| 研究生: |
陳樂玲 Chen, Stephanie |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
非審計公費是否影響財務報表品質?台灣進一步之證據 Do Nonaudit Fees Affect Financial Reporting Quality? Evidence from Taiwan |
| 指導教授: |
黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2019 |
| 畢業學年度: | 107 |
| 語文別: | 英文 |
| 論文頁數: | 49 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 非審計公費 、財務報表品質 、獨立性 、分類非審計公費 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | nonaudit fee, financial reporting quality, auditor independence, categorized nonaudit fee |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:53 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本篇論文沿用Ashbaugh et al. (ALM) (2003)的實證研究,並採用台灣2004年至2007年上市櫃公司及興櫃公司資料以檢驗非審計公費與財務報表品質之關聯性。本研究採用裁決性應計數作為財務報表品質之代理變數。本研究實證結果如下: 首先,我們發現非審計公費總金額與裁決性應計數間存在顯著正相關之關聯性。隨後,我們將樣本依照是否被沙賓法案禁止,區分為沙賓禁止非審計服務與沙賓部分禁止非審計服務,並提供證據顯示沙賓法案確實可以些微增強財務報表品質。最後,我們將樣本依照非審計公費細項揭露的分類分成四類(即系統設計、工商登記、人力資源與其他),並發現各項分類非審計服務對於財務報表品質存在不同程度之個別影響。本篇研究清楚的指出台灣加強會計師獨立性與財務報表品質之重要性,並提供台灣金融監管機關修訂相關法規之政策意涵。本篇論文支持沙賓法案的實施,並呼籲台灣金融監管機構嚴格化現行相關法規。
This paper follows Ashbaugh et al. (ALM) (2003) empirical test and uses Taiwan data from year 2004 to 2017 to examine the relationship between nonaudit fees and financial reporting quality, adapting discretionary accruals as proxy. We provide strong evidence showing that total nonaudit fee is significantly positive associated with discretionary accruals. We then observe that the Sarbanes–Oxley Act (SOX) could marginally enhance financial reporting quality. Finally, providing different categories of nonaudit services to audit clients has varying degrees of impact on discretionary accruals. Our empirical results indicate the effectiveness of implementing the SOX and lend support for the financial supervisors in Taiwan to amend relevant regulations accordingly.
Antle, R., Gordon, E., Narayanamoorthy, G., & Zhou, L. “The joint determination of audit fees, non-audit fees, and abnormal accruals.” Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting 27.3, 235-266, (2006).
Ashbaugh, Hollis, Ryan LaFond, and Brian W. Mayhew. “Do nonaudit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence.” The Accounting Review 78.3, 611-639, (2003).
Cheng, Kuie-Hui. “Auditor Sanction, Auditor-Auditee Bonding and Earnings Quality.”
Business Review 10.2, 1-23, (2005).
Chung, Hyeesoo, and Sanjay Kallapur. “Client importance, nonaudit services, and abnormal accruals.” The Accounting Review 78.4, 931-955, (2003).
DeFond, Mark L., Kannan Raghunandan, and K. R. Subramanyam. “Do non–audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions.” Journal of Accounting Research 40.4, 1247-1274, (2002).
Frankel, Richard M., Marilyn F. Johnson, and Karen K. Nelson. “The relation between auditors' fees for nonaudit services and earnings management.” The Accounting Review 77.s-1, 71-105, (2002).
Huang, Hua-Wei, Suchismita Mishra, and Kanan Raghunandan. “Types of nonaudit fees and financial reporting quality.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 26.1, 133-145, (2007).
Hung, Yu-Mei. “A Survey Study on Accountants' Legal Liability.” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. (1995).
Kinney Jr, W. R., Palmrose, Z. V., & Scholz, S. “Auditor independence, non‐audit services, and restatements: Was the US government right?”. Journal of Accounting Research 42.3, 561-588, (2004).
Krishnan, Jayanthi, Lixin Su, and Yinqi Zhang. “Nonaudit services and earnings management in the pre-SOX and post-SOX eras.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 30.3, 103-123, (2011).
Lai, Springfield. “The Changes in the Business Scope, Legal Responsibilities of A Certified Public Accountant (CPA) and The Evolution of Audit Firm's Organization.
” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. (2000).
Larcker, David F., and Scott A. Richardson. “Fees paid to audit firms, accrual choices, and corporate governance.” Journal of Accounting Research 42.3, 625-658, (2004).
Lee, Jan-Zan, and Chen, Jeng-Fang. “The Effect of Economic Incentive on Audit Independence: Evidence from Audit Groups within Big 5.” Taiwan Accounting Review 4.1, 79-96, (2003).
Lee, Jan-Zan, Hsu, Shu-Wei, and Chen, Jeng-Fang. “The Relationship between Non-Audit Services and Abnormal Accruals.” Journal of Accounting Review 37.7, 1-30, (2003).
Lee, Jan-Zan, Liao ,Hsiu-Mei, and Huang, Yu-Chi. “The Knowledge Spillover Effect between Audit and Non-Audit Services.” Journal of Chinese Management Review 13.2, 1-23, (2010).
Liao, Hsiu-Mei and Hung, Shiau-Wen. “Nonaudit Service, Audit Tenure and Audit Quality.” Journal of Contemporary Accounting 11(2), 151-178, (2010).
Li, Kuei-Fu, Chen, Yun-Shan, and Chang, Ling-Ling. “Is the Audit Market of Listed
Companies in Taiwan Competitive? The Perspective from Audit Fees.” Journal of Management & Systems 26.1, 1-41, (2019).
Ma, Chun-Mei and Hsieh, Yung-Ming. “The Effect of Spontaneous Auditor Change
within the Audit Firms on Corporate Earnings Quality.” Soochow Journal of Economics and Business, 56, (2007).
Ma, Chun-Mei, Su, Yu-Hui, and Li, Pei-Pei. “The Determinants of Audit Fees: A Study
for Listed Company in Taiwan.” Soochow Journal of Economics and Business 41, 25-50, (2003).
Mishra, S., K. Raghunandan, and D. Rama. “Do investors’ perceptions vary with types of non- audit fees? Evidence from auditor ratification voting.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 9–25, (2005).
Professional Ethics Committee of the National Federation of Certified Public Accountant Associations of the Republic of China. The Norm of Professional Ethics for Certified Public Accountant of the Republic of China. (2003).
Reynolds, J. Kenneth, Donald R. Deis Jr, and Jere R. Francis. “Professional service fees and auditor objectivity.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 23.1, 29-52, (2004).
Reynolds, J. Kenneth, and Jere R. Francis. “Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions.’ Journal of Accounting and Economics 30.3, 375-400, (2000).
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Financial Reporting Release No. 56: Revision of the Commission’s Auditor Independence Requirements. Washington, DC. (2000).
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Proposed Rule: Strengthening the Commission’s Requirements Regarding Auditor In- dependence. Release Nos. 33-8154; 34-46934. Washington, DC. (2002).
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Financial Reporting Release No. 68: Strengthening the Commission’s Requirements Regarding Auditor Independence. Washington, DC. (2003).
Su, Yu-Hui. “Audit fees and auditor size: A study of audit market in Taiwan.” Taiwan Accounting Review 1, 59-78, (2000).
Securities and Futures Bureau under the R.O.C (Taiwan) Financial Supervisory Commission. Article 10. Regulations Governing the Preparation of Financial Reports by Securities Issuers. (2002).
Securities and Futures Bureau under the R.O.C (Taiwan) Financial Supervisory Commission. General Inspection Report. (2018).
Securities and Futures Bureau under the R.O.C (Taiwan) Financial Supervisory Commission. List of Sanction by the Certified Public Accountant Law (For the recent 5 years). (2018).
Securities and Futures Bureau under the R.O.C (Taiwan) Financial Supervisory Commission. List of Sanction by the 3 Paragraph, 37 Article, Security and Exchange Act (For the recent 5 years). (2013).
Tsai, Bi-Huei and Lai, Kuei-Lien. “Analysis of Non-audit Service Provision, Enterprise Credit Risk and Auditors' Opinions in Taiwanese Firms.” Journal of National Defense Management 30.1, 103-122, (2009).
Tsai, I-Fang. “CPA's Legal Liability - A Survey of Liability Cap and Proportionate Liability” Unpublished Master Thesis, National Taiwan University, Taiwan. (1995).
Wu, Tsing-Zai C., Chiou, Jeng-Ren and Cheng,L. “The Influence of Corporate Governance on a CPA’s Going-concern Opinion for Financially Distressed Firms: An Empirical Study for Firms Listed in the Taiwan Stock Exchange.” NTU Management Review 21.2, 187 -217, (2011).
Yang, Yan-Jie and Guan, Yue-Duan. “Do Client Importance and Nonaudit Services Affect Audit Quality? Post-Enron Observation.” Journal of Accounting Studies 43, 27-61, (2006)
校內:2024-07-01公開