| 研究生: |
黃偵原 Huang, Chen-Yuan |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
專案管理中的關鍵因子探討 - 以C 公司為例 The Study of Key Factors in Project Management- Using C-Company as an Example |
| 指導教授: |
蕭飛賓
Hsiao, Fei-Bin |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 工程管理碩士在職專班 Engineering Management Graduate Program(on-the-job class) |
| 論文出版年: | 2013 |
| 畢業學年度: | 101 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 90 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 專案管理 、層級分析法 、關鍵因子 、標竿企業 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Project Management, Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP), Key Factor, Benchmarking |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:106 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
於本研究中,使用層次分析法(AHP)方法的目的,是用來研究專
案管理中可能影響專案最終會成功或失敗的關鍵因子。找出關鍵因子
的主要目的,是讓有類似專案問題的人,可以從中獲得一些有價值的
參考依據。
為了達到這個目標,本研究選定一家C 公司做為案例,一開始應
用C 公司的建廠專案作為研究標的,並以標竿企業中的關鍵成功/失敗
因子做分析對照,再以PMI 的管理方針作探討。並為強化研究的結果,
以AHP 方法做嚴謹的問卷調查,並與工業界和學術界的相關管理專家
做訪談和討論。
本研究的結論清楚地闡明,有三個正向關鍵因素影響專案管理和
執行上的發現。(1)人力資源開發和管理項目團隊;(2)一個清楚、完
整的專案管理計劃是不可或缺的(3)專案也需要風險監測計劃,以確
保在執行過程中不會受到影響。另有三點重要專案管理建議:(1)為
顧及邊際效應,應兼顧安全、健康、環保之相關風險辨識及回應(2)
若缺乏完整之構型基礎及流程改進辦法,專案計畫也無法發揮效能(; 3)
缺乏獎懲誘因,專案計畫只能達到堪用門檻。
In this thesis, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is used
to investigate the possible key factors of project management to effectively
influence the end results of the project to be subsequently success or failure.
With those key factors being indentified, the purpose is hence to be used
for the followers who may execute the similar projects as some guidelines
to obtain the required outcomes and satisfactory consequences.
To achieve this goal, a so-called C-Company is selected as a case
sample. It is intended to apply this C-Company’s factory construction
project as a starting target for indentifying the critical success/failure
factors in comparison with some benchmarking companies’ control and
management policy listed in the Project Management Institute (PMI). To
strength the results of this study, a careful questionnaire study by AHP
method is conducted through interviews and discussion with industrial and
academic-related management experts.
The results of this study clearly indicate that three positive key factor
s to influence the project management and its execution are obtained. They
are (1) Human resource development and management project team; (2) A
clear, complete project management plan before execution is inevitably
needed; (3) A project risk monitoring plan is also needed to ensure that the
implementation process will not be affected. It is also worthwhile to
recommend three important things for project management: (1) To take into
account the marginal effect for the sake of the safety, health and
environmental risk identification and response; (2) Without complete
configuration of basic structure and process improvement approach, the
project cannot be effectively and efficiently executed; (3) Lack of incentive,
rewarding and punitive regulations, the project management can seemingly
be useful for only achieving some low standard of threshold but not the
complete value as expected in the project plan.
[1]Commons, J. R., Institutional Economics: Its Place in Political
Economy, Transaction Publishers, 1934.
[2]Barnard, C. I., Organization and Management,Harvard University Press,
Cambridge, Massachusetts,1948.
[3]Daniel, D. R., “Management Information Crisis.” Harvard Business Review, 39, No.5, 1961.
[4]Drucker, P. F., Managing for Results, New York, Harper & Row, 1964.
[5]Hofer, C. and Schendel, D., Strategy Formulation: Analytical Concepts, St. Paul: West Publishing,1977.
[6]Rockart, J. F., “Chief Executives Define Their Own Data Needs,” Hard Business Review, Vol. March-April,1979.
[7]Ferguson, C. R. & Dickinson, R., Critical Success Factor for Directors in
the Eighties, Business Horizons, 2(5)., 1982.
[8]Aaker, D. A., Strategic market management. New York: John Willy & Sons. ,1st ed.1984.
[9]Boynton, A. C., & Zmud, R. W., An assessment of critical success
factors.Sloan Management Review, 25(4),1984.
[10]吳思華著,「策略九說」,麥田出版股份有限公司,1988。
[11]Tillett, B. B., Authority Control in the Online Environment, New York:
Haworth Press.1989.
[12]Pollalis, Y. A. & Frieze, I. H., "A New Look at Critical Success Factors in
Information Technology", Information Strategy: The Executive's Journal,
Vol. 10, No. 1,1993.
[13]孟德芸,「企業成功關鍵因素之研究-以個人電腦產業為實證」,國立
中興大學企管所碩士論文,1998。
[14]袁素君,「成本中心營運績效關鍵成功因素之研究-以台電營建工
程系統為例」,私立長榮管理學院經營管理研究所碩士論文, 2002。
[15]范誠均,「發電工程計畫執行關鍵成功因素之探討」,國立交通大
學經營管理研究所碩士論文,2002。
[16]沈恆夙,「營造業利潤中心制度關鍵成功因素之研究」,國立中山大
學企管系碩士論文,2004。
[17]郭信毅,「廠房設施規劃與新機台導入之實證研究–以某TFT LCD廠
為例」,國立中央大學工業管理研究所碩士在職專班,2010。
[18]http://wiki.mbalib.com/wiki/%E5%85%B3%E9%94%AE%E6%88%90%
E5%8A%9F%E5%9B%A0%E7%B4%A0%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90%E6%B3%95 (2009/7/20)
[19]http://wiki.mbalib.com/zh-tw/%E6%9D%9C%E9%82%A6%E5%85%AC%E5%8F%B8 (2007/11/28)
[20]曹海東,「杜邦公司大型建廠項目管理系統分析」,國立復旦大學工
商管理研究所碩士論文,2002。
[21]http://cois.moi.gov.tw/moiweb/web/frmHome.aspx(2003/8/28)
[22]鄭清和,“品管新七手法實戰”,台灣復文興業股份有限公司,1997。
[23]http://WWW.CDMS.ORG.TW(2003/08/28)
[24]http://csel.csu.edu.tw/adm3/news/Conference/001.ppt(Date:2012/12/28)
[25]鄧振源、曾國雄,“層級分析法(AHP)的內涵特性與應用(上)”,
中國統計學報,第27卷,第6期,1989。
[26]鄧振源,計畫評估、方法與應用,國立海洋大學運籌規劃與管理
研究中心,2002。
[27]林德建,「軟體研發部門專案管理的關鍵成功因素」,逢甲大學經營
管理研究所碩士論文,2009。
[28]許光華,專案管理知識體系的觀點,初版。台北:華泰文化事業股份
有限公司,1995。
[29]邱國光,「TFT-LCD 產業的技術取得模式之選擇-模糊理論之應用」。銘傳大學國際企業管理研究所碩士論文,2000。
[30]林原宏,層級分析法:理論與應用之探討-1.2.3-。測驗統計簡訊,1995。
[31]Zahedi, F., The Analytic Hierarchy Process - A Survey of the Method
and its Application, Interfaces, 16(4), 1986.
[32]高廣權,「航空發動機檢肅齒輪箱失效調查與分析研究」,國立成功大學碩士論文,2008。
[33]劉紹鈞,「運用層級分析法(AHP)探討航空發動機TFE731渦輪級間溫度異常之肇因與改善」,國立成功大學碩士論文,2012。
[34]臺灣省議會對外資在臺設廠之折衝:以杜邦、拜耳案為例,李巧雯,臺灣文獻,62:1 2011.03,2011。
[35]PMI專案管理學會 台灣分會,”專案管理知識指南第四版”,宏典文
化出版社,2009。
校內:2018-02-01公開