簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 呂罡銘
Lu, Kang-Ming
論文名稱: 應用衛星遙測技術 解析都市地表不透水率之研究 -以台南市為例
An Application of Satellite Remote Sensing Technique to Analyze Percentage of Impervious Surface Area in Urban Environment - A Case Study of Tainan City
指導教授: 林憲德
Lin, Hsien-Te
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 規劃與設計學院 - 建築學系
Department of Architecture
論文出版年: 2006
畢業學年度: 94
語文別: 中文
論文頁數: 104
中文關鍵詞: 地表不透水率預測公式分層篩選分類法衛星遙測地表不透水率
外文關鍵詞: Predicting equation of the impervious surface ar, Satellite remote sensing, Percentage of impervious surface area (ISA), Sifter
相關次數: 點閱:76下載:5
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 都市地表不透水率(ISA,Percentage of Impervious Surface Area)為評估
    都市水循環體系重要的指標,在都市微氣候與生態環境的評估上,亦占有舉足輕重
    的影嚮性。為了具體呈現都市ISA 分布的狀況,並進行都市區域ISA 定量與定性的
    解析,本研究以台南市為例,應用衛星遙測技術解析都市ISA。本研究內容分成兩
    階段,分別探討「應用衛星遙測技術解析都市ISA 之可行性」與「台南市ISA 之解
    析」兩個課題。
    第一階段,本研究採用「非監督式分類法」、「監督式分類法」與本研究發展
    的「分層篩選法」三種分類方法,進行二十二組實驗,並以多項評估指標進行綜合
    評估,選擇其中最佳的實驗數據,以進行製作台南市ISA 數值圖的工作。在二十二
    組分類實驗中,以「分層篩選法」第二次實驗(Sifter_C02)之綜合評估結果最佳,
    適合度(α)達0.93、ΔISA 為-2.04%、分類純度達80.69%、未分類率為15.41%,
    因此,本研究採用該實驗結果進行繪製台南市ISA 數值圖。
    第二階段,本研究根據台南市ISA 數值圖,解析台南市各行政區之ISA。台
    南市各行政區ISA 數值由高而低依序如下:北區62.25%、中西區59.97%、東區
    59.36%、南區40.74%、安平區35.64%、安南區20.23%,而台南市全區為
    30.80%。影響台南市各行政區ISA 之重要都市計畫因子,在正相關部分有商工住
    路區比(R=0.98)、人口密度(R=0.95)與;在負相關部分主要有公園自然區比
    (R=-0.98)。本研究根據都市計畫因子進行迴歸分析,推導整理出三條台南市各行
    政區ISA 之預測公式,公式如下:
    ISA= 0.743X 商工住路區比+ 7.411 ··················································· 公式A
    ISA= 2.826 X 人口密度+ 20.881 ····················································· 公式B
    ISA= -0.688 X 公園自然區比+ 67.318 ·············································· 公式C
    本研究初步證實應用「衛星遙測技術」可有效解析台南市ISA,同時提出影
    響台南市ISA 的都市計畫因子,並推導出台南市各行政區ISA 單迴歸預測式,以提
    供都市計畫相關領域工作者參考與使用。
    關鍵字:地表不透水率、衛星遙測、分層篩選分類法、地表不透水率預測公

    The percentage of impervious surface area (ISA) is one of the important
    index while assessing the city water circulation. It also plays an important role
    on the evaluation of urban micro climate and city eco-environment. In order to
    quantified and qualitative analyze the state of ISA in urban environment; we
    utilized satellite remote sensing technique to analyze the percentage of ISA in
    Tainan city. This research is divided into two subjects. One is the feasibility
    study of the application of utilizing satellite remote sensing technique on
    analyzing the percentage of ISA area in urban area, and another subjects is the
    analysis of percentage of ISA in Tainan .
    In the first phase, we carried out 22 times experiments with three
    classification methods (Unsupervised, Supervised and Sifter) from those we
    choice the best experimental result (Sifter_C02, test of goodness of fit is 0.93,
    ΔISA is -2.04%,degree of purity is 80.69%, percentage of unclassified pixel is
    15.41%) by multiple assessment index to develop ISA scatter map of Tainan
    city.
    During the second phase, we analyze ISA in every administrative area of
    Tainan according to Tainan ISA maps. The ISA values of north district is
    62.25%, center-western district is 59.97%, east district is 59.36%, south
    district is 40.74%, district of Anping is 35.64%, district of Annan is 20.23%,
    and the overall value of Tainan is 30.80%. The rate of the total amount of
    commercial, industry, residential and road area (CIRR,R=0.98), population
    density (R=0.95) , and the rate of the total amount of park and natural surface
    area (PN,R=-0.98) are the three influential factors of ISA. We use regression
    analysis to establish three simple predicting equations:
    ISA= 0.743X CIRR + 7.411 ················································· equation A
    ISA= 2.826 X population density + 20.881 ··································· equation B
    ISA= -0.688 X PN + 67.318 ·············································· equation C
    Key word:Percentage of impervious surface area (ISA), Satellite remote sensing,
    Sifter, Predicting equation of the impervious surface area percentage

    中文摘要 英文摘要 謝誌 目錄·······································Ⅰ 圖目錄······································Ⅳ 表目錄······································Ⅵ 第一章緒論 第一章緒論····································1 1-1 前言·······································································1 1-2 文獻回顧···································································2 1-2.1 地表不透水率計算方式·····················································2 1-2.2 地表不透水率研究方法·····················································2 1-2.3 衛星遙測相關研究·························································3 1-2.4 數位影像基礎知識······························4 1-2.5 一般遙測分類方法·························································5 1-3 研究動機與目的·····························································5 1-4 研究內容與範圍·····························································6 1-5 研究方法與流程·····························································7 第二章遙測分類方法與結果 第二章遙測分類方法與分類結果···················································9 2-1 遙測分類方法·······························································9 2-1.1 遙測分類方法·····························································9 2-1.2 衛星影像之選擇··························································10 2-1.3 分類軟體之選擇··························································13 2-1.4 查核區地表不透水率之調查················································13 2-1.5 分類結果之評估指標······················································19 2-2 非監督式分類方法··························································22 2-2.1 分類方法································································22 2-2.2 查核區查核······························································24 2-3 監督式分類方法····························································26 2-3.1 分類方法································································26 2-3.2 訓練區訓練·································27 2-3.3 查核區查核······························································28 2-4 分層篩選分類方法··························································30 2-4.1 分層篩選分類法之目的····················································30 2-4.2 分層篩選分類法之方法····················································31 2-4.3 訓練區訓練·································32 2-4.4 分層篩選分類法之評估指標················································37 2-4.5 分層篩選分類································39 2-4.6 查核區查核······························································52 2-4.7 查核結果再訓練·······························53 第三章遙測分類結果之解析 第三章遙測分類結果之解析······················································55 3-1 遙測分類結果之綜合評估····················································55 3-1.1 綜合評估之目的··························································55 3-1.2 綜合評估之原則··························································55 3-1.3 遙測分類結果之綜合評估··················································56 3-1.4 小結····································································59 3-2 遙測地表不透水率誤差之檢討················································59 3-2.1 遙測測量方式誤差························································60 3-2.2 遙測分類誤差····························································60 3-2.3 查核區之代表性··························································61 3-2.4 人為誤差································································61 3-3 台南市地表不透水率數值地圖之製作··········································61 3-3.1 各類地表分類圖之製作····················································62 3-3.2 開放水域及地表不透水率數值灰階圖之製作··································63 3-3.3 地表不透水率數值色階圖之製作············································65 第四章台南市地表不透水率之解析 第四章台南市地表不透水率之解析················································67 4-1 台南市地表不透水率之解析··················································67 4-1.1 北區地表不透水率之解析··················································68 4-1.2 中西區地表不透水率之解析················································69 4-1.3 東區地表不透水率之解析··················································70 4-1.4 南區地表不透水率之解析··················································71 4-1.5 安平區地表不透水率之解析················································72 4-1.6 安南區地表不透水率之解析················································73 4-1.7 台南市地表不透水率之解析················································74 4-2 國內都市地表不透水率相關研究之比較········································76 4-3 台南市各行政區地表不透水率之預測··········································79 4-3.1 台南市各行政區地表不透水率之相關因子····································79 4-3.2 台南市各行政區地表不透水率預測公式······································86 4-4 小結······································································89 第五章結論與建議 第五章結論與建議······························································91 5-1 結論·····································92 5-2 建議······································································94 參考文獻······································································97 附錄·······································101

    1. 台南市政府,「台南市統計要覽」,台南市政府,2004
    2. 台南市都市計畫書圖資訊系統,http://bud.tncg.gov.tw/upmis,2006/05/01 瀏覽
    3. 江中豪,應用遙測影像於都市地區綠化程度評估之研究,中國文化大學建築及
    都市計畫研究所碩士論文,2002
    4. 吳麗真,鄉鎮基地保水性能之研究-以台南縣麻豆鎮、官田鄉、六甲鄉為例,
    成功大學建築所碩士論文,2002
    5. 李仁豪,都市保水性能之實測研究-以台南市為例,成功大學碩士論文,2000
    6. 李魁鵬,台灣四大都會區都市熱島之研究,成功大學建築所博士論文,1999
    7. 林子平,基地保水性能實驗解析,成功大學建築所碩士論文,1998
    8. 林子平,都市水循環之研究-地表不透水率之調查及逕流量實測解析,成功大
    學建築所博士論文,2002
    9. 林子平、何友鋒、楊鴻銘,都市地表不透水率之預估與分析:以台中市為例,
    「都市與計劃」,第32 卷,第3 期,第333~353 頁,2005
    10. 林立人,台北都市熱島效應之觀測解析,成功大學建築所碩士論文,1999
    11. 林憲德、孫振義、李魁鵬、郭曉青,台南地區都市規模與都市熱島強度之研究,
    「都市與計劃」,第32 卷,第1 期,第33-48 頁,2005
    12. 孫振義、林憲德,台南地區都市熱島強度全年變動之研究,「都市與計劃」學
    報,第33 卷,第1 期,第51~68 頁,2006
    13. 徐文婷、吳炳方、顏長珍、黃慧萍,用SOPT-VGT 資料製作中國2000 年度
    土地覆蓋資料,「遙感學報」,第9 卷,第2 期,2005
    14. 張洲滄,都市保水性能與地表逕流量之實測解析-以台南市虎尾寮地區為例,
    成功大學建築所碩士論文,2001
    15. 郭曉青,台中都市熱島效應之觀測解析,成功大學建築所碩士論文,1999
    16. 陳子謙,台南都市熱島效應之觀測解析,成功大學建築所碩士論文,1999
    17. 陳冠廷,台灣中小型都市熱島效應之觀測解析,成功大學建築所碩論,2000
    18. 陳慧敏,綠覆率與地表溫度關係之研究-以龍潭地區為例,中華大學土木工程
    學系碩士論文,2004
    19. 黃意茹,都市綠覆率與氣溫之相關性研究-衛星影像類神經網路分類法之應
    用,逢甲大學土地管理學系碩士論文,2002
    20. 楊鴻銘,台中市都市區域透水性能實測解析之研究,朝陽科技大學建築及都市
    設計研究所碩士論文,2005
    21. 臺灣省住宅及都市發展局,「臺南縣歸仁鄉雨水下水道系統規劃報告」,臺灣
    省政府,1980
    22. 臺灣省住宅及都市發展局,「台中市第一、二、三、四期擴大都市計畫區雨水
    下水道系統規劃報告」,臺灣省政府,1981
    23. 臺灣省住宅及都市發展局,「臺南市(鄭子寮、虎尾寮)雨水下水道系統規劃報
    告」,臺灣省政府,1989
    24. 臺灣省建設廳公共工程局,「台南市雨水下水道系統規劃報告書」,臺灣省政
    府,1970
    25. 劉岳明,臺北市都市環境透水性能實測解析,成功大學建築所碩論,2001
    26. Arnold, C. L. and Gibbons, C. J. , Impervious surface coverage:The
    emergence of a key environmental indicator, Journal of the American
    Planning Association, 62(2):243-258 ,1996
    27. Barnes, K. B., Morgan, J. M., & Roberge, M. C. , Impervioussurfaces and the
    quality of natural and built environments. Baltimore,MD: Department of
    Geography and Environmental Planning, Towson University. , 2000
    28. Bauer, M. E., Doyle, J. K., & Heinert, N. J. , Impervious surface mapping
    using satellite remote sensing. Proceedings, IEEE Geoscience and Remote
    Sensing Symposium, Toronto, Canada, June 24–28, Unpaginated CD ROM,
    3 pp. , 2002
    29. Bodamer, D. ,New satellite maps pinpoint storm-water runoff , Civil
    Engineering, 71(7):33. , 2001
    30. Brander, K.E., Owen, K. E.. and Potter, K. W. , 2004 , Modeled impacts of
    debelopment type on runoff volume and infiltration performance, Journal of
    the American Water Resources Association, 40(4):961-969
    31. Carlson, T. N. , Analysis and prediction of surface runoff in an urbanizing
    watershed using satellite imagery, Journal of the American Water
    Resources Association, 40(4):1087-1098, 2004
    32. Civco, D. L., & Hurd, J. D. , 1997, Impervious surface mapping for the state
    of Connecticut. Proceedings ASPRS/ACSM Annual Convention. Seattle,
    WA, April 7 –10 ( pp. 124– 135). , 1997
    33. Estes, M. G., Gorsevski, V., Russel, C., Quattrochi, D., & Luvall, J., The
    urban heat island phenomenon and potential mitigation strategies.
    Proceedings, 1999 National Planning Conference : Approaching the
    Millennium, Seattle, WA. ,1999
    34. John E. Hasse、Richard G. Lathrop, Land resource impact indicators of
    urban sprawl, Applied Geography , 23 (2003):159-175, 2003
    35. Kali E. Sawaya, Leif G. Olmanson, Nathan J. Heinert, Patrick L. Brezonik,
    Marvin E. Bauer, Extending satellite remote sensing to local scales:land and
    water resource monitoring using high-resolution imagery, Remote Sensing
    of Environment , 88(2003):144-156, 2003
    36. Ridd, M. K. (1995). Exploring a V-I-S (vegetation-impervious surface-soil)
    model for urban ecosystem analysis through remote sensing: comparative
    anatomy for cities, International Journal of Remote Sensing,16(12), 2165–
    2185.
    37. Schueler, T., The importance of imperviousness, Watershed Protection
    Techniques, 1(3):100-111. ,1994
    38. Sleavin, W. J., Civco, D. L., Prisloe, S., & Giannattti, L., Measuring
    impervious surfaces for non-point source pollution modeling. Proceedings,
    2000 ASPRS Annual Conference , May 22–26, Washington, DC,11 pp. K.
    Sawaya et al. / Remote Sensing of Environment ,156 88 (2003) 144–156. ,
    2000
    39. Thomas M. Lillesand、Ralph W. Kiefer、Jonathan W.Chipman,Remote
    sensing and image interpretation-fifth edition , Wiley,2004
    40. W.B. Clapham Jr., Continuum-base classification of remotely sensed
    imagery to describe urban sprawl on a watershed scale , Remote Sensing of
    Environment , 86(2003):322-340, 2003
    41. Zandbergen, P. A., Urban watershed ecological risk assessment using
    GIS:a case study of the Brunette River watershed in British Columbia,
    Canada, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 61(1-3):163-173. ,1998

    下載圖示 校內:2007-07-18公開
    校外:2007-07-18公開
    QR CODE