簡易檢索 / 詳目顯示

研究生: 顏伯芳
Yen, Po-Fang
論文名稱: 輔以YouTube影片及小組海報的英文單字教學法:增進國中三年級學生之英文單字習得與存留之影響
Thematic YouTube Video-aided Vocabulary Instruction with the Group Poster Task: A Case Study on Enhancing Ninth Graders’ English Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention
指導教授: 劉繼仁
Liu, Gi-Zen
學位類別: 碩士
Master
系所名稱: 文學院 - 外國語文學系碩士在職專班
Department of Foreign Languages and Literature (on the job class)
論文出版年: 2012
畢業學年度: 100
語文別: 英文
論文頁數: 181
中文關鍵詞: YouTube影片溝通語言式的教學視覺的識字能力
外文關鍵詞: YouTube, communicative language teaching, visual literacy
相關次數: 點閱:98下載:20
分享至:
查詢本校圖書館目錄 查詢臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統 勘誤回報
  • 論文名稱:輔以YouTube影片及小組海報的英文單字教學法:增進國中三年級學生之英文單字習得與存留之影響
    校別組名:國立成功大學外國語文研究所
    研 究 生:顏伯芳
    指導教授:劉繼仁博士
    論文內容提要:
    本研究旨在了解YouTube影片輔助英文單字教學,對於英語為外語的國三學生單字習得與存留之影響。研究對象為台南市某市立國中39位三年級學生,研究者運用YouTube影片搭配理論及實務兼具的學習模式,探討針對單字的字義、字義和影像的連結、單字在情境的用法及閱讀測驗的學習成效。此外,本研究的另一主旨為探討合作學習的小組海報製作,強化學生單字的辨識及字義的存留,而發展視覺的識字能力。
    本研究採用質性及量化的混合式研究,所有的參與者都要完成評量的前測、後測及延遲測驗和問卷調查。研究結果摘要如下:
    1.YouTube影片輔助英文單字教學有助於加強學生的單字習得及存留。
    2.學生在字義學習及字義和影像的連結有顯著的進步。在閱讀測驗上,學生在教 學後無立即的進步,但在延遲測驗中有顯著的進步。情境的單字使用,學生在教學完有立即顯著的進步,學習成效隨時間而消弱。
    3.根據問卷調查及訪談結果,學生大致同意此教學法可讓英文單字學習有趣。此外,YouTube影片的情境及句子可幫助他們理解及加深字義的存留,而且減少學習緊張感。
    4.問卷調查及訪談結果顯示此教學法主要有三個缺點及九個優點。缺點為: (1)影片的旁白陳述速度對國中生來說偏快,(2) 使用YouTube影片師生需花較多的時間及精力,(3)影片的內容及單字較教科書的困難。 優點為: (1)影片有趣且令人印象深刻,(2)學生對於單字的知識及用法顯著進步,(3)提供視覺線索的輔助,(4)增進聽力能力,(5)加強單字字義的學習,(6)增加文法句型的習得,(7)透過影片中的母語講者的發音增進口語能力,(8)透過影片中的視覺及聽覺內容加強單字理解及記憶,和(9)提供日常生活的情境。
    5.學生大致上喜歡透過合作學習的小組海報方式進行英文單字的學習,並認為同儕的合作學習可幫助他們發展視覺的識字能力。
    本研究結果顯示YouTube影片輔助英文單字教學有助於中學生的英語單字學習及識字能力的培養。而合作學習的小組海報方式可形成溝通語言的學習模式。YouTube影片中真實的語言環境有助於網路世代的國中生專注於字彙習得與留存。
    關鍵字:YouTube影片、溝通語言式的教學、視覺的識字能力。

    Abstract

    Although videos have been widely applied in educational contexts since the 1960s, their effects with regard to vocabulary acquisition and word retention are still a matter of some debate. YouTube, a popular Internet-based video site, has not only changed people’s habits of watching TV programs and other video materials, but also brought new opportunities for language education. While some studies have examined the use of this new media in education, there has been little research about its use in English vocabulary learning and teaching in formal contexts, especially in the English as Foreign Language (EFL) environments that occur in junior high schools.

    This study aimed to investigate the effects of using thematic YouTube video-aided vocabulary instruction, abbreviated as YVAVI, when applied with thirty-nine ninth graders in Tainan City. Based on prior research, since the major difficulties in learning vocabulary are word recognition and retention, it was hypothesized that YouTube videos could be used along with a theory-and-practice-based learning model focusing on the word meanings, the association between images and word meanings, the word use in the context, and reading comprehension. Another aim of this research was to investigate whether the task of making group posters in the YVAVI could motivate learners to recognize and retain the forms and word meanings, and further develop their digital visual literacy.

    A mixed quantitative and qualitative methodology was applied in this study, and all the participants were asked to complete a pre-test, an immediate post-test, and a two-week delayed post-test in both formative and summative ways, as well as two sets of questionnaires. The quantitative data were analyzed with the paired samples t-test and descriptive statistics in the SPSS 17.0 system. As for the qualitative data, the group poster analysis, the opinions and reflections of the open-ended questions in the questionnaire, and the interview with nine subjects were analyzed with Stake’s (1995) methods of “direct interpretation” and “categorical aggregation”. The major findings are summarized as follows:

    1. The YVAVI enhanced the students’ vocabulary acquisition and retention.
    2. The students in this study acquired the word meanings significantly, and built the association of word forms and images. As for the reading comprehension, although learners did not get improvement after the intervention immediately, they eventually had significant improvement. For the word use in context, they acquired it after the intervention but did not retain it as time went by.
    3. Based on the results of the questionnaires and the interviews, the students roughly agreed that the YVAVI made English word learning more interesting. In addition, the contexts and sentences of YouTube videos can help them comprehend and memorize word meanings better, and reduce their learning anxiety.
    4. The three disadvantages of using YouTube in vocabulary learning included the fast speed of recorded video narration, the requirement of more time and efforts to complete a lesson, and the difficult content and vocabulary. Furthermore, the nine advantages included the creation of interesting and impressive atmosphere of the video clips, the significant gains with regard to vocabulary knowledge and usage, the aid of visual clues, the improvement of listening skills, the facilitation of word memory, the increase of grammar pattern acquirement, the development of oral skills with the use of native speaker pronunciation in the videos, the enhancement of word comprehension and memorization with support of audio and visual input, and the support of real-life contexts.
    5. Finally, most of the students in this study agreed that they liked to learn English vocabulary by making group posters and considered that peer collaboration helped them to develop their own digital visual literacy.

    To sum up, the results of this study indicate that it is worth providing an authentic scenario to motivate EFL learners to get involved in the video-aided vocabulary instruction. Furthermore, the teaching approach and the learning tasks applied in this study can also be employed with a wide variety of videos in classroom settings. In future work, this study can be expanded to a longitudinal experiment with a larger number of participants, and also recruit participants with more advanced English abilities.

    Keywords: YouTube, communicative language teaching, visual literacy

    Abstract (Chinese) i Abstract (English) iii Acknowledgements v Table of Contents vi List of Tables xii List of Figures xv CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Purpose of the Study 3 1.3 Significance of the Study 4 1.4 Definition of Terms 5 CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW 6 2.1 The Development of Vocabulary Teaching and Learning 6 2.1.1 The Teaching Methodology about Vocabulary Acquisition 10 2.1.2 Language Learning Strategies of Vocabulary Acquisition 11 2.2 The Theoretical Framework of Multimedia Integrated Instruction 12 2.3 The Development of CALL 14 2.4 The Functions, Use and Selection Criteria of Videos in Classroom 16 2.4.1 Videos and Their Effects on Motivation and Dual-coding 19 2.5 Visual Literacy and Concept Mapping 21 2.5.1 The Theory of Concept Mapping 22 2.5.2 Procedures for Evaluating the Group Posters with Concept Mapping 24 2.6 The Criteria and Principles of Selecting Appropriate Videos in Language Learning and Teaching 26 2.6.1 The Criteria of Video Selection 26 2.6.2 The application of captions and redundancy principles in the video selection 32 2.7 YouTube and Its Use in Language Teaching and Learning and Functions of YouTube Videos 33 2.7.1 Previous Studies of YouTube Videos 34 2.7.2 YouTube Videos in the EFL Classroom 37 2.8 Summary 39 2.9 Research Questions 40 CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY 41 Overview 41 3.1 Research Setting and Participants 42 3.2 Materials and instruments 43 3.2.1 Howcast Videos 45 3.3 Research Design 46 3.4 Instruments 47 3.4.1 Questionnaire: Q-LEWAP and Q-PS 48 3.4.2 Pre-test, Immediate Post-test, and Delayed Post-test 50 3.4.3 The Task of Making Group Posters 52 3.5 Measurements 54 3.6 Instructional Procedures 54 3.7 Research Method 56 3.8 Data Collection and Data Analysis 57 3.8.1 Quantitative Analyses 57 3.8.2 Qualitative Analyses 58 3.9 Summary of the Study Design 58 CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS 60 Overview 60 4.1 Results of the Quantitative Data Analysis 64 4.1.1 Results of Quantitative Analysis of Summative Tests 64 4.1.2 Results of Quantitative Analysis of Formative Tests 66 4.1.3 Results of Data Analysis for the Four Vocabulary Exercises 67 4.1.4 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis of Pre- and Post-questionnaire (Q-LEWAP) 70 4.1.5 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis of Post-Study Questionnaire (Q-PS) 72 4.1.6 Results of Quantitative Data Analysis of Q-PS about YVAVI 74 4.2 Results of Qualitative Analyses 76 4.2.1 Data Analysis of Group Posters and Concept Mapping 77 4.2.2 Sentence Analysis of Group Posters 78 4.2.3 Error Analysis of the Group Posters 80 4.2.4 Linguistic Analysis of the Group Posters 84 4.2.5 Data Analysis of the Open-ended Questions in Q-PS 85 4.2.5.1 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 1 85 4.2.5.2 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 2 85 4.2.5.3 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 3 87 4.2.5.4 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 4 87 4.2.5.5 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 5 89 4.2.5.6 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 6 89 4.2.5.7 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 7 90 4.2.5.8 Qualitative Data Analysis of Open-ended Question 8 92 4.3 The Interviews 92 4.3.1 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis of Interview Question 1 93 4.3.2 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis of Interview Question 2 95 4.3.3 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis of Interview Question 3 97 4.3.4 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis of Interview Question 4 99 4.3.5 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis of Interview Question 5 102 4.3.6 Results of Qualitative Data Analysis of Interview Question 6 103 4.4 Summary 104 CHAPTER FIVE DISCUSSIONS, IMPLICATIONS, SUGGESTIONS AND CONCLUSION 106 5.1 Discussions 106 5.1.1 Discussion of Research Question 1 106 5.1.2 Discussion of Research Question 2 107 5.1.3 Discussion of Research Question 3 107 5.1.4 Discussion of Research Question 4 109 5.1.5 Discussion of Research Question 5 111 5.1.6 Discussion of Research Question 6 113 5.1.7 Discussion of Research Question 7 115 5.2 Limitations 117 5.3 Pedagogical Implications 118 5.4 Suggestions for Future Research 119 5.5 Conclusions 120 5.5.1 The Influence of YVAVI on Language Learning Performance 122 5.5.2 Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions towards YVAVI 123 REFERENCES 125 APPENDICES 151 APPENDIX A: The Multimedia Development from Overhead Projector Slides to Online Videos 151 APPENDIX B: A Framework for a Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning 154 APPENDIX C: Evaluating the Usability of YouTube, the Computer Mediated Communication with the Derived Criteria Combined with a Checklist 155 APPENDIX D: Load Reduction Methods for Five Overload Scenarios in Multimedia Instruction 157 APPENDIX E: The Summary of the Study Design 159 APPENDIX F: The Brief Introduction of 3 Thematic Videos and 30 Target Words in YVAVI 160 APPENDIX G: Target Words of Three YVAVI Lessons 161 APPENDIX H: The Instruction Procedure 162 APPENDIX I: Consent Form A 163 APPENDIX J: Consent Form B 164 APPENDIX K: Questionnaire of the Pre-study and Post-study (Chinese Version of Q-LEWAP) 165 APPENDIX L: Questionnaire of the Post-study (Chinese Version of Q-PS) 167 APPENDIX M: Pre-test, Immediate Post-test, Delayed Post-test of Formative L3 169 APPENDIX N: Summative Test 172 APPENDIX O: Descriptive Data and the Results of the Learning Experience in the Post-questionnaire (Q-PS) 177 APPENDIX P: The Poster Analysis based on Scores of the Concept Mapping and Student Votes 178 APPENDIX Q: Comparison between the Group Concept Mapping Scores and Group Test Scores 179 APPENDIX R: Error Analysis of the 24 Group Posters 180 APPENDIX S: The Thematic Analysis of the Three Lessons and the 24 Group Posters based on the Theory of Categorical Aggregation 181 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1 The Four Significant Paradigm Shifts in Vocabulary Development 8 2.2 Three Types of CALL Programs 17 2.3 Berk’s Twenty Specific Learning Outcomes for Using a Video Clip in Teaching across the College Curriculum 29 2.4 The Modified Design of YVAVI based on Berk’s Eight Steps 31 2.5 Research into YouTube between Twenty Studies from 2006 to 2011 36 3.1 Learning Procedures 47 3.2 Peer Reviewers for Evaluating the Content Validity of the Pre-tests and Post-tests 50 3.3 Peer Reviewers for Evaluating the Content Validity of the Questionnaires 50 3.4 The Roles and Jobs of Learners in Group 53 3.5 Four Phases of Design-based Research 57 4.1 Summary of Respondents’ Demographic Data 62 4.2 The Interviewees’ Characteristics 63 4.3 Comparison among the Pre-tests, Immediate Post-tests and Delayed Post-tests of the Formative and Summative Tests 66 4.4 Comparison of Students’ Performance in the Formative and Summative Tests 66 4.5 Comparison among the Four Vocabulary Exercises in the Summative Tests 68 4.6 Comparison of Students’ Performances in the Four Vocabulary Exercises in the Summative Tests 69 4.7 Comparison of the Students’ Perspectives on Their English Word Learning between the Pre-study and Post-study of the Q-LEWAP 70 4.8 Students’ Attitudes towards English Word Learning in the Pre-study and Post-study of Q-LEWAP 73 4.9 Questionnaire Items of the Post-Study (Q-PS) 74 4.10 The Influences about the Use of the Thematic YouTube Videos on the English Word Learning 74 4.11 Learners’ Perceptions and Attitudes towards the Use of the Thematic YouTube Videos 75 4.12 Responses to the Thematic YouTube Video Aided English Word Learning and the Features of YouTube Videos 76 4.13 The Sentence Analyses of the Whole Group Posters 80 4.14 The Word and Error Analyses of the Whole Group Posters 80 4.15 The Analysis of the Competency and Performance Errors of the Whole Group Posters 83 4.16 Responses to Open-ended Question 2 in the Post-questionnaire 86 4.17 Responses to Open-ended Question 3 in the Post-questionnaire 87 4.18 Responses to Open-ended Question 4 in the Post-questionnaire 88 4.19 Responses to Open-ended Question 5 in the Post-questionnaire 89 4.20 Responses to Open-ended Question 6 in the Post-questionnaire 91 4.21 Responses to Open-ended Question 7 in the Post-questionnaire 91 4.22 Responses to Open-ended Question 8 in the Post-questionnaire 92 4.23 Responses to Interview Question 1 Composed of Items 3, 5, 6 in the Questionnaire 95 4.24 Responses to Interview Question 2 Composed of Items 12, 13, and 15 in the Questionnaire 97 4.25 Responses to Interview Question 3 Composed of Items 10, 12, 13, 14, and 16 in the Questionnaire 99 4.26 Responses to Interview Question 6 Composed of Open-ended Questions1, 3, and 4 in the Q-PS 101 4.27 Responses about the Process of Making Group Posters of the Nine-participant Interviews 102 4.28 Responses about the Number of Times and the Ways How the Video Clips Should be Watched 103 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 2.1. The Relational Scoring Method Adapted from and the Scoring System of Novak and Gowin (1984) and the Protocol for the Relational Scoring Method from Mc Clure et al. (1999) 25 2.2. The Lesson Three Poster Example from Group Five based on the Concept Mapping Structure 26 2.3. The Modified Application of Doolittle’s Model in YVAVI 28 2.4. Students did the Voting for Their Favorite Group Poster 30 2.5. An Example of the Group Five Poster about Lesson 3: “ How to Make Friends?” 30 3.1. The Lesson Three YouTube Reading in the Lesson Three YVAVI 44 3.2. The Thematic Lesson Three YouTube Video Clip 44 3.3. An Overview of the Instructional Procedure 55 3.4. Four Stages of Design-based Research 56 4.1. The Participants’ Overall Performances on the Summative Pre-test, Immediate Post-test, and Delayed Post-test 65 4.2. The Participants’ Performances in the Four Vocabulary Exercises 69

    AbuSeileek, A. F. (2007). Cooperative vs. individual learning of oral skills in a CALL environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2(5), 493-514.
    doi: 10.1080/09588220701746054
    Adami, E. (2009). ‘We/YouTube’: Exploring sign-making in video-interaction. Visual Communication, 8(4), 379-399. doi: 10.1177/1470357209343357
    Alexa. (n.d.). YouTube-Site info from Alexa. Retrieved March 31, 2010, from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com#keywords
    Alexa (2009). YouTube.com traffic statistics from Alexa. Retrieved from http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/youtube.com
    Alm, A. (2006). Call for autonomy, competence, and relatedness: Motivating language learning environments in web 2.0. The JALT CALL Journal, 2(3). 29-38. Retrieved from http://www.jaltcall.org/journal/articles/2_3_Alm.pdf
    Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 202-232. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/alseghayer/default.html
    Balcikanli, C. (2009). Long live, YouTube: L2 stories about YouTube in language learning. In A. Shafaei, M. Nejati. (Eds.) Annals of Language and Learning: Proceedings of the 2009 International online Language Conference (IOLC 2009), 91-95. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:Tx3ucE5Ir-MJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0

    Baltova, I. (1999). Multisensory lan¬guage teaching in a multidimensional curriculum: The use of authentic bimo¬dal video in core French. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56, 32-48.
    Barcroft, J. (2009). Strategies and performance in intentional L2 vocabulary learning, Language Awareness, 18(1), 74-89. doi: 10.1080/09658410802557535
    Barron, A., Breit, F., Boulware, Z., & Bullock, J. (1994). Videodiscs in education: Overview, evaluation, activities (2nd Ed.). Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Center for Excellence in Mathematics, Science, Computers, and Technology. Retrieved from ERIC database ( ED384335).
    Berk, R. A. (2009). Multimedia teaching with video clips: TV, movies, YouTube, and mtv U in the college classroom. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-21.
    Berk, R. A. (2009). Integrating video clips into the “Legacy Content” of the K-12 curriculum: TV, movies, and YouTube in the classroom. Retrieved from http://assets.pearsonschool.com/asset_mgr/legacy/200943/10_Berk_28030_1.pdf
    Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and Researching: Autonomy in Language Learning. London: Longman. Retrieved on August 10, 2006, from http://ec.hku.hk/autonomy/what.html and http://ec.hku.hk/autonomy/#k
    Benson, P. (2003). Learner autonomy in the classroom. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Practical English language teaching (pp. 289-308). New York: McGraw Hill.
    Bickes, G. and Andrew, S. (1989). On the Computer as a Medium for Language Teaching. CALICO Journal, 6 (3), 21-31. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:pTwOkI7cpIUJ:scholar.google.com/+Bickes,++and+Andrew+,+1989,++%E2%80%9COn+the+Computer+as+a+Medium+for+Language&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0
    Bishop, M. J., & Cates, W. M. (2001b). Theoretical foundation for sound's use in multimedia instruction to enhance learning. E.T.R. & D Educational Technology Research and Development, 49 (3), 5-22. Retrieved from http://www.speakeasydesigns.com/SDSU/student/SAGE/compsprep/Theory_of_Sound_in_Instruction.pdf
    Bleed, R. (2005). Visual literacy in higher education. Educause Learning Initiative. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli4001.pdf
    Bonk, C. J. (2008). YouTube anchors and enders: The use of shared online video content as a macrocontext for learning. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association (AERA) 2008 Annual Meeting, New York, NY. Retrieved from http://trainingshare.com/SFX7EED.pdf
    Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141-178.
    Brown, H. D. (2000). Principles of language learning and teaching. New York: Longman.
    Brunvard, S. (2010). Best practices for producing video content for teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2). Retrieved from http://www.citejournal.org/vol10/iss2/currentpractice/article1.cfm
    Brusilovsky, P. (1996). Methods and techniques of adaptive hypermedia. Journal of User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 6 (2-3), 87-129.
    Burnett, C. (2009). Research into literacy and technology in primary classrooms: an exploration of understandings generated by recent studies. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 22-37.
    Burke, S., Snyder, S., & Roger, R. C. (2009). An assessment of faculty usage of YouTube as a teaching resource. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 7(1). Retrieved from http://ijahsp.mova.edu
    Burt, M. (1999). Using videos with adult English language learners. Washington D.C.: Office of Educational Research and Improvement. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED434539) http://www.ericdigests.org/2000-2/videos.htm
    Chambers, F. (1997). What do we mean by fluency? System, 25(4), 535-544. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0346251X97000468
    Chang, C. H. (張春興) (1996). 教育心理學-三化取向的理論與實踐。台北市:東華。
    Chapelle, C. A. (1998). Multimedia CALL: Lessons to be learned from research on instructed SLA. Language Learning, 2(1), 22-34.
    Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing, and Research. Cambridge University Press (2001). Retrieved from http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/cam031/2001269254.pdf
    Chapelle, C. (2005a). Computer assisted language learning. In E. Hinkel (ed.) Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 743-756). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. doi: 10.1002/9780470694138.ch41
    Chapelle, C. (2005b). Interactionist SLA Theory in CALL research. In J. L. Egbert & G. M. Petrie (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 53-64). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Technology and second language acquisition. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 27, 98-114. Retrieved from http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayFulltext?type=6&fid=1820468&jid=APL&volumeId=27&issueId=-1&aid=1820464&bodyId=&membershipNumber=&societyETOCSession=&fulltextType=RA&fileId=S0267190508070050
    Chiu, C.-H., Huang, C.-C., & Chang, W.-T. (2000). The evaluation and influence of interaction in network supported collaborative Concept Mapping. Computers & Education, 34(1), 17-25. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00025-1
    Chiu, C. H., Chen, H. P., Wei, L. C., & Hu, H. W. (1999). Approaching effective network co-operative learning. In Proceedings of International Conference on Mathematics/Science Education and Technology, San Antonio, TX, USA. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00025-1
    Chiu, H. C. (邱皓政) (2006). 量化研究與統計分析:SPSS中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。臺北市:五南。
    Chun, D., & Plass, J. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198. Retrieved from
    http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/328635
    Collins, A. Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(1), 15-42. Retrieved from http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic122288.files/Collins.pdf
    Constantinescu, A. I. (2007). Using technology to assist in vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension. The Internet TESL Journal, 13(2). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org/Articles/Constantinescu-Vocabulary.html
    Cook, L. K., & Mayer, R. E. (1983). Reading strategies training for meaningful learning from prose. In M. Pressley, & J. Levin (Eds.). Cognitive strategy research (pp. 87-162). New York: Springer Verlag.
    Cooper, G. (1998). Research into Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW. University of New South Wales, Australia. Retrieved from http://dwb4.unl.edu/Diss/Cooper/UNSW.htm
    Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (1997). Study of school uses of television and video. 1996-1997 School year summary report. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 413 879)
    Corporation for Public Broadcasting. (2004). Television goes to school: The impact of video on student learning in formal education. Retrieved from http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/tvgoestoschool/
    Coughlin, J. M. (1989). Recent Developments in Interactive and Communicative CALL: Hypermedia and “Intelligent” Systems. Georgia. Clearinghouse No. FL018262 (ERIC Document Reproduction Services No. ED 313 909)
    Coyle, J. (2007). Internet videos taking over educational lessons. Tucson Citizen, September 20. Retrieved from http://tucsoncitizen.com/ss/calendar/63497.php
    Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. California, US: Sage Publications.
    Cruse, E. (2011). Using Educational Video in the Classroom: Theory, Research and Practice. M.Ed., Curriculum Director, Library Video Company. Retrieved from http://safarimontage.com/pdfs/training/UsingEducationalVideoInTheClassroom.pdf
    Crystal, D. (2001). Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://videoweb.nie.edu.sg/phonetic/reviews/crystal.pdf
    Doolittle, P. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning: Empirical Results and Practical Applications, Retrieved from http://scr.csc.noctrl.edu/courses/edn509/resources/readings/multimediaLearningEmpericalResults.pdf
    Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mawah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
    Duffy, P. (2008). Engaging the YouTube Google-eyed generation: strategies for
    using Web 2.0 in teaching and learning. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 6(2), 119-130. Retrieved from http://www.ejel.org/index.htm
    Duquette, L., Renié, D., & Laurier, M. (1998). The Evaluation of Vocabulary Acquisition when Learning French as a Second Language in a Multimedia Environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, l(11), 3-34. doi: 10.1076/call.11.1.3.5725
    Ellis, D. C., & Thornborough, L. (1923). Motion pictures in education: A practical handbook for users of visual aids. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company. Retrieved from http://www.archive.org/details/ motionpicturesin00ellirich
    Ewing, M. (2000). Conversations of Indonesian language students on computer-assisted projects: Linguistic responsibility and control. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(4), 333-356. doi: 10.1076/0958-8221(200012)13:4-5;1-E;FT333
    Felton, P. (2008). Visual literacy. The Magazine of Higher Education Learning, 40(6), 60-64. doi: 10.3200/CHNG.40.6.60-64
    Fraser, C. A. (1999). Lexical processing strategy use and vocabulary learning through reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21. Cambridge Press, 225-241. Retrieved from http://pi.library.yorku.ca/dspace/bitstream/handle/10315/1309/CRLC00146.pdf?sequence=4

    Gardner, H. (2005, May). Multiple lenses on the mind. Paper presented at the ExpoGestion Conference, Bogota, Columbia. Retrieved from http://pzweb.harvard.edu/PIs/MultipleLensMay2005.pdf
    George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
    Graesser, A. C., Chipman, P., & King, B.G. (2008). Computer-mediated technologies. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 211-231). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/Alhassan/Hand%20book%20on%20research%20in%20educational%20communication/ER5849x_C017.fm.pdf
    Greenberg, O. (2010, March 25). More courses, more colleges: YouTube EDU turns one. The Official YouTube Blog. [Weblog post]. Retrieved from http://youtube-global.blogspot.tw/2010/03/more-courses-and-more-colleges-youtube.html
    Groot, P. (2000). Computer Assisted Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 4(1), 60-81 Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol4num1/groot/default.html
    Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary learning in a second language: Person, task, context, and strategies. TESL-EJ, 7(2), 1-25. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume7/ej26/ej26a4/
    Guillory H. G. (1998). The effects of keyword captions to authentic French video on learner comprehension. Calico Journal, 15 (1-3), 89-108. Retrieved from http://www.dcmp.org/caai/nadh165.pdf
    Hébert, S., & Peretz, I. (1997). Recognition of music in long-term memory: Are melodic and temporal patterns equal partners? Memory and Cognition, 25(4), 518-533. Retrieved from http://www.brams.umontreal.ca/plab/downloads/HebertPeretz1997.pdf
    Hicks, R., & Essinger, J. (1991). Making computers more human: Designing for human-computer interaction. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Advanced Technology. Cited in Metros, S. E. (2008), The Educator’s Role in Preparing Visually Literate Learners. Theory Into Practice, 47, 102-109. doi: 10.1080/00405840801992264
    Hinkel, E. (2010). What research on second language writing tells us and what it doesn’t. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching. 2, (pp. 523-538). NY: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.elihinkel.org/downloads/ch_32.pdf
    Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a Clockwork Orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11, 207-223. Cited in Huang, H.T. (2007). Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program, Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 64-82. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num3/huangliou/default.html
    How Teens Use Media (2009). A Nielsen report on the myths and realities of teen media trends. Retrieved from http://www.scribd.com/doc/16753035/Nielsen-Study-How-Teens-Use-Media-June-2009-Read-in-Full-Screen-Mode

    Howcast. (2008). In DBpedia. Retrieved February 6, 2012, from http://dbpedia-live.openlinksw.com/page/Howcast
    Howcast. (2012). In Wikipedia. Retrieved March 8, 2012, from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howcast
    Huang, H. T. (2007). Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program, Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 64-82. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num3/huangliou/default.html
    Hulstijn, J. H. (1993). When do foreign-language readers look up the meaning of unfamiliar words? The influence of task and learner variables. The Modern Language Journal, 77, 139-147. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1993.tb01957.x
    Huang, H. T. (2007). Vocabulary learning in an automated graded reading program. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 64-82. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num3/huangliou/default.html
    Hung, H. T., & Yuen, S. C. Y. (2010). Educational use of social networking technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 703-714.
    doi: 10.1080/13562517.2010.507307.
    Hung, L. C. (洪儷倩) (2008). Grammatical structure recycling in Taiwan High School English textbook for Nine-year Integrated Curriculum. Unpublished Master Thesis. Graduate Institute of National Taiwan Normal University. Retrieved from http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi?o=dnclcdr&s=id=%22096NTNU5238021%22.&searchmode=basic
    Hu, H. P., & Deng, L. J. (2007). Vocabulary acquisition in multimedia environment. In S. Peng , & X. Peng (Eds.), US-China Foreign Language, 5(8), Serial No.47, 55-59. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:OZwe267WdakJ:scholar.google.com/+Hu,+H.+P.,+%26+Deng,+L.+J.+(2007).+Vocabulary+acquisition+in+multimedia+environment.+US-China+Foreign+Language,+5(8).+&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0,5
    Irvin, J. L. (1990). Vocabulary knowledge: Guidelines for instruction. What research says to the teacher. Washington, DC: National Education Association (Educational Resources Document No. ED 319 001).
    Jame, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use. Harlow, N.Y.: Longman.
    Jeng, Y. L., Wang, K. T., & Huang, Y. H. (2008). Retrieving video features for language acquisition, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009), 5673-5683. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.06.117
    Jeon-Ellis, G., Debski, R., & Wigglesworth, G. (2005). Oral interaction around computers in the project-oriented CALL classroom. Language, Learning & Technology, 9(3), 121-125. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jeon/default.html
    Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Smith, K. A. (1991). Cooperative Learning: Increasing College Faculty Instructional Productivity. ASHE-FRIC Higher Education Report No.4. Washington, D.C.: School of Education and Human Development, George Washington University. Retrieved from http://www.getcited.org/puba/102930106
    Jones-Kavalier, B. R, & Flannigan, S. L. (2006). Connecting the digital dots: Literacy of the 21st Century. Educause Quarterly, 2, 8-10. Retrieved from http://www.msmc.la.edu/include/learning_resources/todays_learner/eqm0621.pdf
    Jones, L. (2003). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition with multimedia annotations: The students’ voice. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 41-65.Retrieved from https://calico.org/memberBrowse.php?action=article&id=281
    Kashihara, A., Suzuki, R., Hasegawa, S., & Toyoda, J. (2000). A learner-centered navigation path planning in web-based learning. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers in Education 2, 1385-1392. Retrieved from http://wlgate.ice.uec.ac.jp/contents/Kashihara/PDFs/ICCE2000-2.pdf
    Kay, A.C. (1991). “Computers, Networks, and Education.” Scientific American, 265(3), pp. 138-148. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:wTwunxXlrfEJ:scholar.google.com/++Nakajima,+Kazuko.+(1988).+%E2%80%9COn+Developing+HyperCard+Stacks+for+the+Study+of+Chinese&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0
    Kay, R., & Kay, J. (1983, November). Instructional and extracurricular use of video-tapes. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Speech Communication Association, Washington, DC. Retrieved fromERIC database (ED238065).
    Kelsen, B. (2009). Teaching EFL to the iGeneration: A Survey of Using YouTube as Supplementary Material with College EFL Students in Taiwan. CALL-EJ Online, 10(2). Retrieved from http://callej.org/journal/10-2/kelsen.html
    Kirkhart, K. E. (2000). Re-conceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence. New Directions for Evaluation , 88, 5-23. doi: 10.1002/ev.1188.
    Kinchin, I., &Hay, D. (2005). Using concept maps to optimize the composition of collaborative student groups: a pilot study. Journal of Advance Nursing, 51(2), 182-187. Retrieved from http://cmapspublic2.ihmc.us/rid=1182801997437_775437038_6321/JAdv_Nurs_2005_51_182.pdf
    Kinsella, K. (1995). Understanding and empowering diverse learners in ESL classroom. In M. J. Reid (Ed.), Learning styles in the ESL/EFL classroom (pp. 74-86). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Cited in Yeh and Wang (2003), Effect of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21 (1), 131-144.
    Knowlton, D.C., & Tilton, J.W. (1929). Motion pictures in history teaching: A study of the Chronicles of America Photoplays as an aid in seventh grade instruction. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    Koerner, R. J. (1988). “Language Laboratory in the High School: Dinosaur or Valuable Tool for the Teaching of Foreign Languages?” CALICO Journal, 6(1), 82-85. Retrieved from https://calico.org/html/article_391.pdf
    Kost, C. R., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. J. (1999). Textual and pictorial glosses: Effectiveness of incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), 89-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.1999.tb02378.x
    Kvale, S. (2007). Doing Interviews. California: SAGE Publications.
    Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2003). Students’ evaluation of CALL software programs. Educational Media International. 40(3-4), 293-304. doi: 10.1080/0952398032000113211
    Lange, P. G. (2007). Publicly private and privately public: Social networking on YouTube. Journal of Computer mediated communication. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00400.x
    Lashley, K. S., & Watson, J. B. (1922). A psychological study of motion pictures in relation to venereal disease campaigns. Washington, DC: U.S. Interdepartmental Social Hygiene Board. Retrieved from http://brittlebooks.library.illinois.edu/brittlebooks_open/Books2009-06/lashka0001psystu/lashka0001psystu.pdf
    Laufer, B., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2001). Incidental vocabulary acquisition in a second language: The construct of task-induced involvement. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 1-26. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://www.corpus4u.org/forum/upload/forum/2005112217011578.pdf
    Levy, M. (1997). Computer-assisted language learning: Context and conceptualization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Levy, M. (2009), Technologies in use for second language learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 769-782. Retrieved from http://moodle.bracu.ac.bd/pluginfile.php/2512/mod_resource/content/1/Technologies%20in%20Use%20for%20Second%20Language%20Learning.%20by%20Mike%20Levy.pdfom
    Levie, W. H. & Lentz, R. (1982). Effects of text illustrations: A review of research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 30(4), 195-232. doi:10.1007/ BF 02765184.
    Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). Call dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Mahwah, NJ: Routledge. Retrieved from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume11/ej42/ej42r9/?wscr
    Lin, C. (林淑媛) (2003). 英語教學政策探討: 立法院「國小英語教育政策座談會」報告92.04.28, Retrieved from http://www.chere.idv.tw/share/essay/engpolicy920428.pdf
    Lin, H. T. (林宏澤) (2010). The Effects of Cooperative Learning on Junior High School Students’ English Learning Achievement and Attitudes. Unpublished Master Thesis. Graduate Institute of Leader University.
    Lin, H., & Chen, T. (2007). Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 83-106. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol11num3/linchen/default.html
    Liu, Y. F.(劉郁芬)(2002). The effect of English word exposure frequency in the simplified novel on incidental vocabulary acquisition by EFL senior high school students in Taiwan. Unpublished master's thesis, National Kaohsiung Normal University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
    Liu, G. Z. (2005). The trend and challenge for teaching EFL at Taiwanese universities. RELC Journal, 36(2), 211–221. doi: 10.1177/0033688205055575
    Liu, G. Z. & Chen, AS-W. (2007). A taxonomy of Internet-based Technologies Integrated in Language Curricula. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(5), 934-938. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00728.x
    Liu, Z. H., Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2011). Constructing multidimensional evaluation criteria for English learning websites. Computers & Education, 56(1), 65-79. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131510002472

    Liu, P. L. (2011). A study on the use of computerized concept mapping to assist ESL learners’ writing. Computer and Education, 57 (4), 2548-2558. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.03.015
    Maiguashca, R. (1993). Teaching and learning vocabulary in a second language: Past, present, and future directions. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50(1), 83-100.
    Ma, Q., & Kelly, P. (2006). Computer-assisted language learning. Taylor & Francis, 19 (1), 15-45. doi: 10.1080/09588220600803998.
    Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 380–386. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.380
    Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an Aid to Multimedia Learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 107-119. Retrieved from http://www.it.iitb.ac.in/~s1000brains/rswork/dokuwiki/media/animation_as_an_aid_to_multimedia_learning.pdf
    Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. Retrieved from http://edtechnewsletter.wikispaces.umb.edu/file/view/Cognitive+load+in+Multimedia+learning.pdf/280318464/Cognitive+load+in+Multimedia+learning.pdf
    Meara, P. (1980). Vocabulary acquisition: A neglected aspect of language learning. Language Teaching and Linguistics Abstracts, 13, 221-246. Retrieved from
    http://www.lognostics.co.uk/vlibrary/meara1980.pdf
    Medhi, I., Menon, S. R., Cutrell, E., & Toyama, K. (2010). Beyond strict illiteracy: abstracted learning among low-literate users. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on ICTD 2010, London, UK. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/people/cutrell/ICTD2010%20Medhi%20et%20al.pdf
    Metros, S. E. (2008). The educator’s role in preparing visually literate learners. Theory Into Practice, 47, 102-109. doi: 10.1080/00405840801992264
    McClure, J. R., Sonak, B., & Suen, H. K. (1999). Concept map assessment of classroom learning: Reliability, validity, and logistical practicality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4), 475-492. Retrieved from
    http://suen.ed.psu.edu/~hsuen/pubs/conceptmap99.pdf
    Ministry of Education. (2008). 97年國民中小學課程綱要 : 國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要語文學習領域(英語). Retrieved from http://www.edu.tw/eje/content.aspx?site_content_sn=15326
    Molenda, M. (2008). Historical foundations. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Meriil, J. van. Merrienboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-20). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from http://faculty.ksu.edu.sa/Alhassan/Hand%20book%20on%20research%20in%20educational%20communication/ER5849x_C001.fm.pdf
    Moreno, M. A., Parks, M., & Richardson, L. P. (2007). What are adolescent showing the world about their health risk behaviors on MySpace? MedGenMed. 2007; 9(4): 9. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2234280/
    Moreno, M. A., Parks, M. R., Zimmerman, F. J., Brito, T. E., & Christakis, D. A. (2009). Display of health risk behaviors on MySpace by adolescents: Prevalence and associations. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 163(1), 27-34. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:BmWcrL7qBPsJ:scholar.google.com/&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0
    Moreno, M. A., VanderStoep, A., Parks, M. R., Zimmerman, F. J., Kurth, A., & Christakis, D. A. (2009). Reducing at-risk adolescents’ display of risk behavior on a social networking web site. Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, 163(1), 35-41. doi:10.1001/archpediatrics.2008.502
    Mullen, R., & Wedwick, (2008). Avoiding the digital abbyss: Getting started in the classroom with YouTube, digital stories, and blogs. Clearing House, 82(2), 66-69. Retrieved from http://reinhardtedu525.pbworks.com/f/digital%2Babyss.pdf
    Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language. Cambridge, England: University Press. Retrieved from http://www.corpus4u.org/forum/upload/forum/2005110612351651.pdf
    Nakajima, K. (1988). On developing hypercard stacks for the study of Chinese characters: KanjiCard. CALICO Journal 6(2), 75-87. Retrieved from http://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:wTwunxXlrfEJ:scholar.google.com/++Nakajima,+Kazuko.+(1988).+%E2%80%9COn+Developing+HyperCard+Stacks+for+the+Study+of+Chinese&hl=zh-TW&as_sdt=0
    Nelson, B., Ketelhut, D., Clarke, J., Bowman, C., & Dede, C. (2005). Design-based research strategies for developing a scientific inquiry curriculum in a multi-user virtual environment. Educational Technology, 45(1), 21-28. Retrieved from http://rivercity.activeworlds.com/rivercityproject/documents/nelson_edtech_nov2.pdf
    Nielsen Company. (2009, June). How teens use media: A Nielsen report on the myths and realities of teen media trends. Retrieved from http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/reports/nielsen_howteensusemedia_june09.pdf
    Nikolova, O. R. (2002), Effects of Students' Participation in Authoring of
    Multimedia Materials on Student Acquisition of Vocabulary. Language
    Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100-122. Retrieved from
    http://llt.msu.edu/vol6num1/pdf/vol6num1.pdf#page=102
    Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1984). Learning How to Learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
    Novak, J. D., & Cañas, A. J. (2008). The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct and use them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01 Rev 01-2008, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2008. Retrieved from http://cmap.ihmc.us/Publications/ResearchPapers/TheoryUnderlyingConceptMaps.pdf
    Omaggio, A. H. (1986). Teaching language in context: Proficiency-oriented instruction. Boston, MA: Heine & Heinle.
    O'Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0? Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software. O’Reilly Media, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/7425
    Oxford, R. L. (1988). Problems and solutions in foreign/second language vocabulary learning: The potential role of semantic mapping. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
    Oxford, R. L. (1993). Style analysis survey (SAS). University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.
    Paivio, A. (2007). Mind and its evolution: A dual coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Peek, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227-238
    Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. K. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47, 222-244. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.10.007
    Prensky. M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon (NCB University Press, 9(5). London. Retrieved from http://www.albertomattiacci.it/docs/did/Digital_Natives_Digital_Immigrants.pdf
    Plass, J. L., Chun, D. M., Mayer, R. E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19(2), 221-243. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00015-8
    Purcell, K. (2010). The state of online video. Retrieved from the Pew Internet & American Life Project website: http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/State-of-Online-Video.aspx
    Richards, J. (1971). Error analysis and second language strategies. English Language Teaching, 25, 115-135. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED048579&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED048579
    Saettler, P. (1990). The evolution of American educational technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited, INC. Retrieved from http://courses.ceit.metu.edu.tr/ceit627/week2/saettlerp69-81.pdf
    Saettler, P. (2004). The evolution of American educational technology. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
    Salling, A. (1959). What can frequency counts teach the language teacher? Contact, 3, 24-29.
    Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Haung, Y., Staiger, J., & Steinmetz, H. (1995). Increased corpus callosum size in musicians. Neuropsychologia, 33(8), 1047-1055. Retrieved from http://musicianbrain.com/papers/Schlaug_CCallosum_1995b.pdf
    Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (1995). Vocabulary notebooks: theoretical underpinnings and practical suggestions. ELT Journal, 49(2), 133-142. Retrieved from http://203.72.145.166/ELT/files/49-2-3.pdf
    Schneider, V. I., Healy, A. F., & Bourne, L. E. Jr. (2002). What is learned under difficult conditions is hard to forget: Contextual interference effects in foreign vocabulary acquisition, retention, and transfer. Journal of Memory and Language, 46(2), 419-440. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2813
    Schwan, S., & Riempp, R. (2004). The cognitive benefits of interactive videos: learning to tie nautical knots. Learning and Instruction, 14, 293-305. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.005
    Shernoff, D. J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow in schools: Cultivating engaged learners and optimal learning environments. In R. Gilman, E. S. Heubner, & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of Positive Psychology in the Schools (pp. 13-146).
    New York: Routledge Publisher. Retrieved from http://www.cedu.niu.edu/~shernoff/Shernoff%20and%20Csikszentmihalyi%20C011.pdf
    Snelson, C. (2011). YouTube across the disciplines: A review of the literature. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(1), 159-169. Retrieved from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no1/snelson_0311.htm

    Snelson,C, & Perkins, R. A. (2009). From Silent Film to YouTube™ : Tracing the Historical Roots of Motion Picture Technologies in Education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 28(1), 1-27. Retrieved from http://www.ohio.edu/visualliteracy/JVL_ISSUE_ARCHIVES/JVL28(1)/28_1_SnelsonPerkins.pdf
    Snelson, C., & Perkins, R. (2009). From silent film to YouTube TM: Tracing the Historical Roots of Motion Picture Technologies in Education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 28, 1-27. Retrieved from http://www.ohio.edu/visualliteracy/JVL_ISSUE_ARCHIVES/JVL28(1)/28_1_SnelsonPerkins.pdf
    Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. London: Sage Publications.
    Stempleski, S. (1992). Teaching communication skills with authentic videos. In S. Stempleski & P. Arcari. (Eds.). Video in second language teaching: Using, selecting, and producing video for the classroom (pp. 7-24). Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. Retrieved from ERIC databse. (EDRS No. ED 388 082)
    Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 50-73. Retrieved from http://www.llt.msu.edu/vol14num2/sydorenko.pdf
    Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(11), 77-100. London: Sage Publications. doi: 10.1177/2345678906292430
    Terantino, J. M. (2011). Emerging technologies YouTube for foreign languages: You have to see. Language and Culture Learning, 15(1), 10-16. Retrieved from
    http://llt.msu.edu/issues/february2011/v15n1.pdf
    The Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8. Retrieved from http://eec.edc.org/cwis_docs/NEWS_ARTICLES_JOURNALS/Design_Research_Coll_EMERGING.pdf
    The YouTube-facts-and-figures-history-statistics. (2010). YouTube facts & figures (history & statistics). Retrieved from http://www.website-monitoring.com/blog/2010/05/17/youtube-facts-and-figures-history-statistics/
    Tsai, C.-J. (1988). Hypertext: Technology, applications, and research issues. Educational Technology Systems, 17(1), 3-14. Retrieved from
    http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ380455&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=EJ380455
    Tschirner, E. (2001). Language acquisition in the classroom: The role of digital video. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(3-4), 305-319. Retrieved from http://sba.edu.hku.hk/new_sba/doc/video.pdf
    Trier, J. (2007). “Cool” engagements with YouTube: Part 2. International Reading Association, 598-603. doi:10.1598/JAAL.50.7.8
    Tsou, W., Wang, W., & Li, H. (2002). How computers facilitate English foreign language learners acquire English abstract words. Computers & Education, 39(4), 415-428. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00078-7

    Underwood, J. (1989). On the edge: Intelligent CALL in the 1990s. Computers and the Humanities, 23, 71-84. doi: 10.1007. BF0008770
    van Boxtel, C., van der Linden, J., Roelofs, E., & Erkens, G. (2002). Collaborative concept mapping: Provoking and supporting meaningful discourse. Theory Into Practice, 41, 40-46. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4101_7
    Vogt, D. (1983). Semantic mapping as a vocabulary teaching technique to improve recall of word meaning. M.Ed. Thesis, Eastern Montana College. Retrieved from ERIC Document Reproduction Services ( ED 258 150)
    Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International. Cited in Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning and Technology, 5(1), 202-232. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol5num1/alseghayer/default.html
    Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (2000). Reading-based exercises in second language vocabulary learning: An introspective study. The Modern Language Journal, 84 (ii), 196-213. Retrieved from http://www.education.auckland.ac.nz/webdav/site/education/shared/about/centres/lipis/docs/readings/vocab-n-reading-0026-7902.pdf
    White, C., Easton, P., & Anderson, C. (2000). Students’ perceived value of video in a multimedia language course. Educational Media International, 37(3), 167-175. doi: 10.1080/09523980050184736
    Winke, P., Gass, S., & Sydorenko, T. (2010) .The effects of captioning videos used for foreign language listening activities. Language Learning & Technology, 14(1), 65-86. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/vol14num1/vol14num1.pdf#page=72
    Wikipedia (2012). Howcast. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Howcast
    Wong, L., & Nunan, D. (2011). The learning styles and strategies of effective language learners. System 39(2), 144-163. doi:10.1016/j.system.2011.05.004
    Wong, W. Y., & Reimann, P. (2006). Web based educational video teaching and learning platform with collaborative annotation. 2009 Ninth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies. doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2009.223
    Wu, W.-S. (2005), 吳偉西 Use and helpfulness rankings of vocabulary learning strategies employed by EFL learners in Taiwan. 台灣英語學習者使用字彙學習策略之探討, Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(2), 7-13.
    Retrieved from http://journal.dyu.edu.tw/dyujo/document/hssjournal/h1-2-7-13.pdf
    Yeh, Y., & Wang. C.-W. (2003). Effect of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131-144. Retrieved from http://calico.org/html/article_285.pdf
    Yip, F. W. M., & Kwan, A. C. M. (2006). Online vocabulary games as a tool for teaching and learning English vocabulary. Educational Media International, 43(3), 233-249. Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/30294/11/FullText.pdf?accept=1
    Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 85-101. Retrieved from http://www.llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/yoshii/default.html
    YouTube. (2009c). Getting started: Creating or editing annotations. Retrieved from http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=92710
    “YouTube Surpasses 100 Million U.S. Viewers for the First Time”. comScore.com, Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/press/release.asp?press=2741
    Young, J. R. (2008, May 5). YouTube™ professors: Scholars as online video stars. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 54 (20), 19. Retrieved from
    https://confluence.media.berkeley.edu/confluence/download/attachments/13110961/2008-01-28_YouTube+Professors+-+Scholars+as+Online+Video+Stars.pdf

    下載圖示 校內:2015-07-31公開
    校外:2015-07-31公開
    QR CODE