| 研究生: |
許敬 Hsu, Ching |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
地方農民對瀕危物種保育政策之態度與影響因素之探討—以苗栗通霄鎮石虎族群為例 Attitudes and Influential Factors of Local Farmers on The Endangered Species Conservation Policy: A Case Study of Leopard Cats in Miaoli County |
| 指導教授: |
趙子元
Chao, Tzu-yuan |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
規劃與設計學院 - 都市計劃學系 Department of Urban Planning |
| 論文出版年: | 2020 |
| 畢業學年度: | 108 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 100 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 石虎 、生態保育 、生態系統服務功能補償 、態度行為 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Leopard cat, Ecological conservation, Payment for ecosystem services, Attitude and behavior |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:145 下載:21 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
政府對於生態環境的土地保護管制,常常為了盡量避免限制到私有土地上的經濟活動,因此政策多施行於國有地上,卻往往忽略一大部分與人們活動範圍有著高度重疊的物種,造成私有地上與保育目的不相容的土地使用遭受非議,也引發許多地主往往為了捍衛土地使用權利而不惜發動抗爭,對需要保育的物種抱持著更加敵對的態度,陷入惡性循環。顯見透過一昧地限制人民財產權來達到保育目的並不是長久之計。因此,近期國際間發展出“生態系統服務功能補償(PES)”的新保育模式並被廣泛地運用,主要利用獎勵的方式,鼓勵土地所有者改善土地利用方法以維護和提供生態系統服務,搭配適當的輔助政策,更能改善私有地主對於應保育物種的排斥態度,達到更好的保育效果。
石虎為本研究之研究對象,屬於保育等級第一級「瀕臨絕種」野生動物,主要生存於台灣中西部的淺山地區,近20年來因土地開發造成其族群不斷減少,呼籲政府重視石虎保育的聲音也愈來愈多,但相對也引發部分在地居民的不滿。因此,政府於民國108年運用PES的概念,推出《友善石虎生態服務給付試辦方案》,希望能因此讓在地居民自願做出友善環境、保育石虎的行為,減少對立衝突。
本研究透過問卷調查及深度訪談,從農民的地方依附程度、對於石虎的態度以及保育行為,來看其與參與「友善石虎生態服務給付」意願的關連性,調查民眾對給付方案之接受程度與考量因素。本研究經過分析整理過後,研究結果顯示如下:
一、受訪者參與友善石虎生態服務給付的意願與對石虎的保育態度及保育行為較有關連,呈現顯著正相關。
二、受訪者的背景屬性(性別、年齡、教育程度及居住地等)在四個構面上皆有不同程度的差異。
三、多數受訪者對於《友善石虎生態服務給付試辦方案》並不了解,導致政策施行的成效有限。
As the awareness of environmental protection is gradually rising, the conflicts between development and conservation are becoming more and more frequent. One of Taiwan's endangered animals, Leopard cat, is currently facing this dilemma. To protect the Leopard cats, the Taiwan government has taken many different actions, but none of them have significant results. They have also been opposed by local residents and many parliamentarians because of the economic benefits generated by land development. Therefore, the government recently launched the "Payments for Ecological Services of Leopard Cat Program"(PESLCP) which is expected to encourage local farmers to participate in conservation activities through rewards, and hope to reduce the conflict between local residents and eco-conservation.
This research is mainly conducted by questionnaire and in-depth interviews. By examining the relevance of farmers' local attachment, attitude towards Leopard cat, conservation behavior and their willingness to participate in the "Payments for Ecological Services of Leopard Cat Program", to investigate interviewees' acceptance and consideration factors of the payment scheme. After the analysis, the results are as follows:
1. The willingness of the interviewees in join the PESLCP is more related to the conservation attitude and behavior toward the Leopard cat, which shows a significant positive correlation.
2. The differences in the background (such as gender, age, education level and residence, etc.) of the interviewees will affect the scores of the four dimensions of the questionnaire.
3. Most of the interviewees were not aware of the PESLCP, which led to limited effectiveness of policy implementation.
Finally, according to the research results, some policy recommendations are given.
一、西文參考書目
A. G. Tansley (1935). The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms. Ecology, 16, 284-307.
Ajzen I. (1985) From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In: Kuhl J., Beckmann J. (eds) Action Control. SSSP Springer Series in Social Psychology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211. Doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Asquith, N.M., Vargas, M.T., Wunder,S. (2008) .Selling two environmental services: in-kind payments for bird habitat and watershed protection in Los Negros, Bolivia. Ecol. Econ. 65, 675–684.
A. Buda and A.Jarynowski (2010) Life-time of correlations and its applications. [Vol. 1]., Wydawnictwo Niezalezne: 5–21, December 2010, ISBN 978-83-915272-9-0
Andersson, K. P., Cook, N. J., Grillos, T., Lopez, M. C., Salk, C. F., Wright, G. D., & Mwangi, E. (2018). Experimental evidence on payments for forest commons conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1(3), 128. doi:10.1038/s41893-018-0034-z
Burrus-Bammel, L.L. (1978). Information’s effect on attitude: a longitudinal study. Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 41-50.
Berger, I. E. (1997). The demographics of recycling and the structure of environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 29, 515-531. Doi: 10.1177/001391659702900404
Bonaiuto, M., Carrus, G., Martorella, H. & Bonnes, M. (2002): Local identity process andenvironmental attitudes in land use changes: the case of natural protected areas. Journal ofEconomic Psychology, 23: 631-653.
Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 21-32. Doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6
Backlund, Erik A.; Williams, Daniel R. (2004). A Quantitative Synthesis of Place Attachment Research: Investigating Past Experience and Place Attachment. In: Murdy, James, comp., ed. Proceedings of the 2003 Northeastern Recreation Research Symposium; 2003 April 6-8; Bolton Landing, NY. Gen. Tech. Rep. NE-317. Newtown Square, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station: 320-325.
Bamberg, S., & Moser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psychosocial determinants of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27, 14-25. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.002
Bernardo Hernández, M. Carmen Hidalgo, M. Esther Salazar-Laplace,Stephany Hess-Medler.(2007). Place Attachment and Place Identity in Natives and Non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 310-319.
Baylis, K., Peplow, S., Rausser, G., Simon, L. (2008). Agri-environmental policies in the EU and United States: a comparison. Ecological Economics, 65, 753–764 (this issue). doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.034.
Bowles S, Polanía-Reyes S. (2012). Economic incentives and social preferences: substitutes or complements? J Econ Lit, 50, 368–425.
Cullen, Rowena. (2001). Perspectives on User Satisfaction Surveys. Library Trends, 49(4), 662-686.
Claassen, R., Cattaneo, R., Johansson, R. (2008). Cost-effective design of agri-environmental payment programs: U.S. experience in theory and practice. Ecological Economics, 65, 737–752 (this issue). doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.032.
Chao, Y., & Lam, S. (2011). Measuring responsible environmental behavior: Self-reported and other-reported measures and their differences in testing a behavioral model. Environment and Behavior, 43, 53-71. Doi: 10.1177/0013916509350849
Dunlap, R. E., & Van Liere, K. D. (1978). The “New Environmental Paradigm”: A proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. The Journal of Environmental Education, 9(4), 10–19. Doi: 10.1080/00958964.1978.10801875
Diehl, Janet and Thomas Barrett.(1988). The conservation easement handbook. SanFrancisco: The Trust for Public Land and Alexandria, VA: The Land Trust Exchange.
Daily, G. (1997). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Washington, D.C.: Island Press.
Daneshvary, N., Daneshvary, R., & Schwer, R. K. (1998). Solid-waste recycling behavior and support for curbside textile recycling. Environment and Behavior, 30, 144-161. Doi: 10.1177/0013916598302002
Dobbs, T.L., Pretty, J. (2008). Case study of agri-environmental payments: the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics, 65, 765–775 (this issue). doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.030.
Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S. (2008). Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecological Economics, 65, 663–674.
Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: an Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Boston, MA.
Food AND Agriculure Organization of the United Nations.(2007). Paying farmers for environmental services. The State of Food and Agriculure.
Fred Nelson.(2008). Developing Alternative Frameworks for Community-based Conservation: Piloting Payments for Environmental Services (PES) in Tanzania’s Simanjiro Plains. Report prepared for WCS Translinks Program. New York: Wildlife Conservation Society.
Fish and Wildlife Service [FWS], National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [NOAA].(2016). Listing Endangered and Threatened Species and Designating Critical Habitat; Implementing Changes to the Regulations for Designating Critical Habitat.
Gustanski, J.A. and Squires R.H. (2000) Protecting the Land: Conservation Easements Past, Present and Future. Island Press, Washington, DC.
Gpts Hemakumara, Rainis Ruslan.(2018). Spatial Behaviour Modelling of Unauthorised Housing in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Published online.
Hungerford, H. R., & Peyton, R. B. (1976). Teaching environmental education. Portland, Maine: J. Weston Walch
Hines, J.M., Hungerford, H.R. & Tomera, A.N. (1986/87). Analysis and synthesis of research on responsible environmental behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Education, 18(2), 1-8.
Heberlein, T. A. (1989). Attitudes and environmental management. Journal of Social Issues, 45, 37-57.
Hungerford, H. R., & Volk, T. L. (1989). Changing learner behavior through environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 21(3), 8-21.
Hwang DR, Kegeles LS, Laruelle M. (2000). (−)-N-[(11)C]propyl-norapomorphine: a positron-labeled dopamine agonist for PET imaging of D(2) receptors. Nucl.Med.Biol. 2000;27:533–539.
Homburg, A., & Stolberg, A. (2006). Explaining pro-environmental behavior with a cognitive theory of stress. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 26, 1-14. Doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.03.003
Hernández, B., Martín, A. M., Ruiz, C., & Hidalgo, M.C. (2010). The role of place identity and place attachment in breaking environmental protection laws. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 281-288.
Hack, J., Kosmus, M., Kräuter, H.J., Weiskopf, B., Somarriba, D. (2010). TEEB case: Payments for Hydrological Ecosystem Services in the Gil González Watershed – A Public-private-partnership Case Study. TEEB.
Iversen, H., & Rundmo, T. O. (2001). Environmental concern and environmental behavior among the Norwegian public. Journal of Risk Research, 5, 265-279. Doi: 10.1080/13669870110115434
Irina Prokofieva, Elena Gorriz. (2013). Institutional analysis of incentives for the provision of forest goods and services: An assessment of incentive schemes in Catalonia (north-east Spain). Forest Policy and Economics, 37, 104–114.
Inga Racinska, Siim Vahtrus. (2018). The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union. REPORT TO NABU BUNDESVERBAND.
James Salzman. (1990). Evolution and Application of Critical Habitat under the Endangered Species Act. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 14, 311-342.
Jenkins, M., S. J. Scherr, and M. Inbar. (2004). Markets for Biodiversity Services, Potential Roles and Challenges. Environment, 46 (6), 32–42.
Jennifer Farnum, Troy Hall, Linda E. Kruger (2005). Sense of place in natural resource recreation and tourism: an evaluation and assessment of research findings. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-660. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 59 p.
Jan Krajhanzl. (2010). Environmental and proenvironmental behaviour. School and health 21.Health Education:International Experience.
Jennifer Eileen Crossa, Catherine M. Keske, Michael G. Lacy, Dana L.K. Hoag, Christopher T. Bastian.(2011). Adoption of conservation easements among agricultural landowners in Colorado and Wyoming: The role of economic dependence and sense of place. Landscape and Urban Planning, 101, 75–83.
Kano, T. (1929). The distribution and habit of mammals of Formosa (1). Zoological magazine, 41, 332-340.
Kano, T. (1930). The distribution and habit of mammals of Formosa (2). Zoological magazine, 42, 165-173.
Kaiser, F. G. (1998). A general measure of ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 395-422. Doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01712.x
Kuhlemeier, H., van den Bergh, H., & Lagerweij, N. (1999). Environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in Dutch secondary education. Journal of Environmental Education, 30, 4-14. Doi: 10.1080/00958969909601864
Kelly S. Bricker, Deborah Kerstetter.(2000). Level of Specialization and Place Attachment: An Exploratory Study of Whitewater Recreationists.
Kibert, N.C. (2000). An analysis of the correlation between the attitude, behavior and knowledge components of environmental literacy in undergraduate university students [On-line]. Master’s thesis, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
Kinzig P, Perrings C, Chapin FS, Polasky S, Smith VK, Tilman D, et al. (2011). Paying for ecosystem services—promise and peril. Science, 334,603–604.
Kaczan D., Swallow B., Adamowicz W.L. (Vic), Vihemäki H. (2012). Designing an incentive programme to reduce on-farm deforestation in the East Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. ICRAF Working Paper no 145. Nairobi. World Agroforestry Centre. 74 pages. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5716/WP12048.PDF
Landell-Mills N, Porras I. (2002). Silver bullet or fools’ gold? A global review of markets for forest environmental services and their impacts on the poor. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
Marcinkowski, T. J., & Rehring, L. (1995). The secondary school report: A report on the development, pilot testing, validation, and field testing of – The secondary school environmental literacy assessment instrument. Cincinnati, Ohio: Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Minichiello V., Aroni R., Timewell E. & Alexander L. (1995) In-depth Interviewing, Second Edition. South Melbourne: Longman.
Musters, C. J. M., Kruk, M., de Graaf, H. J., & Ter Keurs, W. J. (2001). Breeding birds as a farm product. Conservation Biology, 15(2), 363–369.
Mobley, C., Vagias, W. M., & DeWard, S. L. (2010). Exploring additional determinants of environmentally responsible behavior: The influence of environmental literature and environmental attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 42, 420-447. Doi: 10.1177/0013916508325002
Nelson Grima, Simron J. Singh, Barbara Smetschka, Lisa Ringhofer. (2016). Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) in Latin America: Analysing the performance of 40 case studies. Ecosystem Services, 17, 24–32.
O' Riordan, T. (1976). Attitudes,behavior, and environmental policy issues. In I. Altman & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Human behavior and environment: Advances in theory and research (1st ed., pp. 1-26). New York: Plenum Press.
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 10(2), 147-169.
Paul Ralph Ehrlich.(1983). Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. New York: Ballantine Books.
P.W. Burgess, N. Alderman, J. Evans, H. Emslie, B.A. Wilson. (1998). The ecological validity of tests of executive function. The Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4 (6), 547-558.
Poortinga, W., Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental concern, and environmental behavior: A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36, 70-93. Doi: 10.1177/0013916503251466
Pagiola, S. (2008) . Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 65, 712–724 (this issue). doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.07.033.
Petty, R. E., and P. Brinol. (2010). Attitude Structure and Change: Implications for Implicit Measures. Handbook of Implicit Social Cognition: Measurement, Theory, and Applications, edited by B. Gawronski, and K. Payne, 335–352. New York, NY :Guilford Press.
Ramsey, C. E., & Rickson, R. E. (1976). Environmental knowledge and attitudes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 10-15.
Roth, C.E. (1992). Environmental Literacy: Its Roots, Evolution and Directions in the 1990s. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics and Environmental Education, Columbus, OH.
Robertson, N., and S. Wunder. (2005). Fresh tracks in the forest: Assessing incipient payments for environmental services initiatives in Bolivia (draft). In CIFOR. Bogor.
Račinska, I., Vahtrus, S. (2018). The Use of Conservation Easements in the European Union. Report to NABU Bundesverband.
Scott, D., & Willits, F. K.(1994). Environmental attitudes and behavior: A Pennsylvania survey. Environment and Behavior, 26(2), 239-260.
Schiffman, G. and Kanuk, L. (2000) Consumer Behavior. Prentice Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliff.
Sven Wunder.(2005). Payments for environmental services:Some nuts and bolts. CIFOR Occasional Paper No.42.
Sarker, A. H. M. R., and E. Røskaft. (2011). Human attitudes towards the conservation of protected areas: a case study from four protected areas in Bangladesh. Oryx, 45, 391-400.
Tanner, C., & Kast, S. W. (2003). Promoting sustainable consumption: Determinants of green purchases by Swiss consumers. Psychology of Marketing, 20, 883-902. Doi: 10.1002/mar.10101
Vaske, J. J., & Kobrin, K. C. (2001). Place attachment and environmentally responsible behavior. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(4), 16-21.
Weigel, R. H., & Newman, L. S. (1976). Increasing attitude behavior correspondence by broadening the scope of the behavioral measure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 793-802. Doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.33.6.793
Williams M. (1997). Social Surveys: Design to Analysis. In: T. May (Ed.) Social Research Issues, Methods and Process. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Williams, Daniel R.; Vaske, Jerry J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49(6), 830–840
William E. Hammitt, Erik A. Backlund, Robert D. Bixler. (2006). Place Bonding for Recreation Places: Conceptual and Empirical Development. Leisure Studies, 25, 17-41.
Wyerman, J., 2006. Private land conservation in U.S. Soars. In: Land Trust Alliance.查詢日期:2019-09-03,網址:http://www.landtrustalliance.org/about-us/news/alliance-news/private-landconservation-in-u.s.-soars.
Watson, R., Fitzgerald, K.H. and Gitahi, N.(2010). Expanding options for habitat conservation outside protected areas in Kenya: The use of environmental easements. African Wildlife Foundation,Technical Papers, Number: 2.
二、中文參考書目
王培蓉、林俊成(2010)。買賣自然-淺論為生態系服務付費。林業研究專訊,17(1),頁23-27。
王思懿(2014)。臺灣陸域保育類哺乳動物的空間分布預測、保護區涵蓋及熱點分析。國立臺灣大學生命科學院生態學與演化生物學研究所碩士論文,台北市。
王玉婷、曾威、蔡作明(2018)。106年度臺中地區石虎族群調查及保育。聲野生態環境顧問有限公司。
江佳穎(2017)。海洋生態保育認知、態度與行為之社會階層分析-以新北市為例。國立東華大學社會學系碩士論文,花蓮縣。
危芷芬譯(1995)。心理學導論。臺北市:雙葉書廊。
何鳳月、賴文亮、廖少威(2012)。以結構方程模式探討濕地生態保育知識、態度、行為之影響。大仁學報,40,頁59 – 74。DOI: 10.29707/TJ.201203.0004
吳明隆(2007)。SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務。臺北市:五南。
吳水榮、顧亞麗。(2009)。國際森林生態補償實踐及其效果評價。世界林業研究,22(4),頁11~16。
吳鳳陞(2017)。消防人員地方依附、組織承諾及工作績效之間的關係-以新北市政府消防人員為例。淡江大學公共行政學系公共政策碩士在職專班學位論文,新北市。
吳孟珊、詹為巽、王培蓉(2019)。結合生態系統服務支付的造林獎勵計畫。林業研究專訊,26(4),頁50-54。
李永展(1995)。環境態度與環保行為-理論與實證。臺北:胡氏圖書。
李承嘉、洪鴻智、詹士樑(2010)。水梯田溼地生態保存及復育補貼政策之研究。行政院農業委員會林務局補助研究計畫。
沈聖峰(2017)。台灣的環境政策與檢討。臺灣大學生物多樣性研究中心。
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),頁122-136。
林易萱(2009)。私有地上的生態保育:以雙連埤的協力治理為例。國立政治大學公共行政學系碩士論文,台北市。
林俊成、王培蓉、柳婉郁(2010)。台灣獎勵造林政策之實施及其成效。林業研究專訊,17(2),頁16-21。
林惠玲、陳正倉(2014)。應用統計學第四版。台北:雙葉。
林良恭、姜博仁、王豫煌(2016)。重要石虎棲地保育評析(2/2)。行政院農業委員會林務局。
宜蘭縣政府(2003)。「宜蘭縣雙連埤野生動物保護區」保育計畫書。
邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析-SPSS資料分析範例。臺北市:五南。
姜博仁、林良恭、袁守立(2015)。重要石虎棲地保育評析(1/2)。行政院農業委員會林務局。
侯錦雄、陳昭志(1998)。兒童對兒童遊戲場之環境認知。戶外遊憩研究,11(2)。
徐鳳翎、許玉玫、劉正雄(2008)。技專校院學生其人格特質與環境認知對大陸就業態度之研究。興國學報,9,頁97 – 116。
許咏真(2013)。納入農地環境效益之補貼對農地轉用的影響–以雲嘉南地區為例。國立成功大學都市計劃研究所碩士論文,台南市。
許嘉恩、洪立三(2015)。社區依附、環境態度與居民對於保護區的看法:以關渡自然公園為例。地理研究,62,頁97-108。
張春興(1992)。現代心理學。臺北市:東華書局。
曹勝雄、孫君儀(2009)。建構地方依附因果關係模式。地理學報,55,頁43-63。
陳兼善(1956)。臺灣脊椎動物誌。台北:開明書局。
陳雅惠(2012)。生態系統服務功能補償(PES)概念之介紹。101年度「生態系統暨生物多樣性經濟倡議(TEEB)」研習會。
陳雅惠、李俊鴻(2013)。以生態系服務功能補償(PES)促進林業部門發展綠色經濟。臺灣林業,3(39),頁23-28。
黃書禮、詹士樑、馮君君。(2000)。建立限制發展地區救助、補貼、補償、回饋制度之研究。行政院經濟建設委員會委託研究案,中華民國都市計劃學會。
黃威智(2019)。大學生氣候變遷認知、校園永續認知評價與低碳生活態度、低碳生活行為之關聯性研究─以台灣成功大學為例。國立成功大學建築研究所碩士論文,台南市。
楊玉全(2012)。屏東縣國小高年級學生對生態旅遊的認知、態度與新環境典範觀之研究。國立屏東教育大學進修暨研究學院生態休閒教育教學碩士學位學程班碩士論文,屏東縣。
裴家騏(2004)。墾丁國家公園較大型哺乳類動物的現況及保育。台灣林業科學, 19(3),頁199-214。
裴家騏、陳美汀(2008)。新竹、苗栗之淺山地區小型食肉目動物現況與保育研究(3/3)。行政院農業委員會林務局。
裴家騏、陳美汀(2011)。台灣淺山地區哺乳動物保育的迫切議題。國道永續經營環境復育研討會。
劉建男、林育秀(2017)。石虎的過去、現在及未來。台灣林業,43(2),頁46-52。
蔡孟宜(2000)。大學生環境認知、態度與行為相關研究:以逢甲大學為例。私立逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士論文,台中市。
蕭涵之(2009)。荒野青年團義工環境知識、環境態度與環境行為之研究。臺北市立教育大學環境教育與資源研究所碩士論文,台北市。
鍾聖校 (1990)。認知心理學。台北: 心理出版社。
謝淑芬(1994)。觀光心理學。台北:五南出版社。
龔鈺文(2020)。戶外遊憩專門化與環境態度和環境行為關聯性的實證研究—以龍洞戶外攀岩為例。臺灣師範大學環境教育研究所碩士論文,台北市。
上下游News&Market (2018)。今年糧價不美麗,因為綠色對地補貼太誘人?如何保障農民收益,又能總量調節?。查詢日期:2020-04-25,網址:https://www.newsmarket.com.tw/blog/115238/。
中時電子報(2019)。石虎大紅包!苗縣友善生態給付發出逾53萬 養禽戶、農民樂翻。查詢日期:2020-05-20,網址:https://reurl.cc/mnz26l。
台灣的自然保育(2011)。查詢日期:2019-09-14,網址:http://www1.geo.ntnu.edu.tw/jiaen/1-1.htm。
行政院農業委員會林務局自然保育網。自然保護區域總表。查詢日期:2020-07-29,網址:https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/total。
林華慶、夏榮生、陳超仁、王佳琪(2019)。國土生態保育綠色網絡建置計畫之啟動。查詢日期:2019-09-14,網址:https://ecocorridor.forest.gov.tw/page7.html。
海洋保育署。我國海洋保護區名單。查詢日期:2020-07-29,網址:https://www.oca.gov.tw/ch/home.jsp?id=38&parentpath=0,5。
國家重要濕地保育計畫。臺灣濕地地圖。查詢日期:2020-07-29,網址:https://wetland-tw.tcd.gov.tw/tw/GuideMap.php。
環境資訊中心(2014)。憂阻礙開發 三義、通霄反劃設石虎重要棲地。查詢日期:2019-09-01,網址:https://e-info.org.tw/node/104213。
環境資訊中心(2019)。友善石虎生態服務給付 苗栗通霄、南投中寮先試辦。查詢日期:2019-09-01,網址:https://e-info.org.tw/node/219071。
關鍵評論(2019)。苗栗縣議會二度退回「石虎保育條例」,25位議員投下反對票。查詢日期:2019-09-01,網址:https://www.thenewslens.com/article/96711。