinational and Export Diversification on the Profit Stability of U.S. Corporations." Southern Economic Journal 46(3): 792.
    Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf (1984). "Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have." Journal of Financial Economics 13(2): 187-221.
    Ohlson, J. A. (1995). "Earnings, Book Values, and Dividends in Equity Valuation." Contemporary Accounting Research 11(2): 661-687.
    Park, S. and M. H. Song (1995). "Employee stock ownership plans, firm performance, and monitoring by outside blockholders." Financial Management 24(4): 52-65.
    Pugh, W. N., S. L. Oswald, Jahera Jr, John S. (2000). "The Effect of ESOP Adoptions on Corporate Performance: Are there Really Performance Changes?" Managerial & Decision Economics 21(5): 167-180.
    Robinson, D. and D. Burton (2004). "Discretion in Financial Reporting: The Voluntary Adoption of Fair Value Accounting for Employee Stock Options." Accounting Horizons 18(2): 97-108.
    Skinner, D. J. (1996). "Are disclosures about bank derivatives and employee stock options' value-relevant?" Journal of Accounting & Economics 22(1-3): 393-405.
    Subramanyam, K. R. and J. J. Wild (2009). "Financial Statement Analysis, 10th edition." McGraw-Hill, NY.
    林有志, 黃荷分 (Yu-Chih Lin, Ho-Fen Huang, 2004). "員工分紅費用化與財務績效之衡量." 績效與策略研究 1卷(1期): 47-64.
    陳妙玲 (Miao-Ling Chen, 2003). "員工分紅配股評價對每股盈餘之影響." 會計研究月刊 207: 132-136.
    葛冠琳 (Kuan-Lin Ko, 2006). "美國限制性股票之研究." 國立成功大學法律學系未出版碩士論文.
    簡依萍 (Yi-Ping Chien, 2009). "員工分紅費用化對公司績效影響之研究." 國立臺北大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文.

    無法下載圖示 校內:2020-12-31公開
    校外:不公開
    電子論文尚未授權公開,紙本請查館藏目錄
    QR CODE