在永續的發展下，電動機車的選擇成為一種趨勢，而根據交通部統計數據顯示，在這些電動機車銷售紀錄當中，又以電池交換為主要運作方式的電動機車佔目前最大銷售比例，為目前市場中的主流，然而隨著換電式機車的使用人口增加，電池供需問題自然也因應而生，其使用者換電行為經常集中在特定時段或集中在某幾個換電站，造成部分換電站的電池供不應求，反之，有些電池交換站利用率則低，這樣不僅會影響顧客滿意度，對於業者來說也會產生負面的影響。
因此，本研究旨在探討以電池交換為主要運作方式的電動機車分析其使用者的換電行為，包括從一開始發覺電池的狀態到整個換電的過程，並利用說服科技即以科技去改變使用者的態度與行為，於各行為階段提出合適之說服策略，希望藉此提高利用率低之換電站的使用率。研究首先透過文獻回顧收集說服策略（1.出於理論2.出於行為改變實際設計），接著整理出適合電池交換系統之說服策略，並以故事版的方式呈現說服策略進行問卷設計，得知使用者對於說服策略的偏好。
透過問卷調查的結果顯示性別的不同對說服策略的說服力無顯著影響，而年齡、教育程度與職業則有所差別，另外本研究也針對受測者認同度較高的策略進行軟硬體操作分析，進而找出四個策略組合方案，分別為I：引導、媒體豐富性與互動策略；II：模擬、數據視覺化與互動敘述策略；III：威脅、提醒策略；IV：多元、顏色、與折扣策略，以上成果希望能幫助以電池交換為主要運作方式的電動機車業者參考，讓電池的使用更加永續。

Among the sales records of the electric scooters, electric vehicles with battery exchange as the main operational mode account for the current largest sales ratio, which is the mainstream in the current market. However, with the increasing number of the users of electric scooters, the problem of battery supply and demand naturally arises. The user's behavior of exchanging battery often concentrates in a certain period of time or at a certain amount of the power stations, resulting in the shortage of batteries in some power stations. On the contrary, the utilization rate of some power stations is low, which will not only affect customer satisfaction, but also the industry.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyze the users' exchanging behavior of the electric vehicle with battery exchange as the main operational mode, and to use the persuasive technology to propose appropriate persuasion strategies in each behavior stage. The research first collects strategies through literature review, and then develops the persuasive strategies suitable for battery exchange systems. Then classifies users according to demographic variables. Through the results of the questionnaire survey, the user's preference for the persuasion strategies are known, and the best persuasion strategy for different user groups is learned. The above results hope to help the motor vehicle industry with battery exchanging as the main operational mode for reference, so as to let battery use more sustainable.

中文部分
1. 林怡璇、林珊如 (2009)。從老年人獲取資訊與通訊科技 (ICT)技能的歷程探討數位落差。圖書資訊學研究，3(2)，75-102。
2. 鄭伊秦(2016)。考量使用者類型下節能減碳行為鼓勵資訊系統之說服與遊戲設計策略。國立成功大學資源工程所碩士論文，臺南。
英文部分
3. Ackermann, L., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. (2018). Consumers' perspective on product care: An exploratory study of motivators, ability factors, and triggers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 183, 380-391.
4. Adaji, I., & Vassileva, J.(2016). Evaluating persuasive systems using the PSD framework. In UMAP（Extended Proceedings）.
5. Bergh, D. D. (1995). Problems with repeated measures analysis: Demonstration with a study of the diversification and performance relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 389(6),1692–1708.
6. Cathcart, R., & A. Glendon, A. (2016). Judged effectiveness of threat and coping appraisal anti-speeding messages. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 96, 237-248.
7. Chen, H., Lin, C., Hsieh, S., Chao, H., Chen, C., Shiu, R., Ye, S. & Deng, Y. (2012). Persuasive feedback model for inducing energy conservation behaviors of building users based on interaction with a virtual object. Energy and Buildings, 45, 106-115.
8. Chou, Yu-Hung. (2010) Investigating persuasion in female cycling design. Master's thesis of the Institute of Applied Arts of the National Chiao Tung University, Taiwan.
9. Coombes, E. & Jones, A. (2016). Gamification of active travel to school: A pilot evaluation of the Beat the Street physical activity intervention. Health & Place, 39, 62-69.
10. Dayan, E., & Bar-Hillel, M. (2011). Nudge to nobesity II: Menu positions influence food orders. Judgment and Decision Making, 6, 333-342.
11. Drozd, F., Lehto, T., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H., (2012). Exploring perceived persuasiveness of a behavior change support system: A Structural Model, Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 157-168.
12. Eisenbeiss, M., Wilken, R., Skiera, B., & Cornelissen M. (2015). What makes deal-of-the-day promotions really effective? The interplay of discount and time constraint with product type. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 32, 387-397.
13. Fogg, B. J. (1998). Persuasive computers: perspectives and research directions. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. CHI98, Los Angeles, USA.
14. Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. ACM, 1-7, Clarement, California.
15. Goodwin, P.B. (1996). Empirical evidence on induced traffic—a review and synthesis. Transportation, 23, 35-54.
16. Gatto, NM., Ventura, EE.,Cook, LT.,Gyllenhammer, LE., & Davis, JN. (2012). LA Sprouts: a garden-based nutrition intervention pilot program influences motivation and preferences for fruits and vegetables in Latino youth. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, 112,913-920.
17. Halko, S., & Kientz, J. A. (2010). Personality and persuasive technology: An exploratory study on health-promoting mobile applications. Persuasive Technology, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 150-161.
18. Haller, H., Nguyen, V.-B., Debizet, G., Laurillau, Y., Coutaz, J., & Calvary, G. (2017). Energy consumption in smarthome: persuasive interaction respecting user’s values. The 9th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data Acquisition and Advanced Computing Systems, Technology and Applications, Romania, 804–809.
19. Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2013). Social motivations to use gamification: an empirical study of gamifying exercise. In Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on Information Systems, Utrecht, Netherlands, June 5–8, 2013.
20. Harries, T., Eslambolchilar, P., Stride, C., Rettie, R., & Walton, S. (2013). Walking in the wild – using an always-on smartphone application to increase physical activity. Human-computer Interaction–interact, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 8118, 19-36.
21. He, Z., Luo, Y., & Liang, G. (2013). Runking: A mobile social persuasion system for running exercise. Computing, Communications and IT Applications Conference (ComComAp), Hong Kong, 74-78.
22. Karppinen, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H., Alahäivälä, T., Jokelainen, T., Keränen, A. M., Salonurmi, T., & Savolainen, M. (2016). Persuasive user experiences of a health behavior change support system: A 12-month study for prevention of metabolic syndrome. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 96, 51-61.
23. Kaptein, M., Markopoulos, P., Ruyter, B., & Aarts, E. (2015). Personalizing persuasive technologies: Explicit and implicit personalization using persuasion profiles. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 77, 38-51.
24. Kluckner, P. M., Weiss, A., Sundström, P., & Tschelig, M. (2013). Two actors: Providers and consumers inform the design of an ambient energy saving display with persuasive strategies. In: First Int. Conf. on Behavior Change Support Systems (BCSS), Adjunct PERSUASIVE 2013, Position Paper, 33-44.
25. Lee, H., Koopmeiners, J S., Rhee, T., Raveis, V H., & Ahluwalia, J S. (2014). Mobile phone text messaging intervention for cervical cancer screening: changes in knowledge and behavior pre-post intervention. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 16, 8.
26. Lehto, T., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2011). Persuasive features in web-based alcohol and smoking interventions: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13, 3.
27. Lu, S., Ham, J. & Midden, C. (2016). The influence of color association strength and consistency on ease of processing of ambient lighting feedback. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 47, 204-212.
28. Lu, Y., Kim, Y., Dou, X. & Kumar, S. (2014). Promote physical activity among college students: Using media richness and interactivity in web design. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 40-50.
29. Mohadis, H. M., Ali, N. M, & Smeaton, A. F. (2016). Designing a persuasive physical activity application for older workers: understanding end-user perceptions. Behaviour & Information Technology, 35, 1102-1114.
30. Mumm, J., & Mutlu, B. (2011). Designing motivational agents: The role of praise, social comparison, and embodiment in computer feedback. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1643-1650.
31. Ng, K. H., Bakri, A., & Rahman A. A. (2016). Effects of persuasive designed courseware on children with learning difficulties in learning malay language subject. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1413-1431.
32. Oh, J., Lim, H., Copple, J., & Chadraba, E. (2018). Harnessing the persuasive potential of data: The combinatory effects of data visualization and interactive narratives on obesity perceptions and policy attitudes. Telematics and Informatics, 35, 1755-1769.
33. Oinas-Kukkonen, H., & Harjumaa, M. (2009). Persuasive systems design: Key issues, process model, and system features. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 24, Article 28, 485-500.
34. Orji, R., Vassileva, J., & Mandryk,R. L. (2014). Modeling the efficacy of persuasive strategies for different gamer types in serious games for health. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 24(5) , 453–498.
35. Payne, C., & Niculescu, M. (2018). Can healthy checkout end-caps improve targeted fruit and vegetable purchases? Evidence from grocery and SNAP participant purchases. Food Policy, 79, 318-323.
36. Rudolph, M., Feth, D., & Polst, S. (2018). Why users ignore privacy policies – a survey and intention model for explaining user privacy behavior. Human-computer Interaction, Springer, Cham, 10901, 587–598.
37. Shu, W., & Cheng, C. (2012). How to improve consumer attitudes toward using credit cards online: An experimental study. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11, 335-345.
38. Tillema, T., Ben-Elia, E., Ettema, D., & Delden, J. V. (2013). Charging versus rewarding: A comparison of road-pricing and rewarding peak avoidance in the Netherlands. Transport Policy, 26, 4-14.
39. Thomas, R. J., Masthoff, J. & Oren, N. (2017). Adapting healthy eating messages to personality. Persuasive Technology: Development and Implementation of Personalized Technologies to Change Attitudes and Behaviors, 119-132.
40. Truong, K.N., Hayes, G.R., & Abowd, G.D. (2006).: Storyboarding: An empirical determination of best practices and effective guidelines. In: Proc. of DIS 2006, pp. 12–21.
41. Whillans, A. V., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2018). Overcoming barriers to time-saving: reminders of future busyness encourage consumers to buy time. Social Influence, 13, 117-124.
42. Win, K.T., Mullan, J., Howard, S., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2017). Persuasive systems design features in promoting medication management for consumers. Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
43. Yom-Tov, E., Shembekar, J., Barclay, S. & Muennig, P. (2018). The effectiveness of public health advertisements to promote health: a randomized-controlled trial on 794,000 participants. npj Digit. Med, 1, 24.
44. Wang, Y., Wu, L., Lange, J.-P., Fadhil, A. & Reiterer, H. (2018) . Persuasive technology in reducing prolonged sedentary behavior at work: A systematic review. Smart Health, 7-8 , 19 - 30.
45. Zhong H., & Huang L. (2016). The empirical research on the consumers’ willingness to participate in E-waste recycling with a points reward system. Energy Procedia, 104, 475-480.
 
網路資料
1. 經濟部工業局https://www.moea.gov.tw/MNS/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=1&menu_id=40&news_id=80134 （造訪時間：2018.12.10）
2. 電動機車產業網
https://www.lev.org.tw/default.asp （造訪時間：2019.01/2019.06.01）
3. G牌電動機車官網
https://www.gogoro.com/press/2017-09-04/august-registration/ （造訪時間：2018.07.13）
4. 新聞https://www.storm.mg/article/1136288?srcid=73746f726d2e6d675f30633664333365316365303662643435_1558255355 （造訪時間：2019.05.08）
5. G牌電動機車維基百科
https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gogoro （造訪時間：2018.07.13）
6. 台灣物聯科技有限公司
https://www.taiwaniot.com.tw/product/日本進口-panasonic-國際牌-ncr18650b-3400mah-18650-鋰電池-小尖頭/ （造訪時間：2019.05.23）
7. Fogg的官網https://www.bjfogg.com
http://www.behaviormodel.org/index.html （造訪時間：2018.08.03）
8. 行政院研究發展考核委員會(2007)。九十六年數位落差調查報告
https://ws.ndc.gov.tw/001/administrator/10/relfile/0/1000/871616535971.pdf （造訪時間：2019.04.25）