| 研究生: |
湯雅惠 Tang, Ya-Hui, |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
公司名聲與產品論證對漲價理由與價格公平性知覺關係之調節 The Moderation of Firm Reputation and Product Backing on Relationship between Price Increment and Perceived Price Fairness |
| 指導教授: |
葉桂珍
Yeh, Quey-Jen |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2014 |
| 畢業學年度: | 102 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 69 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 漲價理由 、公司名聲 、產品論證內容 、價格公平性知覺 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | the reasons of a price increment, firm reputation, trust-assuring arguments, price-fairness perception |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:74 下載:1 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
許多企業由於近年來原物料或人事成本等因素之變動,導致其銷售的商品或服務價格上漲。許多研究發現對於廠商的漲價行為,重視價格的消費者會進一步地影響到其對價格的接受程度、購買意願與品牌忠誠度。除了產品本身之售價外,也會選擇參考其他外佈線索,例如產品資訊、公司名聲、市場概況或代言人等因素,將這些資訊作分析後,進而判斷此產品或服務的價格公平性,而對於感知不公平的價格,消費者大多不會願意購買。
公司名聲代表企業整個品牌及產品的整體形象,故企業形象高者,消費者對於其產品的信賴度、忠誠度與知覺品質也較高,因此對於偏好高品質或針對某品牌有優越感的消費者而言,則會感知具有高名聲的企業其產品價格較合理,也願意支付較高的價格購買。
根據論證內容的模型 (TAP, Toulmin, 1958),當論證內容包含的資訊其結構越完整時,接收者將會感知其較有說服力且值得信賴,而學者Gilly (2007) 認為較具說服力的資訊則會影響消費者對於資訊的看法以及其購買意願。
本研究結果顯示,企業採取漲價行為時會使消費者改變對價格接受的程度,而其中當企業提出的漲價理由為外部因素時 (非廠商可控制之原因),相較於內部因素 (廠商可控制之原因),消費者會感知其漲價行為較合理。此外,當企業具備高名聲時,消費者會認為其產品漲價後的價格較可接受。再者,當產品提供較有說服力的資訊時,消費者容易被說服,且產生信任感,因而感知企業的漲價行為較可接受。
This thesis aims at investigating the effect of overall firm image and product information on the relationship between price increment and perceived price fairness. Eight scenarios were created in the experimental designs, which includes different criteria of firm reputation, completeness of product argument, and different reasons to increase product prices. The analysis focuses on the causal relationship between price raising and price fairness perception moderated by firm reputation and product argument. Online questionnaires were distributed and from which, 274 samples were collected. This research discovered that: first, the reasons for incrementing prices would create an impact on to consumers’ perceived price fairness. Second, the firm’s reputation moderates the relationship between the cause of price increment and price fairness perception; more particularly when price increment results from an external factor. And lastly, product argument moderates the relationship between the price increment cause and consumers’ perceived price fairness, specifically when the firm increases product’s price due to an external factor. In sum, consumers usually consider external cues in evaluating and rationalizing product price increments. And so as a result, companies should pay more attention to factors which will likely influence consumers’ attitude and acceptance toward product price increases.
葉日武,池文海 (2006),三種常用企業聲望量表之效度驗證,玄奘管理學報第四卷第一期,37-70.
黃柏鴻、林樹聲(2007),論證教學相關實證性研究之回顧與省思。科學教育月刊,Vol.302,5-20.
Bolton, E., Warlop, L. and Alba, W. (2003). Consumer Perceptions of Price (Un)Fairness. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 474–91.
Bei Lien-Ti, Yu-Ching Chiao. (2001). an Integrated Model for the Effects of Perceived Product, Perceived Service Quality, and Perceived Price Fairness on Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty. Jornal of Consumer Satisfaction,Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 14, 125-139.
Brucks, M., (1985). The effect of Product Class Knowledge on Information Search Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 1-15.
Chaiken, S., & Eagly, H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of personality and social psychology, 34(4), 605.
Campbell, C. (1999). Perceptions of Price Unfairness: Antecedents and Consequences. Journal of Marketing Research, 36, 99-187.
Campbell, C. (2007). Says who?! How the Source of Price Informations and Affect Influence Perceived Price (Un)fairness. Journal of Marketing Research, 2, 261-271.
Cacioppo, T., Petty R. & Morris, K. (1983). Effects of Need for Cognition on Message Evaluation, Recall and Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 805-818.
Daniel, L., Coombs, T. (2006). How Should a Company Response to a Product Harm Crisis? The Role of Corporation Reputation and Consumer-Based Cues. Business Horizon, 49, 379-385.
Fombrun, C. and Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (2), 233-258.
Giily, C., Graham, L., Wolfinbarger, F. Yale, J. (1998). A Dyadic Study of Interpersonal Information Search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 83-100.
Greyser, A. (1999). Advancing and enhancing corporate reputation. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 4(4), 177-181.
Herbig,P.& Milewicz,J. and Golden, J. (1994). A Model of reputation Building and Destruction. Journal of business research, 31, 23-31.
Joseph, K., and Robert, T. (1970). Psychophysics of Prices. Journal of Marketing Research, 7, 21-35.
Kahneman, Daniel, Jack L. Knetsch and Richard Thaler (1986). Fairness as a Constraint on Profit Seeking Entitlements in the Market. The American Economic Review, 76, 728–41.
Klein. Noreen M. and Janet E. Oglethorpe (1987). Cognitive Reference Points in Consumer Decision-Making. In Advances in Consumer Research, 14, 183-187.
Karen, C., Elizabeth G., Oliver & Sridhar R. (2003). The reputation index: Measuring and managing corporate reputation. European Management Journal, 21 (2), 201-212.
Kuhn, D. (1991). The skill of argument. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Marttunen, M. (1994). Assessing argumentation skill among finish university students. Learning and Instruction, 4, 175-191.
Kim, D. and Benbasat, I. (2003). TRUST-RELATED ARGUMENTS IN INTERNET STORES:A FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION, Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 4, 49-64.
Laufer,D. and Coombs, T. (2006). How should a company respond to a product harm crisis? The role of corporate reputation and consumer-based cues. Business Horizons, 49, 379-385.
Martins, A. and Monroe, B. (1994). Perceived Price Fairness: A New Look at an Old Construct,” Advances in Consumer Research, 21, 75-78.
Martin, A., Lang, B., Wong, S. (2003). Conclusion explicitness in advertising: The moderating role of need for cognition (NFC) and argument quality (AQ) on persuasion. Journal of Advertising, 32(4), 57-66.
Petty, E., Cacioppo, T. (1986). Central & Peripheral Routes to Persuasion: An Individual Difference Perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1032-1043.
Paul, H., Frank, K. and John, Kim. (1991). Effect of Word of Mouth and Product-Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility-Diagnosticity Perspective. Journal of Consumer Research, 17, 454-561.
Rosemary K. , Dickson R. and Urbany E. (1991). Perceived Price Fairness and Dual Entitlement. Advances in Consumer Research, 18, 788-793.
Shapiro, C. (1983). Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. The quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 661-79.
Sussman, W., & Siegal, S. (2003). Informational influence in organizations: an integrated approach to knowledge adoption. Information Systems Research, 14(1), 47-65.
Toulmin, E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
Toulmin, E, (2003). The Use of Argument : Updated Edition, Cambridge, U.K., New York Cambridge University Press.
Vaidyanathan, Rajiv and Praveen A. (2003). Who Is the Fairest of Them all? An Attributional Approach to Price Fairness Perceptions. Journal of Business Research, 56, 453-463.
Wang,Y., Shen, L.& Zhu, J.(2008). A Conceptual Action Model of Repuatation Mechanism and Corporate Governance. In International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application Workshops, 620-623.
Xia, Lan, Kent B. Monroe and Jennifer L. Cox (2004). The Price is Unfair! A Conceptual Framework of Price Fairness Perceptions. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–15.
Zeithaml,. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: a means-end model and synthesis of evidence. The Journal of Marketing, 2-22.