| 研究生: |
高嘉瑩 Kao, Chia-Yin |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
企業永續裁罰與債務資金成本之關聯性 The Association between Corporate Sustainability Penalties and Cost of Debt |
| 指導教授: |
黃華瑋
Huang, Hua-Wei |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 會計學系 Department of Accountancy |
| 論文出版年: | 2025 |
| 畢業學年度: | 113 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 42 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | ESG裁罰 、債務資金成本 、永續違法行為 、授信決策 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | ESG penalties, credit decision-making, cost of debt, sustainability violations |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:22 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究旨在探討企業發生ESG永續裁罰時,是否對其債務資金成本產生影響,進一步分析不同裁罰構面(環境、社會、治理)以及裁罰次數與金額對資金成本之影響。隨著永續政策推動與金融機構風險評估機制日趨成熟,ESG相關資訊逐漸被納入授信決策之重要考量。本研究以2000至2023年台灣上市櫃與興櫃企業為實證對象,採用TEJ資料庫之永續裁罰事件與財務數據進行實證分析,衡量企業永續裁罰與債務資金成本之關聯性。
研究結果顯示,企業若發生ESG相關裁罰,特別是環境構面之裁罰,將顯著提高其債務資金成本,顯示環境裁罰最易被債權人視為融資風險之訊號。相較之下,社會與治理構面裁罰之影響尚不顯著。另就裁罰嚴重程度分析,當年企業永續裁罰之裁罰次數與裁罰金額皆與資金成本呈顯著正向關係。整體而言,本研究實證結果支持ESG裁罰資訊作為授信風險評估的重要參考指標,對金融實務與政策制定提供實證依據,並呼籲企業強化永續治理機制,以降低其資金成本與提升信用品質。
This study investigates whether ESG-related penalties influence corporate debt financing costs, with a particular focus on the impact of different penalty dimensions—Environment, Social, and Governance—as well as the count and amount of such penalties. As sustainable finance policies advance and credit risk evaluation frameworks evolve, ESG information is increasingly incorporated into lending decisions.
Using a sample of listed and OTC firms in Taiwan from 2000 to 2023, this research utilizes ESG penalty and financial data from the Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ) to empirically examine the relationship between sustainability violations and the cost of debt.
The empirical results show that ESG penalties, especially those related to environmental issues, significantly increase firms’ debt financing costs. Environmental violations are more likely to be viewed by creditors as indicators of financing risk. In contrast, penalties in the Social and Governance dimensions do not show significant effects. Additionally, both the number and monetary amount of penalties are positively associated with higher debt costs, suggesting that the severity and count of violations serve as important credit risk signals.
Overall, this study provides empirical evidence supporting the integration of ESG penalty information into credit risk assessment, offering insights for financial practice and policy-making. It also calls on firms to strengthen their ESG governance to reduce financing costs and enhance credit quality.
Ahluwalia, R. (2002). How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270-279.
Anderson, R. C., Mansi, S. A., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(3), 315-342.
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103.
Apergis, N., Poufinas, T., & Antonopoulos, A. (2022). ESG scores and cost of debt. Energy Economics, 112, 106186.
Armour, J., Mayer, C., & Polo, A. (2017). Regulatory sanctions and reputational damage in financial markets. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 52(4), 1429-1448.
Bauer, R., & Hann, D. (2010). Corporate environmental management and credit risk. Available at SSRN 1660470.
Campiglio, E. (2016). Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics, 121, 220-230.
Capelle-Blancard, G., & Petit, A. (2019). Every little helps? ESG news and stock market reaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 157, 543-565.
Chava, S. (2014). Environmental externalities and cost of capital. Management Science, 60(9), 2223-2247.
Chen, L., Feldmann, A., & Tang, O. (2015). The relationship between disclosures of corporate social performance and financial performance: Evidences from GRI reports in manufacturing industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 170, 445-456.
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1-23.
Chi, W., Dhaliwal, D., Li, O. Z., & Lin, T. H. (2013). Voluntary reporting incentives and reporting quality: evidence from a reporting regime change for private firms in Taiwan. Contemporary Accounting Research, 30(4), 1462-1489.
Chi, W., Wu, S. J., & Zheng, Z. (2020). Determinants and consequences of voluntary corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from private firms. The British Accounting Review, 52(6), 100939.
Dai, R., Liang, H., & Ng, L. (2021). Socially responsible corporate customers. Journal of Financial Economics, 142(2), 598-626.
Dasgupta, S., Laplante, B., & Mamingi, N. (2001). Pollution and capital markets in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 42(3), 310-335.
Ding, W., Levine, R., Lin, C., & Xie, W. (2021). Corporate immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Financial Economics, 141(2), 802-830.
Eliwa, Y., Aboud, A., & Saleh, A. (2021). ESG practices and the cost of debt: Evidence from EU countries. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 79, 102097.
Fields, L. P., Fraser, D. R., & Subrahmanyam, A. (2012). Board quality and the cost of debt capital: The case of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 36(5), 1536-1547.
Francis, J. R., Khurana, I. K., & Pereira, R. (2005). Disclosure incentives and effects on cost of capital around the world. The Accounting Review, 80(4), 1125-1162.
Gao, H., Wang, J., Wang, Y., Wu, C., & Dong, X. (2020). Media coverage and the cost of debt. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 55(2), 429-471.
Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of bank loans. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(7), 1794-1810.
Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Pollution as news: Media and stock market reactions to the toxics release inventory data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(1), 98-113.
Hampl, F., & Vágnerová Linnertová, D. (2024). How do ESG controversies moderate the nexus between ESG performance and cost of capital? Evidence from European listed companies. Managerial Finance, 50(10), 1727-1746.
He, R., Chen, X., Chen, C., Zhai, J., & Cui, L. (2021). Environmental, social, and governance incidents and bank loan contracts. Sustainability, 13(4), 1885.
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93(1), 15-36.
Johnson, S., Boone, P., Breach, A., & Friedman, E. (2000). Corporate governance in the Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1-2), 141-186.
Kouwenberg, R., & Phunnarungsi, V. (2013). Corporate governance, violations and market reactions. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 21(1), 881-898.
La Rosa, F., Liberatore, G., Mazzi, F., & Terzani, S. (2018). The impact of corporate social performance on the cost of debt and access to debt financing for listed European non-financial firms. European Management Journal, 36(4), 519-529.
Liu, X., Jin, X., Luo, X., & Zhou, Y. (2023). Quantifying the spatiotemporal dynamics and impact factors of China's county-level carbon emissions using ESTDA and spatial econometric models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 410, 137203.
Nofsinger, J. R., Sulaeman, J., & Varma, A. (2019). Institutional investors and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Corporate Finance, 58, 700-725.
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403-441.
Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093.
Seltzer, L. H., Starks, L., & Zhu, Q. (2022). Climate regulatory risk and corporate bonds (No. w29994). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Van Binsbergen, J. H., Graham, J. R., & Yang, J. (2010). The cost of debt. The Journal of Finance, 65(6), 2089-2136.
Zaiane, S., & Ellouze, D. (2023). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance: the moderating effects of size and industry sensitivity. Journal of Management and Governance, 27(4), 1147-1187.
吳幸蓁, & 廖蕙儀. (2017). 自願性揭露企業社會責任資訊之決定因素與其資訊後果. 中山管理評論, 25(1), 13-62.
翁鈺雅 (2024). 企業ESG爭議事件對銀行貸款成本之影響.(碩士論文,國立政治大學)
溫肇東, & 陳俊銘. (2010). 英國石油 (BP) 墨西哥灣漏油事件的管理省思. 商管科技季刊, 11(3), 315-336.
資誠聯合會計師事務所.(2021). 〈企業永續發展新訊〉,網址:https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/sustainability-news/pdf/sustainability-news-220126.pdf
資誠聯合會計師事務所.(2022). 〈2022台灣CEO調查〉,網址:https://www.pwc.tw/zh/ceo-survey/2022/assets/2022-taiwan-ceo-survey.pdf
Chen, M. H., & Wu, Y. H. (2024). ESG 第三方確信, 負面社會責任新聞報導與債 務資金成本間之關聯性. 會計評論, (78), 1-43.
校內:2030-06-21公開