全球觀光旅遊轉型，旅遊市場的需求從傳統風景區遊歷或是朝聖大型量體建築，轉向城市觀光的體驗式旅遊，文化成為觀光旅遊的核心價值。素有文化首都之稱的台南市為因應這股城市觀光旅遊的風潮，向交通部提出將「台南雙城地區」指定為觀光地區，此項提案於2016年正式通過，台南市舊城區內得以合法設立民宿，並且寄望以此促進台南觀光產業朝向多元且具在地特色之方向發展，為舊城區注入再次活絡的新契機和生命力。
隨創是一種克服資源限制的手段，轉化資源為創新的來源，讓創新得以實現。本研究以台南舊城區中透過歷史老屋再利用作為民宿用途之經營者為研究個案，以隨創理論觀點為切入視角，從而深入了解台南老屋特色民宿經營者的創業與發展歷程，同時也進一步分析民宿經營者是如何透過資源轉換與連結在地資源之取用，將過去被閒置廢棄的歷史老屋再利用並且翻轉重生為帶動城市觀光的關鍵角色，使的老屋和在地資源轉換創造出多元的文化性價值，進而成為城市永續發展的重要資源。
本研究從研究發現中得出的結論：老屋特色民宿的經營者必須持續創新，才能為歷史老屋注入永續發展的生命力。再者，老屋特色民宿連結城市觀光的深度旅遊，在地資源脈絡在資源轉換的過程當中扮演了關鍵性的重要角色，經營者在策略規畫時必須正視且重視外部在地資源的連結。而經營者若能將老屋、在地資源等視為可以永續使用的資源，並以此思維作為隨創行為的核心價值時，即使身處於受限的環境中亦可以擴大資源轉換，並以此創造、獲取更多的經營成果。

With the transformation of the global tourism industry, the demand of the tourism market has shifted from traditional scenic touring or large-scale attractions pilgrimaged to experiential tourism of urban sightseeing. Therefore, culture has become the core value of tourism.
To adopt this trend of urban sightseeing, Tainan city, known as the cultural capital, proposed to the Ministry of Communications to designate the " the Area of Tainan Two Cities " as a focused sightseeing area. As the proposal was officially approved in 2016, Bed and Breakfasts (also known as B&B) can be set up legally in the old town region. With the expectation that the proposal could promote the development of the tourism industry in Tainan City, with the direction of diversification and local characteristics, as well as bringing new opportunities and vitality into the old town.
This research takes the manager of H B&B who reuse historical old houses in the old town area as cases. With the notion of bricolage to deeply understand the entrepreneurial and development process of the B&B managers of Tainan old houses reuse. Meanwhile, this research also further analyzes how B&B managers recycle and regenerate abandoned historical old houses through resource conversion and local resources connection. The modification creates diverse cultural values, furthermore becoming a significant resource for the sustainable development of the city.
The conclusions from the research findings are as following. First, the B&B managers of the reused old houses in Tainan City must innovate constantly to bring the vitality of sustainable development into the historical old houses. Second, the in-depth tour of the B&Bs in reused old houses connects with urban sightseeing. The content of local resources plays a crucial role in the process of resource conversion. The managers must pay attention to combining external resources while planning strategies. Third, if the operators could consider old houses and local resources as sustainable supplies along with this concept as the core value of the bricolage behavior, the managers would be able to expand the resource conversion to create and capture more values even in a restricted environment.

中文參考文獻
文建會 (2004)。2004文化白皮書。中華民國文化部。取自：etrievedfromhttps://www.
moc.gov.tw/downloadfilelist_341_268_2.html
方思文 (2015)。台南市中西區老屋再利用現象之初探─1994至2013年。國立成功大學都市計畫學系碩士論文，台南市。
王文科、王智弘 (2010)。質的研究的信度和效度。彰化師大教育學報，(17)，29-50。
台南市政府觀光局 (2016)。「臺南雙城地區」已獲交通部公告指定為觀光地區，將落實管理，以提升觀光地區品牌效應。台南市政府觀光局行政服務網。取自：https://admin.twtainan.net/zh-tw/twins/newsdetail/124
何心怡 (2002)。產業遺構的再利用─日本灘區酒藏的災後重建。文化空間創意再造：閒置空間再利用國外案例彙編，166-169。
吳姵璇 (2016)。臺南市舊建築再利用之關鍵成功因素。國立臺北教育大學文化創意產業經營學系碩士論文，台北市。
吳思華 (2000)。策略九說：策略思考的本質第三版。臉譜出版社。
李佩璇 (2018)。歷史老屋再利用之社會價值研究。國立成功大學都市計畫學系碩士論文，台南市。
李俊緯 (2012)。近代都市規劃對晚清台南府署周邊市區的衝擊。國立成功大學都市建築學系碩士論文，台南市。
李慶芳 (2013)。質化研究之經驗敘說:質化研究的六個修煉。高立圖書有限公司。
汪詩堯 (2019)。資源相依：曜越科技如何以隨創扭轉劣勢。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文，台北市。
林雅君 (2012)。探討老屋再利用之空間改造策略與社會現象意義：以台南「老屋欣力」之案例為例。國立成功大學建築學系碩士論文，台南市。
柯琬柔 (2013)。舊建築再利用的風格創新：以客庄文創產業為例。國立交通大學客家文化學院客家社會與文化學程碩士論文，新竹市。
洪世章、蔡碧鳳 (2006)。企業興業與成長：比較個案研究。中山管理評論，14(1)，79-117。
珍雅各 (2007)。偉大城市的誕生與衰亡：美國都市街道生活的啟發(吳鄭重翻譯)。聯經出版公司。
珍雅各 (2016)。與珍雅各邊走邊聊城市經濟學：城市，是經濟發展的溫床(梁永安翻譯)。早安財經。
馬以工 (1983)。歷史建築。北屋出版事業股份有限公司。
梁雯晶 (2020)。老屋欣力：常民生活場域的文藝復興。詹氏出版社。
梁箐華 (2005)。台灣舊建築再利用理念與手法之探討。國立臺灣科技大學建築系碩士論文，台北市。
陳向明 (2002)。社会科學質的硏究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
陳秀卿 (2015)。社區治理與藝術介入閒置空間的活化：以內壢里藝術社區營造為例。國家與社會(17)，205-238。
陳煥宏 (2019)。負資源轉換：瀨戶內海島嶼之隨創過程。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所博士論文，台北市。
黄艳、陶秋燕、高腾飞 (2020)。资源拼凑：起源，研究脉络与理论框架。科技进步与对策，37(3)，151-160。
傅朝卿 (2000)。古蹟與歷史建築的修護倫理。國立文化資產保存研究中心籌備處。
傅朝卿 (2010)。建築再利用設計的跨領域思維。跨領域設計與永續發展，215-230。中原大學設計學院，中壢市。
傅朝卿 (2014)。台湾传统民居保存与再利用的几个面向。南方建筑(5)，7-13。
彭玉樹、梁奕忠、于卓民、梁晉嘉 (2010)。台灣管理學門質性研究之回顧與展望。中山管理評論，18(1)，11-39。
曾梓峰 (2001)。閒置空間的文化力量。文化視窗，第28期，18-19。
黃鼎倫、王玉霞、李虹叡 (2015)。以眷村文化保存觀點探討屏東勝利新村活化策略。高雄應用科技大學人文與社會科學學刊，1(2)，47-60。
趙又嬋、鄭維亮 (2015)。街屋再利用之軀體與裝修建材減碳評估-以餐飲類空間為例。建築學報(91)，63-79。
劉旭堯 (2006)。舊建築再利用計畫的擬定。楊裕富設計教學網，2008年，11。取自：http://teacher.yuntech.edu.tw/yangyf/hh/hhd115.html
蔡孟宏 (2016)。基進共享的台南老屋：能盛興鐵工廠作為都市共享域的營造。國立臺灣大學建築與城鄉研究所碩士論文，台北市。
蔡敦浩、劉育忠、王慧蘭 (2011)。敘說探究的第一堂課。鼎茂圖書。
蔡穎青 (2012)。台南市舊城歷史區域中的老屋經營之研究。國立成功大學都市建築學系碩士論文，台南市。
蕭瑞麟 (2019)。服務隨創：少力設計的邏輯思維。五南書局學術專書。
蕭瑞麟 (2020)。不用數字的研究:質性研究的思辯脈絡。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
蕭瑞麟、徐嘉黛 (2020)。境隨心轉：服務隨創中的認知轉移與資源轉換。組織與管理，13(2)，1-51。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、吳彥寬 (2017)。逆勢拼湊:化資源制約為創新來源。中山管理評論，25(1)，219-268。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳煥宏 (2019)。負負得正:隨創時相依性如何促成負資源轉換。組織與管理，12(1)，127-171。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、陳蕙芬(2014)。劣勢創新：梵谷策展中的隨創行為。中山管理評論，22(2)，323-367。
蕭瑞麟、歐素華、蘇筠 (2017)。逆強論：隨創式的資源建構過程。臺大管理論叢，27(4)，43-73。
蘇鴻昌 (2011)。從舊建築再利用看老字號旅店的文化創新體驗-以台南佳佳西市場為例。設計學研究，14(S)，237-256。

英文參考文獻
Ashford, S. J., Rothbard, N. P., Piderit, S. K., & Dutton, J. E. (1998). Out on a Limb: The Role of Context and Impression Management in Selling Gender-equity Issues. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23-57.
Baker, T. (2007). Resources in Play: Bricolage in the Toy Store (y). Journal of Business Venturing, 22(5), 694-711.
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005). Creating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 329-366.
Baker, T., Miner, A. S., & Eesley, D. T. (2003). Improvising Firms: Bricolage, Account Giving and Improvisational Competencies in the Founding Process. Research Policy, 32(2), 255-276.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Barr, P. S., Stimpert, J. L., & Huff, A. S. (1992). Cognitive Change, Strategic Action, and Organizational Renewal. Strategic Management Journal, 13(S1), 15-36.
Bechky, B. A., & Okhuysen, G. A. (2011). Expecting the Unexpected? How SWAT Officers and Film Crews Handle Surprises. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 239-261.
Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. (2011). Adaptive Reuse of Heritage Buildings. Structural Survey.
Bullen, P. A., & Love, P. E. (2009). Residential Regeneration and Adaptive Reuse: Learning from the Experiences of Los Angeles. Structural Survey.
Conejos, S., Langston, C., & Smith, J. (2011). Improving the Implementation of Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Historic Buildings. Le Vie dei Mercanti Save Heritage: Safeguard of Architectural, Visual, Environmental Heritage. Naples, Italy.
Cooper, I. (2001). Post-occupancy Evaluation-Where Are You? Building Research & Information, 29(2), 158-163.
Desa, G., & Basu, S. (2013). Optimization or Bricolage? Overcoming Resource Constraints in Global Social Entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 7(1), 26-49.
Dutton, J. E., Worline, M. C., Frost, P. J., & Lilius, J. (2006). Explaining Compassion Organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 59-96.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Elsorady, D. A. (2014). Assessment of the Compatibility of New Uses for Heritage Buildings: The Example of Alexandria National Museum, Alexandria, Egypt. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 15(5), 511-521.
Foldy, E. G., Goldman, L., & Ospina, S. (2008). Sensegiving and the Role of Cognitive Shifts in the Work of Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(5), 514-529.
Garud, R., & Karnøe, P. (2003). Bricolage versus Breakthrough: Distributed and Embedded Agency in Technology Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 32(2), 277-300.
Gnyawali, D. R., & Park, B. j. (2009). Co‐opetition and Technological Innovation in Small and Medium‐sized Enterprises: A Multilevel Conceptual Model. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 308-330.
Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Ectj, 29(2), 75-91.
Hamel, G., & Prahalad, C. K. (1993). Strategy as Stretch and Leverage. Harvard Business Review, 71(2), 75-84.
Howard-Grenville, J., Golden-Biddle, K., Irwin, J., & Mao, J. (2011). Liminality as Cultural Process for Cultural Change. Organization science, 22(2), 522-539.
Kvale, S. (1994). Ten Standard Objections to Qualitative Research Interviews. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 25(2), 147-173.
Latham, A. (2000). Urban Renewal, Heritage Planning and the Remaking of an Inner-city Suburb: A Case Study of Heritage Planning in Auckland, New Zealand. Planning Practice and Research, 15(4), 285-298.
Llopis, J., Torres, A., Serra, J., & García, Á. (2015). The Preservation of the Chromatic Image of Historical Cities as a Cultural Value. The Old City of Valencia (Spain). Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(5), 611-622.
Lounsbury, M., & Glynn, M. A. (2001). Cultural Entrepreneurship: Stories, Legitimacy, and the Acquisition of Resources. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6‐7), 545-564.
Mason, J. (2017). Qualitative Researching. Sage.
Mısırlısoy, D., & Günçe, K. (2016). Adaptive Reuse Strategies for Heritage bBs: A Holistic Approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 26, 91-98.
Nelson, L. H. (1988). Architectural Character: Identifying the Visual Aspects of Historic Buildings as an Aid to Preserving Their Character.
Ormston, R., Spencer, L., Barnard, M., & Snape, D. (2014). The Foundations of Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research Practice: a Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers, 2(7), 52-55.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. Oxford University Press.
Rindova, V., Dalpiaz, E., & Ravasi, D. (2011). A Cultural Quest: A Study of Organizational Use of New Cultural Resources in Strategy Formation. Organization Science, 22(2), 413-431.
Senyard, J., Baker, T., Steffens, P., & Davidsson, P. (2014). Bricolage as a Path to Innovativeness for Resource‐constrained New Firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(2), 211-230.
Shane, S. (2000). Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448-469.
Shen, L. y., & Langston, C. (2010). Adaptive Reuse Potential: An Examination of Differences between Urban and Non‐urban Projects. Facilities.
Sonenshein, S. (2017). Stretch: Unlock the Power of Less and Achieve More Than You Ever Imagined. Harper Collins.
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571-610.
Velthuis, K., & Spennemann, D. H. (2007). The Future of Defunct Religious Buildings: Dutch Approaches to Their Adaptive Re-use. Cultural Trends, 16(1), 43-66.
Vicente, R., Ferreira, T. M., & Da Silva, J. R. M. (2015). Supporting Urban Regeneration and Building Refurbishment. Strategies for Building Appraisal and Inspection of Old Building Stock in City Centres. Journal of Cultural Heritage, 16(1), 1-14.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A Resource‐based View of the Firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
Yanow, D. (2004). Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), 9-25.
Yin, R. K. (1981). The Case Study as a Serious Research Strategy. Knowledge, 3(1), 97-114.
Yin, R. K. (1994). Discovering the Future of the Case Study. Method in Evaluation Research. Evaluation Practice, 15(3), 283-290.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Design and Methods. Case Study Research, 3(9.2).
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (Vol. 5). sage.
Yin, R. K. (1992). The Case Study Method as a Tool for Doing Evaluation. Current Sociology, 40(1), 121-137.
Zott, C., & Huy, Q. N. (2007). How Entrepreneurs Use Symbolic Management to Acquire Resources. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 70-105.