| 研究生: |
王智鈿 Wang, ,Zhi-Tian |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
拓樸最佳化於船體縱梁開孔設計應用 Applications of Topology optimization on hull girder lightening hole design |
| 指導教授: |
林忠宏
Lin, Chung-Hung |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 系統及船舶機電工程學系 Department of Systems and Naval Mechatronic Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2021 |
| 畢業學年度: | 109 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 51 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 拓樸最佳化 、密度函數法 、有限元素法 、強度分析 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | topology optimization, density function method, Strength analysis |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:102 下載:0 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
本研究依據拓樸最佳化的方法於貨櫃船舯部縱梁開孔設計應用,比較原始設計與拓樸最佳化設計,計算其Von mises應力分佈,以船級社標準探討拓樸最佳化設計開孔可行性。
使用ANSYS模擬軟體應力分析模組,以1800TEU貨櫃船舯部縱梁為對象,對其設定不同邊界及施加不同負載的條件下,針對縱梁所受應力加以探討。
拓樸最佳化使用方法為密度函數法,以最小柔度為目標函數,並設定限制體積作為限制條件,以縱梁區域為開孔設計對象進行最佳化分析。
比較原始設計與拓樸最佳化設計,分析其應力分佈以及開孔形狀,以計算驗收標準判斷拓樸最佳化設計是否優於原始設計。
This study deal with hull girder lightening hole design of Topology optimization, Compare the original design to the optimization design, It then goes on to calculate Von mises stress distribution, and discuss feasibility of Topology optimization method based on Lloyd's Register rule.
Using the analysis module inside ANSYS simulation software stress, taking 1800 TEU container amidship longitudianl girder as a research subject, Before proceeding to discuss longitudianl girder, it will be necessary to setting different boundaries and applying different loads.
The method of Topology optimization is the density function method, the minimum compliance is the objective function, and the volume is set as the constraint condition, taking the longitudinal girder area as the design object of the lightening hole for optimization analysis.
After compare the original design to the topology optimization design, analysis the stress distribution and the shape of the hole, with acceptance criteria to judge the topology optimization design is better than the original design.
[1] Michell, “The limits of economy of material in frame-structures”, Philosophical Magazine, Vol.84, p.589-597, 1904
[2] Schmit, L. A.,“ Structural synthesis 1959–1969:A decade of progress, Recent Advances in Matrix Methods of Structural Analysis and Design ”, Univ. Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp.565-614, 1971
[3] Haftka R.T. and Grandhi,R.V. ,“ Structural Shape Optimization – A Survey,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , pp.91-106, 1986
[4] Bendsoe M.P. and Kikuchi,N.,“ GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD ”, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering , pp.197-224, 1988
[5] Xie,Y.M. and Steven,G.P.,“A Simple Evolutionary Procedure for Structural Optimization”, Computers and Structures, 49, No.5, pp.885-896, 1992
[6] Yeon-Seung Lee and Jose A. Gonzalez ,“ Structural topology optimization of the transition piece for an offshore wind turbine with jacket foundation ”, Renewable Energy , pp.1214-1225, 2016
[7] Altair , https://web.altair.com/ship-design-goes-organic-to-save-material
[8] Bendsoe M. P.,“ Optimal shape design as a material distribution problem. Structural optimization ”, pp.193-202, 1989
[9] Hashin. Z and Shtrikman .S,“ A variational approach to the elastic behavior of multiphase minerals” Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, pp.127-140 , 1963
[10] Xianmin Zhang · Benliang Zhu ,“ Topology Optimization of Compliant Mechanisms ”
[11] Bendsoe M. P. and Sigmund,“ Ole, Topology Optimization: Theory,Methods and Applications ”, New York: Springer-Verlag, 2003
[12] Lloyd's Register , ‘‘Structural Design Assessment Primary Structure of Container Ships ’’, 2016
[13] IACS , ‘‘UR S11 Longitudinal Strength Standard’’ , 2020
[14] RINA,’’ Rules for the Classification of Ships ’’ , 2015
[15] X. Huang and Y.M. Xie,‘‘Evolutionary Topology Optimization of Continuum Structures: Methods and Applications’’, John Wiley & Sons Ltd ,2010
[16] Sergio Ivvan Valdez Pena and Salvador Botello Rionda, ‘‘Topology optimization algorithms for the solution of compliance and volume problems in 2D’’, CIMAT,2016
校內:2026-07-28公開