| 研究生: |
丁禹豪 Din, Yu-Hao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
現有汽車座椅吸能裝置之設計於後方撞擊中降低乘員傷害之研究 Design of an Energy-Absorbing Device on Current Car Seat to Lessen Occupant's Injuries During Rear Impacts |
| 指導教授: |
黃才烱
Huang, Tsai-Jeon |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系 Department of Mechanical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2026 |
| 畢業學年度: | 114 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 124 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 後方撞擊 、頸部傷害 、摩擦式阻尼器 、吸能裝置 、汽車座椅 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | Rear Impact, Neck Injury, Energy-Absorbing Device, Friction Damper |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:27 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
後方撞擊為道路交通事故中常見的碰撞型態之一,雖其致死率相對較低,但乘員頸部傷害之發生比例仍相當高。撞擊過程中,座椅將車體負載傳遞至乘員軀幹,而頭部因慣性作用產生相對滯後,使頭部與軀幹間形成明顯的相對運動,進而增加頸部傷害風險。因此,本研究由座椅與車體間之能量傳遞路徑進行改善,設計出一套可安裝於現有汽車座椅之吸能裝置,以降低後方撞擊時傳遞至乘員之頸部傷害。
本研究以既有汽車座椅有限元素模型與BioRID II 後撞碰撞人偶模型為基礎,將由摩擦式阻尼器與機械式避震器組成之吸能裝置配置於座椅與滑台之間。摩擦式阻尼器用以建立作動門檻並透過滑移耗散撞擊能量,機械式避震器則用以控制座椅滑移速度與回彈反應。模擬條件參考Euro NCAP後方撞擊動態測試流程,分別建立中嚴重度與高嚴重度撞擊條件,比較有無安裝吸能裝置時之座椅動態反應、能量變化與乘員頸部傷害指標。
模擬結果顯示,安裝吸能裝置後,中嚴重度與高嚴重度撞擊之座椅動能峰值分別降低22.15%與27.89%,NIC分別降低27.9%與11.6%,Nkm則分別降低24.4%與10.3%。Euro NCAP後方撞擊動態評分亦由2.186分提升至2.588分。綜合結果顯示,所提出之吸能裝置可藉由受控滑移與阻尼作用降低部分撞擊能量傳遞,並改善乘員頭頸部動態反應與多數頸部傷害指標,顯示其具有提升現有汽車座椅後方撞擊乘員保護性能之潛力。
Rear-impact collisions are common traffic accidents and frequently result in neck injuries.During a rear impact, the seat transfers vehicle-induced loads to the occupant’s torso,while the head lags behind because of inertia, producing relative motion between the head and torso. This study proposes an energy-absorbing device that can be integrated into an existing automotive seat to reduce the dynamic loading transmitted to the occupant.
An existing automotive seat finite element model and a BioRID II rear-impact dummy model were used. The proposed device consists of a friction damper and a mechanical shock absorber installed between the seat and the sled. The friction damper provides an activation threshold and dissipates impact energy through controlled sliding, while the shock absorber controls seat sliding velocity and rebound. Rear-impact simulations were conducted under medium- and high-severity conditions based on the Euro NCAP rear impact dynamic test procedure.
The results showed that peak seat kinetic energy decreased by 22.15% and 27.89% under the medium- and high-severity conditions, respectively. NIC decreased by 27.9% and 11.6%, while Nkm decreased by 24.4% and 10.3%. The Euro NCAP rear-impact dynamic assessment score increased from 2.186 to 2.588. These results indicate that the proposed device can reduce impact-energy transmission and improve most neck injury indicators, demonstrating its potential to enhance rear-impact occupant protection in existing automotive seats.
Boström, O., Svensson, M. Y., Aldman, B., Hansson, H. A., Håland, Y., Lövsund, P., Seeman, T., Suneson, A., Säljö, A., and Örtengren, T. (1997). A new neck injury criterion candidate-based on injury findings in the cervical spinal ganglia after experimental neck extension trauma. In PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 INTERNATIONAL IRCOBI CONFERENCE ON THE BIOMECHANICS OF IMPACT, SEPTEMBER 11-13, 1996, DUBLIN, IRELAND.
Bowman, B. M., Schneider, L. W., Lustick, L. S., Anderson, W. R., and Thomas, D. J. (1984). Simulation analysis of head and neck dynamic response. In 28th Stapp Car Crash Conference (1984). SAE Technical Paper.
Dixon, J. C. (2007). The shock absorber handbook. John Wiley & Sons.
European New Car Assessment Programme (2025). Crash Protection Rear Impact Protocol. Protocol Version 1.1, Euro NCAP. Implementation January 2026.
Freeman, M. D., Croft, A. C., and Rossignol, A. M. (1998). " whiplash associated disorders: redefining whiplash and its management" by the quebec task force: a critical evaluation. Spine, 23(9):1043–1049.
Himmetoglu, S., Acar, M., Bouazza-Marouf, K., and Taylor, A. J. (2008). Energy-absorbing car seat designs for reducing whiplash. Traffic injury prevention, 9(6):583–591.
Humanetics (2026). BioRID-II. https://www.humaneticsgroup.com/products/anthropomorphic-test-devices/rear-impact/biorid-ii. Accessed June 1, 2026.
Jakobsson, L., Lundell, B., Norin, H., and Isaksson-Hellman, I. (2000). Whips–volvo’s whiplash protection study. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(2):307–319.
Kaneoka, K., Ono, K., Inami, S., and Hayashi, K. (1999). Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. Spine, 24(8):763–769.
Kelly, J. R. (2003). BioRID-IIc Rear Impact Crash Test Dummy. Technical report, Robert A. Denton Inc., Rochester Hills, Michigan, USA.
Lundell, B., Jakobsson, L., Alfredsson, B., Lindström, M., and Simonsson, L. (1998). The whips seat-a car seat for improved protection against neck injuries in rear-end impacts. In Proc. 16th ESV Conference, Paper, volume 98, page S7.
Maurel, N., Lavaste, F., and Skalli, W. (1997). A three-dimensional parameterized finite element model of the lower cervical spine, study of the influence of the posterior articular facets. Journal of Biomechanics, 30(9):921–931.
Mertz, H. and Patrick, L. M. (1967). Investigation of the kinematics and kinetics of whiplash. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper.
Mertz, H. J. and Patrick, L. M. (1971). Strength and response of the human neck. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper.
Mualla, I. H. (2000). Experimental Evaluation of New Friction Damper Device. In Proceedings of the 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand. Paper No. 1048.
Munoz, D., Mansilla, A., López-Valdés, F. J., and Martin, R. (2005). A study of current neck injury criteria used for whiplash analysis. proposal of a new criterion involving upper and lower neck load cells. In Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, volume 2005, pages 14p–14p. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
National Center for Statistics and Analysis (2025). Traffic safety facts 2023: A compilation of motor vehicle traffic crash data. Technical Report DOT HS 813 738, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Ono, K. and Kaneoka, K. (1999). Motion analysis of human cervical vertebrae during low-speed rear impacts by the simulated sled. Traffic Injury Prevention, 1(2):87–99.
Ono, K. and Kanno, M. (1996). Influences of the physical parameters on the risk to neck injuries in low impact speed rear-end collisions. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 28(4):493–499.
Saunders, J. W., Molino, L. N., and McKoy, F. (2003). Performance of seating systems in a fmvss no. 301 rear impact crash test. In 18th Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV) Conference.
Schmitt, K., Muser, M., Heggendorn, M., Niederer, P., and Walz, F. (2003). Development of a damping seat slide to reduce whiplash injury. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part D: Journal of Automobile Engineering, 217(11):949–955.
Schmitt, K.-U., Muser, M. H., and Niederer, P. (2001). A new neck injury criterion candidate for rear-end collisions taking into account shear forces and bending moments. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper.
Sekizuka, M. (1998). Seat designs for whiplash injury lessening. In Proceedings: International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, volume 1998, pages 1570–1578. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Stahlschmidt, S. (2015). LS-DYNA BioRID-II Version 3.8 User’s Manual. DYNAmore GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany. Manual Release 0.0 for Model 3.8.
Tare, H. K. and Dharankar, C. S. (2016). Determination of Damping Coefficient of Automotive Hydraulic Damper Using Sinusoidal Testing. International Journal of Current Engineering and Scientific Research, 3(7):4–13. ISSN: 2393-8374.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (2023). UNECE Annual Report 2022. Annual report, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
Urbaniak, C. R. (2006). Conceptualisation and Analysis of an Automotive Shock Absorber with Integrated Hydraulic Mount. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
van Ratingen, M., Ellway, J., Avery, M., Gloyns, P., Sandner, V., and Versmissen, T. (2009). The euro ncap whiplash test. In 21st international technical conference on the enhanced safety of vehicles, pages 09–0231.
Volvo Cars Global (2003). Volvo seats reduce whiplash by 50 per cent. Press release; accessed June 1, 2026.
Watanabe, Y., Ichikawa, H., Kayama, O., Ono, K., Kaneoka, K., and Inami, S. (2000). Influence of seat characteristics on occupant motion in low-speed rear impacts. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 32(2):243–250.
Więckowski, D., Dąbrowski, K., and Ślaski, G. (2018). Adjustable Shock Absorber Characteristics Testing and Modelling. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 421:022039.
Wiklund, K. and Larsson, H. (1998). Saab active head restraint (sahr)-seat design to reduce the risk of neck injuries in rear impacts. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper.
Zellmer, H., Stamm, M., Seidenschwang, A., and Brunner, A. (2001). Enhancement of seat performance in low-speed rear impact. In International Technical Conference on Enhanced Safety of Vehicles. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
交通部公路局 (2025). 機動車輛登記數. 交通部公路局統計查詢網.
張鈞岳 (2014). 根據NCAP後撞測試規範行汽車座椅安全設計與模擬. Master’s thesis, 國立成功大學機械工程學系學位論文.
林意謙 (2021). 應用有限元素法進行 Euro-NCAP 汽車座椅後撞測試之評估. Master’s thesis, 國立成功大學機械工程學系學位論文.