簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 羅子誼
Lo, Tzu-Yi
論文名稱: 消費稅、資本稅與經濟成長
Consumption Tax、Capital Tax and Economic Growth
指導教授: 王富美
Wang, Fuh-Mei
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 社會科學院 - 政治經濟研究所
Graduate Institute of Political Economy
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 69
中文關鍵詞: 福利內生成長實質資本稅消費稅
外文關鍵詞: Capital Tax, Endogenous Growth, Welfare, Consumption Tax
相關次數: 點閱:109下載:7
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  •   本文以內生經濟成長模型與不完全競爭的財貨市場為架構,探討消費稅與實質資本稅的課徵對於經濟成長與福利水準之影響。結果發現:在未納入人力資本時,消費稅之課徵不影響經濟成長,對福利具正面影響;課徵資本稅對經濟成長與福利皆具負面影響。體系納入人力資本考量後,消費稅與實質資本稅皆不會對經濟成長造成影響;對實質資本課稅將帶來負面的福利效果,對消費課稅則會使福利提升。
      本研究借助數值模擬驗證理論模型之政策效果。針對跨期替代彈性、生產技術與人力資本生產力係數、財貨間的替代彈性、產品價格相對於消費者物價指數的比率、以及國家規模等參數,探討政府在課徵消費稅與資本稅對經濟成長與福利影響下,參數所扮演的重要角色。數值例子更提供了政策效果之時間路徑。

      Incorporating endogenous growth theory and imperfect competition in goods markets, this thesis attempts to investigate the effects of consumption and capital taxation on economic growth and welfare. We find that, ignoring human capital, consumption taxation does not affect economic growth but deteriorates domestic welfare. Capital taxation deteriorates both growth and welfare. Concerning human capital, imposing tax on consumption and capital does not affect economic growth. However, consumption tax improves domestic welfare and capital tax deteriorates it.
      Through numerical examples, it verifies our analytical results. Through details of the simulation of the parameter values, including those of intertemporal elasticity of substitution, production technology, the elasticity of goods substitution, and country sizes, numerical results illustrate the effects of an increase in government expenditure via taxation on consumption and capital, with changes in consumption, capital, economic growth and welfare reacting differently in either case.

    第一章 緒論 1   第一節 研究動機與目的 1   第二節 理論和文獻回顧 2      一、經濟成長理論演進 2      二、相關文獻之回顧 4   第三節 論文架構 14 第二章 模型建立 15   第一節 基本模型 15   第二節 納入人力資本之探討 26   第三節 動態傳遞過程之圖形分析 38 第三章 數值模擬 41   第一節 未納入人力資本之數值模擬分析 43   第二節 納入人力資本後之數值模擬分析 51 第四章 結論 60 參考文獻 63 附錄一 67 附錄二 69

    一、中文部份
    1. 陳明郎:《經濟成長》,(台北市:華泰出版社,一版,民國88年)。
    2. 陳智華:〈政府消費性支出與經濟成長〉,《經濟論文》(台北市),33卷1期(2005年3月),頁67-101。
    3. 莊奕琦、李鈞元:〈如何衡量人力資本:理論與台灣實證〉,《經濟論文叢刊》(台北市),31卷1期 (2003年3月),頁51-85。
    4. 楊立岩、王新麗:〈人力資本、技術進步與內生經濟增長〉,《經濟學季刊》(北京 市),3卷4期(2004年7月),頁905-918。
    5. 賴景昌:《總體經濟學》,(台北市:雙葉書廊出版,一版,民國90年)。
    6. 財政部:〈民國93年財政統計年報〉,http://www.mof.gov.tw/public/Data/statistic/Year_Fin/93/3080.htm
    (瀏覽日期:2006年5月3日)

    二、西文部份
    1. Altig, David, Auerbach, Alan J., Kotlikoff, Laurance J., Smetters Kent A. and Walliser, Jan, “Simulating Fundamental Tax Reform In the United States,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 91, No. 3(June 2001), pp. 574-595.
    2. Barro, Robert J. and Sala-I-Martin, Xavier, Economic Growth (New York:McGraw-Hill, Second edition, 2004).
    3. Blanchard, Olivier and Kiyotaki, Nobuhiro, “Monopolistic Competition And the Effects of Aggregate Demand,” American Economic Review, Vol. 77, No. 4(September 1987), pp. 647-666.
    4. Blanchard, Olivier, Macroeconomics (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, International edition, 1997).
    5. Bouzahzah, Mohamed, Croix, D. D. L. and Docquier, F. “Policy Reforms And Growth in Computable OLG Economies,” Journal of Economic Dynamic and Control, Vol. 26, No. 12(October 2002), pp.2093-2113.
    6. Canton, E., “Business Cycles in a Two-sector Model of Endogenous Growth,” Economic Theory, Vol. 19, No. 3(April 2002), pp. 477-492.
    7. Cargill, Thomas F. and Parker, Elliott, “Asian Finance And the Rule of Bankruptcy:A Model of the Transition Costs of Financial Liberalization,” Journal of Asian Economies, Vol. 13, No. 3(May-June 2002), pp. 297-318.
    8. Chen, Been-Lon, “Tax Evasion In a Model of Endogenous Growth,” Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 6, No. 2(April 2003), pp. 381-403.
    9. Creedy, John and Gemmell, Norman, “Publicly Finances Education in an Endogenous Growth Model,” Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 32, No. 2(2005), pp. 114-131.
    10. Doi, Junko and Futagami, Koichi, “Commodity Taxation And the Effects of Entry:a Case of Variety Preferences,” Journal of Economics, Vol. 83, No. 3(December 2004), pp. 267-279.
    11. Dornbusch, Rudiger, Fisher, Stanley and Startz, Richard, Macroeconomics (New York:McGraw-Hill, Ninth edition, 2004).
    12. Einarsson, Tor and Marquis, Milton H., “Note on Human Capital Externalities,” Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 18, No. 2(Spring 1996), pp. 341-351.
    13. Helpman, Elhanan and Krugman, Paul R., Market Structure And Foreign Trade Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, And the International Economy (Cambridge, Mass.:MIT Pr., 1985).
    14. Heijdra, Ben J. and Ligthart, Jenny E., “Tax Policy, the Macroeconomy, And Intergenerational Distribution,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 49, No. 1(March 2002), pp. 106-127.
    15. Jensen, Svend E. H., Nielsen S. B., Pedersen L. H. and Sorensen P. B., “Tax Policy, Housing And the Labour Market:an Intertemporal Simulation Approach,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 13, No. 3(July 1996), pp. 355-382.
    16. Judd, Kenneth L., “Capital Income Taxation with Imperfect Competition,” The American Economic Review, Vol. 92, No. 2(May 2002), pp. 417-421.
    17. Keen, Michael and Ligthart, Jenny E. “Coordinating Tariff Reduction And Domestic Tax Reform under Imperfect Competition,” Review of International Economics, Vol. 13, No. 2(May 2005), pp. 385-390.
    18. Kumar, Krishna B. “Education And Technology Adoption in a Small Open Economy:Theory and Evidence,” Macroeconomic Dynamics, Vol. 7, No. 4(September, 2003), pp. 586-617.
    19. Milesi-Ferretti, G. and Roubini, N., “Growth Effects of Income And Consumption Taxes: Positive And Normative Analysis,” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, Vol. 30, No. 4(November 1998), pp. 721-744.
    20. Obstfeld, Maurice and Rogoff, Kenneth , “Exchange Rate Dynamics Redux,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 103, No. 3(June 1995), pp. 624-660.
    21. Ortigueira, Salvador, “Equipment Prices, Human Capital And Economic Growth,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, Vol. 28, No. 3(November 2003), pp. 307-329.
    22. Padovano, Fabio and Galli, Emma, “Tax Rates and Economic Growth in the OECD Countries (1950-1990),” Economic Inquiry, Vol. 39, No. 1(January 2001), pp. 44-57.
    23. Pelloni, Alessandra and Waldmann, Robert, “Can Waste Improve Welfare?,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 77, No. 1(July 2000), pp. 45-79.
    24. Penalosa, Cecilia Garcia and Turnovsky, Stephen J., “Second-best Optimal Taxation of Capital And Labor in a Developing Economy,” Journal of Public Economics, Vol. 89, No. 6(June 2005), pp. 1045-1074.
    25. Petrucci, Alberto, “Consumption Taxation And Endogenous Growth in a Model with New Generations,” International Tax and Public Finance, Vol. 9, No. 5(September 2002), pp. 553-566.
    26. Rosen, Harvey S., Public Finance (New York:McGraw-Hill, Sixth edition, 2002).
    27. Smetters, Kent, “A (interesting) Dynamic Properties of the Neoclassical Growth Model with CES Production,” Review of Economic Dynamics, Vol. 6, No. 3(July 2003), pp. 697-707.
    28. Turnovsky, Stephen J., “Fiscal Policy, Elastic Labor Supply, And Endogenous Growth,” Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol. 45, No. 1(February 2000), pp. 185-210.
    29. Turnovsky, Stephen J., “On the Role of Government in a Stochastically Growing Open Economy,” Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control, Vol. 23, No. 6(April 1999), pp. 873-908.
    30. Uhlig, H. and Yanagawa, N., “Increasing the Capital Income Tax May Lead to Faster Growth,” European Economic Review, Vol. 40, No. 8(November 1996), pp. 1521-1540.
    31. Varian, Hal R., Intermediate Microeconomics (New York:Norton, Fifth edition, 1999).
    32. Wang, Ping and Yip, Chong K., “Macroeconomic Effects of Factor Taxation with Endogenous Human Capital Evolution:Theory And Evidence,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 61, No. 3(January 1995), pp. 803-818.

    下載圖示 校內:2007-07-24公開
    校外:2007-07-24公開
    QR CODE