| 研究生: |
黃玠豪 Huang, Chieh-hao |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
產品X倍數計算方法之改良研究 Improving Computation Methods of Factor X Indicator for Product Assessment |
| 指導教授: |
陳家豪
Chen, Ja-hau |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
工學院 - 機械工程學系 Department of Mechanical Engineering |
| 論文出版年: | 2008 |
| 畢業學年度: | 96 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 100 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 產品X倍數 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | factor X |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:92 下載:3 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
X倍數(Factor X)是一種將產品的價值與產品對環境的衝擊數值化,並進一步的比較出新舊產品的進步比率的方法,可以由倍數的方式輕易的分析出產品本身的進步及對環境衝擊的影響,雖然各公司均開始採用X倍數的方法去計算自家的產品,但是由於各家公司所訂定的X倍數方法不盡相同,只能比較同一家公司的產品,而不同公司的產品將無法相互比較。
本論文先將幾個公司所提出來的較有指標性的方法,做一個整理比較及說明,發現各公司對於環境負載值的計算部份,大多採用Life Cycle Assessment(LCA)生命週期評估方法,且評估的項目差異不大,因此針對差異性較大的產品價值的部份,做進一步的產品收集與分析,包含各公司所採用的產品功能、新舊產品年份與算法,再針對此三部份提出解決的方法,在產品功能的部份使用Quality Function Deployment(QFD)品質機能展開法,將消費者的意見轉化到產品功能上,從中找到權重較高的產品功能;在產品年份的選擇上,有三種選擇方法,第一種是選擇最老的產品,第二種是選擇功能最差的產品,第三種是選擇特定年份的產品;算法的部份,提出兩種不同的算法,第一種是將選出的產品功能包含壽命乘上其各自權重,再做加總,第二種是將產品功能但不包含壽命乘上其各自的權重再加總後,再乘上壽命。
接著,將收集到的產品功能資訊套入到以上改良的方法中,實際作運算,即可算出各產品的X倍數。各公司的產品可以透過改良過且統一的X倍數方法得到其產品進步的倍數,使各公司的產品可以互相做比較,且在權重的部份透過QFD方法將消費者的聲音轉化到產品的工程特性上,不再是由公司自行來訂定,較能符合顧客對產品的想法,讓消費者更能比較各公司之產品。
Factor X Indicator Method is an approach to numeric data of product value and the environmental load; hence it also can compare the improvement rate of old and new products by using multiple approaches. Because different companies use different Factor X Indicator Methods to calculate their own products, they can’t compare themselves to other companies.
This research collects, compares and explains some companies’ Factor X Indicator Methods. Most companies use Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to calculate the environmental loads, hence the items which they use to evaluate don’t have much differences. Therefore, bigger diversification of the same items in different companies pertain product values, the year and calculation of old and new products are collected amd analysed .Also, some methods are proposed to solve the diversifications. First, using Quality Function Deployment (QFD) to turn consumer’s opinions into product value and find the higher index of product value. There are three options of product year choosing: first is choosing the oldest one, second is choosing the worst function one, and the third one is choosing the specific year product. Finally, there are two options of Factor X Indicator calculation. One is multiple product value year to its own index and add all of them, the other is multiple productvalue but not including age to its own index and add all together then multiple age.
Consequently, put all the product information to above proposed methods and we can calculate the Factor X indicator methods of different products. Every company can use the reform method to get the product improvement multiplier, and compare them to different companies. Hence, it is more objective and easier for consumers to compare with all products made by different companies by using QFD for turning consumer’s opinions to product engineering function in index instead of companies using their own approaches.
1.F. Schmidt-Bleek, Factor Ten, Carnoules Peclaration of the Factor Ten Club, Wuppertal Institute, 1994.
2.Livio D. DeSimone and F. Popoff, Eco-efficiency, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), 1997.
3.E. U. Weizsäcker, A. B. Lobins and L. H. Lobins, Factor Four, London:Earthscan, 1997.
4.山本良一 著、王天民 譯,2003,戰略環境經營生態設計-範例100,化學工業出版社,頁165-169,177-180。
5.T. Aoe, 2003a, “Introduction and Development of a Factor X (Eco-Efficiency) Tool”Proceedings of 2003 IEEE International Symposium on Electronic and the Environment, May 19-22, 2003, Boston, MA, USA, pp. 371-376.
6.山本良一、小田克郎,2003,環境技術革新の最前線。CO2はこうして削減し、京都議定書をクりアする,日科技連,頁6-11。
7.Matsushita Group, 2003, Factor X. Aiming for Harmonious Coexistence between Lifestyles and the Global Environment.
8.T. Aoe,2005,“新.価值基準ファクターX (環境效率)”,日本環境效率フォーラム第1回製品に関する環境效率意見交換会。
9.T. Aoe, “Green Products Indicators in Matsushita Electric Group.”EcoDesign 2003, December 8-11, 2003, Tokyo, Japan.
10.T. Aoe,“Eco-Efficiency (Factor X) for Electrical and Electronic Products and a Case Study on Home Appliances in a Household.”March 15, 2006, Japan.
11.參考網址1:http://panasonic.net/eco/factor_x/index.html
12.參考網址2:http://panasonic.net/eco/factor_x/list01.html
13.Hitachi Group, “Environmental Efficiency of Hitachi Products Ver.2.” December 2003.
14.Hitachi Group , “ファクターXで見る日立製品と地球環境.” December 2005.
15.O. Namikawa, “Development of the evaluation tool that integrate Design for Environment and Eco-efficiency at Hitachi.” EcoDesign 2005:4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, December 12, 2005, Tokyo, Japan.
16.高橋徹也、上野 潔、杉山陽一,2005,“持続可能な社会の実現をあ目指した指標“ファクターX”の評価手法とその適用事例。”三菱電機技報。
17.T. Takahashi, K. Ueno and K. Ishii, “Evaluation methods and Applications of Factor X Indicator for Realization of a Sustainable Society.” EcoDesign 2005:4th International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, December 12-14, 2005, Tokyo, Japan.
18.參考網址3:http://www.mitsubishielectric.co.jp/corporate/eco/factorx/index.html
19.Toshiba Group ,“A New Indicator for Products Factor T.” ,December 2006.
20.Toshiba Group, “製品の新しい指標[ファクターT]の広がり.” July 2007.
21.Toshiba Group “A New Indicator for Products Factor T NOW.” July 2007.
22.S. Oikawa, K. Ebisu, and K. Fuse,“Fujitsu•s Approach for Eco - efficiency Factor”, FUJITSU Science Technology Journal, Vol. 41 NO. 2, July 2005, pp. 236-241.
23.Japan Environmental Management Association for Industry (JEMAI) “Eco-efficiency Indicator Handbook for products.” January 2004.
24.梅田 靖,“Basic Framework and Issues of Inegrated Evaluation of Product Life Cycles”,EcoDesign 2006 Asia Pacific Symposium, December 11-12, 2006, Tokyo, Japan.
25.林廷諺,“X倍數指標(Factor X)對於液晶顯示器綠色設計進步性評估”,國立成功大學機械工程學系碩士論文,July 2007。
26.林廷諺、陳家豪,“Factor X方法對於液晶顯示器產品可進步性評估設計之研究”,2006永續性產品與產業管理研討會, 2006年 3月18日, 台南, 國立成功大學。
27.J. L. Chen, K. Masui, S. Kondoh, N. Mishima and M. Matsumoto, “Discussion on Factor X indicator for Eco-Products Comparison”, Fifth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, Ecodesign07, December 10-12, 2007, Tokyo, Japan.
28.王明妤、黃炟淐、曾建閔,“應用環境品質機能展開於塑膠抽屜式整理箱之設計改善 – 以北縣是大學生的需求為例”,環境與管理研究第七卷第二期,頁37-52,2006。
29.Fraunhofer IZM,“EuP Preparatory Studies “Televisions” (Lot 5) Final Report”, August 2007, Berlin.
30.R. Stamminger, W. Mebane, R. Esposito, A. suljug, A. Hillenstedt, R. Scialdoni, M. Presutto, B. Mebane, L. Cutaia and S. Faberi,“Preparatory Studies for Eco-Design Requirements of EuPs Lot 13 Domestic Refrigerators & Freezers”, September, 2007 - March, 2008.
31.R. Stamminger, W. Mebane, R. Esposito, A. suljug, A. Hillenstedt, R. Scialdoni, M. Presutto, B. Mebane, L. Cutaia and S. Faberi,“Preparatory Studies for Eco-Design Requirements of EuPs Lot 14 Domestic Dishwashers & Washing Machines”, July, 2007 - March, 2008.
32.P. Riviere, J. Adnot, L. Grignon-Masse, D. Marchio, P. Andre, L. Detroux, J. Lebrun, V. Teodorose, J. L. Alexandre, E. SA, G. Benke, T Bogner, A. Conroy, R. Hitchin, C. Pout W. Thorpe and S. Karatasou,“Preparatory study on the environmental performance of residential room conditioning appliances (airco and ventilation)“Air conditioners”(Lot 10)”, March, 2008.
33.P. V. Tichelen, B. Jansen, T. Geerken, M. V. Bosch , V. Vanhoof, L. Vanhooydonck and A. Vercalsteren,“Preparatory Studies for Eco-design Requirements of EuPs Project Report Lot 8: Office lighting”, April, 2007.
34.IVF Industrial Research, “Preparatory studies for Eco-design Requirements of EuPs Lot 3 Personal Computers (desktops and laptops) and Computer Monitors Final Report”, August 27, 2007.
35.http://www.hitachi.co.jp/
36.http://www.toshiba.co.jp/index_j3.htm
37.http://www.mitsubishi.com/j/index.html
38.http://panasonic.co.jp/index3.html
39.http://jp.fujitsu.com/