| 研究生: |
徐浩庭 Hsu, Hao-Ting |
|---|---|
| 論文名稱: |
影響人際關係之因素─成就動機在組織犬儒主義、內外控人格特質與人際關係中之干擾效果 Factors Affecting Interpersonal Relationship─The Moderating Role of Motivation Achievement in the Effects of Organizational Cynicism and Locus of Control on Interpersonal Relationship |
| 指導教授: |
莊雙喜
Chuang, Shuang-Shii |
| 學位類別: |
碩士 Master |
| 系所名稱: |
管理學院 - 企業管理學系 Department of Business Administration |
| 論文出版年: | 2011 |
| 畢業學年度: | 99 |
| 語文別: | 中文 |
| 論文頁數: | 93 |
| 中文關鍵詞: | 組織犬儒主義 、內外控人格特質 、人際關係 、成就動機 |
| 外文關鍵詞: | organizational cynicism, locus of control, interpersonal relatioinship, achievement motivation |
| 相關次數: | 點閱:102 下載:11 |
| 分享至: |
| 查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報 |
人際關係在工作環境中的重要性與日俱增,要以單打獨鬥完成所有工作或任務已經幾乎不可能,即使是日常性的工作,也時常需要與他人溝通、協調、合作,以共同達成組織的目標。因此企業無論是對於尚未進入企業的應徵者,或已經任職於企業的正式員工,均應更加重視其人際關係之狀況。透過了解可能影響員工人際關係的因素,企業可減少錯誤錄取人際關係可能較差之應徵者的機會,並透過管理面與制度面的控制,減少正式員工產生人際關係問題的可能性。本研究目的即在於探討組織犬儒主義、內外控人格特質與人際關係間之關係,並進一步探討成就動機之干擾效果,以供實務界參考。本研究以員工人數200人以上之企業為研究對象,並針對研究對象發放問卷,發出問卷524份,回收有效問卷194份,無效問卷26份,有效回收率37.02%,並進一步以統計軟體針對問卷資料進行驗證性因素分析、差異分析、相關分析、迴歸分析、層級迴歸分析等,得以下之實證研究結果:
(一) 不同教育程度、產業別、工作部門的員工,在組織犬儒主義傾向上有顯著差異。
(二) 不同教育程度、工作資歷、產業別、在目前公司的工作年數之員工,在對人際關係上有顯著差異。
(三) 組織犬儒主義與人際關係之間存在顯著的負相關;內外控人格特質與人際關係之間存在顯著的正相關。
(四) 組織犬儒主義對人際關係有顯著的負向影響力;內外控人格特質對人際關係有顯著正向影響力。
(五) 組織犬儒主義與成就動機「精熟」因素之交互作用對人際關係之「情感」因素有顯著影響。
Interpersonal relationship in workplace becomes more and more important. It is almost impossible to finish all tasks and miossions assigned by the organization alone. Even in daily works, one has to spend a lot of time on communicating, negotiating, and cooperating with others to achieve the goals of the department or the organization. Therefore, enterprises should pay more attention on interpersonal relationship. Through understanding the factors that could affect interpersonal relationship, enterprises can reduce the opportunity to recruit employees may have poor interpersonal relationship in the future. Moreover, through controling these factors, enterprises can also reduce employees’ interpersonal relationship problems which are caused by these factors. Therefore, this research attempts to analyze the relationships between organizational cynicism, locus of control, and interpersonal relationsip, while achievement motivation as the moderator of these relationships.
We use random sampling as the methodology. A total of 524 questioinnaires are issued, 194 effective and 26 ineffective questiuonnaires are collected with effective responding rate of 37.02%. We analyze the datas through t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and multiple regression. Empirical findings are as follows:
1. Significant difference exsists in organizational cynicism for employees with different domogrphic variables, such as education, industry, and department.
2. Significant difference exsists in locus of control for employees with different domogrphic variables, such as education, industry, and working years.
3. There is a significant negative correlation between organizational cynicism and interpersonal relationship. And organizational cynicism has significant impact to interpersonal relationship.
4. There is a significant positive correlation between locus of control and interpersonal relationship. And locus of control has significant impact to interpersonal relationship.
5. The moderating effect of achievement motivation is partial supported.
一、 中文部分
1. E. Jerry Phares (1995)。人格心理學(林淑梨、王若蘭、黃慧真,譯)。台北市:心理。(原著第三版出版於1991年)
2. Michael Argyle and Monika Henderson (1985)。人際關係剖析(苗延威,譯)。台北市:巨流。
3. Rudolph F. Verderber and Kathleen S. Verderber (1996)。人際關係與溝通(曾端真、曾玲珉,譯)。台北市:揚智文化。
4. Stephen P. Robbins (2001)。組織行為學第九版(李青芬、李雅婷、趙慕芬,譯)。台北市:華泰文化。
5. 李佩怡(1999),人際關係理論。測驗與輔導,152,3152-3156。
6. 周典芳、鄭嫥嫥、陳國明((2009)。人際關係與溝通。台北市:五南。
7. 邱顯皓(2010),傳統產業員工人際關係對工作績效之相關研究,國立成功大學企業管理學系碩博士班論文。
8. 余安邦、楊國樞(1987) ,社會取向成就動機與個我取向成就動機:概念分析與實徵研究,中央研究院民族學研究期刊,64,51-98。
9. 邱麗家(2006),內部稽核人員人格特質、工作特性與工作滿意度關係之研究-以成就動機為中介變項,國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所碩士在職專班碩士論文。
10. 許勝雄(1980),如何促進良好的人際關係,台灣教育,354,31-34。
11. 陳皎眉(1995),美好的人際關係。學生輔導,36,18-23。
12. 陳仲庚、張雨新(1990)。人格心理學。台北市:五南。
13. 陳忠正(2006),人際關係與工作壓力對工作滿意度影響之研究-以高屏地區大學校院行政人員為例,國立高雄師範大學成人教育研究所文教行政人員碩士學位在職進修專班論文
14. 陳秀玲(2006),人格特質、顧客導向與工作績效之探討-以免稅店營業人員為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
15. 張春興、林清山(1989),教育心理學,台北:台灣東華。
16. 黃光國(1999),也談人情與關係的構念化,本土心理學研究,第十二期,215-248。
17. 黃英忠(2007),人力資源管理(第二版)。高雄市:三民。
18. 黃培鈺(2004),人際關係與溝通。台北縣中和市:新文京開發。
19. 彭泗清、楊中芳(1999),人際交往關係的影響因素與發展過程,本土心理學,第十二期,91-312。
20. 鄭伯壎(1999),華人人際關係研究的困境與出路,本土心理學研究,第十二期,頁203-214。
21. 管秋雄((2005)。人際關係與溝通。台北市:華立。
22. 劉華業(2006),人格特質對工作績效之影響-以領導型態為調節變項-以國防部OO參謀次長室為例,國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1. Abraham, R. (2000). "Organizional Cynicism " Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 126(3): 269-292.
2. Andersson, L. M. (1996). "Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using a Contract Violation Framework." Human Relations 49(11): 1395-1418.
3. Andersson, L. M. and T. S. Bateman (1997). "Cynicism in the workplace: some causes and effects." Journal of Organizational Behavior 18(5): 449-469.
4. Atwater, L. E., D. A. Waldman, et al. (2000). "AN UPWARD FEEDBACK FIELD EXPERIMENT: SUPERVISORS' CYNICISM, REACTIONS, AND COMMITMENT TO SUBORDINATES." Personnel Psychology 53(2): 275-297.
5. Barwick, A. K., A. F. de Man, et al. (2009). "Personality Factors and Attitude toward Seeking Professional Help." North American Journal of Psychology 11(2): 333-342.
6. Bateman, T. S., T. Sakano, et al. (1992). "Roger, Me, and My Attitude: Film Propaganda and Cynicism Toward Corporate Leadership." Journal of Applied Psychology 77(5): 768-771.
7. Bateman, T. S., T. Sakano, et al. (1992). "Roger, me, and my attitude: Film propaganda and cynicism toward corporate leadership." Journal of Applied Psychology 77(5): 768.
8. Bedeian, A. G. (2007). "Even if the Tower Is" Ivory," It Isn't" White:" Understanding the Consequences of Faculty Cynicism." The Academy of Management Learning and Education ARCHIVE 6(1): 9-32.
9. Butterfield, E. C. (1964). "Locus of control, test anxiety, reactions to frustration, and achievement attitudes." Journal of Personality 32(3): 355.
10. Cook, W. W. and D. M. Medley (1954). "Proposed hostility and Pharisaic-virtue scales for the MMPI." Journal of Applied Psychology 38(6): 414.
11. Dean Jr, J. W., P. Brandes, et al. (1998). "ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM." Academy of Management Review 23(2): 341-352.
12. Dudley, D. R. (1937). A history of cynicism, Methuen.
13. Fuller, B. A. G. (1931). HISTORY OF GREEK PHILOSOPHY. 3 v. 1923-1931, ISBN.
14. Helmreich, R. L. S., J.T (1978). "Achievement motivation and scientific attainment." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 4(2): 222.
15. Hoffman, D., T. Novak, et al. (2003). "Locus of control, web use, and consumer attitudes toward internet regulation." Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 22(1): 41-57.
16. Howell, J. and B. Avolio (1993). "Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance." Journal of Applied Psychology 78(6): 891-902.
17. Johnson, J. L. and A. M. O'Leary Kelly (2003). "The effects of psychological contract breach and organizational cynicism: Not all social exchange violations are created equal." Journal of Organizational Behavior 24(5): 627-647.
18. Kanter, D. L. and P. H. Mirvis (1989). The cynical Americans: Living and working in an age of discontent and disillusion, Jossey-Bass.
19. Kren, L. (1992). "The Moderating Effects of Locus of Control on Performance Incentives and Participation." Human Relations 45(9): 991-1012.
20. Lam, D. and D. Mizerski (2005). "The Effects of Locus of Control on Word‐of‐mouth Communication." Journal of Marketing Communications 11(3): 215-228.
21. Mack, B. L. (1994). The lost gospel: the book of Q & Christian origins, HarperOne.
22. McClelland, D. (1961). The Achieving Society, Princeton: Van Nostrand.
23. McClelland, D., J. Atkinson, et al. (1953). The achievement motive, Appleton-Century-Crofts New York.
24. Nandi, J. K. (2008). "Achievement Motivation Amongst Front Line Managers." ICFAI Journal of Organizational Behavior 7(3): 58-64.
25. Reichers, A. E., J. P. Wanous, et al. (1997). "Understanding and managing cynicism about organizational change." Academy of Management Executive 11(1): 48-59.
26. Robbins, S. P. (1994). Organizational Behavior 9e, Prentice Hall
27. Roberts, J. A., R. S. Lapidus, et al. (1997). "Salespeople and stress: The moderating role of locus of control on work stressors and felt stress." Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice 5(3): 93.
28. Rotter, J. B. (1966). "Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement." Psychological monographs 80(1): 1-28.
29. Rotter, J. B. (1973). Social learning and clinical psychology, Johnson Reprint Corp. (New York)
30. Rotter, J. B. (1990). "Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement: A Case History of a Variable." American Psychologist 45(4): 489-493.
31. Spector, P. E. (1988). "Development of the Work Locus of Control Scale." Journal of Occupational Psychology 61(4): 335-340.
32. Stanley, D. J., J. P. Meyer, et al. (2005). "Employee cynicism and resistance to organizational change." Journal of Business and Psychology 19(4): 429-459.
33. Wanous, J. P., A. E. Reichers, et al. ORGANIZATIONAL CYNICISM: AN INITIAL STUDY, Academy of Management.
34. Wanous, J. P., A. E. Reichers, et al. (1994). Organizational cynicism: An initial study, Max M. Fisher College of Business, Ohio State University.
35. Wilkerson, J. M., W. R. Evans, et al. (2008). "A Test of Coworkers' Influence on Organizational Cynicism, Badmouthing, and Organizational Citizenship Behavior." Journal of Applied Social Psychology 38(9): 2273-2292.