| 研究生: |
胡紹華 Hu, Shao-Hua |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
電路板業之含重金屬污泥資源化處理之研究 A Study of Resource Recovery from Metal-Contaminated Sludge produced in the manufacturing Procedure of Printed Circuit Board |
| 指導教授: |
蔡敏行
Tsai, Ming-Shing 顏富士 Yen, Fu-Su |
| 學位類別: |
博士 Doctor |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 資源工程學系 Department of Resources Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2007 |
| 畢業學年度: | 95 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 170 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 電路板 、含重金屬污泥 、濕式氧化 、資源化 、鹼浸漬 、鐵氧磁體化 、選擇性浸漬 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | selective leaching process, alkaline leaching process, ferrite process, resource recovery, metal-contaminated sludge, wet oxidation, printed circuit board |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:112 下載:5 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
電路板業在製程中會排放含有金屬離子之廢水至廢水處理系統,並以化學混凝技術將金屬離子中和沉澱及混凝濃縮,最後將濃泥經過壓濾即形成本研究所稱之「含重金屬污泥」。該污泥是以水合膠羽物型態存在,容易在酸性環境下被溶解而造成環境危害。根據事業廢棄物管制中心之重金屬污泥統計量發現,90-94年度之發生量約介於23至36萬噸/年,其中又以電路板業及電鍍業產生之含重金屬污泥為主。
本研究就電路板產業生產主流(多層板)進行調查,平均污泥生產因子為1.66 kg/m2,由此推估台灣產出之電路板產業含銅污泥約31,000噸/年。另外供應銅箔給電路板產業之銅箔廠亦會產生類似之污泥,由調查資料得知銅箔廠污泥產生因子約為0.152,由2006年各廠產品數量總和可以推估銅箔廠污泥發生量約為21,000噸/年。另外根據相關研究對電鍍污泥的推估量約為94,000噸/年,因此電路板業及電鍍業每年的污泥量推估約為146,000噸/年。
由於污泥中的金屬物質屬於耗竭性資源,無法由自然界再生,且污泥之銅含量均高於銅礦之可開採品位,屬於值得開發的金屬資源。目前處理污泥資源化之理念係針對污泥中的金屬加以回收,在濕式方法上有酸溶、鹼溶將目的金屬溶出後,純化回收金屬,但是浸漬殘渣往往無法符合TCLP要求,而且過濾也遭遇到脫水問題。在乾式方法上利用大量熱能將污泥中的水分蒸發,達到減溶、減量,提高金屬含量供為冶煉原料,但是也衍生煙塵問題。
由於含重金屬污泥係由廢水中和混凝沉澱所產生,形成高含水率的水合膠羽物,具有金屬種類繁多、成份複雜等特性,與天然礦物具有一定礦物組成、共生礦物固定等性質並不相同。一般無機混凝劑分為Al3+ (PAC或Al2(SO4)3)或Fe3+ (FeCl3或Fe2(SO4)3)兩個系統,污泥大致可以分類為鋁系[Al(OH)3]污泥及鐵系[Fe(OH)3]污泥。而混凝劑及後續步驟添加之高分子凝集劑均用來中和水合膠羽物表面電荷,釋放表面結合水使形成自由水,並且造成水合膠羽物互相靠近而增大粒徑,當施加機械力過濾也無法脫除內部結合水,僅能使污泥含水率下降至75%-80%左右。由於水合膠羽物顆粒微細、結晶特性不明顯、金屬成份複雜且含水率高使金屬含量偏低,無法符合冶鍊業之收料規格,若以現有之資源化技術處理將遭遇經濟效益不足、金屬產品純度不高、過濾脫水問題及浸漬殘渣安定性等問題。
由於污泥特性有異於天然礦物,須另外開發適用於污泥的處理流程,因此本研究以濕式氧化(礦化)方法,使重金屬污泥在水溶液產生礦物相變化,進行礦物性質調整使能夠適合以現有資源化處理技術予以資源化。根據研究結果發現,水溶液銅離子與[OH-]反應生成Cu4SO4(OH)6再轉變為CuO的過程會釋放出H+導致pH下降。由0.01M硫酸銅氧化實驗結果之ORP變化情形,可以了解約40~60分鐘可以生成CuO。當反應溫度提高可以促進CuO的提早生成並有良好的結晶性,且降低濾液之過濾阻抗及降低濾渣含水率。當硫酸銅溶液添加硫酸鋁,[Al]/[Cu]=0.1以上時,對氧化銅結晶相的生成會有影響,當施以加熱時,可以使氧化銅結晶特性明顯,有效改善過濾阻抗及降低含水率至70%左右。而硫酸銅溶液加入亞鐵離子使[Fe]/[Cu]=3以上進行鐵氧磁體化,可以發現鐵氧磁體與氧化銅結晶相,這也顯示可以利用鐵氧磁體與氧化銅不同礦物特性進行分選純化,且經過處理之懸浮液之過濾阻抗獲得改善,亦可將濾渣含水率下降至60%左右。一般壓濾脫水的污泥含水率大多為80%,若能改善污泥特性減少20%的含水率,也就可以使污泥體積減少50%以上。
由於Al(OH)3污泥含有大量之鋁離子,在進行濕式氧化處理的同時,利用鋁的兩性特性將鋁成份移除,而銅可以形成氧化銅留在殘渣中,並改善過濾阻抗及濾渣含水率。有關Fe(OH)3污泥中含有較多之鐵成份,由鐵氧磁體化反應條件得知,含重金屬污泥中的金屬氫氧化物與氫氧化鐵為反應所需之前驅物,若能在污泥鐵氧磁體化反應中補充適當之亞鐵離子,使金屬氫氧化物及鐵離子符合鐵氧磁體之化學計量比(MFe2O4),則可以將含重金屬污泥予以鐵氧磁體化,而銅成份則以氧化銅晶核形式存在,其餘之重金屬則進入鐵氧磁體結構達到安定化的效果,接著可以利用鐵氧磁體與氧化銅之礦物特性差異予以分離純化,其研究結果分述如下:
Al(OH)3污泥: 2N氫氧氧化鈉浸漬劑浸漬一小時後可以使污泥重量損失達20%。由Arrhenius關係求得反應活化能為9.9 KJ/mol.,顯示該反應受溶解擴散模式所影響,而污泥可溶性鋁鹽容易因為浸漬劑的作用而溶解,這可以鹼浸漬反應達15分鐘,鋁鹽的溶出量即可達54.7%至64.1%。因此除了改善污泥過濾特性,減少濾餅含水率外,並因污泥重量損失,有效達到污泥減容、減量的效果。而鹼浸漬液做為中和劑與混凝劑對模擬廢水具有良好之沉澱分離效果,若能額外添加100 ppm的PAM將能夠有效促進懸浮固粒沉降速度,在5分鐘即使固液界面下降1/2高度。
Fe(OH)3污泥: 污泥經鐵氧磁體反應後能夠生成Fe3O4、CuO、6CuO.Cu2O等礦物相,經由SEM分析發現鐵氧磁體產物係約0.2m之單體所組成之聚合體。該鐵氧磁體產物之選擇性浸漬預備實驗結果發現,當浸漬液pH介於3-4之間,能夠使大部分之氧化銅溶出。但是因為此時H+不足,導致無法使鐵氧磁體的鐵溶出而達到抑制的效果。本研究使用0.5 N硫酸做為浸漬劑,在液固比為5的條件下進行選擇性浸漬實驗,能夠將鐵氧磁體產物中的銅浸出約98%,而鐵的最大溶出量卻僅有0.91%。浸漬殘渣經TCLP試驗檢測發現均符合法規要求。
最後本研究以Al(OH)3系列含銅污泥資源化模組之鹼浸漬試驗,在加熱與曝氣條件下,可溶性鋁鹽的溶出率為87%,而固相殘渣之銅回收率為93%,造成污泥減重為1/3,使污泥達到減量效果。另外由於銅成分被濃縮在固相殘渣中,使得殘渣之乾基銅品位達46.3%,符合冶煉業之金屬品位要求。取聯合廢水處理廠之重金屬廢水以鹼浸漬液進行中和與混凝沉澱,其實驗結果發現當廢水之pH被調整至8時,放流水之金屬離子濃度均小於1 ppm。
The metal-contaminated wastewater produced in the procedure of printed circuit board (PCB) was treated by neutralization and coagulation methods, and the thickened sludge was filtered to form “metal-contaminated sludge” in this study. The sludge was composed of metal hydroxide, and it is easily extracted with acidic solution to hazard the environment. According to the estimation of Industrial Waste Control Center, the metal-contaminated sludge amount was about 230-360 thousand tons per year during the years of 92-94. The PCB and galvanic industries were the major contribution to the sludge production.
The average index of sludge production in double sides of PCB factories was 1.66 kg/m2. According to the ratio of investigated factories revenues and industry revenue in the year of 2003, the annual amount of metal-contaminated sludge was about 31,000 tons. Similarly, the index of sludge production in copper foil factory was 0.152,the conjecture production of sludge was about 21,000 tons according to the yield of copper foil in 2006. Furthermore, the amount of galvanic sludge was estimated to be 94,000 tons by other study. Therefore, the sludge amount of PCB and galvanic industries reached a total of 146.000 tons per year.
Owing to the metal resource of the sludge is an exhausted resource and that could not relive in the nature, therefore, the high grade metal-contaminated sludge is of great worth. The ideas of resource recovery are based on the metal recovery direct from sludge of today. The reagents of acid or alkali were utilized to dissolve the species of various metals and to remove the impurities to recover metal in the hydrometallurgical process, but the residue usually did not meet the standards of TCLP testing and the filtration was also a problem. Although the water content was removed by heat treatment to increase the grade of metal and could be a raw material for pyrometallurgy, but the pollution of flue dust would be derived from the process.
In general, the coagulant of Al3+ (PAC or Al2(SO4)3 or Fe3+(FeCl3 or Fe2(SO4)3) was chosen to utilize in wastewater treatment, and the hydroxide floc of high water content is formed. The various metallic ions are in the floc, and the nature is different from the natural minerals. Therefore, the types metal-contaminated sludge were classified as Al(OH)3 and Fe(OH)3. The coagulant and polymer flocculant were utilized to neutralize the surface charge of hydroxide sediment and the surface water would be released. When the surface charge of hydroxide sediment decrease, the particles would be approached each other to increase the particle size. The inner bound water can not be removed via mechanical means to result in the moisture percentage of sludge is usually 75%-80%. Owing to the sludge characteristics of small particle size, amorphous material, composition complicated and high water content is obvious, it would be not economic to recover resource direct by technologies of hydrometallurgy or pyrometallurgy and the problems of product purity, filtration velocity and residue stabilization would be happened.
Owing to the characteristics of sludge is different from natural resource, it is necessary to develop a method to suit the sludge treatment. Therefore, for improving the mineral characteristics of the sludge, the mineral characteristics of metal-contaminated sludge should be appeared and the contemporary technology is feasible for resource recovery from sludge. According to the results of wet oxidation experiments, the aeration oxidation in the alkaline solution would transform cupric into Cu4SO4(OH)6 if the concentration of [OH-] is not high. If the concentration of [OH-] is enough, the Cu4SO4(OH)6 would be transformed further into CuO. In general, the cupric would be transformed into CuO during 40-60 minutes that could refer the formation to the stable and fixed ORP value. When the temperature of the reaction was increased, the formation of CuO would be promoted and the crystalline characteristic was improved. The moisture content of solid residue was decreased to close to 60%. In general, the moisture content of sludge dehydrated by filtering was 80%. If the filtration characteristics of sludge is improved and the water content could be decreased to 60%, the volume of sludge would be decreased 50%.
When the ratio of [Al]/[Cu] was higher than 0.1, the aluminum content would interfere with the formation of CuO. If the temperature of reaction was increased, the specific filtration resistance value would be decreased and the moisture content of solid residue was also decreased to 70%. Furthermore, the ratio [Fe]/[Cu] was higher than 3 in ferrite process, the phases of ferrite and copper oxide would be found in solid residue. It indicates that the mineral characteristics of ferrite and copper oxide would be utilized to recover the valuable metal in the ferrite complex. The specific filtration resistance value would be decreased and the moisture content of solid residue was also decreased to 60%. Owing to the Al(OH)3 sludge contained great amount of aluminum content, the utilizations of amphoteric characteristic of aluminum content and aeration oxidation in this study expect that the Al3+ could be removed and the valuable material was concentrated in the residue. Another type sludge (i.e., Fe(OH)3) contained great amount of Fe3+ and hydroxide that are the precursors of ferrite process, and additional ferrous was added calculated dosage to form the ferrite. The metals except copper content of copper-contaminated sludge would be incorporated into ferrite structure, and the CuO would be formed and maintained in the ferrite complex. The different mineral characteristics of ferrite and CuO could be utilized to recover the copper from the ferrite complex. The relative results are explained as followed:
Al(OH)3 sludge: The weight loss of sludge was 20% when the sludge was leached with alkaline reagent (i.e., 2N NaOH) in one hour. The dissolution of soluble content of the sludge was easily completed in the alkaline leaching process because the activity energy was 9.9 KJ/mole. which calculated from Arrhenius plot and that was controlled by dissolution-diffusion model. The dissolution rate of alkaline leaching could be proved by the dissolution percentage was 54.7%-64.1% in 15 minutes. The reduction of water and solid content in sludge would make the sludge volume decrease greatly. The alkaline leachate was utilized to neutralize the synthetic wastewater, and the sediment settling was satisfied the operation requirement. The settling would be promoted the interface to drop to the half of beginning height in 15 minutes if the 100 ppm PAM was utilized in the suspension.
Fe(OH)3 sludge: The ferrite complex could be formed from metal-contaminated sludge in the ferrite process and the mineral patterns were Fe3O4, CuO, 6CuOCu2O. The SEM images could prove that ferrite complex was composed of many 0.2 m particles and they aggregated densely. In preliminary selective leaching process, the dissolution of CuO would be promoted and that of iron repressed when the leachate pH was controlled at 3-4. In larger scale (i.e., 40 grams ferrite complex) selective leaching process, the 0.5 N H2SO4 and the (leachant volume)/(ferrite complex weight) ratio of 5 were chosen, and the dissolution percentages of copper and iron were about 98% and 0.91% respectively. The leached residue was tested by TCLP, and requirement of regulation standards were met.
Finally, the Al(OH)3 sludge was chosen for the operation of alkaline leaching process on a pilot plant scale, the dissolution of aluminum and recovery of copper were 87% and 93% respectively. The weight loss of sludge was 24% that makes the waste reduction and the copper was concentrated in leached residue to meet the requirement of copper pyrometallurgy. The alkaline leachate was utilized to neutralize the wastewater of united wastewater treatment system, the regulation requirement of effluent would be met when the pH of wastewater was controlled to 8 and the metal concentrations of the effluent were all less 1 ppm.
1.經濟部工業局,資源化產業廠家產品名錄,p.2-p.3,2003。
2.安井 至,リサイクルの百科事典,丸善株式會社,p.345- p.348,2002。
3. W.W. Eckenfelder and C.J. Santhanam, Sludge treatment, New York,New York: Marcel Dekker, INC, 1981.
4. 楊重光,林世益,蔡幸純,有機污泥的資源化及管理,資源廢棄物回收再利用管理論文集,環保署&台北科技大學出版,p23-1-p23-30。
5.T. Mahata, B.P. Sharma, S.R. Nair and D. Parkash, Formation of aluminum titanate-mulite composite from bauxite red mud, Metallurgicaland Materials Transactions B, Vol. 31B, No. 3, p.551-p.553, 2000.
6. R. Winfried, M. Heinrich, M.P. Roland and B. Alexandra, Kieselguhr sludge from the deep bed filtration of beverages as a source for silicon in the production of calcium silicate bricks, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, Vol. 26, p.2547-p.2559 ,2006.
7.工研院能源與資源研究所,灰渣、污泥資源化之研究,行政院環保署七十九年度科技研究發展年度計畫,1990。
8.楊顯萬,邱定藩,濕法冶金,第八章:加壓濕法冶金,p.239-p.276, 1998。
9.A. Pigaga, A. Selskis, V. Pakštas, R. Butkienè and R. Juškènas, Simultaneous decontamination of two copper ligand-containing solutions by mixing and precipitation, Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 79, p.89-p.96, 2005.
10.T.W. Bober, T.J. Dagon and H.E. Fowler, Treatment of photographic processing wastes, Handbook of Industrial Waste Treatment: Volume 1, Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, 1992.
11.A.D. Andreadakis, D. Mamais, E. Gavalaki and S. Kampylafka, Sludge utilisation in agriculture: possibilities and prospects in Greece, Water Science and Technology, Vol. 46, p.231-p.238, 2002.
12.C.H. Weng, D.F. Lin and P.C. Chiang, Utilization of sludge as brick materials, Advances in Environmental Research, Vol. 7, p.679-p.685, 2003.
13.A.G. Liew, A. Idris, C.H.K. Wong, A.A. Samad, M.J.M.M. Noor, and A.M. Baki, Incorporation of sewage sludge in clay brick and its characterization, Waste Management and Research, Vol. 22, p.226-p.233, 2004.
14.E.O. Ugoji, Anaerobic digestion of palm oil mill effluent and its utilization as fertilizer for environmental protection, Renewable Energy, Vol. 10, p.291-p.294, 1997.
15.P. Sengupta, N. Saikia and P.C. Borthakur, Bricks from petroleum effluent treatment plant sludge: properties and environmental characteristics, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 128, p.1090-p.1094, 2002.
16.J.L. Shie, J.P. Lin, C.Y. Chang, D.J. Lee and C.H. Wu, Pyrolysis of oil sludge with additives of sodium and potassium compounds, Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 39, p.51-p.64, 2003.
17.王洪君,張忠智,李慶忠,堆肥法處理含油污泥研究進展,環境污染治理技術與設備,第三卷,第四期,p.86-p.89,2002。
18.P.N. Cheremisinoff, Sludge management and disposal, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1994.
19.L.P. Jackson, A.R. Rohlik and R.A. Conway, Hazardous and industrial waste management and testing: third symposium, ASTM Committee D-34 on Waste Disposal, Philadelphia, p.278- p.288, 1983.
20.C.F. Gurnham, Chapter 19: metal finishing products in industrial wastewater control, p.339-p.338, Chicago, Illinois: Department of Civil Engineering Illinois Institute of Technology, 1965.
21.陳宗鵠,黃兆龍,洪盟峰,輕質骨材混凝土對辦公建築物節約能源效用之評估,中華技術學院學報,第27期,p.424-p.438,2003。
22.林珊如,半導體業氟化鈣污泥再利用,永續產業發展,第五期,p.63-p.68,2002。
23.鈴木 胖,リサイクル工學,ェネルギ資源學會,p.201-p.282,1996。
24.http://waste.epa.gov.tw/prog/IndexFrame.asp?func=5 (2006)
25.經濟部工業局,印刷電路板業資源化應用技術手冊,p.42-p.44,2002。
26.蔡敏行,資源再生講義,國立成功大學資源工程系。
27.朱祖澤、賀家齊,現代銅冶金學,科學出版社,北京,p.586-p.588,2003。
28.B.A. Wills, Mineral Processing Technology: an introduction to the practical aspects of ore treatment and mineral recovery, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 1988.
29.P. B. Queneau and R. W. Gruber, The U.S. production of copper chemicals from secondary and by-product sources, JOM, Vol.49, No.10, p.34-p.37, 1997.
30.A. Lossin and F.J. Westhoff, The production and application of cuprous oxide and cupric hydroxide, JOM, Vol.49, No.10, p.38-p.39, 1997.
31.西山 孝,資源經濟學,中公新書,1993。
32.資源リサイクリソグ部門委員會編著,資源リサイクリソグ,資源.素材學會,日刊工業新聞社出版,p.84-p.85,1991。
33.Couillard Denis and Zhu Shucai, Bacterial leaching of heavy metals from sewage sludge for agricultural application, Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, Vol.63, No.1-2, p.67-p.80, 1992.
34.L.C. Erdincler Aralp, and T.T. Onay, Heavy metal removal from wastewater and leachate co-treatment sludge by sulfur oxidizing bacteria, Water Science and Technology, Vol.44, No.10, p.53-p.58, 2001.
35.P. Solari, A.I. Zouboulis and K.A. Matis, Removal of toxic metals by biosorption onto nonliving sewage sludge, Separation Science and Technology, Vol.31, No.8, p.1075-p.1092, 1996.
36.A.M. Bernardes, I. Bohlinger and W. Wuth, The thermal treatment of galvanic sludges for environmental compatibility, JOM, Vol.48, No.3, p.59-p.62, 1996.
37.R.N. Szente, O.W. Bender, R.A. Schroeter and M.G. Garcia, Treating electroplating residues with thermal plasmas, JOM, Vol.50, No.7, p32-p35, 1998.
38.楊致行,電鍍污泥資源化再利用技術,環保月刊,第1卷,第4期, p.160-P.166,2001。
39.經濟部工業局,印刷電路板製造業廢棄物資源化案例彙編,p.30-p.36,1996。
40.Y. Zhang, Z. K. Wang, X. Xu, Y. Q. Chen and T. Qi, Recovery of heavy metals from electroplating sludge and stainless steel pickle waste liquid by ammonia leaching method, Journal of Environmental Science, Vol.11, No.3, p.381-p.384, 1999.
41.楊維鈞,王粵,呂慶慧,以溶劑萃取法分離氨銅溶液之研究,第九屆廢棄物處理技術研討會,p.541-p.550,1994。
42.J. Jitka, S. Tatana and N. Romana, Recovery of Cu-concentrates from waste galvanic copper sludges, Hydrometallurgy, Vol. 57, p.77-p.84, 2000.
43.K. Bela, K. Laszlo, G. Istvan, E. Istvan, B. Sreedhar and L. Karoly, Study of preparation of zinc (II) ferrite and ZnO from zinc-and iron-containing industrial wastes, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, Vol.42, No. 2, p.318-p.322, 2003.
44.C.C. Wu, C. Huang and D.J. Lee, Bound water content and water bindung strength on sludge flocs, Water Research, Vol. 32, No. 3, p.900-p.904, 1998.
45.C.P. Chu and D.J. Lee, Moisture distribution in sludge: effects of polymer conditioning, Journal of Environmental Engineering, Vol. 125, No. 4, p.340-p.345, 1999.
46.X. Hu, Q. Luo and C. Wang, Investigation on the state of water in a flocculated filter cake, Separation Science and Technology, Vol. 31, No. 13, p.1877-p.1887, 1996.
47.王成財,何丁舜,俞宗欽,增溫調理對鋁鹽污泥脫水性之影響研究,萬能學報,第23期,p.293-p.306,2001。
48.J.C.S. Chang, Gypsum crystallization for limestone FGD, Chemical Engineering Progress, Vol. 82, No. 11, p.51-p.56, 1986.
49.Z. Ruixiang, Process optimization in batch crystallization of sodium fluosilicate, Crystal Research and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 3, p.243-p.247, 2005.
50.段宇君,蕭庭哲,施勵行,謝孟芳,印刷電路板業含銅污泥現況分析,第一屆重金屬污泥減量、減容及資源化關鍵技術研討會暨說明會論文集,p.1-p.10,2003。
51.http://www.taiwantrade.com.tw (2006年台灣經貿網)/TWTRADE/TC/temp/industry/electronics/index-1.htm#
52.李文瑞、陳秋宏,產業群聚與競爭優勢-我國印刷電路板業發展與競爭力之分析,1997。
53.台灣電路板協會,印刷電路板業廢棄物清理現況調查報告,2001。
54.王志方,電解銅箔產業概況,台灣工業銀行,2006。
55.周瑋珊,蕭宏蒝,施勵行,蔡敏行,從金屬礦石可開採品位的觀點談重金屬污泥資源化之潛力,礦冶,第53卷,第3期,2006。
56.趙慶祥,污泥資源化技術,化學工業出版社,北京,p.60-p.61,2002。
57.M. Pourbaix, Atlas of electrochemical equilibria in aqueous solutions, Second English Edition, Houston, Texas: National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1974.
58.E.V. Margulis, L.I. Beisekeeva, E.D. Maletina and N.I. Kopylov, Hydrolytic precipitation of copper hydroxide sulphate, Russian Journal of Inorganic Chemistry, Vol.10, No.8, p972-p977, 1965.
59.H. Tanaka, M. Kawano, N. Koga, Thermogravimetry of basic copper(II) sulphates obtained by titrating NaOH solution with CuSO4 solution, Thermochimica Acta, Vol.182, No.2, p.281-p.292, 1991.
60.L. Hidmi and M. Edwards, Role of temperature and pH in Cu(OH)2 solubility, Environ. Sci. Technol., Vol.33, No.15, p2607-p2610, 1999.
61.B. Beverskog and I. Puigdomenech, Revised Pourbaix diagrams for copper at 25 to 3000C, J. Electrochem. Soc., Vol.144, No.10, p3476-p3483, 1997.
62.吳在賢,蔡敏行,電鍍廢水Ferrite化處理之研究,國科會研究報告,NSC 80-0410-E-006-36,1992。
63.陳文泉,重金屬廢水鐵氧磁體法處理之基礎研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學礦冶及材料科學研究所,1992。
64.宋宏凱,電鍍廢水鐵氧磁體化及其安定化之研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學資源工程研究所,1993。
65.黃契儒,電鍍廢水鐵氧磁體化及前處理研究,碩士論文,國立成功大學礦冶及材料科學研究所,1992。
66.張健桂,以鐵磁體程序處理含重金屬實驗室廢液之研究,碩士論文,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,2002。
67.涂耀仁,以多段式磁鐵氧化法處理重金屬系實驗室廢液, 碩士論文,國立中山大學環境工程研究所,2002。
68.蔡尚林,蔡敏行,周永祥,喬泰智,不銹鋼鍊鋼煙塵安定化研究,礦冶,第40期,第2卷,P119-P126,1997。
69.F. Tomas-Alonso, L.J.M. Palacios, Synthesis and surface properties of zinc ferrite species in supported sorbents for coal gas desulphurization, Fuel Processing Technology, 86, p.191-p.203, 2004.
70.J.A. Toledo, M.A. Valenzuela, P. Bosch, H. Armendariz, A. Montoya, N. Nava and A. Vazquez Effect of Al3+ introduction into hydrothermally prepared ZnFe2O4, Applied Catalysis A: General, 198, p.235-p.245, 2000.
71.K. Andrea, S. Jaromir and K. Petr, Nontoxic anticorrosion pigments of the spinel type compared with condensed phosphates, Dyes and Pigments, 30, p.129-p.140, 1996.
72.Y. Tamaur, P.Q. Tu, S. Rojarayanont, and H. Abe, Stabilization of hazardous materials into ferrites, Water Science and Technology, Vol.23, No.1-3, p.399- p.404, 1991.
73.M.A. Ahmed, L. Alonso, J.M. Palacios, C. Cilleruelo and J.C. Abanades, Structural changes in zinc ferrites as regenerable sorbents for hot coal gas desulfurization, Solid State Ionics, 138, p.51-p.62, 2000.
74.S.H. Hu, M.S. Tsai, F.S. Yen and T. Onlin, Recovery of copper-contaminated sludge in a two-stage leaching process, Environmental Progress, Vol. 25, No. 1, p.72-p.78, 2006.
75.P. Prakash and A.K. Sengupta, Selective coagulant recovery from water treatment plant residuals using donnan membrane process, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 37, p.4468-p.4474, 2003.
76.D. Petruzzelli, N. Limoni, G. Tiravanti and R. Passino, Aluminum recovery from water clarifier sludges by ion exchange: comparison of strong and weak electrolyte cation resins performances, Reactive & Functional Polymers, Vol. 38, p.227-p.236, 1998.
77.D. Petruzzelli, A. Volpe, N. Limoni and R. Passino, Coagulants removal and recovery from water clarifier sludge, Water Research, Vol. 34, p.2177-p.2182, 2000.
78.W.R. Knocke, J.R. Hamon and B.E. Dulin, Effects of coagulation on sludge thickening and dewatering, Journal of American Water Works Association, Vol. 79, p.89-p.98, 1987.
79.A.K. Sengupta and B. Shi, Selective alum recovery from clarifier sludge, Journal of American Water Works Association, Vol. 84, p.96-p.103, 1992.
80.M.M. Bishop, A.T. Rolan, T.L. Bailey and D.A. Cornwell, Testing of alum recovery for solid reduction and reuse, Journal of American Water Works Association, Vol. 79, p.76-p.83, 1987.
81.T. Panswad and P. Chamnan, Aluminum recovery from industrial aluminum sludge, Water Supply, Vol. 10, p.159-p.166, 1992.
82.S.H. Hu, J.Y. Wu, F.S. Yen and M.S. Tsai, Alkaline leaching of printed circuit board sludge, Environmental Progress, Vol. 25, No. 3, p.243-p.250, 2006.
83.楊顯萬,邱定藩,濕法冶金,第六章:濕法冶金過程動力學,p.174-p.174, 1998。