簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 郭穎謙
Ying-Chien, Kuo
論文名稱: 政府政策對市場經濟之影響分析--以中國宏觀調控政策對鋼價之影響為例
Government Policy to Influence Analysis Market Economy---Take the China Government’s Fuction of Macro Control Coordination to Influence of the Steel Price as the Example
指導教授: 邱正仁
Chiou, Jeng-Ren
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 管理學院 - 高階管理碩士在職專班(EMBA)
Executive Master of Business Administration (EMBA)
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 61
中文關鍵詞: 衝擊反應變異數分解單根檢定宏觀調控鋼鐵產業
外文關鍵詞: the government’s function of macro control coor, mpulse response function, steel industry, forecast error variance decomposition, unit root test
相關次數: 點閱:153下載:3
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 中國總理溫家寶2004年4月27日宣佈宏觀調控政策,採取強而有力措施,以壓抑中國國內過熱之經濟成長,對於我國的影響係以鋼鐵、電解鋁、水泥、房地產衝擊較大;2005年中國鋼鐵需求量佔全球鋼鐵需求量27.7%,以成為全球最大鋼鐵需求量國家,故中國鋼市足以影響全球鋼鐵市場;我國與中國同處亞洲,在全球化的今天,鋼鐵產業更深受其影響。

    本研究為探討政府政策對市場經濟之影響,而以中國宏觀調控政策對鋼價之影響為例,希我國鋼鐵產業對於國家干預政策能有效因應、預為應對。

    在實證資料方面鋼價是以CRU亞洲鋼價指數為主要分析變數加以探討,而政策影響因素則選取宏觀調控相關中國總體經濟變數加以分析。利用時間序列資料,分別以單根檢定、變異數分解及衝擊反應等方式檢測中國宏觀調控政策對鋼價之影響以及彼此間長短期交互影響關係。

    主要結論分述如下:

    一、由衝擊反應分析得知亞洲鋼價指數與宏觀調控相關中國總體經濟變數,確實存在長短期相互影響關係。
    二、由變異數分解分析得知亞洲鋼價指數隨著時間之增 加,明顯的由原自本身100%之變異,經過 2004年5月(宏觀調控)後,變異幾乎來自宏觀調控相關之中國總體經濟變數變異。
    三、由本研究得知行政干預手段仍然有其意義和功能,是故鋼廠現階 段有意投資中國設廠應採取較審慎保守的作為,注意宏觀調控的實際成效,再決定投資計畫推動之力道與投資速度;同時鋼廠投資對於國家政策干預程度,更應抱持高度評估審慎計畫之態度面對。

    The Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao’s announced the government’s function of macro control coordination on the April, 27th 2004, hope this powerful policy could hold back China’s over heated on economic growth. This also had an impact on the industry of steel, electro-aluminum, cement, and real estate in Taiwan. The demand of steel in China is 27.7% of the whole world, it’s the biggest amount of steel demand on earth, that’s why the China market could influence the steel market of the world, included Taiwan.

    This research is going to discuss that how the government’s policy could effect the market economy, and we will take the China government’s function of macro control coordination as an example. The steel industry in Taiwan could learn how to deal with government’s interfere with policy by this as well.

    In this research, we use CRU Asia steel index as a main variable to analysis the price of steel, we took the general economic variable of macro control coordination in China as a policy factor to analysis the influence factor. Then we used the sort of time data, such as unit root test, forecast error variance decomposition, and the impulse response function to analysis that what the China government’s function of macro control coordination to do with steel price, and their related connection.

    Summarize as follow:

    1、From the Impulse Response function analysis, we can tell the Asia steel price has a close relationship with the China’s economic variable of government’s function of macro control coordination.
    2、In the error variance decomposition, we can say that the increase of Asia steel price by times, the differentiation is 100% by itself, after the government’s function of macro control coordination in 2004, the differentiation is all by China’s general economic variable.
    3、We could tell that interfere with policy really does have it’s meaning and functions, so steel company should be careful to invest in China, better to notice the effect of government’s function of macro control coordination. About government’s interfere with policy, industrialists should considerate and evaluate it more seriously, and come with a prudential plan.

    目 錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅰ 表目錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅲ 圖目錄…………………………………………………………………Ⅳ 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究動機………………………………………………………2 第三節 研究目的………………………………………………………3 第四節 研究步驟………………………………………………………4 第二章 文獻探討………………………………………………………6 第一節 市場均衡分析…………………………………………………6 第二節 政治干預………………………………………………………9 第三節 管制價格之侷限………………………………………………11 第四節 計量方法文獻…………………………………………………13 第三章 鋼鐵產業環境與概論…………………………………………16 第一節 中國之鋼鐵業概況……………………………………………16 第二節 中國之宏觀調控政策…………………………………………20 第三節 煉鋼產業投入產出流程分析…………………………………22 第四節 鋼鐵業的價值創造策略………………………………………27 第四章 研究方法………………………………………………………29 第一節 研究假說………………………………………………………29 第二節 研究範圍及資料來源…………………………………………33 第三節 研究方法………………………………………………………36 第五章 實證結果分析…………………………………………………42 第一節 敘述性統計資料敘述…………………………………………42 第二節 單根檢定結果…………………………………………………43 第三節 向量誤差修正模型……………………………………………44 第四節 預測誤差變異分解結果………………………………………47 第五節 衝擊反應函數結果……………………………………………49 第六章 結論與建議……………………………………………………56 第一節 研究結論………………………………………………………56 第二節 研究建議………………………………………………………58 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………59

    壹、中文部份
    丁萬鳴,1992,我國獎勵投資政策的政治經濟分析—從「獎勵投資條例」到「促進產業升級條例」,台灣大學三民主義研究所碩士論文。
    王尊賢,2006,國際銅價決定機制與影響因素之實證分析,中原大學國際貿易研究所碩士論文。
    宋鎮照,1993,依賴發展的政治經濟學分析:一個理論研究架構的探討,思與言,第31卷第2期,頁51-87。
    宋鎮照,1995,發展政治經濟學—理論與實踐,台北:五南出版社。
    李雨純,2000,亞洲金融風暴下之國際股市動態傳導效果,文化大學經濟學研究所碩士論文。
    周育仁,1997,我國政府經濟管制角色之分析:兼論建立廉能政府應有的方向,經濟情勢暨評論,第2卷第4期,頁6-9。
    林建山,1991,產業政策與產業管理,台北:環球經濟出版社。
    孫克難,1991,獎勵投資條例的綜合檢討,收錄於李宗哲主編之台灣經濟研究論叢(第六輯):產業經濟,台北:中華經濟研究院。
    張世賢、陳恆鈞,1997,公共政策—政府與市場的觀點,台北:商鼎文化。
    張清溪、許嘉棟、劉鷹釧、吳聰敏,1998,經濟學,台北:翰蘆圖書。
    張裕鑫,2001,歐元成立對台灣貿易及股市之影響,成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    莊春發,2002,競爭的內涵與公平交易法規範,公平交易季刊,第10卷第3期,頁1-5。
    許淑華,2000,歐洲經濟暨貨幣聯盟會員國匯率長期趨勢效果之檢定,銘傳大學金融研究所碩士論文。
    郭建中,1992,政治經濟學與台灣政經發展經驗,台灣大學中山學術論叢,第8卷第10期,頁89-107。
    黃鎮台,2001,全球化下的兩岸經貿政策與台灣競爭力,國家政策論壇,第1卷第6期,頁107-127。
    楊炯洋,2000,從台灣紡織業的外移與轉型論國家角色,政治大學中山人文社會科學研究所碩士論文。
    楊國義,1996,開放型都市工業經濟效率分析—以DEA 法評估兩岸沿海都市為例,中山大學大陸研究所碩士論文。
    蕭全政,2000,政治與經濟的整合,台北:桂冠出版社。

    貳、西文部份
    Afriant, S. N., 1967, The construction of utility functions from expenditure data, International Economic Review, 8, 67-77.
    Ajayi, R., J. Friedman, and S. Mehdian, 1998, On the relationship between stock returns and exchange rate: Tests of granger causality, Global Finance Journal 9(2), 241-251.
    Archibald, R., and Gillingham, R., 1980, An analysis of the short-run consumer demand for gasoline using household survey data, Revolution Economic the State,23, 623-629.
    Chavas, J. E., and Cox, T. L., 1997, On nonparametric demand analysis, European Economic Review, 41, 75-95.
    Chernik, H., and Reschovsky, A., 1992, Is the gasoline tax regressive? Institute of Research on Poverty, 980-992.
    Dick, H., 1980, The oil price subsidy deforestation and equity, Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 16(3), 32-60.
    Diewert, W. E., 1973, Afriant and revealed preference theory, Review of Economic Studies, 40, 419-406.
    Diewert, W. E., 1985, Tests for the eonsistency of consumer data, Journal of Econometrics 30, 127-147.
    Engle, R. F., and C. W. J. Granger. 1987. Co-integration and error correction:representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55(2): 251-276.
    Fisher, F. M., P. H. Cootner, and M. N. Baily, 1972, An econometric model of the world copper industry, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3(2), 568-609.
    Gerdtham, U. G., M. Johannesson, L. Lundberg, and D. Isacson, 1999, The demand for health: results from new measures of health capital, European Journal of Political Economy 15, 501-521.
    Granger, C. W. J. 1969, Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica 37, 424-438.
    Grossman, M., 1972, On the concept of health capital and the demand for health, Journal of Political Economy 80, 223-255.
    Johansen, S., and K. Juselius . 1990, Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on co-integration-with applications to the demand for money. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52(2), 169-210.
    Kennedy, M., 1974, An economist model of the world oil market, Bell Journal 5(4), 540-577.
    Kettl, D. F., 2000, The transformation of governance: globalization, devolution, and the role of government, Public Administration Review 60, 488-497.
    Kodra, J. E., 1997, Restructuring the state: devolution, privatization, and geographic redistribution of power and capacity in governance, State Devolution in America12, 79-96.
    Koshal, R. K., M. Koshal, K. L. Luthra,. and D. J. Lindley, 1990,Productive and high energy prices: a case of some Pan-Pacific countries, Energy Economics 12(3), 197-203.
    Koshal, R. K., M. Koshal, R. G. Boyd, and H. Rachmany, 1999, Demand for kerosene in developing countries: a case of Indonesia, Journal of Asian Economics 10, 329-336.
    Landsburg, S. E., 1981, Taste change in the United Kingdom 1900-1955, Journal of Political Economy 89, 92-94.
    Mannering, F. and C. Winston, 1985, Vehicle demand and the demand for new car fuel efficiency, Rand Journal of Economics 16, 215-236.
    Pei, F. and J. E. Tilton, 1999, Consumer preferences, technological change, and the short-run income elasticity of metal demand, Resources Policy 25, 87-109.
    Porter, M. E., 1990, The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York : Free Press.
    Sims C. A. 1980. Macroeconomics and reality, Econometrica 48, 1-48.
    Skocpol, T., 1979, State and Social Revolutions. Cambridge Mass: Cambridge University Press.
    Slade, M. E., 1991, Market Structure, marketing method, and price instability, Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4), 1309-1340.
    Smadja, C., 2000, Time to learn from seattle. Newsweek ( Atlantic Edition) 17, 64-66.
    Varian, H., 1982, The nonparametric approach to demand analysis, Econometrica 50, 945-973.
    Varian, H., 1983, Nonparametric tests of consumer behavior, Review of Econometric Studies 50, 99-110.
    Varian, H., 1985, Nonparametric analysis of ptimizing behavior with measurement error, Journal of Econometric 30, 445-458.

    下載圖示 校內:立即公開
    校外:2006-07-05公開
    QR CODE