| 研究生: |
黃青淵 Huang, Ching-Yuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
以概念特徵為基之本體論學習與維護機制研發 Development of a Mechanism for Concept Feature-Based Ontology Learning and Maintenance |
| 指導教授: |
陳裕民
Chen, Yuh-Min |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
電機資訊學院 - 製造工程研究所 Institute of Manufacturing Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2006 |
| 畢業學年度: | 94 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 74 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 知識本體 、知識本體維護 、知識管理 、知識本體學習 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Knowledge Management, Ontology, Ontology Learning, Ontology Maintenance |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:79 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
在知識經濟時代,知識管理已成為企業致勝的重要關鍵之一,而能夠促進知識整合、存取、共享及重覆使用的知識本體(Ontology)已逐漸在知識管理領域中扮演重要的角色,因此知識本體(Ontology)有效率的建立、管理與維護是支援知識管理重要關鍵。
目前知識本體(Ontology)維護主要的問題之一是如何有效率及正確地學習概念知識進而定位至適當的儲存位置,因此本研究之目的在(1)設計一以概念知識特徵為基之本體論學習架構,包含了多格式輸入、前處理(自然語言處理、概念箤取及特徵標注)、學習與定位與維護功能,(2)依學習架構研發一知識本體學習與維護機制,透過概念特徵標註,運用特徵限制關聯及布林函數進行概念的學習,最後再利用定位圖(Location map)找到正確之定位點,將概念置入知識本體庫中,(3)針對知識本體庫中概念知識的維護,提出知識本體庫維護演算法,包含插入、合併及移除等功能。本研究之成果能有效提昇本體論學習與維護之效率及正確性,進而實現知識管理與分享之目標。
In the knowledge economy Age, Knowledge management has become important key factors of enterprise success. ontology act as vital support role of knowledge management for facilitated knowledge integration、access、share and reuse. So building、management and maintenance ontology efficiently are importance of supporting knowledge management.
The one of main problem of ontology are efficiently and accurately to learning and location to suitable store address. For this reason, In this thesis objective are (1) Designing a frameworks for Concept Feature-Based Ontology Learning, including Import of diversity entity knowledge、preprocess(Natural Language Process、Concepts extraction and Feature Annotation)、Learning and Location、Maintenance and User interface. (2) We according to framework to development of an
Mechanism for Concept Feature-Based Ontology Learning and Maintenance through annotate out concept feature and feature constraint relations for concept learning. Finally, Find out Concept Location on the Is-A hierarchy from Location map. (3) We take a function of ontology maintenance Algorithms , including Insert、Merge and Delete.
In our these result to be able to promotion efficiency and accuracy of ontology learning and maintenance. And then to carry out an objective of knowledge management and share
[1] Alexander Maedche and Steffen Staab,”Ontology Learning for the Semantic
Web” Intelligent System,IEEE, Volume16,Issue2, pp.72-79,2001
[2] Alexander maedche and Steffen Staab,”Ontology Learning”Knowledge
Maintenance of case-based system,phd,2002
[3] Assadi, H, 1997, “Knowledge acquisition from texts: using an automatic
clustering method based on nounmodifierrelationship” Proceedings of the
35th Annual Meeting of the Association for ComputationalLinguistics
(ACL'97)504–506.
[4] Bisson, G, 1992, “Learning in FOL with a similarity measure” Proceedings
of the 10th National Conference onArtificial Intelligence (AAAI’92)
82–87.
[5] Bowers, AF, Giraud-Carrier, C and Lloyd, JW, 2000, “Classification of
individuals with complex structure”Proceedings of the 17th International
Conference on Machine Learning (ICML2000) 81–88.
[6] Christopher Brewster; Fabio ciravegna and Yorick Wilks “Background and
Forground Knowledge in dynamic Ontology Construction: Viewing Text as
Knowledge maintenance”, pp.105-157, AKT 2004
[7] Ding Y.,& Foo,S.,”Ontology Research and Development Paret2-A
Review of Ontology Mapping and Evolving,”Journal of Information
Science,28(5),(2002),pp.375-388.
[8] Duane Degler and Renee Lewis”Maintaining Ontology Implementations: The
Value of Listening”,A Conference of IDEAlliance Extreme markup
Languages,2005
[9] Finkelstein-Landau, M and Morin, E, 1999, “Extracting semantic
relationships between terms: supervised vs.unsupervised methods”
Proceedings of the nternational workshop on Ontological Engineering
on the Global Information Infrastructure 71–80.
[10] Gangemi A, guarino N, Oltramari A “Conceptual analysis of lexical
taxonomies: The case of Wordnet top-level. In: Smith B, Welty C (eds)
International Conference on formal Ontology in Information Systems
(FOIS’01). Ogunquit, Maine. ACM Press, Yew York, pp 3-15,2001
[11] Gio Wiederhold “An Algebra for Ontology Composition,”ARPA and
Stanford University July 1994.
[12] Gio Wiederhold and Jan Jannink,”Composing Diverse Ontologies,”prepared
for IFIP Working Group on Database 8th Working Conference on Database
Semantics(DS-8)in Rotorua,NewZealand,DS-8.
[13] Hahn, U and Schnattinger, K, 1998, “Towards text knowledge engineering”
Proceedings of the 15th NationalConference on Artificial Intelligence
(AAAI’98) 524–531,1998
[14] Enhong CHEN,Gaofeng WU,”An Ontology Learning Method Enhanced by Frame
Semantics” Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Symposium on
Multimedia(ISM’05).
[15] Hahn, U and Romacker, M, 2001, “The SYNDIKATE text knowledge base
generator” Proceedings of the 1stInternational Conference on Human
Language Technology Research 328–333.
[16] Hahn, U and Marko, KG, 2002, “Ontology and lexicon evolution by text
understanding” Proceedings of the ECAI2002 Workshop on Machine Learning
and Natural Language Processing for Ontology Engineering(OLT’2002).
[17] He huang;Zhongzhi Shi;Yong Cheng;Lirong Qiu.”Service-oriented knowledge
management on virtual oraganizations”,Computer and information
Technology,CIT2005.The Fifth International conference on,
pp.1050-1054,2005.
[18] Hearst, MA., 1992, “Automatic acquisition of hyponyms from large text
corpora” Proceedings of the 14thInternational Conference on
Computational Linguistics 539–545.
[19] Maedche, A and Staab, S, 2001a, “Ontology learning for the Semantic
Web” IEEE Journal of Intelligent Systems16(2) 72–79.
[20]Maedche, A and Staab, S, 2001b, Comparing Ontologies – Similarity
Measures and a Comparison Study InternalReport 408, Institute AIFB,
University of Karlsruhe.M SHAMSFARD AND A A BARFOROUSH 314.
[21]Maedche, A and Staab, S, 2002, “Measuring similarity between ontologies”
Proceedings of EKAW’02.
[22] Mehrnoush Shamsfard; Ahmad Abdollahzadeh Barforoush “The state of the
art in ontology learning: A framework for comparison”The Knowledge
Engineering Review,Vol. 18:4,pp.293-316,2003.
[23] Nadira lammari; Elisabeth metais.”Building and Maintaining ontologies: a
set of algorithms”Data & Knowledge Engineering,48,pp.155-176,2004.
[24] Nicola Guarino,”Formal Ontology and Information Systems,”Proceedings of
FOIS’98,Trento,Italy,6-8 June 1998,Amsterdam,IOS Press,3-15.
[25] Philipp Cimiano; Steffen Staab “Learning by googling”ACM SIGKDD
Explorations Newsletter,Vol.6,I2,2004
[26] Roberto Navigli,Paola Velardi,”Ontology Learning and its application to
automated terminology translation”Intelligent
system,IEEE,Volume18,Issue1, pp.22-31,2003.
[27] Shamsfard, M Barforoush,AA,” Learning ontology from natural language
texts” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
IJHCS) ,Volume60,Issue1,pp.17-63,2004.
[28] Tuzovsky,A.F.;Yampolsky,V.Z.;Chirikov,S.V.”Ontological knowledge
management system development”,Science and Technology,Proceedings.
The 9th Russian-Korean International Symposium on , KORUS2005 ,
pp.718-720,2005.
[29] Y. Ding, “Ontology: The enabler for the Semantic Web,” Journal of
Information Science, vol. 27, no. 6, 2001, pp. 377-384.
[30] Vijayan Sugumaran,Veda C. Storey,”Ontologies for conceptual modeling:
their creation,use,and management,” Data & Knowledge Engineering, 42
(2002),251-271.
[31] Yassine Gargouri,Bernard Lefebvre and Jean-Guy Meunier,”Ontology
Maintenance using Textual Analysis”In proceedings of the seventh world
Multi-Conference on systemics, Cybernetics and informatics,pp27-30,2003
[32] Zelle, JM and Mooney, RJ, 1993, “Learning semantic grammars with
constructive inductive logic programming”.
中文文獻
[33]于國華 「台灣需要怎樣的大百科?」聯合報 93年6月8日 15版。